Now Available!
Other Lands Have
Dreams:
From
Baghdad to Pekin Prison
by KATHY KELLY
Click Here to Order the Hot New CounterPunch
Book by 3-time Nobel Peace Prize Nominee Kathy Kelly!
Today's
Stories
May
25, 2005
John
Ross
Sweet Revenge at Terminal Island
May
24, 2005
Dave
Zirin
Palestine's Big Visitor: Not Laura,
but Ronaldo
Michele
Bollinger
Criminalizing Abortion in S. Carolina: Why Did Gabriela Flores
Go to Jail?
Winslow
Wheeler
The Pork War
Uri
Avnery
Wagner at the Holocaust Memorial
Michael
Donnelly
Behind the Green(back) Curtain
Joshua
Frank
Chavez's Economy: Is It Sustainable?
Stephen
Dunifer
The Folly of Media Reform
Paul
Craig Roberts
Is Bush a Sith Lord?

May
23, 2005
Esther
Sassaman / Thomas Nagy
An Exclusive Interview with George Galloway
Mike
Whitney
Free Jose Padilla: Three Years
in Prison, Not a Shred of Evidence
Ramzy
Baroud
Fallout from a Forged War: Battling Windmills While Iraq Burns
Michael
Dickinson
Pictures at an Exhibition: Censoring the "Carnival of Chaos"
Walter
Brasch
In Praise of Bob Barr
Dick
J. Reavis
The Newsweek Scandal: an Unmentioned Detail
Maria
Tomchick
Galloway and the US Press
Norman
Solomon
Let's Play "Media Jeopardy"
Kevin
Zeese
Inventing a Pretext for War: an Inte4rview with James Bamford
Website
of the Day
Drawings of Darfur: Genocide Through Children's Eyes

May
21 / 22, 2005
David
H. Price
CIA Skullduggery in Academia
Gabriel
García Márquez
My Visit to the Clinton White House, Bearing a Message from Fidel
on Terrorism
Oren
Ben-Dor
To Create Academic Freedom in Israel,
a Boycott is Needed
Gary
Leupp
Nights in White House Satin with Jeff Gannon
Laith
al-Saud
An Anatomy of the Iraqi Resistance
Elaine
Cassel
Bush and the Angry God: Twilight of Secular Democracy in America?
Greg
Moses
The Saints of Mischief and Halliburton
Fred
Gardner
Martyring Dr. Carol Wolman
Dave
Lindorff
The GOP's Police State
Alan
Maass
Uzbekistan's Karimov: Bush's Favorite Terrorist?
William
Blum
The American Myth Industry
Tom
Crumpacker
Send Posada Carriles to Venezuela
Niranjan
Ramakrishnan
Newsweek: a Contest of Hypocrisies
Doug
Giebel
The Grand Illusion
Evelyn
J. Pringle
No Child Left Unmedicated: TeenScreen, State-drugging and Suicide
Carolyn
Baker
Spiritual Abuse by the Religious Right
Chris
Floyd
Justice in JebWorld
Frederick
B. Hudson
Black and Gay?: a Review of "Brother to Brother"
Ben
Tripp
Him Talk Plenty Long Time: Busting the Filibuster
Poets'
Basement
Davies, Engel and Louise

May
20, 2005
Dave
Lindorff
Newsweek and White House Hypocrisy
Kevin
Zeese
As Insurgency Increases, New US Military
Recruits Fall
Paul
de Rooij
"Private": a Film in Search
of a Cliché
Christopher
Brauchli
How Insurance Companies Exploited 9/11
Mark
Engler
Triumph Over Debt?
Joshua
Frank
Bush to Dine with Porn Star
Robert
Jensen
TV Talk, No Evidence Required
Jeffery
R. Webber
Bolivia Erupts

May
19, 2005
Bill
Forman
An Interview with Alexander Cockburn
Stan
Goff
Hey, Democrats, Listen to Galloway and
Learn Something
Neve
Gordon
From Ghettos to Frontiers: What Will Happen After Israel Withdraws
from Gaza
Michael
Dickinson
The Trouble with Menwith: Tagging British Peace Activists
Karyn
Strickler
The Texas Nexus: How Racial and Political Gerrymandering United
Andrew
Freedman
Nazi Science at NIH
Paul
Craig Roberts
The Politics and Economics of Outsourcing

May
18, 2005
Jean
Bricmont
Vive La France?
Laura
Carlsen
Bush's Posada Carriles Quandry: an
Anti-Cuba Terrorist is Still a Terrorist
Mike
Whitney
The Secret Raids of Alberto Gonzales: 10,000 Swept Up
Joshua
Frank
Flushing the Koran: Why Newsweek Got It Right
George
Galloway
Thusly, I Humiliated Norm Coleman (and Christopher Hitchens)
Manuel
Garcia, Jr.
Writing Tickets for American War Crimes
Dwight
D. Eisenhower
How the GOP will Destroy Itself
Dave
Lindorff
The Plot to Make the PATRIOT Act
Even Worse
May
17, 2005
Mickey
Z.
GIs Behaving Badly
Petuuche
Gilbert
The People of Acoma Still Fight to
be Free
Paul
Craig Roberts
Lies That Kill: Why Isn't Bush in
the Dock?
Ramzy
Baroud
The New Palestinian Uprising
Robert
Jensen / Pat Youngblood
Pinning the Blame on Newsweek
Stan
Cox
Poisoning Patancheru: the Severe Side Effects of India's Drug
Industry
Dave
Zirin
American Anthem: Ozzie Guillen and Fining for Freedom
Diana
Barahona
Reporters Without Borders Unmasked
Website
of the Day
Revolutionary Flower Pot Society

May
16, 2005
Michael
Gillespie
The Family Released a Statement:
Death Notices for the Warrior Theocracy
Jason
Leopold
BP Stains the Arctic
Jesse
Muldoon
How Many Schools Left Behind?
Norman
Solomon
Media and the War: "The Bombs in Iraq Explode at Home"
Robert
Cray
Twenty
Patrick
Cockburn
Iraq is a Bloody No Man's Land
Website
of the Day
Bolton's Divorce Papers: She Took It All Away, Including Most
of the Furniture
May
14 / 15, 2005
Alexander
Cockburn
Join the 14 Per Cent Club!
Saul
Landau
Lessons from Vietnam: Wars Kill Empires as Well as People
Gary
Leupp
Whither Yale? Towards the Imperial University
JoAnn
Wypijewski
The Glory that is Lockhart, Texas
Ben
Tripp
The Wayward Airplane: a Cautionary Tale
Brian
J. Foley
Was Jesus Gay?
Tom
Barry
Bolton the Eavesdropper
Mitchell
Verter
Barbarous Oaxaca: Indigenous Rights Groups Meet the "Law
of the Club"
Mike
Ferner
War on COs: Army Files Additional Charges Against Kevin Benderman
Dan
Smith
Perceiving Darfur
Mark
Scaramella
Death with Pitfalls
Don
Fitz
Mommy, Is This a Finger in My Rice Puffs?: Splicing Human DNA
into the Food Chain
Diane
Farsetta
PR Industry Imitates Big Tobacco: the Senate's "Fake News"
Hearings
Michael
Dickinson
Soldier Crawling: Military Conscription in Turkey
Ron
Jacobs
The Jackson State Murders
Fred
Gardner
"Hydroponics? Ridiculous!": A Real Farmer Looks at
Medical Marijuana
Farrah
Hassen
Far From Heaven: a Review of Ridley Scott's "Kingdom of
Heaven"
Douglas
Valentine
50 Cent's Plea
Poets'
Basement
Louise, Ford, Engel, & Albert
Website
of the Weekend
Military Base Closings and the South

May
13, 2005
Tom
Stephens
A Chronology of US War Crimes and Torture, 1975-2005
Patrick
Cockburn
"They Destroyed Everything"
Mike
Whitney
Tom Friedman, Imperial Chronicler
Chris
Floyd
Miami Vice: the Sleazy World of Jeb Bush
Jenna
Orkin
Ground Zero's Toxic Dust
Dave
Lindorff
Googling for Fun
Joshua
Frank
Yale Fires an Acclaimed Anarchist Scholar:
an Interview with David Graeber
Website
of the Day
Botero: Pinta El Horror de Abu Ghraib
May
12, 2005
Paul
Craig Roberts
America is Losing: More Phony Jobs
Hype
Uri
Avnery
Death of a Myth
Greg
Moses
Neo-Con Logic at the Border
Carolyn
Baker
The Politics of Dominionism: the New Religious Right in America
Pat
Williams
Amateurish High Jinks on Roadless Areas
William
S. Lind
Reality Gap: the Myth of US Invincibilty
Jack
Random
The Dubious Wisdom of George W. Bush
Gary
Leupp
Douglas Feith Bares His Soul to Jeffrey Goldberg
May
11, 2005
Patrick
Cockburn
The Rise, Fall and Rise of Ahmed
Chalabi: King of Jordan to Pardon His $300 Million Bank Swindle
Kevin
Zeese
The Occupation Gets More Saddam-like
Every Day
Christopher
Brauchli
Coffee, Tea or Torture?: A One Way Ticket to Uzbekistan
Zalman
Amit
The Collapse of Academic Freedom in
Israel: Tantura, Teddy Katz and Haifa University
Robert
Shull
Carte Blanche for the Terror Cops:
Senate Gives DHS Power to Waive All Laws
Mike
Whitney
God, Gays, and George Bernard Shaw
Dr.
Teresa Whitehurst
Anti-Arabic Week at a Southern High School
Norman
Solomon
Political Bluster and the Filibuster

May
10, 2005
Richard
Drayton
The Imperial Mythology of WW II:
an Ethical Blank Check
Dave
Zirin
Steve Nash's Brilliant Year: Anti-War
Hoopster Wins NBA's MVP
Jackie
Corr
The Medicare Catch: Mrs. O'Hara's Windfall
Dave
Lindorff
Silence of the Scams: Economists
on China
Michael
Donnelly
From Roadless to Clueless: the Great
Stillborn Eco Victory
Reza
Fiyouzat
Nomadic Abstracts
Scott
Parkin
Taking Direct Action Against Halliburton
Stephen
Babcock
The Burden of Knowing Better
Alan
Farago
Florida, Water and Lobbyists
Michael
Neumann
Naomi's Courage
Website
of the Day
One Nation Under Plagiarism

May
9, 2005
Louis
Proyect
Shilling for Chevron: Jared Diamond,
Greenwasher
Robert
Fisk
"Mission Accomplished": the Occupation, Year Two
Kevin
Zeese
Concientious Objection on Trial: the Court Martial of Keith Benderman
Joshua
Frank
Kerry Bashes Gay Marriage
Sasha
Kramer
A Mother's Day Call for Justice in Haiti's Prisons
Andrew
Wimmer
Create and Resist
Jeffrey
Webber
Back to the Streets in Bolivia?
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Straight to Bechtel
May
7 / 8, 2005
Alexander
Cockburn
Who Beat Hitler?
Gary
Leupp
Biblical Prophecy and Christian Zionism
Saul
Landau
Pope Torquemada: Purges, Pedophiles and Cover-Ups
Joe
DeRaymond
Autumn of the Revolutionary: Another Look at Daniel Ortega
Daniela
Ponce
Seeing Chile in Nepal
Heather
Williams
Hollywood Does Enron
Gregory
Elich
Zimbabwe's Fight for Justice
Anis
Memon
To Cuba and Back
John
Chuckman
The Peculiar State: "Criticism of Israel is a Form of Anti-Semitism"
Mike
Whitney
Hard Right Rage Against the Truth
Ron
Jacobs
Re-Reading "Born on the Fourth of July" as the Iraq
War Grinds On
Colin
Kalmbacher
Whither Disorder? Ann Coulter and the Texas Police State, Cont.
Lance
Selfa
Uprising in Mexico City
Fred
Gardner
"Getting High is a Little Like Cuba"
Ben
Tripp
Letters on Wittgenstein
Mickey
Z.
The Mother of All Days
Richard
Joseph
Those Patriotic Magnets
Dr.
Susan Block
Come As You Are: Masturbation 101
Poets'
Basement
Smith-Ferri, Louise, Nettnin, Engel and Albert
May
6, 2005
Patrick
Cockburn
Baghdad Diary: a Week of Bombs and
Blood
Erin
Yoshioka
Another "3 Strikes" Travesty:
Why is Santo Reyes Facing Life in Prison?
Sam
Husseini
Talking with Syrians
Dave
Lindorff
Ernie Pyle Where Are You? When Reporters were Reporters
Kevin
Zeese
Circus Trials of Abu Ghraib: When Even the Fall Girl Can't Plead
Guilty
Joshua
Frank
An Overextended US Military? It Won't Stop Another War
Dan
Bacher
Tribes and Salmon Win One: Bush Backs Off Trinity River Water
Raid
P.
Sainath
India's Bloody Water Wars
May
5, 2005
Carles
Mutaner
Is Chavez's Venezuela "Socialist"
or "Populist?"
Carl
G. Estabrook
Is There Any Hope for the Pope?
Farrah
Hassen
The US's Syrian Obsession
Kevin
Zeese
"Sent Into Combat Unequipped and Unprepared": an Interview
with Patrick Resta
Michael
Leonardi
May Day with an American Soldier in Rome
Bennett
Ramberg
The Future of Nuclear Terror: Coming to a Reactor Near You
Ray
McGovern
The Smoking Gun on White House Deceit
Norman
Solomon
Nuclear Fundamentalism, the New York Times and Iran
Nicole
Colson
The Back Alley Attack on Abortion Rights
Brian
Concannon, Jr.
Clearing the Fences in Haiti
May
4, 2005
Colin
Kalmbacher
Ann Coulter and the Police State:
Heckle a Racist, Get Arrested
John
Walsh
Al Franken is a Big Fat Phony: Lying
on Air America to Support the War
Greg
Moses
Vigilante Wedge: Schwarzenegger Reprises
"Birth of a Nation"
Ali
Khan
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Poised to Fall Apart
Chris
Floyd
Ring Them Bells
Linda
S. Heard
D-Day for Tony Blair: Bogeymen and Scare Tactics
Dave
Zirin
The NFL, Congress and the Male Cheerleader Principle
William
S. Lind
Fool's Paradise
Gary
Leupp
Bolton's Proudest Moment: Breaking
the UN's Anti-Zionist Resolution
Website
of the Day
Kent State, May 4, 1970
May
3, 2005
Dave
Lindorff
Bush has Grasped the Third Rail,
Now Turn on the Juice
Brian
Cloughley
Halliburton's War Loot
Ira
Kurzban
Death Squad Diplomacy: How Bolton Armed Haiti's Thugs and Killers
Seth
Sandronsky
Towards Debtors' Prisons?
Gilad
Atzmon
The Labour Party Isn't an Option Any More
Michael
Donnelly
Branding Eco Collapse
Alex
Sanchez
Chile's Man at the OAS: a Blow to Bush?
Peter
Linebaugh
Magna Carta and May Day
May
2, 2005
Ron
Jacobs
Toward an Anti-Imperialist Movement
Stan
Goff
The Case of Hasan Akbar
Karyn
Strickler
Achieving Gender Balance in US Politics
Joshua
Frank
Leaked UK Memo Indict's Blair's Iraq Folly
Kevin
Zeese
Getting Out of Iraq will Prove Tougher Than Getting Out of Vietnam
Vicente
Navarro
Pope Benedict: a Rightwing Politician
April
30 / May 1, 2005
Alexander
Cockburn
Marla Ruzicka, Rachel Corrie and
"Credibility"
Gabriel
Kolko
Lessons from a Total Defeat: the End
of the Vietnam War, 30 Years Later
Jennifer
Loewenstein
The Disengaged: Gaza and the Fragmentation of Palestinian Nationhood
Lee
Sustar
City for Sale: Richard Daley's Chicago
Saul
Landau
The Bush-DeLay Axis of Naked Power
T.W.
Croft
The Undiscovered Country: the High Tide of the Neo-Con Confederacy
Nikolas
Kozloff
Fox News v. Hugo Chavez
William
Blum
Never-Ending Double Standards
Dave
Lindorff
Judicial Jury Tampering in Philly
Joshua
Frank
The Bi-Partisan Assault on Teenage Girls
Doug
Giebel
Saving Jane Fonda
Steven
Erlanger
A Response to Kathy Christison, from the NYT Jerusalem Bureau
Chief
Fred
Gardner
Washington State Doctor Harassed
Mike
Whitney
Another Mad Bush Press Conference
Kurt
Nimmo
Putin Pussyfoots in Palestine
Joe
DeRaymond
A Short History of the 15th Congressional District of Pennsylvania
Michael
Dickinson
Flags
Mickey
Z.
May Day at Yankee Stadium
Justin
Taylor
The Crawling Chaos: HP Lovecraft's Polymorphous Legacy
Poets
Basement
Krieger, Engel, Albert, St. Clair
Website
of the Weekend
Save Barbados's Cowpastor









Hot Stories
Alexander Cockburn
Behold,
the Head of a Neo-Con!
Subcomandante
Marcos
The
Death Train of the WTO
Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens
as Model Apostate
Steve Niva
Israel's
Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?
Dardagan,
Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians
Steve
J.B.
Prison Bitch
Sheldon
Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda
in the Iraq War
Wendell
Berry
Small Destructions Add Up
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click
Here for More Stories.


|
May 25, 2005
Board of Deputies of British
Jews: "Pragmatic" Nazi-Zionist Collaboration was OK
The
Plot to Stigmatize "51 Documents" on Amazon.com
By
LENNI BRENNER
On May 4th, an article, "Board's
Amazon Appeal," appeared on Jewish News, a Zionist website.
It reported that the Board Of Deputies Of British Jews, pro-Zionist
religious Jewry's central organization, had complained to Amazon
re a book I edited, 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with
the Nazis.
I wrote the Board. It responded.
I answered their critique & challenged them to publicly debate
the issue. Below is the Jewish News article and the correspondence
between me & the Board.
The Holocaust is being heavily
memorialized this year, the 60th anniversary of the end of WW
ll. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan attended the opening of Israel's
new museum at Jerusalem's Yad Vashem Institute. NYC's Mayor Michael
Bloomberg, running for reelection, was Bush's official representative.
Documentaries have appeared on TV re differing aspects of Nazism
& the atrocity.
Altho historians have examined
Nazism in detail in all its complexity, the present general public,
world-wide, is interested in little more than the Holocaust,
the Jews as victims. Few, Jew or gentile, know anything about
the range of
Jewish politics in the Hitler era.
What happened to the Jews is
constantly utilized in Zionist propaganda as justification for
the creation of the Israeli state, the silver lining around the
dark cloud of desolation. That's the tip off that there is something
missing: What did the Zionists do for the Jews? There is no 51
Documents: Zionist Resistance to the Nazis.
The Board's attempt to discredit
my book with Amazon, and their response to me, permitted me to
briefly document some of my charges. But this is no substitute
for delving deeper into the controversy. For this, I recommend
looking at my 1st book, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators,
in conjunction with 51 Documents, which contains complete texts
of much of the material cited in the earlier work. Zionism in
the Age of the Dictators is out of print, but is on the internet
at <www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/index.htm>.
I must thank the Board. Its
crude attempt to discredit the book with Amazon backfired. They
have put some of their later-day rationalizations for such collaboration
out there for the world to see. Now they will have to debate
me, or demonstrate, once & for all & forever, that they
don't dare defend Zionism's shameful politics during Jewry's
desperate hour.
***
"Board's Amazon Appeal"
by Daniella Peled
May 4 - The Board of Deputies
has called on online booksellers Amazon to emphasise the controversial
nature of a book sold on their website that claims to expose
Zionist-Nazi cooperation. The current synopsis of "51 Documents:
Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis" by American writer
Lenni Brenner begins: "The Nazi era is the most discussed
period in history, yet most Jews and others are unaware of the
interaction between Zionism, Hitler and Mussolini."
It goes on to describe the
"disservice that the Zionists did to Jews before and during
the Holocaust," claiming that the book's documents were
carefully selected "so that a rounded picture of history
emerges."
Last year, following a request
from the Board, Amazon posted a message on their web page for
the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, to make the anti-Semitic
nature of the notorious forgery clear.
Stressing that Amazon did not
endorse the Protocols, the note added: "This book is one
of the most infamous, and tragically influential, examples of
racist propaganda ever written."
The Board wants a similar warning
to accompany "51 Documents." A Board spokesman said:
"We have urged Amazon to acknowledge on the site that this
book is of a dangerous and controversial nature.
"Currently Amazon has
shown an appreciation of our concerns and we are looking at ways
of ensuring such texts will not be bought by those who unwittingly
believe them to be accurate accounts of history."
He added that other books available
on the Amazon site had also raised concerns, including "The
Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection, by Justin Raimondo,"
which questions whether Mossad had prior knowledge of the terror
attacks.
***
5 12 05 Brothers & sisters,
I have read in Jewish News
(www.totallyjewish.com)
that your Board lobbied Amazon to issue a warning about my book
"51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis."
The article can be found at
www.totallyjewish.com/news/stories/?disp_type=0&disp_story=5agkkD
Is this true? If so, can the
board send me an email copy of its complaint, including all specifics?
All I know is what I read in the above:
"The Board wants a similar
warning to accompany '51 Documents.' A Board spokesman said:
'We have urged Amazon to acknowledge on the site that this book
is of a dangerous and controversial nature.'
'Currently Amazon has shown
an appreciation of our concerns and we are looking at ways of
ensuring such texts will not be bought by those who unwittingly
believe them to be accurate accounts of history.'"
Do you contest the authenticity
of any documents? Or do you have problems with the translations?
In any case, please let me
hear from you as soon as possible, as I intend to contact Amazon
in this matter.
Let me thank you, in advance,
for your time and trouble in this regard, Lenni Brenner
***
17 May 2005
Dear Mr. Brenner
Thank you for your email regarding
our contact with Amazon.co.uk.
Firstly I must inform you that
no written representations have been made to Amazon on this issue.
Secondly, you should know that the concern that was raised related
not to your book, but to the synopsis of it included on the website.
Whilst the contention that
"Zionism betrayed the Jews," stated at the end of the
synopsis, is controversial, uncomfortable and simply wrong in
the eyes of many people, it is at least given as your personal
view. However, the earlier statement that "this book brings
to light, through the use of actual historical documents, the
disservice that the Zionists did to Jews before and during the
Holocaust" is recorded as fact, rather than as a matter
of opinion or historical debate and this is particularly troubling.
Zionism is simply the aspiration
of the Jewish people for a national home in what is now Israel.
It represents the consensus view of the Jewish people. The bald
statement as fact that Zionism is a betrayal of the Jewish people
is one that we feel should be qualified for the impartial or
uninformed observer, as should the assertion that Zionists collaborated
with the Nazis when in fact those Jews who did escape to Palestine
were in truth fortunate in being able to flee the Holocaust.
To misrepresent, as the synopsis does, pragmatism for collaboration
(particularly before the Nazis' policy of extermination was known
about) as if Zionists and Nazis shared the same ideals is insulting
and disingenuous when, in fact, some of the truest allies of
the Third Reich in World War II were the leaders of the Palestinian
people.
I am sure that you would not
disagree that the propositions in your book are highly controversial
and I trust that you will accept that they are of concern to
the Jewish community. This concern was confirmed by the list
of publications also bought by those who had purchased your book,
including titles linking Israel and 9/11. It is clear that this
is only likely to endorse antisemitic conspiracies, so often
behind modern antisemitism.
We trust that Amazon can find
a form of words that, notwithstanding our differing viewpoints,
would be acceptable to all.
Yours sincerely,
Jon Benjamin, Chief Executive
***
May 23, 2005
Dear Mr. Benjamin,
Thank you for your reply to
my query of May 12th, re the Board's contact with Amazon.co.uk.
You write that "the concern
that was raised related not to your book, but to the synopsis
of it included on the website." The synopsis reads:
"The Nazi era is the most
discussed period in history, yet most Jews and others are unaware
of the interaction between Zionism, Hitler and Mussolini. This
book brings to light, through the use of actual historic documents,
the disservice that the Zionists did to Jews before and during
the Holocaust. Some of these documents were published in English
decades ago, but are only now seeing the light of day. Others
are being translated into English here for the first time. Included
are excerpts from Propaganda Minister Goebbels' newspaper, Der
Angriff, detailing an SS-man's visit to Palestine as the Zionists'
guest. Readers will also learn about Adolf Eichmann's account
of his personal dealings with Hungarian Zionist Reszo Kasztner,
who was later assassinated in Israel as a Nazi collaborator who
betrayed 400,000 Hungarian Jews. Also revealed is pro-Zionist
propaganda put out by the Nazis, such as a medal for getting
Jews to Palestine and a Nazi board game where the object is to
move Jews to Palestine. The documents contained in this book
were selected with due care so that a rounded picture of history
emerges. The author concludes that Zionism betrayed the Jews;
and the evidence that led him to that conclusion is contained
in this book."
Your complaint is that
"Whilst the contention
that 'Zionism betrayed the Jews,' stated at the end of the synopsis,
is controversial, uncomfortable and simply wrong in the eyes
of many people, it is at least given as your personal view. However,
the earlier statement that 'this book brings to light, through
the use of actual historical documents, the disservice that the
Zionists did to Jews before and during the Holocaust' is recorded
as fact, rather than as a matter of opinion or historical debate
and this is particularly troubling."
In my note, I asked if you
"contest the authenticity of any documents? Or do you have
problems with the translations?" As you raise no objection,
we may treat the documents as undisputed.
You restrict your objection
to the synopsis's claim that "this book brings to light,
through the use of actual historical documents, the disservice
that the Zionists did to Jews before and during the Holocaust."
For you, this is "a matter of opinion or historical debate."
As you insist that what the
documents show is open to debate, I challenge the Board to exactly
that. Let us arrange a public debate as to whether or not they
prove that the Zionist movement collaborated with Hitler.
You go on to claim that "Zionism
is simply the aspiration of the Jewish people for a national
home in what is now Israel. It represents the consensus view
of the Jewish people." But no scholar follows you on this.
All acknowledge that Zionists were a minority of Hitler-era Jewry.
That is even more true of today, when most Jews outside Israel
marry gentiles.
You then restate your objection
to the book's thesis:
"The bald statement as
fact that Zionism is a betrayal of the Jewish people is one that
we feel should be qualified for the impartial or uninformed observer."
You then object to "the
assertion that Zionists collaborated with the Nazis when in fact
those Jews who did escape to Palestine were in truth fortunate
in being able to flee the Holocaust."
But the documents demonstrate
that collaboration began when Hitler came to power, years before
the Holocaust. In 1933, the Zionistischen Vereinigung für
Deutschland, the German Zionist Federation, sent a secret message
to the Nazis:
"May we therefore be permitted
to present our views, which, in our opinion, make possible a
solution in keeping with the principles of the new German State
of National Awakening.... It is our opinion that an answer to
the Jewish question truly satisfying to the national state can
be brought about only with the collaboration of the Jewish movement
that aims at a social, cultural, and moral renewal of Jewry....
Zionism believes that a rebirth of national life, such as is
occurring in German life through adhesion to Christian and national
values, must also take place in the Jewish national group....
On the foundation of the new state, which has established the
principle of race, we wish so to fit our community into the total
structure so that for us too, in the sphere assigned to us, fruitful
activity for the Fatherland is possible.... Our acknowledgment
of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere relationship
to the German people and its national and racial realities....
[W]e do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too,
are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity
of the Jewish group."
The ZVfD wasn't thinking about
any future slaughter of Jews. To the contrary, they proclaimed
that
"[A] self-conscious Jewry
here described, in whose name we speak, can find a place in the
structure of the German state, because it is inwardly unembarrassed,
free from the resentment which assimilated Jews must feel at
the determination that they belong to Jewry, to the Jewish race
and past. We believe in the possibility of an honest relationship
of loyalty between a group-conscious Jewry and the German state."
They went further.
"For its practical aims,
Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration even of a government
fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with the Jewish
question no sentimentalities are involved but a real problem
whose solution interests all peoples, and at the present moment
especially the German people.
The realization of Zionism
could only be hurt by resentment of Jews abroad against the German
development. Boycott propaganda such as is currently being
carried on against Germany in many ways is in essence un-Zionist,
because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to
build.... Our observations, presented herewith, rest on the conviction
that, in solving the Jewish problem according to its own lights,
the German Government will have full understanding for a candid
and clear Jewish posture that harmonizes with the interests of
the state."
You charge that the synopis
misrepresents "pragmatism for collaboration (particularly
before the Nazi's policy of extermination was known about) as
if Zionists and Nazis shared the same ideals is insulting and
disingenuous."
But they called for "a
solution in keeping with the principles of the new German State
of National Awakening." After all, "Zionism believes
that a rebirth of national life, such as is occurring in German
life through adhesion to Christian and national values, must
also take place in the Jewish national group.... [W]e do not
wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too, are against
mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish
group."
Webster's dictionary defines
pragmatism as "a practical approach to problems and affairs."
What was practical re saving Jewish lives about any of the above?
Indeed, in chapter 13 of Zionism
in the Age of the Dictators, I demonstrated that the World
Zionist Organization was never interested in rescuing Jews qua
Jews, but only interested in building Zionism in Palestine.
***
"The week of terror unleashed
against the Jews by the Nazis' victory in the elections of March
1933 had brought thousands on to the streets outside the Palestine
Office in Berlin, but there was still no desire to turn Palestine
into a genuine refuge. Emigration had to continue to serve the
needs of Zionism. Only young, healthy, qualified and committed
Zionists were wanted. The German HaChalutz Pioneers declared
unrestricted emigration to Palestine to be a "Zionist crime."
[9]
9. Abraham Margaliot, "The
Problem of the Rescue of German Jewry during the Years 1933-1939;
the Reasons for the delay in the Emigration from the Third Reich,"
Rescue Attempts During the Holocaust (Israel), p. 249.
***
"The Israeli scholar Abraham
Margaliot has written about a speech given by Weizmann before
the Zionist Executive in 1935:
'he declared that the Zionist
movement would have to choose between the immediate rescue of
Jews and the establishment of a national project which would
ensure lasting redemption for the Jewish people. Under such circumstances,
the movement, according to Weizmann, must choose the latter course.'"
[14]
14. Margaliot, Problem of the
Rescue of German Jewry, p. 255.
***
"When, after Kristallnacht,
the British, in the hope of easing the pressure for increased
immigration into Palestine, proposed that thousands of children
be admitted directly into Britain, Ben-Gurion was absolutely
against the plan, telling a meeting of Labour Zionist leaders
on 7 December 1938:
'If I knew that it would be
possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them
over to England, and only half of them by transporting them to
Eretz Yisrael, then I would opt for the second alternative. For
we must weigh not only the life of these children, but also the
history of the People of Israel.'" [23]
23. Yoav Gelber, "Zionist
Policy and the Fate of European Jewry (1939-42)," Yad Vashem
Studies, vol.XII, p.199.
***
You added that
"in fact, some of the
truest allies of the Third Reich in World War II were the leaders
of the Palestinian people."
But I cited this in a note
on page 225 of 51 Documents:
"[A]s many readers will
not recognize the Palestinian 'Grand Mufti' of Jerusalem, Amin
al-Husayni, let me introduce him.
He tried to get rid of the
threatening Zionist colonizers by allying himself first with
Mussolini, then with Hitler. After the war, he was seen as a
major war criminal for mobilizing Muslims in the Soviet Union
and Yugoslavia to fight on Hitler's side against the Red Army
and Marshall Tito's partisans."
For more information on him,
readers were referred to chapter 8 of my 1983 book, Zionism in
the Age of the Dictators. There, I summed him up thus:
"The Mufti gained nothing,
then or later, from his collaboration with either Rome or Berlin,
nor could the Palestinian interest ever have been served by the
two dictators.... The Mufti was an incompetent reactionary who
was driven into his anti-Semitism by the Zionists. It was Zionism
itself, in its blatant attempt to turn Palestine from an Arab
land into a Jewish state, and then use it for the yet further
exploitation of the Arab nation, that generated Palestinian Jew-hatred."
The 'spiritual' representative
of the Palestinian land owners, hence unwilling to mobilize the
Palestinian peasantry against Zionist colonization, the Mufti
allied himself to the enemy of his people's enemy. But Zionist
collaboration has even less justification. The WZO sought to
collaborate with the Jews' most venomous enemy.
You followed this with another
specious argument.
"I am sure that you would
not disagree that the propositions in your book are highly controversial
and I trust that you will accept that they are of concern to
the Jewish community. This concern was confirmed by the list
of publications also bought by those who had purchased your book,
including titles linking Israel and 9/11. It is clear that this
is only likely to endorse antisemitic conspiracies, so often
behind modern antisemitism."
If you think that buying Brenner
leads to "linking Israel and 9/11," how come being
Brenner doesn't? I've written the following re 9/11 and the Israel-did-it
fantasy in my 1/15/02 Theses re the 2 US-Afghan wars, which I
sent out to my e-list:
"The best analogy to the
relationship between Washington & bin Laden is that of Germany's
capitalists to Adolf Hitler in 1929-33. They were looking for
an anti-Marxist kickass as Germany entered the world Depression.
They weren't thinking about killing almost 6 million Jews. But
that's what happened when they looked to a right-wing militarized
fanatic for the solution to their problems.
Carter & Reagan needed
a homicidal holy warrior against the Soviet Union. While neither
was exactly a feminist, domestically, they weren't motivated
by personal anti-feminism in backing Afghanistan's world class
male-chauvinists. But, in arming those women-haters, they set
in train a chain of political forces that produced one of history's
major disasters, for America, Afghanistan & the world....
Many Arab-Americans feared
they would be rounded up, as Arabs &/or as politicals. When
TV showed Palestinians cheering the destruction, many convinced
themselves that the photos were staged. Some may have been, in
the age-old way of photographers everywhere. But, for certain,
many did cheer. But soon we saw emails about Israelis arrested
cheering the destruction in NY, Israelis with boxcutters on the
George Washington Bridge, & Co.
The professional psychological
terms for this are simple enuf: Denial & projection.
Most American lefts were not
ethnically fearful of retaliation for suicide bombers, so few,
beyond congenital Kennedy conspiracy buffs like Ralph Schoenman,
are into 'the Zionists did it.'"
One thing you will admit. As
you tried connecting me with a notion that I've exposed, you
have only yourself to blame for my quoting myself at length,
on 9/11, in a discussion of Zionists' roles during the totalitarian
era.
You concluded with "We
trust that Amazon can find a form of words that, notwithstanding
our differing viewpoints, would be acceptable to all."
Amazon took what it got from
my publisher, as it does with other books. It can't evaluate
endless books on an infinity of subjects. Instead, it puts readers'
reviews, pro and con, in conjunction with the display of all
books. I see, at
your site that no one in Britain has taken up their offer,
"Write the first customer review of this item." But
at Amazon's
American site, there are 8 reviews, 5 pro-Zionist.
Amazon tries to be fair to
authors and customers. It is difficult to see what it could do
that would satisfy both sides in political disputes. But we,
your Board and I, can resolve your problem. We should organize
a debate on Zionism's 1933-45 role, between myself and you or
any one of your choosing. (I specialize on the issue. You personally
might be at a disadvantage re dealing with it.)
A structured debate should
be organized, in person in Britain. Or it could be done internationally
on an agreed upon website, or via a phone-radio or TV hookup.
Obviously debate would publicize
my book. But it would also work to Zionism's advantage. My charges
are accepted by the informed international community. Edward
Mortimer, presently Director of Communications for UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan, praised Zionism in the Age of the Dictators
in the 2/11/84 London Times. Zionism, Mortimer wrote,
"started from the assumption
that anti-Semitism was inevitable and even in a sense justified
so long as Jews were outside the land of Israel.
It is true that only an extreme
lunatic fringe of Zionism went so far as to offer to join the
war on Germany's side in 1941, in the hope of establishing "the
historical Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis,
and bound by a treaty with the German Reich." Unfortunately
this was the group which the present Prime Minister of Israel
chose to join."
Yitzhak Shamir, Prime Minister,
198384/8692, was a leader of the 'Stern Gang' when
it tried to ally with Hitler. He is an elder statesman in Israel's
ruling Likud Party. In the 1930s and 40s, several Likud leaders,
followers of Vladimir Jabotinsky's "Zionist-Revisionism,"
proclaimed themselves totalitarians.
Mortimer continued:
"That fact gives an extra
edge of topicality to what would in any case be a highly controversial
study of the Zionist record in the heyday of European fascism
by Lenni Brenner, an American Trotskyist writer who happens also
to be Jewish. It is short (250 pages), crisp and carefully documented.
Mr Brenner is able to cite numerous cases where Zionists collaborated
with anti-Semitic regimes, including Hitler's; he is careful
also to put on record the opposition to such policies within
the Zionist movement.
In retrospect these activities
have been defended as a distasteful but necessary expedient to
save Jewish lives. But Brenner shows that most of the time this
aim was secondary. The Zionist leaders wanted to help young,
skilled and able-bodied Jews to emigrate to Palestine. They were
never in the forefront of the struggle against fascism in Europe."
51 Documents includes complete
evidentiary texts re Zionist-Revisionist connections to Germany,
Italy and Japan, 1933-41, cited in Zionism in the Age of the
Dictators. That the Likud has a fascist history, likewise "gives
an extra edge of topicality" to 51 Documents' charges in
2005, the 70th anniversary of Mussolini's October 1935 invasion
of Ethiopia.
October also is the 10th anniversary
of the 1995 Million Man March, the largest demonstration in Black
American History. The Millions More Movement, the majority of
Black intellectual, political and religious leaders, has called
for another march on Washington. The Ethiopian anniversary will
naturally be commemorated at the gathering.
A jailed veteran of the Black
civil rights movement, I will be there. The demonstration has
been denounced by Abe Foxman of America's Anti-Defamation League
and Kenneth Stern of the American Jewish Committee, thus focusing
Black attention onto Zionism. I intend to satisfy their interest
by providing documentation of Zionism's alliances with white
racists, including Zionist-Revisionism's passionate support for
Mussolini's poison-gas war.
Indeed, Jabotinsky's 4/11/35
"Jews and Fascism: Some Remarks - and a Warning," admonished
Jews that
"there is also a much
more important reason for discontinuing to use the term 'Fascism'
as a cuss word in Jewish discussions. Fascism is today the official
doctrine of Italy, and Italy is one of those countries where
Jews enjoy full equality not only politically but also socially.
Such countries are not very numerous, and their number is, to
say the least, not increasing. It is very unwise to insist on
antagonizing one of them by turning to abuse a term and an idea
which is so highly cherished both by its rulers and by its youth....
Incidentally, the Permanent
Mandates Commission which supervises Palestinian affairs has
an Italian chairman. In short -- though of course I do not expect
street-urchins (irrespective of age) to follow an advice of caution
-- responsible leaders ought to take care."
He convinced Mussolini to train
his Betar youth group at Italy's naval academy. Their 3/36 L'Idea
Sionistica described them: "there are 49 cadets.... 30 of
them belong to the G(ioventù) U(niversitaria) F(ascista)."
That's Fascist University Youth. They marched alongside Mussolini's
soldiers in a pro-war demonstration and collected scrap metal
for Italy's arms industry.
In 1936, Revisionist financial
director Wolfgang von Weisl declared that
"although opinions among
the Revisionists varied, in general they sympathized with Fascism....
He, personally, was a supporter of Fascism, and he rejoiced at
the victory of Fascist Italy in Abyssinia as a triumph of the
White races against the Black."
Promptly accepting my challenge
to debate would give your Board and its Israeli colleagues an
opportunity to put rebuttal of my documentation in front of the
Black world, prior to the MMM event. That's more advantageous
to Zionism than waiting until after the damage is done and hoping
to repair it.
On the other hand, the public
will understand failure to accept my challenge to mean that the
Board cannot defend Zionism before the bar of history. This will
permit me to, in effect, debate an empty chair, a debate Zionism
must always lose.
In any case, I am sending this
email to you on Monday, May 23rd. If I do not get a reply from
you by May 31, expressing interest in a debate, I will assume
that the Board rejects the project and will so inform the public.
As a report of your intervention
with Amazon is already on the internet, I am also making our
present correspondence, my note of May 12th, yours of May 17th
and this note, immediately available to the public, while looking
forward to your reply.
Let me thank you, in advance,
for your time and trouble in this regard,
Lenni Brenner
***
Lenni Brenner is the editor of 51
Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis and a contributor
to The
Politics of Anti-Semitism. He is presently editing Jefferson
& Madison on Separation of Church and State: Writings on
Religion and Secularism. It will be published by Barricade
Books in late October. He can be reached at BrennerL21@aol.com.
|