|
July
19, 2003
"You Are What
You Do"
The
Future is Ours & We Shall be Heard.
By JULIAN BOND
This is the text of Julian
Bond's dramatic speech to the 2003 NAACP Convention held on July
13, 2003 in Miami, Florida.
It is of course a pleasure to be in Florida--the
state whose motto is, "It ain't over until your brother
counts the votes!"
You know last year we gathered in Texas.
Now maybe because both Florida and Texas are hot, both are home
to a particular species called the "bush". These "bushes"
are prickly and grow lopsided--they lean sharply to the right.
They are apparently an elusive, dwarf
variety because we in the NAACP have not seen these "bushes"
last year or this. But we intend to uproot the bigger "bush"
in 2004. And what better place to start than right here in Florida!
The theme of this year's convention is
"Having Our Say."
The abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison
wrote:
"I do not wish to think, or speak,
or write with moderation. I am in earnest. I will not equivocate.
I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will
be heard!"
We will have our say, and we will be
heard!
We meet during a year studded with important
anniversaries--celebrated events in the centuries-long struggle
for human rights.
One hundred and forty years ago, President
Abraham Lincoln announced the Emancipation Proclamation, freeing
slaves in states in armed rebellion against the United States.
One hundred years ago, W. E. B. DuBois
published The Souls of Black Folk, famously predicting that the
problem of the 20th Century would be the problem of the color
line.
Fifty-five years ago President Harry
Truman desegregated the American military.
Forty years ago last month, NAACP field
Secretary Medgar Evers was assassinated in Jackson, Mississippi.
And forty years ago next month, Martin
Luther King, Jr., fresh from the battlefields of Birmingham,
told the nation of his dream at the March on Washington.
And we meet in a place where NAACP history
dates to 1915, when the first Florida branch was started in Key
West. In 1916 W. E. B. DuBois came to Florida to energize our
members, as we gather this week to be energized again.
In 1917, James Weldon Johnson, himself
a native Floridian, organized Branches in Florida in his capacity
as our first National Field Secretary.
By 1926, perhaps decimated by World War
I, not a single dues-paying Florida Branch existed, but the NAACP
stayed in the fight. It took Chambers v. Florida to the United
States Supreme Court, saving an innocent black man from the electric
chair. In 1940, NAACP attorneys filed suit to equalize teachers'
salaries, the first such suit in the South.
When the Florida State Conference was
formed in 1941, Harry T. Moore became its President and later
its full-time Executive Secretary, along with officers E. D.
Davis, W. J. H. Black, Frank Burts, Emma Pickett, Mamie Mike,
and K. S. Johnson.
On Christmas night 1951, Harry T. Moore
and his wife, Harriet, joined the ranks of civil rights martyrs
when the KKK bombed their home, killing them both.
Moore's successor was Robert W. Saunders,
Sr., who died this year. When Bob Saunders replaced Harry T.
Moore, he stepped into big footprints, but he more than filled
them. He was brave and daring and innovative and hard working--and
we all miss him terribly.
After Brown v. Board, Thurgood Marshall targeted Florida, saying
of the state:
"We found not one instance on the
part of the political leadership to even consider the possibility
of desegregating."
The NAACP sued the school system here
in Dade County.
Florida fought back. They formed an infamous
body, known as the Johns Committee, to investigate the NAACP,
and it "embarked on a witch-hunt that would last for years."
But the NAACP helped to force desegregation
in the public schools of 20 Florida counties and attacked segregation
statewide--at service stations, cafeterias, in the Florida National
Guard, and the University of Florida. The list goes on and on.
As Bob Saunders wrote of the NAACP's
role in Florida during the 1960s,
"We welcomed others to the fight.
Still, we were here before the others came, and we were there
after some of them left."
And we're still here!
The Florida NAACP story is full of champions--Father
Theodore Gibson, Reverends A. Leon Lowery and C. K. Steele, Rutledge
Pearson, Charles Cherry, Flossie Currington, Ellen P. Greene--the
list is long.
Today, Florida is the fourth largest
state in the union, with a population becoming more diverse every
day. Whites account for 65 percent, blacks 15, Asians 2, and
Hispanics 17 percent.
We know that nationally, as in Florida,
Hispanics are now the largest minority, and we are reminded of
our need to make common cause with all who share our condition
and concerns. Although Latinos are less cohesive as a group than
blacks--identifying themselves by place of origin rather than
race and collectively lacking a shared history in the United
States--blacks and Latinos, as well as other minorities, will
move forward fastest if we move forward together.
We've said it again and again--in the
NAACP, we believe colored people come in all colors. Anyone who
shares our condition, values and concerns is more than welcome.
Although Florida boasts a diverse population
and has witnessed a huge growth in its minority student population,
its schools--in keeping with national trends--are becoming more
segregated. We know that when properly enforced, Brown v. Board
of Education does work--because we've seen it work, here in Florida
and elsewhere throughout the South.
In 1980, the average black student in
Florida, as a result of enforcement efforts under Brown, was
attending a school that was half white. By 2000, however, that
student's school was only about one-third white. We know that
"[s]egregation by race is strongly associated with concentrated
poverty and many forms of social inequality."
We've tried segregation, and it doesn't
work.
Governor Jeb Bush's notion of school
reform is going to send black children to reform schools. His
exit tests threaten to bar third-graders from advancing to fourth
grade and high school seniors from graduation. Florida loses
nearly half of its Black and Hispanic students before they graduate.
Which brings us to Jeb Bush's One Florida
Initiative--the first time any state's governor abolished affirmative
action in higher education, government employment, and state
contracting.
Maybe that's why he's not here--this
time, the Supreme Court didn't bail him out.
The Bush brothers are big on preemption.
First Governor Jeb Bush became the only governor to carry out
a preemptive strike on affirmative action, and then President
George Bush carried out a preemptive strike on Iraq, the only
President in our nation's history to attack a country which did
not threaten or attack us first. Both strikes were unnecessary
and unwise.
The NAACP tried unsuccessfully to block
the One Florida Initiative, which has turned out to be an abysmal
failure. In higher education, race-conscious undergraduate admissions
were replaced with the Talented 20 Program. "There is little
evidence," despite Governor Bush's premature pronouncements
to the contrary, that the Talented 20 Program "has done
anything to change the admissions prospects for Florida's public
high school students."
Despite this, the President praised his
little brother's Talented 20 Program, along with similar programs
in Texas and California, as "race neutral alternatives"
to affirmative action in the Michigan cases. These percent plans,
which guarantee admission to state universities for a fixed percentage
of the state's top high school graduates, suffer from numerous
deficiencies, not the least of which is that they depend for
any success on continued racial segregation in high schools.
In the process, they encourage students to remain in low-performing
segregated schools and discourage them "from taking challenging
classes that might lower their grade point averages."
And percent plans do nothing to increase
minority enrollments in private colleges or graduate and professional
schools.
The Administration's brief, of course,
discussed none of these infirmities in urging the Supreme Court
to consider such "race neutral" plans as a viable alternative
to affirmative action.
You know the Bush Administration likes
to use Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security
Advisor Condoleezza Rice as human shields against any criticism
of its record on civil rights. After all, the President is proud
of saying, his Administration is more diverse than any in history--except
the one that preceded it.
But the day after the administration
filed its brief in the Michigan cases, Ms. Rice issued a rare
statement on a domestic issue, saying, "[I]t is appropriate
to use race as one factor among others in achieving a diverse
student body."
And Ms. Rice has acknowledged that affirmative
action was responsible for her employment at Stanford University.
Secretary Powell, for his part, has long
been an outspoken advocate for affirmative action, and specifically
said he hoped Michigan would prevail in court.
Happily, Secretary Powell got his wish.
The Supreme Court held, for the first time, held "that student
body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify
the use of race in university admissions."
The Court struck down the points but
upheld the principle. Since the opponents kept telling us that
this was all about principle, I'd say we won!
The Supreme Court gave legal sanction
to what we knew to be morally, socially, and educationally correct.
We urge all the states which have abandoned
race-conscious affirmative action to come back into the Union.
We're going to monitor their commitment to the Supreme Court's
endorsement of race as a tool in achieving diversity.
Governor Bush, are you listening? We
will be heard!
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas,
affirmative action's poster child, opined that "every time
the government makes race relevant to the provision of burdens
or benefits, it demeans us all."
If only he had said that to the first
President Bush and, from the lofty perch of principle, declined
his nomination to the Supreme Court.
Justice Thomas begins his dissent in
the Michigan case by invoking Frederick Douglass for the proposition
that black people do not need the government's "interference"
and want to be "let alone."
Justice Thomas ought to recall that Frederick
Douglass also said this:
"If the American people could build
a schoolhouse in every valley; a church on every hilltop and
supply them with a teacher and preacher respectively and welcome
the descendants of the former slaves to all the moral and intellectual
benefits of the one and the other, without money and without
price, such a sacrifice would not compensate their children for
the terrible wrong done to their fathers and mothers, by their
enslavement and enforced degradation."
I believe Frederick Douglass would approve
of the descendants of slaves taking their rightful place at the
University of Michigan and elsewhere. Affirmative action represents
racial redress and restitution.
But "winning" in the Michigan
cases was considered "losing" when the Bakke case was
decided 25 years ago. What really happened in the Michigan cases
is that we avoided disaster. We cannot truly celebrate until
we achieve justice.
Our relief over the outcome of the Michigan
cases is further tempered by the knowledge that the opponents
of fairness are not going to accept defeat and disappear. The
average KKK member may be stupid, but the well-financed forces
of the radical right are not.
They say they believe in a color-blind
America, where race doesn't count. Sadly, in America, equal opportunity
is color-coded. What they really want is a color-free America,
and they think they'll get there by not counting race.
Ward Connerly, the California Terminator,
is back! This time he's sponsoring an information ban, which,
like his Proposition 209 in 1996, will threaten the state's efforts
to achieve justice and fairness. If it passes, it will hide racial
differences in health care, education, and disease, making it
harder to file discrimination complaints and to hold discriminatory
organizations and institutions responsible for their deeds.
It will keep the state from collecting
much-needed demographic information by race, but as long as race
counts in America, we've got to count race.
If it passes, California will keep track
of every kind of discrimination except discrimination by race
and ethnicity. Studies on racial profiling, disparate medical
treatment for people of color, black and white rates of incarceration,
racial composition of juries, pass/fail rates for students of
different races, loan approval rates for blacks--knowing all
this and more will be forbidden.
The only color Connerly recognizes is
the color of money. After years of loudly complaining about the
so-called "civil rights industry", he's created a lucrative
multi-million dollar career fighting fairness. He says he's non-profit
but not if you look at his paycheck.
He made four times the salary of the
governor of California last year--$700,000. In the four years
ending in June 2002, he made $2.1 million dollars.
Friends, we're in the wrong end of the
civil rights business if we expect to get rich. Our payday comes
in civil rights victories; his comes in civil rights defeats.
We're doing good doing democracy's work; he's fighting democracy
and doing quite well.
Now even though, or perhaps because,
the United States Supreme Court has given approval to affirmative
action at the University of Michigan, he intends to make Michigan
his next target, along with several other states and cities.
In considering the University of Michigan
cases, only Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justices Souter and Breyer,
directly confronted the realities of our past and present, saying:
"[W]e are not far distant from an
overtly discriminatory past, and the effects of centuries of
law-sanctioned inequality remain painfully evident in our communities
and schools."
"In the wake 'of a system of racial caste only recently
ended,' large disparities endure."
Justice Ginsburg acknowledged what we
know to be true:
"Unemployment, poverty, and access
to health care vary disproportionately by race. Neighborhoods
and schools remain racially divided. African-American and Hispanic
children are all too often educated in poverty-stricken and under
performing institutions. Adult African-Americans and Hispanics
generally earn less than whites with equivalent levels of education.
Equally credentialed job applicants receive different receptions
depending on their race. Irrational prejudice is still encountered
in real estate markets and consumer transactions."
She could have mentioned payday lending.
Two years ago, our North Carolina State President and Board member
Skip Alston rightly called it "exploitation, pure and simple.
Tolerating this practice is unworthy of a society that claims
to value its most vulnerable."
By convention resolutions in 2000 and
last year and by a Board resolution this year, we've set binding
policy on this issue for the NAACP from the smallest to largest
Branches to the national staff. We despise this predatory practice
that targets the poor, especially blacks. Charging annual interest
rates of 390%, these companies prey on the weak, trapping them
in unending cycles of debt. We won't take their money, and we'll
do our best to stop them from taking money from others.
We will be heard!
Justice Ginsburg could have included
the gross racial inequalities in our criminal justice system.
As Richard Pryor said, "justice is just us!"
Although whites and blacks use illegal
drugs at roughly the same rates, 55% of all those in jail or
prison nationwide for drug violations are black and 30% are Latino.
An estimated 12 percent of black men
between the ages of 20 and 34 are incarcerated, the highest rate
ever measured. Among white men in the same age group, the rate
is 1.6 percent.
Racial disparities exist throughout the
criminal justice system, including in the imposition of the death
penalty.
Florida's death row population trails
only California and Texas. At least in Florida, the sun recently
has shone on wrongful capital convictions. The largest number
of cases in which someone was exonerated after being condemned
to death row have occurred here in the Sunshine State.
Racial disparities also exist throughout
our economic system. In 2001, for example, a college-educated
white man earned an average salary of $65,000, while black and
Hispanic men earned 30% less. The typical white family has a
net worth more than eight times larger than that of its black
counterpart.
Into this mass of economic inequality
marches the President for the rich.
The civil rights community was absolutely
right when we warned that great harm would come from the foolish,
risky tax bill of 2001 that gave millions to the rich. It has
become clear that our warnings were absolutely right.
It did not stimulate economic growth.
It did not provide tax relief for most Americans. In fact, it
succeeded only in fulfilling the worst predictions of those of
us who opposed it--it squandered a once-in-a-lifetime budget
surplus on an unwise tax cut that primarily benefited the wealthy,
and it continues to threaten Medicare and Social Security Trust
Funds.
To make up for just the initial tax cuts,
we would have to cut spending by $5 billion dollars five days
a week for over a year. That was always the point--not just to
further enrich the already wealthy, but also to starve and bleed
the government, making it unable to meet human needs, signing
a death warrant for social programs for decades and decades to
come.
Now they have made matters even worse.
Even as our troops were marching forward toward Baghdad, Congress
was marching backward toward even greater deficits and even more
tax cuts for the rich.
We learned when Ronald Reagan was President
that trickle-down economics don't work. Tax cuts don't trickle
down--instead they've helped create a downpour of debt and a
flood of fiscal disaster for states from coast to coast. The
result is swamped state budgets, closed schools and hospitals,
and cuts in programs serving the poor.
The nation's governors warn that state
deficits are the largest in more than 50 years. Some states are
saving money by unscrewing every third light bulb, having teachers
serve as janitors, releasing prisoners before their sentences
expire, laying off teachers, cutting financial aid, closing schools.
And this in the richest country in the
world!
The Administration also has declared
its intention to farm out 850,000 federal jobs to private companies.
And they've proposed new overtime rules that could cause 8 million
workers, including some who earn as little as $22,100 a year,
to lose their right to overtime pay.
Their proposal is a job-killer, and an
instruction manual to employers on how to lay off workers and
force the ones they keep to work double hours for free.
The Administration is engaged in a relentless
assault on the wage economy, part of its plan to favor the privileged
over the people.
The President called his tax giveaway
a "Jobs and Growth" plan. The only growth we've seen
is in millionaires' bank accounts and the number of black people
standing in unemployment lines.
Last month the unemployment rate rose
to 6.4 percent, the highest in nine years. And "the number
of employed blacks shrank while the number of employed whites
grew."
The White House says its tax cut has
yet to kick in, but the failing economy is already kicking us!
Unemployment for blacks in June was more
than twice the rate for whites.
You cannot patch the leaky economy--or
any other domestic problem--with duct tape and plastic sheets.
You don't show compassion by offering
guests at the millionaires' banquet second helpings and an extra
dessert.
We would do well to recall the wise counsel
of President Franklin Roosevelt who said:
"The test of our progress is not
whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much;
it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
We are meeting in "the poorest big
city in the United States--poorer than Newark, poorer than Detroit,
poorer than any city with a population of 250,000 or more."
Just a few minutes drive away from here is the gateway to Fisher
Island, an exclusive enclave that, according to the 2000 census,
is the wealthiest community in America.
While we add to the abundance of those
in Fisher Island, and provide less than ever to the poor in Miami,
our nation is regressing, not progressing.
We know there is an appalling double
standard played out on Florida's shores between the treatment
received by Haitian and Cuban immigrants--the Haitians are given
the back of America's hand and the Cubans a hearty handshake
and a loud "welcome aboard."
One problem faced by hardworking immigrants
is found in abundance here in Florida--the exploitation and near
peonage of farm workers. Our units here in Florida have worked
to improve their lives, and we support efforts nationwide to
enable them to earn a decent wage under safe and secure conditions.
We've invited representatives of all
the Caribbean nations to come to this convention to share their
problems and the problems their nationals face in the United
States.
We know America's policy makers often
ignore this section of the globe, except as a pawn in the great
power struggles of the past.
So too do America's policy makers often
ignore Africa, choosing neglect over concern and engagement,
so we applaud President Bush's trip there last week.
But while we are pleased that the President
has discovered Africa, the continent needs more than an exotic
photo-op presidential visit.
Solutions to Africa's problems must not
be dependent on free market fundamentalism. The United States
must adopt a multilateral approach to African problems generated
by colonialism's legacy and decades of war, famine, and autocratic
leadership. We must work for cancellation of Africa's unsustainable
and largely illegitimate debt. We must fully fund the fight against
Africa's AIDS pandemic, not just fret over it. Africa deserves
her fair share of American attention, American trade, and American
aid. Egypt and Israel alone receive as much US aid as do all
the African nations south of the Sahara.
Just as we have work to do abroad, we
have work to do at home.
This Administration has not been good
for civil rights. It has not been good for civil liberties. It
has not been good for democracy.
What better place than here and what
better time than now to recall the travesty of the 2000 election.
You all know the story--Governor Bush's
administration hired a firm to purge the voter rolls, and purge
them they did, removing the qualified and the ineligible with
equal eagerness, 94,000 in all. This was truly a weapon of mass
voting rights destruction.
By the way, the man who ran that purge
got a reward--today he is in the Voting Rights Section of the
Department of Justice as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General
for Civil Rights.
Witnesses told the sorry story of voter
suppression and nullification in Florida at our hearings after
the election. They described police stops near polling places,
demands for multiple forms of identification from people who
had voted for decades, long-time voters' names missing from the
rolls, a long and too-familiar litany of the sorts of activities
practiced for years across the country to keep racial minorities
from the polls.
With our coalition partners we filed
and won a lawsuit, NAACP v. Smith, and received promises that
what happened in 2000 will not happen again. But it has been
happening for years, in Florida and elsewhere across the country.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
tried to keep Hispanics from voting in his native Arizona as
a young lawyer; that experience must have served him well when
Bush v. Gore came before him years later.
Despite all this, black Americans voted
with the American majority on Election Day 2000. NAACP efforts
then helped increase the African-American share of the total
vote by 25 percent or more in four states. Two million more voters
cast ballots in 2000 than did in 1996. Turnout in Texas increased
50 percent, in Florida by 60 percent, and in Missouri by a whopping
124 percent! More than a million African-Americans voted here
in Florida, accounting for 15 percent of the total--a state record.
We did less well in 2002--and you saw
the result.
But what happened in the 2002 midterm
elections also illustrated the politicization of patriotism and
terrorism. In the Georgia Senate race, the Republicans used false
patriotism to destroy a true patriot.
The incumbent, Max Cleland, is a Vietnam
War veteran. He lost his right arm and both legs in battle. He
also lost his Senate seat--when his opponent questioned his patriotism.
Cleland had voted against the Homeland Security Act because it
didn't provide protection for workers' rights.
His opponent ran an ad with pictures
of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, implying that the war
veteran and triple amputee didn't love his country enough to
help in the nation's fight against terrorists.
Republican Senator John McCain called
the ad "worse than disgraceful, it's reprehensible."
If Hispanics, blacks and whites turnout
in 2004 in the same percentages as they did in 2000, the no-show
National Guardsman in the White House and his draft avoiding
Vice President will lose by three million votes.
That's why voter registration and voter
turnout must be a top priority for every Branch and every State
Conference from now to election day. The countdown starts now.
If a Branch isn't registering voters and isn't preparing now
for a grassroots turnout program next year, it isn't doing its
job.
Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "You
are what you do!" What you do between now and election day
next year will decide who you are--and will decide what kind
of world we live in.
We've invited all of the Democratic candidates
for President to a forum here. By their presence and their words,
they will let you know that they are interested in your vote.
We invited the Republican candidate for
President too, but he can't come. He couldn't come last year
when we were in his home state--and so was he. He couldn't come
to our Annual Convention in New Orleans two years ago either.
But he did come to our convention in
Baltimore--when he was a candidate, and we hope he will honor
the invitation we intend to issue next year.
We are and always have been nonpartisan.
We've never endorsed a candidate for public office or a political
party, and we never will.
But being nonpartisan doesn't mean being
non-critical. And it doesn't even mean criticizing all parties
equally. If the Democrats were doing anything, we'd criticize
them too.
But one party controls the presidency,
the Congress, and the Supreme Court--all three branches of the
national government. And the press increasingly reflects and
reinforces this one-party control.
One party repeatedly plays the race card,
appealing to the dark underside of American culture, to that
minority of Americans who reject democracy and equality.
In coded racial appeals, they embrace
Confederate leaders as patriots and wallow in a victim mentality.
They preach racial neutrality and practice
racial division. They celebrate Martin Luther King and misuse
his message.
Their idea of reparations is to give
war criminal Jefferson Davis a pardon.
Their idea of equal rights is the American
flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side.
Speaking of the Confederate swastika,
my former home state of Georgia rates last in the nation in SAT
scores. Before they think about raising the Confederate flag
again, they ought to raise their SAT scores!
We meet as our nation seems doomed to
a punishing war of occupation in Iraq, war whose rationale has
changed repeatedly--before it started and today. Theirs was an
ever shifting and constantly rotating reason for war--first regime
change, then ties to terrorism, and then the invisible weapons
of mass destruction.
Last fall the NAACP opposed unilateral
war against Iraq, but we do not confuse opposition to the war
with a lack of support for our fighting forces. We commend the
bravery and sacrifice of our women and men in uniform, who represent
all races and faiths.
More than most of American society, our
military reflects the diversity of our nation. We mourn the lives
lost, almost 20% of them black, almost twice the percentage of
African-Americans in the population.
We have invited Specialist Shoshanna
Johnson, the brave African-American woman taken prisoner during
the war, to attend our Military Affairs Dinner Wednesday night.
But we'll continue to have our say.
At the NAACP, we long ago learned our
lesson about not speaking out in times of war.
In the summer of 1918, on the eve of
America's entry into World War I, one of our founders, Dr. W.
E. B. DuBois, urged blacks "to forget our special grievances
and close ranks shoulder to shoulder with our fellow citizens
and the allied nations that are fighting for democracy."
The criticism he faced then was immediate
and loud. He quickly reversed his position and realized then--as
we must realize now--that when wars are fought to save democracy,
the first casualty is usually democracy itself.
We ought to remember the words of Ohio
Senator Robert Taft, who said two weeks after Pearl Harbor was
attacked:
"I believe there can be no doubt
that criticism in time of war is essential to the maintenance
of any kind of democratic government."
And the words of President Theodore Roosevelt,
who said in 1918,
"To announce that there must be
no criticism of the President, or to stand by the President,
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally
treasonous to the American public."
So we will continue to oppose any nominee
to the federal courts who opposes us--such as William Pryor,
whose nomination to this Circuit's Court of Appeals is pending.
Pryor, currently Alabama's Attorney General, is a right wing
extremist. He has consistently demonstrated hostility toward
civil rights and voting rights. His nomination is an affront
and his confirmation would be a disaster.
As war continues abroad, the attack on
our liberties at home marches on.
We who know firsthand the evils of racial
profiling must not tolerate its use against others in the name
of national security. We also know firsthand the evils of law
enforcement choosing their targets based on advocacy and association.
We have an attorney general who has abandoned
the "attorney" part of his title. He has cast aside
civilian courts in favor of military tribunals. He has "seized
for himself the power to monitor confidential attorney-client
conversations without judicial oversight. The USA Patriot Act
allows agents to seize business records, search a home or get
information about a person's web surfing activity with minimal
judicial review. It also allows the FBI to monitor telephone
or email communications without demonstrating probable cause."
We ought to remind John Ashcroft that
the holiday we celebrate each July 4th commemorates revolutionaries
who threw off the chains of privilege and arrogant power that
were then--and remain today--the primary threats to freedom and
human advancement.
If a dead man beat John Ashcroft in 2000,
surely we can beat back his ideological assault on our Constitution.
Many of you remember when Senator Paul
Wellstone addressed us at our convention in Minneapolis. Since
last we met, we lost this powerful voice for the powerless. But
he speaks to us still:
"I do not believe the future will
belong to those who are content with the present. The future
will belong to those who have passion, and to those grassroots
heroes who are willing to make the personal commitment to make
our country better. The future will belong to those who believe
in the beauty of their dreams."
The future belongs to us. We will be
heard.
Julian Bond
has been Chairman of the NAACP Board of Directors since February
1998. He is a Distinguished Professor in the School of Government
at American University in Washington, DC, and a Professor of
History at the University of Virginia. He can be reached at:
bond@counterpunch.org
Copyright 2003 by Julian Bond
Weekend Edition Features for July 12/13, 2003
Arthur
Mitzman
The Double Wall Before the Future
Standard
Schaefer
The Coming Financial Reality: an
Interview with Michael Hudson
John Feffer
A Fearful Symmetry: Washington and Pyongyang
Ron
Jacobs
Shades of Gray in Iran
Elaine
Cassel
Judicial Terrorism Against the Bill of Rights
Tom
Stephens
Civil Liberties After 9/11
David Lindorff
New White House Slogan: "Case Closed. Just Move On"
Jason
Leopold
The Mini-War Against Iraq Prior to 9/11
Lee Sustar
What's Behind the Crisis in Liberia?
Mickey
Z.
AIDS Dissent and Africa
Sam Hamod
Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Race or Ethnic Group
Ramzy
Baroud
Awaiting Justice on an Old Blanket
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Savage Incongruities: the Photographic Life of Lee Miller
Adam
Engel
Parable of the Lobbyist
Robert
Sanders
A Review of Ralph Lopez's American Dream
Poets'
Basement
Albert, Witherup, Guthrie
Keep CounterPunch
Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
home / subscribe
/ about us / books
/ archives / search
/ links /
|