FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Unrequited Love: Obama and Netanyahu

by

In how many ways does President Obama love Prime Minister Netanyahu?

Let me briefly count them. There are those obvious and well known signs of love: the President toils to donate Netanyahu’s Israel with more American money than even the Bush-Cheney administration did. According to a report on “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel” by the “Congressional Research Service” [April, 11, 2014, P-26] In 2007, for example, the total amount of direct American governmental aid to Israel (not including loans-guarantees, tax exemptions and private donations) was 2.5 billion dollars; in 2012 it was 3.1 billion – “ceteris paribus” and all, this is one of those incidents when statistics say it more clearly than words of affection.  And the billions are delivered to this “wealthy and powerful country” (Obama’s portrayal) with no conditions attached.

And there’s the subtle moves: sporadically, and ever so cleverly, Obama’s administration manipulate timed and much publicized “personal encounters” with Netanyahu –meaning some tender criticism, or pleading suggestion to speak about the “Green Line” and recently to try and  take it easy with war crimes. All these artificial encounters ended up in the same way: the prime minister — as the true representative of “his people” spirit — gets another opportunity to wail: “Holocaust at the Gate”. And, in all cases, right afterwards the White House showers him with praise describing Netanyahu as a staunch defender of “Israel’s security”.

In a typical moving gesture, the White House termed “barbaric” the mere possibility that an IDF officer was captured by the Hamas inside Gaza. This act of immense empathy was made even before the details of the time-line were even clear. Now it is registered that, at least, both sides are responsible for the broken ceasefire, with the IDF the main offender. That humanitarian “cry from hell” was issued, while citing no more than “concern” over Israeli punitive actions which resulted in many more children and women being butchered than Hamas operatives killed (and hurriedly the President signed on the Congressional act to donate 225 million dollars to emergently replenish the highly overrated “Iron Dome”, and thus assure the smooth continuation of this “most moral of wars”, according to the Israeli ambassador to the U.S.).

The latest “lovers’ quarrel” regarding Israel’s conduct in Gaza, presumably have the Obama administration declare that from now on there will be some strings attached to having, basically for free, the best of American military industry. This farce will end up, as always, with gifts’ strings wrapping up further financial and strategic American contributions. The political implications are that Israelis’ are assured that no matter what is spoken, what is publicized, what is commented on, Netanyahu will always bring the fat American bacon home.

As true love dictates, Obama preserve and defend the cherished assets of Netanyahu and his people: by delegating (“comic relief”) Secretary J. Kerry to lead the peace-negotiations, while giving him no sticks whatsoever to waive in front of Netanyahu, Obama virtually assured that the dismantlement of even one settlement won’t be “on the table”. Thus practically redefining, for all time, the “Two-States” solution as consisting of Greater-Israel (from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean) and the State of Jordan (provided Jordan will recognize Israel as a Jewish Republic).

And for this titanic love affair, the Middle East is not enough: the president of the U.S. supplies Netanyahu’s Israel with the types and quantity of strategic weapons that have the potential to shake the foundations of the world system. One should read that sentence again and contemplate the nature of the Israeli leaders which are endowed with the capability to globally project this kind of destructive power.

Also, material possessions, world-shaking as they maybe, are not enough — there’s a need for the merging of world-views: the President’s unqualified and continues acceptance of Netanyahu’s blatant nuclear incitement as the one and only basis for negotiations with Iran is a prime example. Moreover, Obama took no measure to try and prevent the Republicans from Imposing in Congress major sanctions which were manipulated to need a congressional seal to dismantle (coming right after the “Rupture”).

And the love affair is indeed World-Shaking: in a systemic view, the geopolitical implications of the way Obama handles the manufactured Iranian Crisis (just as Netanyahu like it), are among the main factors – chief among them is the strategically absurd “Anti-Iranian” Anti-Missile System in Eastern Europe — that are accountable for the Russian-American crisis and the renewal of the Nuclear Arms Race — an Historical U-Turn which is hurling Humanity towards the brink of Super-Powers confrontation.

Where does all this love stem for? Before the presidential elections the answer was as obvious as can be – and Obama indeed won. But, after being elected? Well, one possibility is that we’re talking full manifestation of “true love” which no complete explanation can be provided for (though coming closely in “The Princess Bride”). As for other possibilities, the readers are free to choose their wildest (conspiracy) scenarios – writing from Israel, for the time being, I’ll keep mine to myself.

And how is the President rewarded for his most affectionate behavior? The way Obama is perceived and portrayed by the Israeli public at large is mostly unprintable. As for Netanyahu, fitting his lordly position, he recently admonished the American ambassador to tell the U.S and its president: “not to ever second guess me again” — the context was the handling of Hamas in Gaza. But have no fear, Obama actually never doubted Netanyahu, in any context, and the President never will.

Dr. Meir Stieglitz received a PhD in International Relations from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, an M.A in Political Science from U.C. Berkeley and a B.A. in Economics and International Relations from the Hebrew University. Dr. Stieglitz did his Post-Doctoral as an adjunct fellow at the CSIA — Kennedy School of Government and at Harvard’s Economics department.  Dr. Stieglitz studies and writings center on the many aspect and implications –Philosophical, Theoretical, Geo-Political, Strategic and economic – of a fundamental query: Is Humanity Possible?  Since 2003, Dr. Stieglitz quitted all his public and governmental positions in Israel (including weekly columns in leading Israeli newspapers, academic attachments, media appearances and lectures). He is currently employed as a consultant to International Investments Groups on global Geo-Political, Strategic and Macro-Economic issues.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
January 20, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Divide and Rule: Class, Hate, and the 2016 Election
Andrew Levine
When Was America Great?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: This Ain’t a Dream No More, It’s the Real Thing
Yoav Litvin
Making Israel Greater Again: Justice for Palestinians in the Age of Trump
Linda Pentz Gunter
Nuclear Fiddling While the Planet Burns
Ruth Fowler
Standing With Standing Rock: Of Pipelines and Protests
David Green
Why Trump Won: the 50 Percenters Have Spoken
Dave Lindorff
Imagining a Sanders Presidency Beginning on Jan. 20
Peter Lee
The Deep State and the Sex Tape: Martin Luther King, J. Edgar Hoover, and Thurgood Marshall
Pete Dolack
Eight People Own as Much as Half the World
Roger Harris
Too Many People in the World: Names Named
Stephen Zielinski
It’s the End of the World as We Know It
David Swanson
Six Things We Should Do Better As Everything Gets Worse
Alci Rengifo
Trump Rex: Ancient Rome’s Shadow Over the Oval Office
Brian Cloughley
What Money Can Buy: the Quiet British-Israeli Scandal
Kent Paterson
Mexico’s Great Winter of Discontent
Norman Solomon
Trump, the Democrats and the Logan Act
David Macaray
Attention, Feminists
Yves Engler
Demanding More From Our Media
James A Haught
Religious madness in Ulster
Patrick Bond
Tripping Up Trumpism Through Global Boycott Divestment Sanctions
Robert Fantina
Trump: What Changes and What Remains the Same
David Rosen
Globalization vs. Empire: Can Trump Contain the Growing Split?
Elliot Sperber
Dystopia
Dan Bacher
New CA Carbon Trading Legislation Answers Big Oil’s Call to Continue Business As Usual
Wayne Clark
A Reset Button for Political America
Chris Welzenbach
“The Death Ship:” An Allegory for Today’s World
Patrick Hiller
Guns Against Grizzlies at Schools or Peace Education as Resistance?
Ron Jacobs
Singing the Body Electric Across Time
Ann Garrison
Fifty-five Years After Lumumba’s Assassination, Congolese See No Relief
Christopher Brauchli
Swing Low Alabama
Jon Hochschartner
The Five Least Animal-Friendly Senate Democrats
Pauline Murphy
Fighting Fascism: the Irish at the Battle of Cordoba
Louis Proyect
Is Our Future That of “Sense8” or “Mr. Robot”?
Charles R. Larson
Review: Robert Coover’s “Huck out West”
January 19, 2017
Melvin Goodman
America’s Russian Problem
Dave Lindorff
Right a Terrible Wrong: Why Obama Should Reverse Himself and Pardon Leonard Peltier
Laura Carlsen
Bringing Mexico to Its Knees Will Not “Make America Great Again”
John W. Whitehead
Nothing is Real: When Reality TV Programming Masquerades as Politics
Yoav Litvin
Time to Diss Obey: the Failure of Identity Politics and Protest
Mike Whitney
The Trump Speech That No One Heard 
Conn Hallinan
Is Europe Heading for a “Lexit”?
Stephen Cooper
Truth or Twitter? Why Donald Trump Is No John Steinbeck
Binoy Kampmark
Scoundrels of Patriotism: The Freeing of Chelsea Manning
Ramzy Baroud
The Balancing Act is Over: What Elor Azaria Taught Us about Israel
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail