home / subscribe / donate / tower / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events / faq
What You're Missing in Our Subscriber-only CounterPunch Newsletter A Just Settlement for the Middle East Our new CounterPunch newsletter, just out, offers Michael Neumann's plan for a just settlement in the Middle East. Manuel Garcia concludes his widely applauded primer on the laws of physics and the myths of conspiracists by explainging the not-so-mysterious collapse of WTC 7. But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation towards the cost of this online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now
Get CounterPunch By Email for Only $35 a Year
|
Today's Stories November 22, 2006 Kathleen Christiston November 21, 2006 Robert Bryce John V. Walsh Luis Hernandez Navarro Kevin Zeese Peter Rost, MD Evelyn Pringle Roger Morris Don Monkerud Website of the Day
November 20, 2006 David H. Price Col. Dan Smith Katherine Hughes Dave Himmelstein Robert Jensen Joe Mowrey Mike Whitney Carl N. McDaniel Robert Fisk Ramzy Baroud Website of the Day
November 18
/ 19, 2006 Alexander Cockburn Ralph Nader Barucha Calamity Peller John Ross Dave Lindorff Fred Gardner Ron Jacobs Larry Portis Frida Berrigan Wes Enzinna Elizabeth Schulte Peter Rost,
MD Martha Rosenberg Seth Sandronsky Missy Beattie Adam Engel Jeffrey St. Clair Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend
November 17, 2006 Greg Grandin Joseph Massad Kevin Zeese Gideon Levy Bill Quigley David Swanson Sherry Wolf Jerry Beisler Website of the Day
November 16, 2006 Kathy Kelly Col. Douglas
MacGregor Norman Solomon Nikki Thanos Cindy Sheehan Lena Khalaf
Tuffaha Gloria La Riva Pat Williams Kerry Joyce CP News Service David Letterman James Ridgeway Website of
the Day
November 15, 2006 Jennifer Loewenstein David Rosen Ashley Smith Landau / Hassen Walden Bello Sibel Edmonds Austin / Bernstein Yitzhak Laor James Rothenberg Gail Dines Website of the Day
Werther Ray McGovern John Walsh David MacMichael William S.
Lind Sharon Smith Laura Carlsen Ron Jacobs Peter Rost,
MD Carol Norris Website of
the Day
November 13, 2006 Kathleen and
Bill Christison Bill Quigley Paul Craig Roberts Uri Avnery Joe DeRaymond Norman Finkelstein Col. Dan Smith Shepherd Bliss Dave Lindorff Missy Beattie Trenticosta / Fleming
Weekend Edition John Walsh Barucha Calamity
Peller Al Krebs Niall Meehan Conn Hallinan Patrick Cockburn Gary Leupp P. Sainath Nikolas Kozloff Lawrence R.
Velvel Fred Gardner Ralph Nader Ben Terrall / John Miller Mike Whitney Joshua Frank Mukul Dube Jason Hribal Daniel Wolff Michael Donnelly Lord Montague Poets' Basement
November 10, 2006 Alexander Cockburn Marjorie Cohn Jorge Mariscal Gregory Elich Joshua Frank Megan Boler Ramzy Baroud Farzana Versey Roberto Rodriguez Cartoon of
the Day
November 9, 2006 Jennifer Loewenstein Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Manuel Garcia,
Jr. Mike Whitney Alan Maass Robert Jensen Nicola Nasser John Chuckman Jamal Juma Felice Pace Website of
the Day
November 8, 2006 Alexander Cockburn
/ Jeffrey St. Clair Lawrence E.
Walsh Bruce K. Gagnon Neve Gordon Dave Lindorff Arthur Neslen Joshua Frank James Goodman Charles Sullivan David Swanson Missy Beattie Dr. Susan Block Website of the Day
November 7, 2006 Michael Neumann Paul Wolf Nikolas Kozloff Eliza Ernshire William S. Lind Mike Ferner Felice Pace Chris Genovali Gilad Atzmon Dick J. Reavis Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg Website of
the Day Question of the Day
November 6, 2006 Alexander Cockburn Norman Solomon Robert Fisk Marjorie Cohn Paul Craig Roberts Nikolas Kozloff Newton Garver Mike Whitney Jesse Hagopian Dr. Peter Rost,
MD Website of
the Day
November 4 / 5, 2006 Dave Zirin Patrick Cockburn Sanho Tree Ralph Nader Lee Sustar Dr. Shepherd Bliss Adam Elkus Seth Sandronsky Fred Gardner Joshua Sperber Evelyn Pringle Mitchel Cohen Missy Beattie Michael Dickinson John Holt Dr. Susan Block Poets' Basement
Laura Carlsen Stephan Said John Stauber Mike Whitney Joshua Frank Victoria Furio Tammara~85,441 Stuart Croswaithe Missy Beattie Website of
the Day
Winslow T.
Wheeler Paul Craig
Roberts Dave Lindorff Uri Avnery Jeff Birkenstein John Ross Zoltan Grossman Eveyln Pringle Christopher
Brauchli
November 1, 2006 Alan Dershowitz
v. Bruce Jackson Brian Tokar Fred Leonhardt Richard W.
Behan Brenda Norrell Charles Sullivan Ron Jacobs Mike Knapp Moshe Adler Walden Bello Lee Ballinger Joshua Frank Carl Gelderloos Peter Rost,
MD Saul Landau Website of the Day
William S.
Lind Stephen S.
Pearcy Uri Avnery Michael Colby Sunsara Taylor Ben Beachy Edward Humes Roger Burbach Subcomandante Marcos Niranjan Ramakrishnan Sharon Smith Website of
the Day
October 30, 2006 Robert Fisk Bruce Jackson Norman Solomon Lance Selfa Ali Khan Lee Sustar Robert Jensen Akiva Eldar Tim Montague Brian M. Downing Website of the Day
Jeffrey St.
Clair Maher Arar David Rosen Gregory Elich Tom Barry Jeff Taylor Dave Lindorff Ron Jacobs Maurus Chino Christopher
Brauchli Sherwood Ross Rev. William
Alberts Aseem Shrivastava Saul Landau
/ Farrah Hassen Russ Fine / Dee Fine Seth Sandronsky Michael Carmichael Joe Allen David Vest Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend
October 26, 2006 Ismael Hossein-zadeh Carlos Zorrilla Paul Craig Roberts Mike Whitney Lily Hughes Jennifer Matsui Tim Matson Stephen Fleischman Missy Beattie Patrick Cockburn Website of the Day
October 25, 2006 Michael Donnelly John Stanton John Ross Conn Hallinan Robert Jensen Johnny Barber Bruce K. Gagnon Daniel McGowan James J. Brittain Peter Harley Jonathan Cook Shepherd Bliss Website of
the Day
October 24, 2006 John Walsh M. Shahid Alam Dr. Trudy Bond Michael Phillips Dave Lindorff David Phinney Laura Carlsen Pierre Tristam Marguerite
Rose Jimenez Website of
the Day
October 23, 2006 Saree Makdisi Joshua Frank Fred Gardner Ralph Nader Ron Jacobs Norman Solomon Richard Manning Neil Kitson William MacDougall Gilad Atzmon Werther Website of
the Day
October 20 / 22, 2006 Alexander Cockburn Gary Leupp Brian Cloughley Dave Zirin William Blum Christopher
Brauchli Winslow Wheeler Michael Donnelly Fred Gardner Susie Day Lucinda Marshall Fred Wilcox Alan Maass Lee Sustar Ariadna Theokopoulos Missy Beattie CP News Wire CP News Services Poets' Basement Website of
the Weekend
October 19, 2006 Elaine Cassel Col. Dan Smith Manuel Garcia, Jr. Josh Gryniewicz Amira Hass Eric Holt-Gimenez Jesse Hagopian Sam Husseini John Weisheit CP News Service Website of
the Day Art Gallery
of the Day
October 18, 2006 Joshua Frank Dr. Curran
Warf, MD Saul Landau Tom Barry Bruce Jackson Dave Lindorff Frederico Fuentes Michael Simmons Daryll E. Ray Kate Doyle Website of
the Day
Michael Neumann Manuel Garcia,
Jr. Stephen S.
Pearcy Sharon Smith Al Krebs David Underhill Daniel Wolff James Brooks Website of the Day
October 16, 2006 Gary Leupp Patrick Cockburn David Wilson Robert Fisk Robert Jensen Ingmar Lee
/ Krista Roessingh Mike Whitney Jake Whitney Sanho Tree Website of
the Day
Uri Avnery John Walsh Jean Bricmont Jennifer Van Bergen Ralph Nader Floyd Rudmin Mark Weisbrot Laura Carlsen Hani Shukrallah Dr. Susan Block John Chuckman Lucinda Marshall Don Monkerud Missy Comley
Beattie Ron Jacobs Website of
the Weekend
October 13, 2006 Jorge Mariscal Stephen Philion John Blair Col. Dan Smith Alastair Crooke / Mark Perry Stephen Fleischman Charles Perroud Anne E. Brodsky Website of the Day
October 12, 2006 Jonathan Cook Norman Solomon M. Shahid Alam Paul Craig
Roberts Meredith Schafer / Chris Kutalik Carl Gelderloos Alastair Crooke / Mark Perry Charles Sullivan William S. Lind CP News Service Website of
the Day
October 11, 2006 John Feffer Dave Lindorff Jackson Katz April Howard / Ben Dangl Michael Carmichael Ken Couesbouc Gregory Afghani Alexander Cockburn Website of
the Day
October 10, 2006 Paul Craig
Roberts Robert Robideau Joshua Frank Dave Lindorff Dave Zirin Heather Gray James Knotwell Missy Beattie Mike Whitney David Rosen Website of the Day
Robert Fisk Norman Solomon Ron Jacobs Gideon Levy Walter Brasch Mickey Z. John Holt Lucinda Marshall Saul Landau Website of the Day
October 7 /
8, 2006 Alexander Cockburn Peter Kwong Ralph Nader Mark Donham Dave Lindorff Peter Bosshard Ron Jacobs Lawrence R.
Velvel Fred Gardner David Green Jim B. Missy Beattie Michael Donnelly Jackson Thoreau Jon Hung CounterPunch
News Service Tom D'Antoni Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend
Alison Weir Tiffany Ten
Eyck / Mark Brenner Corporate Crime Reporter Juan Antonio
Montecino Walden Bello Christopher
Brauchli Brynne Keith-Jennings Jonathan Cook Website of the Day
John Walsh Carol Norris Paul Craig Roberts Ricardo Alarcón James Abourezk Nicola Nasser Kirkpatrick Sale Uri Avnery Website of the Day
Elizabeth Terzakis Paul Wolf Sean Penn Dave Lindorff Diane Farsetta Sharon Smith Felice Pace Sara Roy Website of
the Day
Jennifer Van
Bergen Greg Moses Stan Cox Niranjan Ramakrishnan Evelyn Pringle Fred Wilhelms Michael Abelman Gary Leupp Website of the Day
October 2, 2006 Eric Hazan Mike Whitney Norman Solomon Assaf Kfoury Missy Beattie Arthur Neslen Paula J. Caplan Website of the Day
Subscribe Online
|
November 22, 2006 What is to be Done?Palestinian Solidarity in a Time of MassacresBy GILAD ATZMON Let's face it; while the Palestinian and Arab resistance evolves into an absolute example of the ultimate heroism and collective patriotism, the Palestinian solidarity movement in the UK and around the world is not exactly what could be called a profound success story. In fact, it would be erroneous to state that this is really the fault of those who dedicate their time and energy to it. Supporting the Palestinians is a complicated subject. Though the crimes against the Palestinians have taken place in broad daylight and are not some well-kept secret, the priorities of the solidarity movement are far from being clear. When thinking about Palestinian society we are basically used to thinking of some sharp ideological and cultural disputes between the Hamas and PLO. Not that I wish to undermine that staunch disagreement, but I am here to suggest an alternative perspective that perhaps could lead towards a different understanding of the notion of Palestinian activism and solidarity both ideologically and pragmatically. I maintain that Palestinian people are largely divided into three main groups and it is actually this division that dictates three different political narratives, with three different political discourses and agendas to consider: The three groups can be described as follows: 1. The Palestinians who happen to live within the Israeli State and possess Israeli citizenship - The Israelis have a name for them; they call them 'Israeli Arabs'. These Palestinians are largely discriminated by Israeli law in all aspects of their lives; their struggle is for civil rights and civil equality. 2. The Palestinians who live in the Occupied Territories - In most cases those Palestinians are locked behind walls and barbed wire in Bantustans and concentration camps in the so-called 'Palestinian Authority Controlled Area' (PA). Practically speaking, those people live under a criminal occupation. For three decades these people have been terrorised on a daily basis by Israeli soldiers in roadblocks and incursions, they are subject to air raids and artillery bombardments. Their civil system is shattered, their educational system is falling apart, their health system is extinct. These Palestinian people are craving for a single day with no casualties. 3. The Diaspora Palestinians - Palestinians who were ethnically cleansed over the course of the years and denied return to their homes by the racially orientated Israeli legal system (the Law of Return and Absentee Laws). The Israelis do not have a name for them, they simply deny their existence. The Diaspora Palestinians live all over around the world. According to the UN statistics every third refugee is a Palestinian. Millions of exiled Palestinians live in the region in refugee camps, the others can be found in every corner of the globe. The Diaspora Palestinians know their rights and they want to be able to come home if they so choose, they demand their right of return. Confronting very different realities, the three groups above have managed to develop three competing political discourses: The 1st group, the so-called 'Israeli Arabs', struggle for equality. The means they have to achieve their goals are largely political. They search for a voice within the racially orientated Israeli society. The 2nd group, namely the 'PA inhabitants', battle against the occupation. They fight for liberation. Their means are political, civil resistance as well as armed struggle (in fact it is within the 2nd group where the bitter struggle for hegemony between the PLO and the Hamas is taking place). Being out of Israel and lacking international support as well as adequate political representation, the 3rd group is still ignored by the entire Israeli political system and even by major players within the international community. The exiled Palestinians are largely neglected and their demand for the right of return is yet to be addressed properly. Apparently, the Palestinian discourse is fragmented. It is divided into at least three different, sometimes opposing discourses. Cleverly, not to mention mercilessly, on their behalf, it is the Israelis who maintain this very state of fragmentation. It is the Israelis who manage to stop the Palestinian political and cultural discourse from integrating into a single grand solid narrative. How do they do it? They apply different tactics that maintain the isolation and conflict between the three distinct groups. Within the State of Israel the Israelis maintain a racially orientated legal system that turns the Israeli Palestinians into 10th class citizens. When PA inhabitants are concerned, the Israeli military maintains solid and constant pressure on the civilian population. Gaza is kept starving, it is bombed on a daily basis. Some of it is flattened. More than a few observers regard the situation in the PA as nothing but slow extermination and genocide. In order to humiliate the 3rd group, the Israelis enforce a racist legislation that welcomes Jews to the country but rejects others (Law of Return). In practice it is a racially orientated system that stops exiled Palestinians from returning to their land. Paradoxically enough, the more pain the Israelis inflict on any of the groups, the further the Palestinians get from establishing a grand narrative of resistance. Similarly, the more vicious the Israelis are, the further the Palestinian Solidarity movement is getting from establishing a unified agenda of activism. Indeed the Palestinian solidarity campaigner is confused and asks himself what campaign to choose. Who should be supported? The division of the Palestinian discourse into three conflicting narratives makes the issue of solidarity rather complicated. Seemingly, different Palestinian solidarity groups follow different political calls and Palestinian causes. Some call for an end to the Israeli occupation, others call for the right of return. Some call for equality. Many of the solidarity campaigners are divided amongst themselves. Those who call for the right of return and 'one State' are totally unhappy with what they regard as a watery and limited demand for the 'end of occupation'. Seemingly, Palestinian solidarity is trapped. Joining one call and not another is actually surrendering to a discourse that is violently and criminally imposed by the Israelis. This is exactly where Zionism is maintaining its hegemony within the Palestinian solidarity discourse. It is Israeli brutality that dictates a state of ideological fragmentation upon the Palestinian solidarity discourse. Whatever decision the Palestinian activist is willing to make is set a priori to dismiss a certain notion of the Palestinian cause. It is indeed painful to admit that it is the Israelis who have set us into this trap. Our work, discourse and terminology as activists are totally shaped by Israeli aggression.
The Battle Is Not Lost However, there is a way around that complexity. Rather than surrendering to the Zionist practice which splits the Palestinian solidarity discourse, we can simply redefine the core of the Palestinian tragedy, which is now turning into a global crisis. Once we manage to internalise that the discourse of solidarity with Palestinians is dominated by the malicious and brutal Israeli practices, we are more or less ready to admit: it is the Jewish State: a racist nationalist ideology that we must oppose primarily. It is Jewish State and its supporters around the world that we must tackle. It is Zionism and global Zionism that we must confront immediately. Yet, this is exactly where the solidarity campaigner loses his grip. To identify the Palestinian disaster with the concept of 'Jews Only State' is a leap not many activists are capable to do for the time being. To admit that the Jewish State is the core of the problem implies that there may be something slightly more fundamental in the conflict than merely colonial interests or an ethnic dispute over land. To identify the 'Jews Only State' as the core of the problem is to admit that peace is not necessarily an option. The reason is rather simple: the 'Jews Only State' follows an expansionist and racially orientated philosophy. It leaves no room for other people as a matter of fact and principle. Yet, once we come to grips with this very understanding, once we are enlightened and realise that something here is slightly more fundamental than merely a battle between an invader facing some indigenous counter freedom fighting. We are probably more or less ready to engage in a critical enquiry into the notion of Zionism. We are more or less ready to grasp the notion of the emerging secular emancipated Jewish collective identity. We are ready to confront the modern notion of Jewishness (rather than Judaism). Once we are brave enough to admit that Zionism is a continuation of Jewishness (rather than Judaism), once we admit that Israel draws its force from a racist ideology, harboured in national chauvinism and blatant expansionism, once we admit that Zionism, which was once a marginal Jewish ideology, has become the voice of world Jewry, once we accept it all, we may be ready to defeat the Zionist disease. We do it for the sake of the Palestinians but as well for the sake of world peace. The Gatekeepers Let's try to think of an imaginary situation in which a dozen exiled German dissident intellectuals insist upon monitoring and controlling Churchill's addresses to the British public at the peak of the Blitz. Every time Churchill speaks his heart calling the British people to stand firm against Germany and its military might, the exiled dissident Germans raise their voice: "It isn't Germany, Mr Prime Minister, it is the Nazi party, the German people and the German spirit are innocent." Churchill obviously apologises immediately. I assume that you all realise that such a scene is totally surreal. Britain would never allow a bunch of German exiles to control its rhetoric at the time of a war against Germany. Moreover, dissident German intellectuals would not have the Chutzpah to even consider telling the British what should or what shouldn't be the appropriate rhetoric to use at time of a war with Germany. However, when it comes to the Palestinian solidarity discourse, we are somehow far more tolerant. In spite of the fact that it is the 'Jews Only State' that we struggle against, we allow a bunch of self-appointed Jewish leaders and activists to become our gatekeepers. As soon as anyone identifies the symptoms of Zionism with some fundamental or essential Jewish precepts a smear campaign is launched against that person. I have been closely monitoring the Jewish left discourse for more than a few years now. I might as well admit that I can think of at least one good reason behind Jewish anti-Zionist activism. I do understand the need of some humanist Jews to stand up and say, 'I am a Jew and I find Zionism disgusting.' At a certain stage of my life I myself was saying just that. As some of you know, I totally admire Torah Jews for doing just that. However, when it comes to predominantly Jewish socialist and secular left groups, I am slightly confused. Moshe Machover, a legendary Israeli dissident and a Jewish Marxist who happens to be the intellectual mentor of the British progressive Jewish activists, expressed the following view just a few days ago when he stated a complaint he had with a petition:
Indeed anti-Semitism may be a problem, yet, is it really a Palestinian problem? Should the Palestinian solidarity campaign engage in fighting anti-Semitism? Shouldn't we leave it to ADL and Abe Foxman? I think that we better try to do whatever we can to save the people of Beit Hanoun. This is where we are needed. I am certain that the vast majority of the Palestinian activists know that I am right. Every PSC campaigner I have
ever spoken to admits to me that only very few Palestinians find
interest in the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign. In fact, the
statement by Machover provides the reason. According to Machover,
those amongst the Palestinians who fail to see that anti-Semitism
is the problem are nothing but reactionary, as only the 'Progressive'
Palestinians acknowledge that anti-Semitism is indeed a problem.
Let me tell you, the Palestinians I know do not like it when
Machover or anyone else calls them reactionaries just because
they are not that concerned with anti-Semitism. Reading Machover,
it is rather clear that such views serve as a body shield for
Jewish secular collectivism and the Zio-centric historical narrative.
If to be honest, there is not much reason for any Palestinian
to join a movement predominated by the obsession with anti-Semitism.
Beyond Chutzpah You may have heard of the book I am holding in my hand. Probably, it's the ultimate Zionist tract: Alan Dershowitz's The Case For Israel. I don't know whether any of you have ever considered reading this banal not to say idiotic text. I did, it fell into my hands a few days ago. Shockingly enough, this book is structured as a beginner's guide for the Zionist enthusiast, a kind of "Israel for Dummies". It teaches the nationalist Jew how to be an advocate and defend the 'case of Israel'. We know already that Norman Finkelstein has managed to prove beyond doubt that the text is academically a farce. Yet, there is something revealing in this text. The book is a set of deconstructions of 'the anti-Zionist argument'. It starts with the heaviest ideological and moral accusation against Israel and it gets lighter, more historical and forensic as you progress. Dershowitz launches with the 'million Shekels' question "Is Israel a Colonial, Imperialist State?" To a certain degree Dershowitz manages to tackle the question. He asks, "if it is indeed a colonial state, what flag does it serve?" Fair enough, I say, he may be right. I myself do not regard Zionism as a colonial adventure. However, hang on for a second, Mr. Dershowitz. It seems you might be getting off the hook easily here. Our problem with Israel has nothing to do with its colonial characteristics. Our problems with the 'Jews Only State' have something to do with its racist, expansionist and nationalist qualities. Our problems with Israel have something to do with it being a Fascist State supported by the vast majority of Jewish people around the world. Now if you, Scottish activists stop for a second, ask yourselves why Dershowitz starts his book tackling the colonial aspect of Israel rather than facing its Fascist characteristics. My answer is simple. We are afraid to admit that Israel is indeed a Fascist State. It is predominantly the politically correct groups that furnish Dershowitz with a Zionist fig leaf. In fact, it is the Jewish gatekeepers on the left who have managed to reduce Zionism merely into a colonial adventure. Why did they do it? I can think of two reasons: 1. If Israel, the 'Jews Only State' is wrong for being a racially orientated adventure, then 'Jews for peace', 'Jews against Zionism', 'Jewish Socialists', 'Jews Sans Frontieres' etc. are all wrong for the very same reason (being a racially orientated adventure). 2. To regard the Israeli Palestinian conflict as a colonial dispute is to make sure it fits nicely into their notion of working class politics. May I suggest that a universal working class vision of Israel implies that the Jewish State is nothing but a Fascist experiment. I would use this opportunity and appeal to our friends amongst the Jewish socialists and other Jewish solidarity groups. I would ask them to clear the stage willingly, and to re-join as ordinary human beings. The Palestinian Solidarity movement is craving for a change. It needs open gates rather than gatekeepers. It yearns for an open and dynamic discourse. The Palestinians on the ground have realised it already. They democratically elected an alternative vision of their future. Isn't it about time we support the Palestinians for what they are rather than expecting them to fit into our worldview? From a talk for the Scottish Palestinian Solidarity Campaign in Edinburgh. Gilad Atzmon was born in Israel and served in the Israeli military. He is the author of two novels: A Guide to the Perplexed and the recently released My One and Only Love. Atzmon is also one of the most accomplished jazz saxophon |