home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: The Real Scandal at the Times: Why Not Give Jayson Blair a Pulitzer? After all They Gave Them to Safire and Gerth; What About the Framing of Wen Ho Lee? Falling for the Jessica Lynch Fraud? Judy Miller's Missing WMDs? Blair, the Early Years; Meet the Minister of Sleaze: Deputy Interior Secretary Steve Griles; He Still Works for Big Oil and Strip Miners; Uses 90-Year Old Women as Human Shields; The Crash of the American Economy; Smearing Rachel Corrie's Memory; The Origins of Chalabi: Is He a Creature of Israeli Intelligence? Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Coming Soon!
From Common Courage Press

Recent Stories

May 23, 2003

Standard Schaefer
Lifting the Sanctions: Who Benefits?

Ron Jacobs
Long Live People's Park!

Michael Greger, MD
Return of Mad Cow: US Beef Supply at Risk

Elaine Cassel
Tigar to Ashcroft: "Secrecy is the Enemy of Democratic Govt."

Sam Hamod
The Shi'a of Iraq

Christopher Greeder
After the Layoffs

Alexander Cockburn
Derrida's Double Life (poem)

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Weblog 5/23

 

May 22, 2003

Mark Gaffney
Christian in Name Only

Carl Estabrook
Republic of Fear

Carl Camacho, Jr.
Reason for Hope

Ben Granby
What Rates a Headline from the Middle East?

Vanessa Jones
Terror Alerts in Australia

Mickey Z.
Instant Understanding

Don Monkerud
Snowballs in a Soggy Economy

Barry Lando
The Nether-Nether World of G.W. Bush

Steve Perry
Total Information
Awareness: Secret Shadow Program?

 

May 21, 2003

Dave Lindorff
Ari Fleischer Quits the Scene: The Liar's Gone, the Enablers Remain

Chris Floyd
How Blood Money Becomes Business Opportunity

Dr. Gerry Lower
Graham's God and Bush's Pathology

Patrick Cockburn
In Post War Iraq, the Signs of Breakdown are Everywhere

Brian Cloughley
The Fatuous Braintrust: Newt, Rummy and Wolfowitz

Saul Landau
Shopping, the End of the World and the Politics of Bush

Larry Kearney
Two Morning Poems, May 2003

Steve Perry
Chaos in Iraq: Just What the US Wanted?

Elaine Cassel
Ashcroft Justice Comes to Iraq

 

May 20, 2003

Tariq Ali
The Empire Advances

Ahmad Faruqui
Whither American Nationalism?

Ben Tripp
Dialysis with Osama

Linda Heard
The Cage of Occupation

Cynthia McKinney
Toward a Just and Peaceful World

Edward Said
The Arab Condition

Mokhiber and Weissman
Why Ari Should Have Resigned in Protest Long Ago

Stew Albert
Yale Men

Steve Perry
The New Face of Al-Qaeda

 

May 19, 2003

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
A Letter to Kofi Annan on Powell's Missing Evidence

CounterPunch Wire
"Terror" Slut Steve Emerson Eats Crow

John Chuckman
Blair's Awkward Lies

Matt Vidal
Corporate Media and the Myth of the Free Market

Michael S. Ladah
The Fine Print to Bush's Road Map

Robert Fisk
Bush's Eternal War Backfires

Elaine Cassel
Clarence Thomas, Still Whining After All These Years

Jonathan Freedland
Ann Coulter's Appalling Magic

Steve Perry
Play It Again, O-Sam-a

 

May 17 / 18, 2003

Uri Avnery
The Children's Teeth

Peter Linebaugh
An American Tribute to Christopher Hill

Gary Leupp
Nepal Today

Rock and Rap Confidential
The Republican Plot Against the Dixie Chicks

Walter Sommerfeld
Plundering Baghdad's Museums

Ron Jacobs
Condy Rice's Yipping Tirades

Thomas P. Healy
Dubya Does Indy

Tarif Abboushi
Bush, Sharon and the Roadmap

Francis Boyle
Debating US War Crimes in Iraq

Mark Davis
An Interview with Richard Butler

Richard Lichtman
American Mourning

Michael Ortiz Hill
Overcoming Terrorism

Adam Engel
Uncle Sam is YOU!

Alan Maas
The Best News Show on TV

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Albert

Elaine Cassel
Good Enough for an Alien

Website of the Weekend
The 37 Americans Who Run Iraq

Song of the Weekend
Talkin' Sounds Just Like Joe McCarthy Blues

 

May 16, 2003

Leah Wells
In Iraq Water and Oil Do Mix

Ben Tripp
Fear Itself

Sharon Smith
The Resegregation of US Schools

Ramzy Baroud
Does Defeat Have to be So Humiliating?

Sam Hamod
A Nation of Fear

Phil Reeves
Baghdad Pays the Price

Robert McChesney
The FCC's Big Grab

Mark Engler
Those Who Don't Count

Steve Perry
We're All Extras in Bush's Movie

Website of the Day
Iraq and Our Energy Future

 

May 15, 2003

Ayesha Iman and Sindi Medar-Gould
How Not to Help Amina Lawal: The Hidden Dangers of Letter Writing Campaigns

Julie Hilden
Moussaoui and the Camp X-Ray Detainees: Can He Get a Fair Trial?

Tanya Reinhart
Bush's Roadmap: a Ticket to Failure

Laura Carlsen
Here We Go Again: NAFTA Plus or Minus?

Kenneth Rapoza
The New Fakers: State Dept. Undercuts New Yorker's Goldberg

Stew Albert
A Story I Will Tell

Steve Perry
Bush's Little Nukes

Website of the Day
Strip-o-Rama

 

May 14, 2003

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Jason Leopold
The Pentagon and Hallburton: a Secret November Deal for Iraq's Oil

David Lindorff
Fighting the Patriot Act: Now It's Alaska

John Chuckman
Giggling into Chaos

Jack McCarthy
Twin Towers of Journalism: Racism and Double Standards

Wayne Madsen
Assassinating JFK Again

M. Junaid Alam
The Longer View

Paul de Rooij
The New Hydra's Head:
Propagandists and the Selling of the US/Iraq War

James Reiss
What? Me Worry?

Steve Perry
More on Saudi Arabia Bombings

Website of the Day
A Tribute to Ted Joans

 

May 13, 2003

Saul Landau
Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves

Michael Neumann
Has Islam Failed? Not by Western Standards

Uri Avnery
My Meeting with Arafat

Steve Perry
The Saudi Arabia Bombing

Jacob Levich
Democracy Comes to Iraq: Kick Their Ass and Grab Their Gas

William Lind
The Hippo and the Mongoose: a Question of Military Theory

The Black Commentator
Fraud at the Times: Blaming Blacks for White Folks' Mistakes

Stew Albert
Asylum

Hammond Guthrie
An Illogical Reign

Website of the Day
Sy Hersh: War and Intelligence

 

May 12, 2003

Chris Floyd
Bush, Bin Laden, Bechtel, and Baghdad

Dave Lindorff
America's Dirty Bombs

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Resisting the Bush Administration's War on Liberty

Uzi Benziman
Sharon and Sons, Inc.

Jason Leopold
The Decline and Fall of Thomas White

Rich Procter
George Jumps the Shark

Federico Moscogiuri
Going to Israel? Sign or Else

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/12

Book of the Day
Fooling Marty Peretz

Website of the Day
T-Shirts to Protest In

 

 

 

 

 

Hot Stories

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

May 24, 2003

Who's The Real Enemy?

"Just Cause" or "Kill The Bastards"

By DIANE CHRISTIAN

"An American soldier was wounded and Iraqis also by the enemy who fired a flare into an ammunition dump." CNN early summary of a huge explosion of ammunition in residential Baghdad, 26 April 2003

Who is the enemy? 'A person who hates another and wishes and tries to injure him--synonym: opponent.' Am I George W. Bush's enemy because I oppose his war policies mounted in the name of freedom? I do oppose him though I do not wish to injure him personally. But I do wish and will try to 'take him out' him politically. Is my desire murderous? Will the Secret Service check on me? How real and dangerous are words like 'enemy'?

In war the word 'enemy' licenses corporeal killing. You may, perhaps should, kill the enemy who by definition is one who hates you and wishes to injure or kill you. A soldier's personal identity is effaced. He or she can't define the enemy or disagree with the leader. The job is to fight the enemy and that label 'enemy' makes violence become self-defense, as well as authorized by your country. The license to kill usually comes from religion (kill the infidels) or the state (kill terrorists or evil regimes). Private licenses to kill are discouraged. (You shouldn't kill members of ethnic or racial or gender groups you despise, or family members who irritate you, or most anybody else unless you have a very good and legally defensible reason.) The enemy is the killable other. The US soldier who early in the Iraq War rolled grenades into his officers' tents violated the rules by changing enemies.

We often try to draw distinctions about killing in war. In Iraq we wanted to kill the most hostile soldiers-the Republican Guard and Fedayeen. We often let the regular conscripted army soldiers go if they would abandon their weapons and hostility and soldier status. We said we desired not to kill and maim children and innocent civilians. When we did kill them we argued that it was a mistake or due to the brutality of warfare or the enemy's fault. The enemy, we said, lacked our scruples and deliberately imperiled civilians by placing armaments near them. We blamed the viciousness of the enemy who used innocents as human shields for their own hostilities. And, mostly, ultimately, we blamed the enemy because their evil provoked us to war.

When the ammunition dump exploded in residential Baghdad, the guarding American soldiers tried to help dig out the people buried in the rubble, and the crowd wouldn't let them. The Americans and the Iraqis couldn't speak each others' languages and there were no translators handy. So the soldiers couldn't argue that an Iraqi enemy had deliberately caused the violence, not the soldiers. In one bit of news footage an American soldier yells to his captain 'They don't understand' and the captain responds ' I know they don't understand. Neither do I.' The Iraqis are later reported to be saying that they had warned the soldiers to move the arsenal, that babies are buried alive.

The soldiers looked like an enemy; the angry crowd looked like an enemy too. Further violence was avoided because the soldiers withdrew. In many similar scenes soldiers sometimes shoot and crowds sometimes murder. Not just in Iraq but in Israel and elsewhere.

Could language have calmed this scene? With translators could soldiers and crowd have found a common enemy-an outsider enemy who wished to injure them both-whom they could blame and then work together to help the victims?

Violence can erupt on a word. Yell 'enemy' in war and people often die. Talk shows and politicians pontificate that Madonna and the Dixie Chicks and Hollywood figures aided the enemy in wartime by their opposition to our government's policy. The Congressional cafeteria in Washington serves 'freedom toast' and 'freedom fries' to verbally attack and eliminate the French for their words against our war.

This sense is not the children's rhyme that sticks and stones will break our bones but names will never hurt us. It's more 'them's fightin' words.' If words construct the enemy they're the beginning of war. How do we go from naming enemies-terrorist, tyrant, evil-to killing them? How do we move from opposition to attack? 'The time for talk is over,' Powell and Rumsfeld and Bush announced. 'The enemy means us harm and is moving secretly against us,' they said. 'We risk terrorist attack if we do not attack,' they warned. We go from words to war by ceasing talks and beginning bombing. We also go by abstraction-we don't kill men and women and children and cities but the enemy and evil regimes. We go by justifying our anger as self-protection and revenge. We go by collapsing present time into future intention: 'war is about peace.'

We go by defining and redefining words and staying on message-shutting down other language. We wage a war of words as well as of brute force. The US soldier who screamed at an angry Iraqi crowd "We're here for your fuckin' freedom" needed a translator. Americans have always been fond of the supreme court of the gun. In many a western, Law and Order and Education need force to protect them. Yet the words are what make the actions moral.

Words support ambivalence just as they construct it. An enemy today might have been a friend yesterday or become one tomorrow. Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein twenty years ago and gave him weapons against Iran. Word language allows for another time, a different tense. It admits contradiction and paradox. Language can entertain the idea of loving your enemy, the idea of transcending or changing your definitions.

Language also allows conflict without physical killing. We can oppose verbally and not attack physically. We can articulate intense anger and refrain from bloody followup. We can make mental warfare and live to fight again and tell the tale. We can change our enemies and have new fights. In corporeal warfare we lose language and ambivalence. We cannot heal wounds of the flesh with words or raise the dead. That's what the children's rhyme means-the domains of sticks and stones and words are different. We try to teach children not to hit but to talk.

When the soldiers tried by sign language to signify that they weren't responsible for the carnage at the Baghdad arsenal they were not understood. When the crowd screamed the soldiers were murderers they were not understood either. Were they enemies?

President Bush is angry at Kofi Anan of the UN for calling the US the occupying force rather than the liberating force. President Bush is angry at world leaders calling the US unjust war mongers rather than freedom fighters. Presidents get angry and name their conflicts 'Just Cause' and 'Iraqi Freedom' not 'Kill the Bastards' or 'Smoke the Evil Ones.' They do this to distinguish brutal acts of the righteous from brutal acts of the evil. This is called rationalizing or spinning or lying or delusion. The acts are similar-bombing for example. Labeling alone changes the symmetry of the acts of 9/11 and the shock and awe bombing of Baghdad. We meant to inflict terror through the shock and awe of bombing brute force. We not only thrilled at our explosive might, we boasted we were the most stunning military force in all human history. But we weren't monsters because we meant well and our motives were pure. We were good and the evil regime we swaggered to dazzle was not. They were brutal, cut out tongues, killed, gassed and impoverished their own people, swaggered and swilled scotch and had mistresses. We said we respected Islam, loved the Iraqi people, were bringing democratic freedoms. And we just had to make war because the evil ones wouldn't change any other way.

Most of the world has trouble with these distinctions. The real language that's being spoken is brute force. You can speak before you bomb and say you don't want to hurt anybody and you can speak after you bomb and say you're sorry. The bomb has a different language, one which does not support ambivalence or tense change. Americans don't face their own violence, not the deep psychological kind, not the obvious historical kind. When we railed about weapons of mass destruction, no one pointed out that like the crazy Shakespearean kings we're terrified of them because we've done the thing we fear. Americans don't look at the footage of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombing, and Japan is no longer the enemy. Our myth is that violence is changed by good intentions, that it can be cleansing. Some will say it's a religious error, others that it's the bleak, brusque Darwinian truth of survival.

Does it matter what we say? Osama bin Laden says he's a slave of God and is on a divine mission to revenge insult to Allah and his people. George Bush says he's on a divine mission to rid the world of evil. Both bomb. Do they differ? In enemy tactics, they are enemy twins-resorting to force, blaming their enemy, claiming righteousness, and wreaking savage damage.

Diane Christian is SUNY Distinguished Teaching Professor at University at Buffalo. She can be reached at: engdc@acsu.buffalo.edu

 

Today's Features

Standard Schaefer
Lifting the Sanctions: Who Benefits?

Ron Jacobs
Long Live People's Park!

Michael Greger, MD
Return of Mad Cow: US Beef Supply at Risk

Elaine Cassel
Tigar to Ashcroft: "Secrecy is the Enemy of Democratic Govt."

Sam Hamod
The Shi'a of Iraq

Christopher Greeder
After the Layoffs

Alexander Cockburn
Derrida's Double Life (poem)

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars Weblog 5/23

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /