subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Cockburn/St. Clair: Cheney in Exile?
Noam Chomsky:
A Quick Reaction
Prashad: War Against The Planet

CounterPunch Special Report
The Crimes of
Bob Kerrey
By Douglas Valentine

Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
with Photos
by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS

Published on JULY 12

RAND's BLUEPRINT FOR
THE COLOMBIAN WAR

PRISONERS BATTLE
CALIFORNIA'S PRISON
SHU TORTURE

REMEMBERING SHAHAK

MURDER IN NAVAJOLAND

Published on JULY 1

BLACKS, LABOR AND
SOUTHERN POLITICS:
THE CASE OF THE
CHARLESTON FIVE

SO INIMITABLE:
THE LATE GREAT
JOHN LEE HOOKER

FARMINGTON, NM,
RACIST HELLHOLE

ARSENIC: THE GOOD NEWS

BONO AND HESTON

GALE NORTON'S
SECRET PAST


Search CounterPunch

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press
by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

TDY
By Douglas Valentine


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

New Stories:

Hypocrisy in Florida

Babbitt: I Was Wronged!

From New Orleans to Midland

Bruce Babbitt:
Sleaze Cashes In

Fear and Torture:
Inside a Genoa Jail

Katharine Graham:
She Needed Fewer Friends

Scenes from the Drug War

Nuked Baltimore?

Condit and the Lie Detector

Angelina Jolie and
the French Revolution

Edward Said:
Israel Sharpens Its Axe

Rest Easy, John Lee

The Battle for Public Power

Hitchens v. Kissinger

CounterPunch Special Report:
The Crimes of Bob Kerrey
by Douglas Valentine

Meet the Secret Rulers
of the World: the Truth About
Bohemian Grove

Hell Hath No Fury
Like a Dragon Scorned

Tariq Ali: What Blair's Victory Means for Britain's Left

Indian Affairs

Trout and Ethnic Cleansing

The Jeffords Jump

Defunct Dems

Pearl Harbor Revisited

Jesse Jackson and
the Movement

Kerrey the Throat Slitter

Hate Crime Follies

Curtains for Jeb Bush?

Kerrey and His Liberal
Defenders

Shocked About Kerrey?
You Shouldn't Be

The F-22 Fighter:
Tiffany's On Wings

Linebaugh:
a May Day Meditation

A Letter from the
Trenches of Vieques

Berkshire's Quebec Diary

McVeigh and OK City

Ken Burns Kills Jazz

The Politics of Eminem

The Crimes of Ariel Sharon

Depleted Uranium:
Cancer as Weapon

TR, Clinton, Powell and Plan Colombia

Ashcroft an Extremist?

Farewell Bill and HIll

Criminalizing Youth

CounterPunch Coverage
of Election 2000

Pentagon Auctions
Off the White House

South Carolina's Flag

Attack on Micro-Radio

The CounterPunch 100:
Our List of the
Century's Most Important
Non-fiction Books

Cruel and Unusual Punishment:
Lee Davis Execution Photos

Children In Banana Trees:
a photo exhibit by David Bacon

Bill Gates' Mugshot

Colombia:
Is It the Next Guatemala?

George W. Bush's Money Men:
The 119 Pioneers

What Set Off Ted K.?: The Unabomber, the CIA & LSD

September 16, 2001

An Afghan-American's Perspective
War On Afghanistan?

By Tamim Ansary

I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What else can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the belly to do what must be done."

And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.

I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that something must be done about those monsters.

But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their country.

Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. There are millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban.

We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age. Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already. Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that. New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away and hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've been raping all this time.

So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.

And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants. That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarise the world into Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end the west would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last for years and millions would die, not just theirs but ours.

Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?