home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

CounterPunch

August 26, 2002

Fighting for Right of Dissent & Due Process

by Sami Al-Arian

It was the summer of 1976 when I took my first civics course, along with four other courses. I was 18 and determined to graduate in three years with an engineering degree. Class discussion on the first day centered on the Watergate scandal and the separation of powers. Having come from a region where authoritarian regimes and political repression thrive, I was fascinated with the American system of government. By the end of the week, the professor asked us to research what he called the "2 D's": dissent and due process, cornerstones of American democracy.

Looking in the Arabic-English dictionary, I could not find the word "due process." So I looked up the two words separately. Put together, they did not make much sense to me. It was many discussions later that I grasped this novel idea of the American justice system. Little did I know that two decades later, I would be in the national spotlight in a heated debate concerning the two D's.

By now, much of America has heard of my case. Pick up any newspaper, turn to any news channel or surf the Internet and you're sure to learn of the tenured University of South Florida professor under the threat of being fired for controversy stemming from activism for the Palestinian cause. Not only have many of these media reports frequently misrepresented the facts, but they are to a large extent responsible for my current predicament.

Moreover, in a number of ways my case is indicative of the status of civil liberties in post-9/11 America. In the wake of the attacks against our country, it is conceivable that public reaction to the misinformation about me would be frantic. It is distressing, however, that many in this country seized the moment of widespread fear to rehash accusations that a federal judge already had thrown out of court. Recent charges by USF are clearly politically motivated attacks on freedom of speech. All of these allegations have been rejected outright in a court of law.

In the case of my brother-in-law, Mazen Al-Najjar, who was detained on the basis of secret evidence for nearly four years, immigration judge R. Kevin McHugh ultimately said the following concerning the organizations in question: "Although there were allegations that the ICP (Islamic Committee for Palestine) and WISE (World Islamic Studies Enterprise) were fronts for Palestinian political causes, there is no evidence before the court that demonstrates that either organization was a front for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. To the contrary, there is evidence in the record to support the conclusion that WISE was a reputable and scholarly research center and the ICP was highly regarded."

This same ruling was upheld by a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., and then-Attorney General Janet Reno, who all had access to the secret evidence. This did not stop irresponsible journalists from reaching their own conclusions. Throughout this ordeal, among other things, my views have been completely misrepresented.

I have never once in my life advocated the killing of innocent civilians. I abhor terrorism at all levels, against all people. I condemn all violence against civilians -- regardless of the faith of the perpetrators -- whether they are in pizza parlors, bus stations or refugee camps. It's wrong not only politically, but, more important, on religious, moral and ethical grounds.

Following the Sept. 11 tragedy, I was one of the first Muslim leaders to condemn the attacks and call for justice for the victims. Within a few days, our mosque and the Islamic Community of Tampa Bay collected more than $10,000 for the victims' fund in New York, and I led a blood drive during which 75 local Muslims participated. In addition, I presided over a three-hour ecumenical service where all Abrahamic faiths were represented. The Islamic teachings of cooperation, unity and tolerance for all faith communities became visible during this painful time.

Throughout much of my last 25 years, I've given hundreds of sermons and speeches, as well as participated in many debates and panel discussions. America's promise for me was to give equal opportunity to all points of view, whether popular or unpopular. This is the meaning of the first "D," the right to dissent. As a stateless Palestinian refugee, I appreciated the freedom and opportunity afforded to me to talk about the importance of ending the injustices done to the Palestinians.

As recent events have played out, however, I am very certain that I am being punished because of my speeches and political opinions of at least 10 years ago, none of which was ever brought into the classroom. If I had said "Death to God," even on campus, I would not be fired. Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, as recently as March of this year, has directly advocated violence and torture against the Palestinians without causing a stir. His job and his life were not threatened as a result of these words. Unpopular opinions, even offensive ones, are part of American intellectual life.

Certainly, in the heat of the moment, one may not use the best expressions, especially during impromptu presentations. I had such regrettable moments. However, on many occasions, some of my speeches were misquoted, mistranslated, or taken completely out of context. Here, I'm reminded of the great Jewish philosopher Maimonides, who wrote to his translator, Ibn Tibbon, in 1199. Ibn Tibbon was translating the work of his teacher from Arabic to Hebrew and was seeking the author's advice. This is part of what he said: "Let me premise one rule. Whoever wishes to translate and aims at rendering each word literally and at the same time adheres slavishly to the order of words and sentences in the original will meet with much difficulty and his rendering will be faulty and untrustworthy."

Throughout this saga, I have made my positions on various issues clear to those who wish to know the truth. With regard to the Middle East conflict, I have repeatedly stated that Israel must choose two out of the following three points: maintaining its exclusively Jewish character, being a democratic state, and controlling all the territories. If it chooses the first two, then there would be a two-state solution, which the Oslo process attempted but failed to achieve with the persistence of the brutal occupation and constant expansion of illegal settlements. This option is called the 78-22 solution, a Jewish state on 78 percent of historical Palestine, and a Palestinian state on 22 percent of the land, including the West Bank, Gaza and Arab East Jerusalem. However, if Israel insists on maintaining control of the territories and adhering to democratic ideals, this would mean the one-state solution, which I've always preferred -- a bi-national, non-sectarian state. Palestinians would become full citizens and enjoy the same rights as Jews: one person, one vote as happened in South Africa. In addition, this would solve the right of return problem, as the one state would easily accommodate the return of refugees as well as Jews, the world over.

The third alternative, with which we are now faced, is an exclusively Jewish state that wishes to maintain illegal control of the territories against the will of its native population. As I'm sure all would agree, this situation has been untenable for some time, and will only grow worse unless one of the other two options is pursued.

Here at home, I have prided myself on being a champion for civil liberties and human rights. Over the years, I have constantly maintained the view that changes in government policy must be achieved from within the system. When Mazen was denied his right to a trial and illegally detained, our community formed coalitions, lobbied Congress, and met with editorial boards and administration officials to express our outrage at the use of secret evidence. By the end, we had made it a national issue, garnering more than 130 supporters on a bill in Congress to ban the use of secret evidence.

During the presidential race, the use of secret evidence became a national issue when then Gov. George Bush came out against this policy during the second debate, giving him the support of Arab and Muslim voters.

Sept. 11 should not be used in order to sacrifice this great tradition. In addition, the backlash against the Arab-American and Muslim communities in the United States in the aftermath of the horrible tragedy was wrong and must be condemned. Similarly, to exploit the atmosphere of fear and insecurity in order to silence me is also contrary to our values.

Since 9/11 -- and indeed, long before -- I have not said or done anything to justify the continuous onslaught against me. This fight for academic freedom, free speech and preservation of tenure is indeed a worthy struggle. I will continue the struggle and I appreciate the support I received from my family, friends and community, and the many professors, students, unions and countless others. We have no choice but to continue defending these rights. As Mark Twain once said, "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it is time to pause and reflect."

Sami Al-Arian is a computer engineering professor at the University of South Florida who has been on forced paid leave for the past 11 months.

Weekend Features

Susan Davis
Proverbial Wisdom:
Of Clogs and Enron

Falk / Krieger
No War Against Iraq

Ceylon Mooney
Fasting for Iraq

Jonathon Wright
Police Brutality in Atlanta

Ralph Nader
Congress's Pay Raise Scam

Jeffrey St. Clair
Chainsaw George

Alexander Cockburn
Alterman Cheapens Holocaust

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers:

  • War Talk As White Noise: Anything to Get Harken and Halliburton Out of the Headlines;
  • First Hilliard, Then McKinney: Jewish Groups Target Blacks Brave Enough to Talk About Justice in the Middle East; Intimidation is the Name of the Game; Smearing "Insane" McKinney As Muslims' Pawn;
  • The Missing Terrorist? Calling Scotland Yard: "Where's Atif?"
  • They Never Booed Dylan!: Tape Transcript Shows Famed Newport Folkfest Dissing of Electric Dylan Not True. The Catcalls were for Peter Yarrow!
  • New Shame from the Liffey Shrike

Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840-3683

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /

 

August 24 / 25, 2002

Susan Davis
Proverbial Wisdom:
Of Clogs and Enron

Falk / Krieger
No War Against Iraq

Ceylon Mooney
Fasting for Iraq

Jonathon Wright
Police Brutality in Atlanta

Ralph Nader
Congress's Pay Raise Scam

Jeffrey St. Clair
Chainsaw George

Alexander Cockburn
Alterman Cheapens Holocaust

August 23, 2002

Dave Marsh
Selling Out?

Anthony Gancarski
Super-Duper: Oil, al-Qaeda and a West African Adventure

William Hughes
Lieberman's Conflict
of Interest?

Kurt Nimmo
The Lapdog Conversion of CNN:
They Didn't Want to "Criticize" a Popular War

Sean Donahue
Hardline in Colombia

August 22, 2002

Sean Donahue
Hardline in Colombia

Wayne Madsen
Crushing Congressional Dissent: The Fall of Hilliard, Barr and McKinney

Gilad Atzmon
The Zionist Lobby and
American Foreign Policy

Robert Johnson
Right Wing Doves?

Alexander Cockburn
Taking Down McKinney

August 21, 2002

Gary Leupp
The Return of Mani

Romi Mahajan
Bhopal on $40 a Day

Jerre Skog
Bush and Europe:
Fun, Profit & Betrayal

Tom Crumpacker
The Politics of the Cuba Embargo

August 20, 2002

Kathleen Christison
Israeli Tilt: the NYT
and Palestine

August 14 / 19, 2002

Susan Davis
Played Out: a Journey to Central City, Colorado

CounterPunch Staff
Our Favorite Films

Jeffrey St. Clair
Usonian Utopia's:
Frank Lloyd Wright, Working Class Housing and the FBI

Gilad Atzmon
Sharon and the Iron Wall

Uri Avnery
A Phone Call from Hell

Wendy Brinker
Racism is Alive and Well in the South Carolina Death House

Hamit Dardagan
The Unbearable Lightness of Bombing

Ahmad Faruqui
The Legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Philip Farruggio
Leading by Example

Anthony Gancarski
Union Jackass: Richard Perle's UK Charm Offensive

Jeff Halper
Fortress Israel: the Message of the Bulldozer

Robert Jensen
Our Failures are Borne by the Palestinians

Gary Leupp
An Open Letter to Bruce Springsteen about Bush's War on Terrorism

Dave Marsh
Sing a Simple Song

Rashmi Mayur
To Johannesburg in Search of Hope

Steve Perry
Another Fine Mess:
Martha Stewart and Paul Wellstone

Anis Shivani
What's Next...Concentration Camps?

Edward Said
Punishment by Detail

Jeff Taylor
Paul Wellstone's Legacy

August 10/11, 2002

Walt Brasch
The Bush 2 Legacy...So Far

August 9, 2002

Mokhiber / Weissman
Corporate Crime:
More Shareholder Power
Not the Solution

Ansar Ahmed
The Waning of the
Pax Americana

Alexander Cockburn
War, the Military and the Hunt for the "Violence Gene"

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair