FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

BC’s Liberals: a Rogue Government Which Must be Dispatched

by

The experience of anything approaching good government or robust democracy in the province of BC is now such a distant memory that the present danger is people’s low expectations. The Liberal government of Christy Clark is not so much a government as it is an anti-government: contemptuous of both the public good and of the citizens it is supposed to be governing for.

From reckless and damaging tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations (which leaves a budget shortfall of over $3 billion a year) to the $9-13 billion Site ‘C’ dam catastrophe, to the financial commitment to an LNG business that the experts say is not viable, the Liberal government is aiming to govern into the future even if it loses the May 9th election. These decisions will financially cripple future governments.

If governments could be charged with criminal negligence, the Christy Clark Liberals would be in the dock.

Let me list the charges. Criminal negligence causing harm to pupils. Criminal negligence causing harm to families on social assistance and those with disabilities. Criminal negligence causing harm to BC Ferries. Criminal negligence causing harm to BC Hydro, once the pride of the province under governments of all stripes.

The ‘harm to pupils’ should be familiar even to those outside BC given that it received national attention when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled the Clark government violated the constitution when it unilaterally gutted the teachers’ contract language on class size and composition. That resulted in a whole generation of students – fifteen years worth – being denied not only decent class sizes but librarians, specialist teachers and those serving kids with special needs. And the principal reason for this outrage? Christy Clark’s personal animosity towards the BC Teachers’ Federation.

In Christy Clark’s world the first will always be first and the last, last. Under the Liberal government social assistance rates have not been raised in ten years. That means that you get $610 a month for everything (If you are on disability you get $906). You get more if you have kids but forcing a family to exist on such rates in Vancouver is tantamount to child abuse.

Punishing the poor is hardly new in this neo-liberal world but the BC Liberals have proven to be not just right-wing but spectacularly reckless and incompetent when it comes to public utilities. There are, of course, institutions in BC that even the rabid privateers in Clark’s political universe didn’t dare privatize outright: ICBC (the public insurance corp), BC Ferries and BC Hydro. But even though they couldn’t sell off BC Ferries  they ‘commercialized’ it turning it into a semi-private corporation with a mandate to make a profit. Even the National Post, in 2014,   was left rolling its eyes on the results: “[BC Ferries’] government subsidy has ballooned by more than $20-million a year, fares have risen by as much as 100%, and as per one recent study, the combined effect has sapped an incredible $2.3-billion out of the coastal economy.”

But the prize for recklessness would be awarded for what the Liberals have done to BC Hydro – including, most recently, the decision to proceed at record pace with the Site ‘C’ dam project – at $9 billion (which will likely become $13 billion) the most expensive public infrastructure project in BC history. Flying in the face of withering criticism from a large array of strange bedfellows and experts, Clark is furiously building ‘facts on the ground’ so it can’t be stopped.

Among the angry and dumfounded opponents are large industrial users of electricity who in 2014 declared BC Hydro “out of control.”   They will have seen a doubling of electricity costs even before the dam is half built. Some pulp mills have already decided to use natural gas to produce their own – cheaper – electricity.

And just this week UNESCO  added its voice with a dire warning that if the Canadian government didn’t intervene, the negative downstream effects of Site ‘C’ could result in the giant Wood Buffalo National Park being declared a world heritage site “in danger.”

The bizarre 70-year financing of the dam  means that it will not be paid for until 2094. In other words it will be at least two generations before BC citizens see any return on “their” investment.

Former BC Hydro CEO Marc Eliesen  has also denounced the project as irresponsible: “In my view, the directors of BC Hydro have abdicated their fiduciary and legislative responsibility. They have allowed primarily the premier and the minister of energy to run BC Hydro.”

Doctor Harry Swain, who served as the chair of the Site C Joint Review Panel broke his silence in 2016 saying the project was not needed now or in the foreseeable future:   “You would only want to do that if there were an overwhelming economic case that this was the best and cheapest way, including all external effects, of providing something that the provincial economy absolutely required.”

All of this criticism has been tossed aside by the Clark government because of yet another reckless commitment it has made: to the development of a huge liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry in the province supplied by the fracking fields of northeastern BC – the idea being to provide clean Site C electricity to an industry with a huge carbon footprint.

One madness has led to another – because experts in the field of LNG say it will be years, possibly decades, before anything like the Liberals’ plans will play out. Perhaps three or four of the 20 proposed plants envisioned for the BC coast are economically viable – and then only after the huge supply  coming on line in the next few years – increasing world supply by over 50% – is taken up and prices rise.

Despite the ‘facts on the ground’ both Harry Swain and Former Hydro CEO Eliesen said this week it still makes sense to cancel the project.  It would cost at least a couple of billion dollars but that is still cheaper than a potential white elephant with $9 billion in stranded assets – and huge price increases to pay down the costs.

Regrettably we can’t charge this wrecking crew with criminal negligence. But at least on May 9th we can throw them out of office and stop the carnage.

MURRAY DOBBIN, now living in Powell River, BC has been a journalist, broadcaster, author and social activist for over forty years.  He can be reached at murraydobbin@shaw.ca

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

April 26, 2017
Richard Moser
Empire Abroad, Empire At Home
Stan Cox
For Climate Justice, It’s the 33 Percent Who’ll Have to Pick Up the Tab
Paul Craig Roberts
The Looting Machine Called Capitalism
Lawrence Davidson
The Dilemma for Intelligence Agencies
Christy Rodgers
Remaining Animal
Joseph Natoli
Facts, Opinions, Tweets, Words
Mel Gurtov
No Exit? The NY Times and North Korea
Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Women on the Move: Can Three Women and a Truck Quell the Tide of Sexual Violence and Domestic Abuse?
Michael J. Sainato
Trump’s Wikileaks Flip-Flop
Manuel E. Yepe
North Korea’s Antidote to the US
Kim C. Domenico
‘Courting Failure:’ the Key to Resistance is Ending Animacide
Barbara Nimri Aziz
The Legacy of Lynne Stewart, the People’s Lawyer
Andrew Stewart
The People vs. Bernie Sanders
Daniel Warner
“Vive La France, Vive La République” vs. “God Bless America”
April 25, 2017
Russell Mokhiber
It’s Impossible to Support Single-Payer and Defend Obamacare
Nozomi Hayase
Prosecution of Assange is Persecution of Free Speech
Robert Fisk
The Madder Trump Gets, the More Seriously the World Takes Him
Giles Longley-Cook
Trump the Gardener
Bill Quigley
Major Challenges of New Orleans Charter Schools Exposed at NAACP Hearing
Jack Random
Little Fingers and Big Egos
Stanley L. Cohen
Dissent on the Lower East Side: the Post-Political Condition
Stephen Cooper
Conscientious Justice-Loving Alabamians, Speak Up!
Michael J. Sainato
Did the NRA Play a Role in the Forcing the Resignation of Surgeon General?
David Swanson
The F-35 and the Incinerating Ski Slope
Binoy Kampmark
Mike Pence in Oz
Peter Paul Catterall
Green Nationalism? How the Far Right Could Learn to Love the Environment
George Wuerthner
Range Riders: Making Tom Sawyer Proud
Clancy Sigal
It’s the Pits: the Miner’s Blues
Robert K. Tan
Abe is Taking Japan Back to the Bad Old Fascism
April 24, 2017
Mike Whitney
Is Mad Dog Planning to Invade East Syria?    
John Steppling
Puritan Jackals
Robert Hunziker
America’s Tale of Two Cities, Redux
David Jaffe
The Republican Party and the ‘Lunatic Right’
John Davis
No Tomorrow or Fashion-Forward
Patrick Cockburn
Treating Mental Health Patients as Criminals
Jack Dresser
An Accelerating Palestine Rights Movement Faces Uncertain Direction
George Wuerthner
Diet for a Warming Planet
Lawrence Wittner
Why Is There So Little Popular Protest Against Today’s Threats of Nuclear War?
Colin Todhunter
From Earth Day to the Monsanto Tribunal, Capitalism on Trial
Paul Bentley
Teacher’s Out in Front
Franklin Lamb
A Post-Christian Middle East With or Without ISIS?
Kevin Martin
We Just Paid our Taxes — are They Making the U.S. and the World Safer?
Erik Mears
Education Reformers Lowered Teachers’ Salaries, While Promising to Raise Them
Binoy Kampmark
Fleeing the Ratpac: James Packer, Gambling and Hollywood
Weekend Edition
April 21, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Diana Johnstone
The Main Issue in the French Presidential Election: National Sovereignty
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail