Now
Available from
CounterPunch for Only $11.50 (S/H Included)
Today's
Stories
January 17 / 18, 2003
Joe Quandt
Suicide
Bombers: The Clash of Absurdities
January 16, 2004
Kathy Kelly
A Visit
to Umm Qasr Prison
William S. Lind
More
Thoughts on 4th Generation Warfare
Gillian Russom
So.
Cal Grocery Strikers Speak Out: "We Need Action!"
Ari Shavit
Survival
of the Fittest? An Interview with Benny Morris
Adi Ophir
Genocide Hides Behind Expulsion: a Response to Benny Morris
Dave Lindorff
The General's Henchman: Michael Moore Smears Kucinich
Steve Perry
Iowa Death Trip 2
January 15, 2004
Veteran Intelligence
Professionals for Sanity
Memo
to the President: Your State of the Union Address
John Chuckman
Dry
Hole in the Oval Office: President from Podunk Drilling, Inc
Chris Floyd
Mind Over Matter
Gil-Scott Heron
Whitey on the Moon
Gary Leupp
The
Silk Road: Random Thoughts on the Bam Earthquake and Satan
January 14, 2004
Greg Moses
Happy
Birthday, Dr. King: To Write Off the South is to Surrender to
Bigots
Kurt Nimmo
Bush and the Supremes: Amputating the Bill of Rights
Dave Lindorff
Preview of Iowa? Pennsylvania Straw Poll Spells Trouble for Traditional
Dems (and Dean)
Jason Leopold
O'Neill Claims Backed by Rumsfeld / Wolfowitz War Letters to
Clinton
Alexander Cockburn
Bush,
Oil and Iraq: Some Truth at Last
January 13, 2004
William S. Lind
How 2004
Looks from Potsdam
M. Junaid Alam
Do Iraqis Have a Right to Resist?
Mickey Z
Snipers:
No Nuts in Iraq
Adolfo Gilly
Chonchocoro:
The Prisoner and the Presidents
Steve Perry
You Love God, Right?
January 12, 2004
Ben Tripp
No Stan
for the Kurds
Norman Solomon
The
Dixie Trap: Democrats and the South
Mike Whitney
O'Neill's Revenge
Jason Leopold
From the Very First Instant It Was About Iraq
Uri Avnery
Syria's
Peace Proposal
January 10 / 11, 2004
Alexander Cockburn
Bush
as Hitler? Let's Be Fair
Susan Davis
Dangerous Books
Diane Christian
On Lying and Colin Powell
Lisa Viscidi
Exhumations: Unearthing Guatemala's Macabre Past
Daniel Estulin
Destroying History in Iraq
Saul Landau
Homeland Anxiety
Elaine Cassel
Who's Winning the War on Civil Liberties?
Bruce Jackson
Making the Shit List
Christopher Brauchli
Baptizing Hitler's Ghost
Francis A. Boyle
The Deep Scars of War
Lee Ballinger
Cold Sweat: Sweatshops and the Music Industry
Patrick W. Gavin
Hillary's Slur: Mrs. Lott?
Ramzy Baroud
What Invaders Have in Common
Michael Schwartz
Inside the California Grocery Strike
Gary Johnson
An Interview with Former Heavyweight Champ Greg Page
Dave Zirin
An Interview with Marvin Miller on Unions and Baseball
Mark Hand
A Review of Resistance: My Life for Lebanon
Poets' Basement
Thomas, Daley, Curtis, Guthrie and Albert
January 9, 2004
David Lindorff
The
Misers of War: Troop Strength and Chintzy Bonuses
Kurt Nimmo
Saddam's Defense: Summon Bush Sr. to the Stand
Mike Whitney
Orange Jumpsuits for the Bush Clan?: The Carnegie Report on Iraq's
Non-existent WMDs
Deb Reich
Palestinians and Israelis: This War is Unwinnable
David Vest
Disabled
Vets Fire Back at Rumsfeld
January 8, 2004
Neve Gordon
Israeli
Refuseniks Sentenced to Jail
Lenni Brenner
Dr.
Dean and the Godhead
Ray McGovern
Bush: Driving Without Breaks
Mark Scaramella
Inside
the DA's Office: Lies, Errors and Tedium
Yves Engler
Bush's Mexican Gambit
James Hollander
Journalists
Under Fire: the Death of José Couso in Baghdad
January 7, 2004
Democracy Now!
Uncharitable
Care: How Hospitals are Gouging and Even Arresting the Uninsured
Greg Weiher
The
Bush Administration's Ongoing Intelligence Problem
Ben Tripp
The Word of the Year, 2003
Dave Lindorff
Dean and His Democratic Detractors
Michael Leon
The NYT Does Chomsky
Bob Boldt
God Talk
Ramon Ryan
Small
Victories and Long Struggles: the 10th Anniversary of the Zapatista
Uprising
January 6, 2004
Dave Lindorff
RNC
Plays the Hitler Card: MoveOn Shouldn't Apologize for Those Ads
Ron Jacobs
Drugs
in Uniform: Hashish and the War on Terrorism
Josh Frank
Coffee and State Authority in Colombia
Doug Giebel
Permanent Bases: Leave Iraq? Hell No, We Won't Go
John Chuckman
Sick Puppies: David Frum's New Neo-Con Manifesto
Rannie Amiri
The Politics of the Iranian Earthquake
John L. Hess
A Record
to Dissent From
Thacher Schmid
A Cheesehead's Musings on the Sunday NYT
David Price
"Like
Slaves": Anthropological Thoughts on Occupation
January 5, 2004
Al Krebs
How
Now Mad Cow!
Kathy Kelly
Squatting
in Baghdad's Bomb Craters
Jordy Cummings
The Dialectic of the Kristol Family: Putting the Neo in the Cons
Fran Shor
Mad Human Disease: Chewing the Fat Down on the Farm
Fidel Castro
"We Shall Overcome": On the 45th Anniversary of the
Cuban Revolution
Gary Leupp
North
Korea for Dummies
January 3 / 4, 2004
Brian Cloughley
Never
Mind the WMDs, Just Look at History
Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan
The Wrong War at the Wrong Time
William Cook
Failing to Respond to 9/11
Glen Martin
Jesus
vs. the Beast of the Apocalypse
Robert Fisk
Iraqi Humor Amid the Carnage
Ilan Pappe
The Geneva Bubble
Walter Davis
Robert Jay Lifton, or Nostalgia
Kurt Nimmo
Ashcroft vs. the Left
Mike Whitney
The Padilla Case
Steven Sherman
On Wallerstein's The Decline of American Power
Dave Lindorff
Bush's Taiwan Hypocrisy
William Blum
Codework Orange!
Mitchel Cohen
Learning from Che Guevara
Seth Sandronsky
Mad Cow and Main Street USA
Bruce Jackson
Conversations with Leslie Fiedler
Standard Schaefer
Poet Carl Rakosi Turns 100
Ron Jacobs
Sir Mick
Adam Engel
Hall of Hoaxes
Poets' Basement
Jones, Albert & Curtis
January 2, 2004
Stan Cox
Red Alert
2016
Dave Lindorff
Beef, the Meat of Republicans
Jackie Corr
Rule and Ruin: Wall Street and Montana
Norman Solomon
George Will's Ethics: None of Our Business?
David Vest
As the Top Wobbleth
January 1, 2004
Randall Robinson
Honor
Haiti, Honor Ourselves
David Krieger
Looking
Back on 2003
Robert Fisk
War Takes an Inhuman Twist: Roadkill Bombs
Stan Goff
War,
Race and Elections
Hammond Guthrie
2003 Almaniac
Website of the Day
Embody Bags
December 31, 2003
Ray McGovern
Don't
Be Fooled Again: This Isn't an Independent Investigation
Kurt Nimmo
Manufacturing Hysteria
Robert Fisk
The Occupation is Damned
Mike Whitney
Mad Cows and Downer George
Alexander Cockburn
A Great Year Ebbed, Another Ahead
December 30, 2003
Michael Neumann
Criticism
of Israel is Not Anti-Semitism
Annie Higgins
When
They Bombed the Hometown of the Virgin Mary
Alan Farago
Bush Bros. Wrecking Co.: Time Runs Out for the Everglades
Dan Bacher
Creatures from the Blacklight Lagoon: From Glofish to Frankenfish
Jeffrey St. Clair
Hard
Time on the Killing Floor: Inside Big Meat
Willie Nelson
Whatever Happened to Peace on Earth?
