home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: Labor's Historic No to Bush's War: Joann Wypijewski reports; Who is Barry Rubin? Inside the Israeli Pro-War Lobby; What's Next for the Peace Movement? Elected Greens in Oregon Push for Impeachment; Dirty Bombs: the Legacy of Depleted Uranium. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Recent Stories

April 10, 2003

Zoltan Grossman
The Perils of Occupation: the Easier the Victory, the Harder the Peace

Uri Avnery
The Night After

Wayne Madsen
The Telltale Signs of Empire

Ron Jacobs
Bush and Rummy's Drunken Drive-by

David Krieger
Before You Become Too Flushed with Victory, Think of Ali Ismaeel Abbas

Jeremy Brecher
What Can the World Do Now That Tanks Prowl Baghdad?

Robert Jensen
The Unseen War

Geoffrey Neale
Ashcroft's War on the Constitution: A Patriot Attack on America

Jeffrey St. Clair
Last Tango in Baghdad

Hammond Guthrie
Rumors of War

Joseph Heller
Nately's Old Man

Steve Perry
War Web Log 4/10

Website of the Day
The Third Page

 

April 9, 2003

David Lindorff
Secret Bechtel Docs Reveal: Yes, the War Is About Oil

Doug Lummis
Saving Private Lynch: Hollywood and War

Susan Davis
The New York Times and the Peace Movement

David Vest
Smoking Gun? You're Watching It

John Chuckman
America's Sovereign Right to Do as It Damn Well Pleases

Akiva Eldar
Gary Bauer and AIPAC: an Unholy Alliance with the Christian Right

Ray Hanania
Suicide Bombers without the Suicide: Racism, Hypocrisy and the War on Iraq

Steve Perry
War Web Log 4/9

 

April 8, 2003

David Lindorff
Killing the Messengers: It Doesn't Matter If It's Deliberate or Accidental

Richard Lichtman
Dr. Phil in the Trenches

John Brown
Why Uncle Ben Hasn't Sold Uncle Sam: a Former Foreign Service Staffer on Bush's Policy Failures

Ben Terrall
Report from the Oakland Docks: "The Cops Had No Reason to Open Up on Them"

Jason Leopold
FERC and Wall Street: Conversations May Have Violated Federal Law

Anthony Gancarski
Conyers Heeds the Call on Perle

Linda Heard
Journalists Die, the Networks Lie, Iraqis Ask "Why?"

Ahmad Faruqui
Wallowing in Hypocrisy

Wallace Gagne
Baghdad Babble

Harry Browne
Report from the Protests at the Bush/Blair Summit

Larry Kearney
I Understand There's a Boy in a Baghdad Hospital

Steve Perry
War Web Log 4/8

M. Shahid Alam
The Israelization of America

 

April 7, 2003

Todd Chretien
Wooden Bullets & Grenades: Oakland Cops Attack Peace Protesters and Dock Workers

David N. Gibbs
Spying, Secrecy and the University: The CIA is Back on Campus

Harry Browne
War and Peace Summit a Royal Farce

Gideon Levy
America is Not a Role Model

Diane Christian
A Scene from an Obscene War

Jules Rabin
Remembering Deir Yassin

James Davis
Oddsmaking in Dublin: Will Bush Shake Gerry's Hand?

Robert Fisk
The Twisted Language of War

Patrick Cockburn
Slaughter on the Road to Dibagah

John Mackay
War and Art

Seth Sandronsky
Wars and the Color Line

Steve Perry
War Web Log 4/7

 

April 5, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
The Iraqi Humanitarian Relief is in Shambles

Anne Gwynne
A Drowning in Salem

Uri Avnery
Roadmap to Nowhere

Chris Floyd
Hell for Leather: Bombs, Bullets, Bibles and Bush

William Cook
Would You Have Sent Your Son (or Daughter) Off to War If...

Gila Svirsky
A Busy Day for Bulldozers

Mike Ferner
Back from Baghdad: What Next for the Peace Movement?

Joanne Mariner
Civilian Deaths and Official Apologies

John Stanton
Bush Takes His Killing Orders from the Lord

Romi Mahajan
Learning to Count the Dead

Aluf Benn
After Iraq, US Vows to Deal with Other Mideast Regimes

Mary Ellen Peterson
Gay Marine Refuses to Fight

William MacDougall
Country Music and the Crimes of Patriotism

Ron Jacobs
War and Occupation

Bernie Pattison
Aborigines and the Different God

Mark Engler
Iraq War as Arms Expo

Adam Engel
Li'l Box of Love: a Novelini

Poets' Basement
Tripp, Albert, Katz

Jeffrey St. Clair
Flesh and Its Discontents: the Paintings of Lucian Freud

Norman Madarasz
Canada and the War

 

April 4, 2003

Anthony Gancarski
Colin Powell's Shame

John Chuckman
Was Einstein Right About Israel?

David Krieger
The Meaning of Victory

Tom Gorman
The Mantra of the Troops: Support or Treason?

Adam Federman
The Absence of War

Vijay Prashad
There Are No More Arguments

Tom Stephens
The End of the Innocence

Mickey Z.
Makes Me Sic (Sic): Copy Editing Bush Speak

Pierre Tristam
War Coverage: a Dishonest Reality Show

Hammond Guthrie
The Deadly Mihrab

Steve Perry
War Web Log 04/04

 

April 3, 2003

Uri Avnery
A Crooked Mirror: Presstitution and the Theater of Operations

David Vest
Can You Hear the Silence?

Anthony Gancarski
Colin Powell Telemarketer

David Lindorff
Takoma: the Dolphin Who Refused to Fight

Michael Roberts
War, Debts and Deficits

Ramzy Baroud
Now That Iraqis Are Being Killed Is Israel Any More Secure?

Jo Wilding
From Baghdad with Tears

Anton Antonowicz
Cluster Bombs on Babylon

Alison Weir
Israel, We Won't Forget Rachel Corrie

Bruce Jackson
Hating Wolf Blitzer's Voice

Eliot Katz
War's First Week

Steve Perry
War Web Log 04/03

 

Hot Stories

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.


Burn Your Sweatshop Clothes!
Buy Union Made Apparel!

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

April 11, 2003

The NeoCons Have a Dream

Permanent Occupation

by MICHAEL BERRY

The neocons have a dream. A dream of celebrations in the Iraqi streets at the site of rolling US tanks. Women waving out from windows, men dancing at the edge of the roads, tossing turbans into the air, children riding on the 20 foot long barrels of the tanks, eating pink cotton candy handed down with a warm smile from the helmeted drivers who spin it in the tank cabin.

It could be the Shi-ites of southern Iraq having a memory of slaughter after the US encouraged them to rise against Hussein in 1991. It could be Iraqis having intimate knowledge of the effects the US lead emargo produced over the last 12 years-intimate in the sense that they watch as their children perish from malnutrition. It could be from a correct suspicion that the US isn't really coming to liberate them (is it ethical to accept gifts from the devil?). The failure of Iraqis to welcome the liberating invaders with open arms may not depend primarily on any of these things.

It is human nature to reject any outside, foreign elements that appear by force and without invitation. It is an instinctual reaction. People are naturally prone to cling to the power of their home. Home is to be least feared, even if the power of home is frightening. So much so that even if the current US invasion actually was Operation Iraqi Freedom, or if the Iraqis sensed that, there would still be resistence to the US forces.

We Americans, our imaginations beaten into total submission by our own homegrown dictator, the media, should reflect on such a scenario occuring in our own home: Another country has decided that it wants to free us of our ruling dictators, the few giant corporations that run our state propaganda machine, the media. The liberating country is composed entirely of non-white people. And they're not Christian. In fact they think we're all going to hell, after being freed in this life. Their fighterjets drop leaflets on our cities, which inform us of our coming liberation, and which asks us nicely not to resist. The leaflets go on to explain that though our media dictatorship is not obviously destructive to our freedom, as some oppressive regimes are in other countries, it is the case that our media has programmed as all so deeply, so effectively that our lack of freedom is unconscious to us.

The leaflets explain that in fact we are no more than mere robots acting out the wishes of the media giants, our evil dictators. And again they ask us nicely to not resist their invasion, and to have a nice day. Military divisions of the country amass on our borders, in Mexico and Canada, who were paid well by the liberating country for their services. Missiles begin to hail on our major cities. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Houston. We are told that the missiles are aimed specifically at the corporate headquaters of our media dictators, and all other structures and systems of power associated with them. We experience total blackouts, our water is cut off, and our supplies. Our military, loyal to the bitter end to our media dictators, fight noble and risky battles, but are no match for the invading liberating forces. Victory goes to the liberating forces. Our media dictators have been destroyed. We are told that we are now free. But they need to stick around for a while, to help us set up an information network that tells the truth, rather than the evil lies of our deceased media dictators. We are told that once they set up new media outlets for us, then we will be free to transmit any information we like. Under one condition: that our new people-run media outlets only say what they want us to say.... Such instinctual resistence has no conscience: new free elections may vote out the liberating heretics without so much as a thank you. At least not a majority thank you. Yet there is something suspicious in the neocon's expression of their dream, which some call a hubris that will lead to massive errors and chaos in Iraq and the region. It is suspected that Wolfowitz and Perle don't give much of a damn about chaos, collatoral damage, Americans perishing in suicide attacks (or "terrorist homicide attacks," as according to Ari Fleischer). In fact the neocons may prefer it. Perpetual instablity is the single best breeder of excuses for further US military excursions, full invasions and regime changes. A US agent in control of the new "liberated" administration in many countries of the region, except Israel-this is their end of means. Or at least a pleasant dream. They can also find evil-doing dictators in other countries, for example Chavez, and even much oil, in Venezuela, and continue their dreams elsewhere.

Claiming the invasions would be easy and be met with celebrations are sufficient lies. The media dispatches the necessary propaganda to keep the US population properly numb to the facts--being the only population in the world capable of stopping the US neocon war machine.

One question regarding non-celebratory reluctant or dismissive participation by Iraqis in a post-war environment is what would happen if, now free and democratic, voted out all liberating US entities and their interests, military, administrative, and business. That would not be allowed to happen. What does that mean, not allowed to happen?

Wolfowitz has lately been espousing great notions of pure democracy for Iraqis. He told the Duke of Sunday Spin Tim Russert that "the goal is not to install some particular group as the new leaders of Iraq. That absolutely contradicts the whole notion of democracy." And furthermore, "The oil revenues of Iraq, now, for the first time in decades will be dedicated to the welfare of the Iraqi people instead of building up the instruments of a tyrannical state." The neocons have a dream. This almost seems to suggest that it would be fine and well if the free Iraqi democracy voted out of Iraq all US interests. In fact that seems to be what Wolfowitz intends to be the case anyway.

Perhaps he's assuming a free democratic Iraq will always vote in US interests.

What if representatives of an Iraqi electorate, performing the will of their districts, construct policies that do not favor US interests? Based on history one could suspect that those elected officials might begin to mysteriously disappear or be filled with bullets. Suggestive precedents abound, such as Pinochet and the death of the elected president Allende of Chile, Kissinger's role in coordinating that coup, and of other such covert diplomatic excursions by the US around the world.

The US will claim that Iraq is not yet stable enough for them to leave. For Iraq's own benefit, they had better stay. No doubt they'll claim terrorism still lurking in the dark alleys of Baghdad.

Michael Berry can be reached at: michael.berry@jacobs.com

Today's Features

Zoltan Grossman
The Perils of Occupation: the Easier the Victory, the Harder the Peace

Uri Avnery
The Night After

Wayne Madsen
The Telltale Signs of Empire

David Krieger
Before You Become Too Flushed with Victory, Think of Ali Ismaeel Abbas

Jeremy Brecher
What Can the World Do Now That Tanks Prowl Baghdad?

Robert Jensen
The Unseen War

Geoffrey Neale
Ashcroft's War on the Constitution: A Patriot Attack on America

Jeffrey St. Clair
Last Tango in Baghdad

Hammond Guthrie
Rumors of War

Joseph Heller
Nately's Old Man

Steve Perry
War Web Log 4/10

Website of the Day
The Third Page

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /