Coming
Soon!
From Common Courage Press
Recent
Stories
May
23, 2003
Standard
Schaefer
Lifting the Sanctions: Who Benefits?
Ron
Jacobs
Long Live People's Park!
Michael
Greger, MD
Return of Mad Cow: US Beef Supply
at Risk
Elaine
Cassel
Tigar to Ashcroft: "Secrecy is the Enemy of Democratic Govt."
Sam
Hamod
The Shi'a of Iraq
Christopher
Greeder
After the Layoffs
Alexander
Cockburn
Derrida's Double Life (poem)
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Weblog 5/23
May
22, 2003
Mark
Gaffney
Christian in Name Only
Carl
Estabrook
Republic of Fear
Carl
Camacho, Jr.
Reason for Hope
Ben
Granby
What Rates a Headline from the Middle
East?
Vanessa
Jones
Terror Alerts in Australia
Mickey
Z.
Instant Understanding
Don
Monkerud
Snowballs in a Soggy Economy
Barry Lando
The Nether-Nether World of G.W. Bush
Steve
Perry
Total Information
Awareness: Secret Shadow Program?
May
21, 2003
Dave
Lindorff
Ari Fleischer Quits the Scene: The
Liar's Gone, the Enablers Remain
Chris
Floyd
How Blood Money Becomes Business Opportunity
Dr. Gerry
Lower
Graham's God and Bush's Pathology
Patrick
Cockburn
In Post War Iraq, the Signs of Breakdown
are Everywhere
Brian Cloughley
The Fatuous Braintrust: Newt, Rummy and Wolfowitz
Saul
Landau
Shopping, the End of the World and the Politics of Bush
Larry Kearney
Two Morning Poems, May 2003
Steve
Perry
Chaos in Iraq: Just What the US Wanted?
Elaine
Cassel
Ashcroft Justice Comes to Iraq
May
20, 2003
Tariq
Ali
The Empire Advances
Ahmad
Faruqui
Whither American Nationalism?
Ben Tripp
Dialysis with Osama
Linda
Heard
The Cage of Occupation
Cynthia
McKinney
Toward a Just and Peaceful World
Edward
Said
The Arab Condition
Mokhiber
and Weissman
Why Ari Should Have Resigned in Protest Long Ago
Stew
Albert
Yale Men
Steve Perry
The New Face of Al-Qaeda
May
19, 2003
Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
A Letter to Kofi Annan on Powell's Missing
Evidence
CounterPunch
Wire
"Terror" Slut Steve Emerson
Eats Crow
John
Chuckman
Blair's Awkward Lies
Matt
Vidal
Corporate Media and the Myth of the Free Market
Michael
S. Ladah
The Fine Print to Bush's Road Map
Robert
Fisk
Bush's Eternal War Backfires
Elaine
Cassel
Clarence Thomas, Still Whining After All These Years
Jonathan
Freedland
Ann Coulter's Appalling Magic
Steve Perry
Play It Again, O-Sam-a
May
17 / 18, 2003
Uri
Avnery
The Children's Teeth
Peter
Linebaugh
An American Tribute to Christopher
Hill
Gary
Leupp
Nepal Today
Rock and
Rap Confidential
The Republican Plot Against the Dixie Chicks
Walter
Sommerfeld
Plundering Baghdad's Museums
Ron Jacobs
Condy Rice's Yipping Tirades
Thomas
P. Healy
Dubya Does Indy
Tarif Abboushi
Bush, Sharon and the Roadmap
Francis
Boyle
Debating US War Crimes in Iraq
Mark Davis
An Interview with Richard Butler
Richard
Lichtman
American Mourning
Michael
Ortiz Hill
Overcoming Terrorism
Adam
Engel
Uncle Sam is YOU!
Alan Maas
The Best News Show on TV
Poets'
Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Albert
Elaine
Cassel
Good Enough for an Alien
Website
of the Weekend
The 37 Americans Who Run Iraq
Song of
the Weekend
Talkin' Sounds Just Like Joe McCarthy Blues
May
16, 2003
Leah
Wells
In Iraq Water and Oil Do Mix
Ben Tripp
Fear Itself
Sharon
Smith
The Resegregation of US Schools
Ramzy Baroud
Does Defeat Have to be So Humiliating?
Sam
Hamod
A Nation of Fear
Phil Reeves
Baghdad Pays the Price
Robert
McChesney
The FCC's Big Grab
Mark Engler
Those Who Don't Count
Steve
Perry
We're All
Extras in Bush's Movie
Website
of the Day
Iraq and Our
Energy Future
May
15, 2003
Ayesha
Iman and Sindi Medar-Gould
How
Not to Help Amina Lawal: The Hidden Dangers of Letter
Writing Campaigns
Julie
Hilden
Moussaoui and the Camp X-Ray Detainees:
Can He Get a Fair Trial?
Tanya
Reinhart
Bush's Roadmap: a Ticket to Failure
Laura Carlsen
Here We Go Again: NAFTA Plus or Minus?
Kenneth
Rapoza
The New Fakers: State Dept. Undercuts
New Yorker's Goldberg
Stew Albert
A Story I Will Tell
Steve
Perry
Bush's Little
Nukes
Website
of the Day
Strip-o-Rama
May
14, 2003
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Jason
Leopold
The Pentagon and Hallburton: a Secret
November Deal for Iraq's Oil
David
Lindorff
Fighting the Patriot Act: Now It's
Alaska
John
Chuckman
Giggling into Chaos
Jack
McCarthy
Twin Towers of Journalism: Racism
and Double Standards
Wayne
Madsen
Assassinating JFK Again
M.
Junaid Alam
The Longer View
Paul
de Rooij
The New Hydra's Head:
Propagandists and the Selling of the US/Iraq War
James
Reiss
What? Me Worry?
Steve Perry
More on Saudi Arabia Bombings
Website
of the Day
A Tribute to Ted Joans
May
13, 2003
Saul
Landau
Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves
Michael
Neumann
Has Islam Failed? Not by Western
Standards
Uri
Avnery
My Meeting with Arafat
Steve Perry
The Saudi Arabia Bombing
Jacob
Levich
Democracy Comes to Iraq: Kick Their Ass and Grab Their Gas
William
Lind
The Hippo and the Mongoose: a Question of Military Theory
The
Black Commentator
Fraud at the Times: Blaming Blacks for White Folks' Mistakes
Stew Albert
Asylum
Hammond
Guthrie
An Illogical Reign
Website
of the Day
Sy Hersh: War and Intelligence
May
12, 2003
Chris
Floyd
Bush, Bin Laden, Bechtel, and Baghdad
Dave
Lindorff
America's Dirty Bombs
Sam
Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Resisting the Bush Administration's War on Liberty
Uzi
Benziman
Sharon and Sons, Inc.
Jason
Leopold
The Decline and Fall of Thomas White
Rich Procter
George Jumps the Shark
Federico
Moscogiuri
Going to Israel? Sign or Else
Steve
Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/12
Book
of the Day
Fooling
Marty Peretz
Website
of the Day
T-Shirts to Protest In

Hot Stories
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Elaine
Cassel
Civil Liberties
Watch
Michel
Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I
Saw Marines Kill Civilians"
Uzma
Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War:
What America Says Does Not Go
Paul de Rooij
Arrogant
Propaganda
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click Here
for More Stories.
|
May
24, 2003
Who's The Real Enemy?
"Just Cause"
or "Kill The Bastards"
By DIANE CHRISTIAN
"An American soldier was wounded
and Iraqis also by the enemy who fired a flare into an ammunition
dump." CNN early summary of a huge explosion of ammunition
in residential Baghdad, 26 April 2003
Who is the enemy? 'A person who hates another
and wishes and tries to injure him--synonym: opponent.' Am I
George W. Bush's enemy because I oppose his war policies mounted
in the name of freedom? I do oppose him though I do not wish
to injure him personally. But I do wish and will try to 'take
him out' him politically. Is my desire murderous? Will the Secret
Service check on me? How real and dangerous are words like 'enemy'?
In war the word 'enemy' licenses corporeal
killing. You may, perhaps should, kill the enemy who by definition
is one who hates you and wishes to injure or kill you. A soldier's
personal identity is effaced. He or she can't define the enemy
or disagree with the leader. The job is to fight the enemy and
that label 'enemy' makes violence become self-defense, as well
as authorized by your country. The license to kill usually comes
from religion (kill the infidels) or the state (kill terrorists
or evil regimes). Private licenses to kill are discouraged. (You
shouldn't kill members of ethnic or racial or gender groups you
despise, or family members who irritate you, or most anybody
else unless you have a very good and legally defensible reason.)
The enemy is the killable other. The US soldier who early in
the Iraq War rolled grenades into his officers' tents violated
the rules by changing enemies.
We often try to draw distinctions about
killing in war. In Iraq we wanted to kill the most hostile soldiers-the
Republican Guard and Fedayeen. We often let the regular conscripted
army soldiers go if they would abandon their weapons and hostility
and soldier status. We said we desired not to kill and maim children
and innocent civilians. When we did kill them we argued that
it was a mistake or due to the brutality of warfare or the enemy's
fault. The enemy, we said, lacked our scruples and deliberately
imperiled civilians by placing armaments near them. We blamed
the viciousness of the enemy who used innocents as human shields
for their own hostilities. And, mostly, ultimately, we blamed
the enemy because their evil provoked us to war.
When the ammunition dump exploded in
residential Baghdad, the guarding American soldiers tried to
help dig out the people buried in the rubble, and the crowd wouldn't
let them. The Americans and the Iraqis couldn't speak each others'
languages and there were no translators handy. So the soldiers
couldn't argue that an Iraqi enemy had deliberately caused the
violence, not the soldiers. In one bit of news footage an American
soldier yells to his captain 'They don't understand' and the
captain responds ' I know they don't understand. Neither do I.'
The Iraqis are later reported to be saying that they had warned
the soldiers to move the arsenal, that babies are buried alive.
The soldiers looked like an enemy; the
angry crowd looked like an enemy too. Further violence was avoided
because the soldiers withdrew. In many similar scenes soldiers
sometimes shoot and crowds sometimes murder. Not just in Iraq
but in Israel and elsewhere.
Could language have calmed this scene?
With translators could soldiers and crowd have found a common
enemy-an outsider enemy who wished to injure them both-whom they
could blame and then work together to help the victims?
Violence can erupt on a word. Yell 'enemy'
in war and people often die. Talk shows and politicians pontificate
that Madonna and the Dixie Chicks and Hollywood figures aided
the enemy in wartime by their opposition to our government's
policy. The Congressional cafeteria in Washington serves 'freedom
toast' and 'freedom fries' to verbally attack and eliminate the
French for their words against our war.
This sense is not the children's rhyme
that sticks and stones will break our bones but names will never
hurt us. It's more 'them's fightin' words.' If words construct
the enemy they're the beginning of war. How do we go from naming
enemies-terrorist, tyrant, evil-to killing them? How do we move
from opposition to attack? 'The time for talk is over,' Powell
and Rumsfeld and Bush announced. 'The enemy means us harm and
is moving secretly against us,' they said. 'We risk terrorist
attack if we do not attack,' they warned. We go from words to
war by ceasing talks and beginning bombing. We also go by abstraction-we
don't kill men and women and children and cities but the enemy
and evil regimes. We go by justifying our anger as self-protection
and revenge. We go by collapsing present time into future intention:
'war is about peace.'
We go by defining and redefining words
and staying on message-shutting down other language. We wage
a war of words as well as of brute force. The US soldier who
screamed at an angry Iraqi crowd "We're here for your fuckin'
freedom" needed a translator. Americans have always been
fond of the supreme court of the gun. In many a western, Law
and Order and Education need force to protect them. Yet the words
are what make the actions moral.
Words support ambivalence just as they
construct it. An enemy today might have been a friend yesterday
or become one tomorrow. Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein
twenty years ago and gave him weapons against Iran. Word language
allows for another time, a different tense. It admits contradiction
and paradox. Language can entertain the idea of loving your enemy,
the idea of transcending or changing your definitions.
Language also allows conflict without
physical killing. We can oppose verbally and not attack physically.
We can articulate intense anger and refrain from bloody followup.
We can make mental warfare and live to fight again and tell the
tale. We can change our enemies and have new fights. In corporeal
warfare we lose language and ambivalence. We cannot heal wounds
of the flesh with words or raise the dead. That's what the children's
rhyme means-the domains of sticks and stones and words are different.
We try to teach children not to hit but to talk.
When the soldiers tried by sign language
to signify that they weren't responsible for the carnage at the
Baghdad arsenal they were not understood. When the crowd screamed
the soldiers were murderers they were not understood either.
Were they enemies?
President Bush is angry at Kofi Anan
of the UN for calling the US the occupying force rather than
the liberating force. President Bush is angry at world leaders
calling the US unjust war mongers rather than freedom fighters.
Presidents get angry and name their conflicts 'Just Cause' and
'Iraqi Freedom' not 'Kill the Bastards' or 'Smoke the Evil Ones.'
They do this to distinguish brutal acts of the righteous from
brutal acts of the evil. This is called rationalizing or spinning
or lying or delusion. The acts are similar-bombing for example.
Labeling alone changes the symmetry of the acts of 9/11 and the
shock and awe bombing of Baghdad. We meant to inflict terror
through the shock and awe of bombing brute force. We not only
thrilled at our explosive might, we boasted we were the most
stunning military force in all human history. But we weren't
monsters because we meant well and our motives were pure. We
were good and the evil regime we swaggered to dazzle was not.
They were brutal, cut out tongues, killed, gassed and impoverished
their own people, swaggered and swilled scotch and had mistresses.
We said we respected Islam, loved the Iraqi people, were bringing
democratic freedoms. And we just had to make war because the
evil ones wouldn't change any other way.
Most of the world has trouble with these
distinctions. The real language that's being spoken is brute
force. You can speak before you bomb and say you don't want to
hurt anybody and you can speak after you bomb and say you're
sorry. The bomb has a different language, one which does not
support ambivalence or tense change. Americans don't face their
own violence, not the deep psychological kind, not the obvious
historical kind. When we railed about weapons of mass destruction,
no one pointed out that like the crazy Shakespearean kings we're
terrified of them because we've done the thing we fear. Americans
don't look at the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombing,
and Japan is no longer the enemy. Our myth is that violence is
changed by good intentions, that it can be cleansing. Some will
say it's a religious error, others that it's the bleak, brusque
Darwinian truth of survival.
Does it matter what we say? Osama bin
Laden says he's a slave of God and is on a divine mission to
revenge insult to Allah and his people. George Bush says he's
on a divine mission to rid the world of evil. Both bomb. Do they
differ? In enemy tactics, they are enemy twins-resorting to force,
blaming their enemy, claiming righteousness, and wreaking savage
damage.
Diane Christian
is SUNY Distinguished Teaching Professor at University at Buffalo.
She can be reached at: engdc@acsu.buffalo.edu
Today's
Features
Standard
Schaefer
Lifting the Sanctions: Who Benefits?
Ron
Jacobs
Long Live People's Park!
Michael
Greger, MD
Return of Mad Cow: US Beef Supply
at Risk
Elaine
Cassel
Tigar to Ashcroft: "Secrecy is the Enemy of Democratic Govt."
Sam
Hamod
The Shi'a of Iraq
Christopher
Greeder
After the Layoffs
Alexander
Cockburn
Derrida's Double Life (poem)
Steve
Perry
Bush's Wars Weblog 5/23
Keep CounterPunch
Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
home / subscribe
/ about us / books
/ archives / search
/ links /
|