December 29, 2003
Mark Hand
The Washington
Post in the Dock?
David Lindorff
The
Bush Election Strategy
Phillip Cryan
Interested Blindness: Media Omissions in Colombia's War
Richard Trainor
Catellus Development: the Next Octopus?
Uri Avnery
Israel's
Conscientious Objectors
December 27 / 28, 2003
Alexander Cockburn
A
Journey Into Rupert Murdoch's Soul
Kathy Kelly
Christmas Day in Baghdad: A Better World
Saul Landau
Iraq
at the End of the Year
Dave Zirin
A Linebacker for Peace & Justice: an Interview with David
Meggysey
Robert Fisk
Iraq
Through the American Looking Glass
Scott Burchill
The Bad Guys We Once Thought Good: Where Are They Now?
Chris Floyd
Bush's Iraq Plan is Right on Course: Saddam 2.0
Brian J. Foley
Don't Tread on Me: Act Now to Save the Constitution
Seth Sandronsky
Feedlot Sweatshops: Mad Cows and the Market
Susan Davis
Lord
of the (Cash Register) Rings
Ron Jacobs
Cratched Does California
Adam Engel
Crumblecake and Fish
Norman Solomon
The Unpardonable Lenny Bruce
Poets' Basement
Cullen and Albert
Website of the Weekend
Activism Through Music
December 26, 2003
Gary Leupp
Bush
Doings: Doing the Language
December 25, 2003
Diane Christian
The
Christmas Story
Elaine Cassel
This
Christmas, the World is Too Much With Us
Susan Davis
Jinglebells, Hold the Schlock
Kristen Ess
Bethlehem Celebrates Christmas, While Rafah Counts the Dead
Francis Boyle
Oh Little Town of Bethlehem
Alexander Cockburn
The
Magnificient 9
Guthrie / Albert
Another Colorful Season
December 24, 2003
M. Shahid Alam
The Semantics
of Empire
William S. Lind
Marley's
List for Santa in Wartime
Josh Frank
Iraqi
Oil: First Come, First Serve
Cpt. Paul Watson
The
Mad Cowboy Was Right
Robert Lopez
Nuance
and Innuendo in the War on Iraq
December 23, 2003
Brian J. Foley
Duck
and Cover-up
Will Youmans
Sharon's
Ultimatum
Michael Donnelly
Here
They Come Again: Another Big Green Fiasco
Uri Avnery
Sharon's
Speech: the Decoded Version
December 22, 2003
Jeffrey St. Clair
Pray
to Play: Bush's Faith-Based National Parks
Patrick Gavin
What Would Lincoln Do?
Marjorie Cohn
How to
Try Saddam: Searching for a Just Venue
Kathy Kelly
The
Two Troublemakers: "Guilty of Being Palestinians in Iraq"
December 20 / 21, 2003
Alexander Cockburn
How
to Kill Saddam
Saul Landau
Bush Tries Farce as Cuba Policy
Rafael Hernandez
Empire and Resistance: an Interview with Tariq Ali
David Vest
Our Ass and Saddam's Hole
Kurt Nimmo
Bush
Gets Serious About Killing Iraqis
Greg Weiher
Lessons from the Israeli School on How to Win Friends in the
Islamic World
Christopher Brauchli
Arrest, Smear, Slink Away: Dr. Lee and Cpt. Yee
Carol Norris
Cheers of a Clown: Saddam and the Gloating Bush
Bruce Jackson
The Nameless and the Detained: Bush's Disappeared
Juliana Fredman
A Sealed Laboratory of Repression
Mickey Z.
Holiday Spirit at the UN
Ron Jacobs
In the Wake of Rebellion: The Prisoner's Rights Movement and
Latino Prisoners
Josh Frank
Sen. Max Baucus: the Slick Swindler
John L. Hess
Slow Train to the Plane
Adam Engel
Black is Indeed Beautiful
Ben Tripp
The Relevance of Art in Times of Crisis
Michael Neumann
Rhythm and Race
Poets' Basement
Cullen, Engel, Albert & Guthrie
Hot Stories
Alexander Cockburn
Behold,
the Head of a Neo-Con!
Subcomandante Marcos
The
Death Train of the WTO
Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens
as Model Apostate
Steve Niva
Israel's
Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?
Dardagan,
Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians
Steve
J.B.
Prison Bitch
Sheldon
Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda
in the Iraq War
Wendell
Berry
Small Destructions Add Up
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click Here
for More Stories.
|
Weekend
Edition
January 17 / 18, 2004
If This be Praise...
Lerner,
Said and the Palestinians
By M. SHAHID ALAM
"Michael Lerner is one of the major prophetic figures
of our time."
Cornel West
"Every indigenous people will
resist alien settlers as long as they see any hope of ridding
themselves of the danger of foreign settlement. This is how the
Arabs will behave and will go on behaving so long as they possess
a gleam of hope that they can prevent 'Palestine' from becoming
the land of Israel."
Ze'ev Jabotinsky (1923)
Very few intellectuals in our times would measure
up to Edward Said in the eulogies he received upon his death
last year. Indirectly, every obituary, tribute, essay, reminiscence
honoring his memory was a rebuke to the mercenaries who populate
our media, academia and that execrable category, think tanks.
But would they notice?
Yet, I chanced upon one obituary notice
that I found troubling. I was troubled because it was from Rabbi
Lerner, who has earned the opprobrium of America's Jewish establishment
for opposing the Israeli Occupation of West Bank and Gaza. At
one time, he had to seek police protection in the face of death
threats from pro-Israeli Americans.
It is not that the Rabbi does not praise
Edward Said. He pays "tribute to a great thinker and writer
whose contribution to contemporary intellectual life deserves
our respect and appreciation." Said was a "powerful
and passionate advocate for his own people, the Palestinians."
Is that all?
The Rabbi reserves his deepest respect,
however, for the way in which Edward Said "publicly challenged
Arafat and his thuggish ways (emphasis added)." Actually,
challenging Arafat was quite a commonplace amongst Palestinians
after he traded the rights of Palestinian for policing rights
over Palestinians. The pointed reference to Arafat's "thuggish
ways" is gratuitous. The phrase belongs to the lexicon of
Zionist demonization of Palestinians.
Then come the accusations. Said did not
"sympathize with the plight of European Jews and the way
that their returning to the place they perceived to be
their ancient homeland was not an act of Western colonialism
(emphasis added)." It is a circuitous sentence, a bit jumbled
and problematic too.
Here is how I make sense of the Rabbi's
syntax. First, he posits that the creation of Israel was not
an "act of Western colonialism," something Edward Said
knew or should have known. From this, the Rabbi infers that Said's
opposition to Zionism was due to his lack of sympathy with (a)
the "plight of European Jews" and (b) their right to
return to "the place they perceived to be their ancient
homeland."
The first charge might be serious. Only
someone seized with anti-Semitic loathing could lack "sympathy"
for the centuries of suffering endured by European Jews. Unwittingly,
therefore, the Rabbi accuses Said of anti-Semitism. Or, is the
Rabbi saying that European Jews had earned the right--because
of their long suffering--to a Jewish state in Palestine, even
if this would lead to the destruction of Palestinian society.
Said's sin, then, is that he does not recognize this Jewish right.
On this account, we have to acquit Edward Said. The Rabbi will
agree that self-destructive sympathy does not come naturally
to most people.
The second charge stems from the premise
of a Jewish right of return. In this case, we are asked to concede
that the "perception" that Palestine is "their
ancient homeland" gives European Jews the right to return.
And this right is comprehensive. It empowers European Jews to
'repossess' Palestine--take it away from the Palestinians--in
order to establish a state of the Jewish people.
It is Jewish mythology alone that confers
legitimacy of sorts to the Jewish right of return. There is no
system of law which converts a perceived claim by an individual
or group into a legally enforceable right. Nor does any system
of law confer on any people a perpetual right to a country they
(may have) once inhabited, much less one they left (or claim
to have left) some eighteen hundred years ago. In effect, then,
the Rabbi faults Said for not accepting Jewish mythology as the
law for the Palestinians. Should he?
Rabbi Lerner also accuses the Palestinians--and
Said, by association--of immorality. "He never took the
step of acknowledging that Palestinian resistance to Jewish immigration
in the years when Jews were trying to escape the gas chambers
of Europe or the displaced persons camps of 1945-48 was immoral
(emphasis added)." At best, the argument in tendentious.
Is the Rabbi conceding--perhaps unwittingly--that
Palestinian resistance to Jewish immigration was moral before
Hitler opened the gas chambers? Was it moral then because Jews
were entering Palestine under a Zionist plan--first conceived
in 1897, and ratified by Britain in 1917--whose end was to create
a Jewish state that would dispossess the Palestinians. Jewish
immigration amounted to a Jewish invasion that would necessarily
lead to the displacement and dispossession of Palestinians.
Should the Palestinians have ceased their
resistance because Nazi persecution of Jews in Europe--by accelerating
Jewish immigration into Palestine--was bringing their own demise
nearer, and making it more certain? Did the Zionists at this
time start a dialogue with the Palestinians, explaining to them
that the Jews escaping Nazi persecution would enter only as refugees,
seeking temporary shelter in Palestine before they could be relocated
to countries where they would be welcome? Indeed, Nazi persecution
became the perverse--if unintended--engine for realizing the
Zionist project. Should it then have mattered to the Palestinians
that the Jewish immigrants, who would accelerate their dispossession,
were fleeing persecution?
There is another flaw in the Rabbi's
train of thought. His argument assumes that Palestine was the
only destination for Jewish refugees escaping Nazi persecution.
Could not these Jews find refuge--permanent or temporary--in
any of the Allied countries (or their vast colonies) whose war
effort could have been greatly aided by the influx of Jewish
skills, expertise and capital? All this appears implausible.
In support of this assumption, the Zionists
point to the resistance to Jewish immigration in the United States.
But this won't wash. One has to ask if the world Jewish hierarchy,
by now fully committed to the creation of Israel, had a real
interest in exerting its power to overcome American opposition
to Jewish immigration? If the Jewish lobbies in the United States
could offset the State Department's opposition to the creation
of Israel, were they not capable of overcoming the Administration's
resistance to Jewish immigration? Moreover, the United States
was not the only feasible destination for Jewish refugees.
Rabbi Lerner's difficulties have their
source in the deep contradictions of Zionism. This was a peculiar
nationalist project unlike any other because the people--European
Jews--it defined as a nation did not possess the territorial
attributes of a nation; they did not constitute a majority in
any of the territories that they inhabited. In fact, they were
everywhere a small minority. It was imperative for this nationalist
project, therefore, to acquire territory--a land--where Jews
could exercise the collective rights of nationhood, viz. sovereignty
and statehood.
The founders of the Zionist project knew
instinctively that it would be impractical--indeed suicidal--to
try to acquire territory for a Jewish state within Europe. In
fact, quickly, they decided that they would harness the support
of European powers to create the territorial basis of their state
outside of Europe. At first, Britain was chosen to sponsor
the Zionist project.
Palestine offered the ideal location.
Its historical value--as the site of the ancient Jewish state,
and the land promised by Yahweh to the Hebrews--would be useful
in mobilizing Jewish support for the Zionist project. Since it
was not yet a European colony, it would be easier to persuade
a European power to help create a Jewish state in Palestine,
serving as a "rampart of Europe against Asia, an outpost
of civilization against barbarism." Palestine contained
Christian holy lands too, and this was another incentive for
Europeans to take it away from the Muslims and give it to the
Jews, a Biblical people. Finally, the project would realize the
anti-Semite's dream of cleansing Christian Europe of its Jewish
population.
Inevitably, since its inception, the
Zionist project had two defining features. It was an imperialist
project--a surrogate imperialism--where Britain, the leading
imperialist power, would acquire Palestine in fulfillment of
a deal with an influential segment of Jewish bourgeoisie. Necessarily,
it was also a colonial-settler project, since it sought to create
a state of European Jews on Palestinian land. This
would entail, in some combination, the displacement and marginalization
of the Palestinians.
These are the "wrongs" that
the Zionists regard as right, legitimate, moral, as necessary
for Jewish survival, for Jewish power. Rabbi Lerner is a committed
Zionist. He makes no bones about that. Though an American himself,
he informs us--without any comment--that his son served the Israeli
military in the West Bank. As a Zionist, the Rabbi accuses the
Palestinians--and Edward Said--for not acknowledging the wrongs
done to them as right, as moral, as necessary.
Of course, Rabbi Lerner has more heart
than most Zionists. He concedes that the Palestinians too have
"rights" to Palestine, the same as the Jews. He concedes
this because you cannot be a pro-Israeli without conceding
these rights; because there is no prospect of Jewish security
without mollifying the Palestinians. The "equal" rights
he grants the Palestinians, however, only allows them a "state"
on 22 percent of historic Palestine. He does not contemplate
any Palestinian right of return. No "equality" there.
The creation of Israel was a power play.
It was born out of the contradictions of the history of European
Jews, a contradiction that would be resolved by the convergence
of Jewish influence and Western imperial power, combining to
serve the interests of both. The cost of this project to Palestinians,
to Arabs, to Muslims, was not even an issue in an era dominated
by Western racism and bigotry--of the Christian, Jewish and secular
variety.
As the contradictions of the Zionist
project deepen, forcing it to draw the United States directly
into the conflict, that same racism and bigotry are being mobilized
in the West, and especially the United States, to support another
assault on the rights of the Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims.
Slowly, reflexively, a segment of the Muslim population, a small
segment still I believe, is being energized to take back their
lands, their dignity and rights, their place under the sun. Some
of them are now imitating the bloody-mindedness of their foes.
Is this the clash of civilizations between
the West and the Islamicate world? Was this conflict inevitable
given the oil-thirst and Israelization of the United States confronting
an Islamicate world, beaten in the nineteenth century, divided,
humiliated, now reaching a quarter of the world's population,
and struggling to regain its lost power, to recreate its splintered
unity?
Are Islamicate societies seeking to reconstitute
their life on the primordial foundations--lost in the crush of
modernization--of a perennial encounter "between God as
such and man as such," between the transcendent, creative
principle of the universe and a theomorphic being endowed with
intellect, free will and speech?
Or, are these societies today what their
adversaries say they are--in rage, in denial, impotent, after
the West overtook them in knowledge and power? Did they fail
to modernize because of the flaws in the 'deep structures' of
their culture? And are they now seeking, out of spite, to destroy
the leader of the modern, democratic and dominant West?
Only time will tell who is right, where
this conflict will go, what this contest will bring at the end?
This conflict may end quickly in the capitulation of the Islamicate
adversary producing 'a thousand years' of American hegemony over
the Islamicate world; or it may go the other way. If it goes
the other way, it may restore a balance between the West and
Islamdom, an equilibrium shattered in the nineteenth century.
Or, it may be the beginning of a long, or precipitous, descent
to long and deadly wars, to economic meltdown--to an unforeseen
hell.
M. Shahid Alam
is professor of economics at Northeastern University. His last
book, Poverty from the Wealth of Nations, was published
by Palgrave in 2000. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch's
hot new book: The
Politics of Anti-Semitism. He may be reached at m.alam@neu.edu.
Visit his webpage at http://msalam.net.
© M. Shahid Alam
Weekend
Edition Features for January 10 / 11, 2004
Alexander Cockburn
Bush
as Hitler? Let's Be Fair
Susan Davis
Dangerous Books
Diane Christian
On Lying and Colin Powell
Lisa Viscidi
Exhumations: Unearthing Guatemala's Macabre Past
Daniel Estulin
Destroying History in Iraq
Saul Landau
Homeland Anxiety
Elaine Cassel
Who's Winning the War on Civil Liberties?
Bruce Jackson
Making the Shit List
Christopher Brauchli
Baptizing Hitler's Ghost
Francis A. Boyle
The Deep Scars of War
Lee Ballinger
Cold Sweat: Sweatshops and the Music Industry
Patrick W. Gavin
Hillary's Slur: Mrs. Lott?
Ramzy Baroud
What Invaders Have in Common
Michael Schwartz
Inside the California Grocery Strike
Gary Johnson
An Interview with Former Heavyweight Champ Greg Page
Dave Zirin
An Interview with Marvin Miller on Unions and Baseball
Mark Hand
A Review of Resistance: My Life for Lebanon
Poets' Basement
Thomas, Daley, Curtis, Guthrie and Albert
Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make
a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!
home / subscribe
/ about us / books
/ archives / search
/ links /
|