FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The AFL-CIO Should Be in Ferguson

by

The weakness of organized labor is often attributed to its low numbers and they are low for sure. For example, AFL-CIO membership remained stagnant this year at 12.5 million even with the whopping addition last year of 1.3 million UFCW food and commercial workers.

Nonetheless, I believe the falling numbers are more a reflection than an explanation of labor’s decline. Therefore, I do not agree with the prevailing opinion that spending more money on organizing will turn everything around.

Our biggest problems are political, not organizational.

Put another way, corporate power looms large because unions are seriously disconnected from the social aspirations of the majority of working class women and people of color who strive for equality, justice and fair play that cannot be measured or satisfied solely by the size of a paycheck.

It’s been this way for some time but nowhere is this wide gulf more vivid and more tragic than in the AFL-CIO’s spineless reaction to the police murder of yet another young, unarmed African American.

The national Federation issued a very cautiously worded statement of half a dozen sentences even as 18-year old Michael Brown’s grieving family sharply characterized his shooting as an assassination.

This comes on the heels of the AFL-CIO’s anemic and lame “take action” recommendations released last year on the 50th anniversary of the 1963 civil rights March on Washington. The Federation’s bold action plan was to organize a “national symposium,” a “scholarship fund” and support for “teaching staff” to educate young people.

This is embarrassing. My multi-vitamins pack more of a wallop.

In bold contrast to sleeping-pill prescriptions issued from AFL-CIO headquarters, solidarity protests against the police murder of Michael Brown were hastily organized by outraged citizens throughout the country.

Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time labor sat on the sidelines when the African American community was under attack.

It happens time and time again even as there is arguably an epidemic of police murders of Black men and women, something becoming abundantly apparent to many but seemingly unworthy of action by our key labor leaders.

The Aug. 15 edition of The Nation notes that Black people being murdered by police was not unique to Ferguson, nor “to Sanford or Jacksonville; nor to Staten Island; Beavercreek, Ohio; Dearborn Heights, Michigan; Pasadena, California; or any of the other cities” that could have been added.

In fact, one study backs up with photos and source material from 2012 the needless murder every 28 hours of an unarmed Black person by a cop, security officer or vigilante like George Zimmerman.

Very disturbing data.

Nonetheless, despite their needs being chronically ignored, the Black population of 45 million continually poll as the country’s most consistent and biggest union supporters.

Why is Support A One-Way Street?

There is a long history to the wide racial gulf between the Black community and labor. Seminal historian W.E.B. De Bois documented in 1902 that 43 national unions had no black members with another 27 barring Black apprentices, thereby keeping their inclusion to a minimum.

Things got better with the formation of the CIO labor federation in the 1930s if only because organizing the large steel and auto plants would have been impossible without opening the doors of membership to Black workers.

The same alliance resulted in the victorious 1934 West Coast Longshore strike.

As in other basic industries where Black workers were shut out, they were often used as scabs by dock employers. But radical Harry Bridges’ ILWU promised these workers equal access if the union succeeded in winning one of its main strike demands for a union-controlled hiring hall.

As a result, Blacks joined the picket lines instead of crossing them.

In subsequent years, the ILWU became the most powerful example of how social solidarity strengthens a union. By 1945, Black membership in the CIO reached 500,000.

But then, further progress on uniting all sections of the working class for common goals came to a screeching halt.

The now united AFL-CIO abandoned their much-heralded “Southern Strategy” of organizing the South because they refused to challenge entrenched Jim Crow discrimination against Blacks which, by the way, was enforced by labor’s Democratic Party allies.

Just as the massive growth spurt of the CIO in the 1930s demonstrated the power of uniting social and economic justice objectives, so too did the absence in the 1950s of such a unifying formula doom the southern organizing strategy.

The task of organizing the South was halted for reactionary political reasons but it is once again being talked about today by unions desperate for growth.

However, until and unless American labor learns from our mixed past and accepts the political challenges of championing social and civil rights in this country, both our membership and principles will languish on the lowly bottom.

A Racial Divide Exists

We are not dividing our membership by strongly addressing issues of racism. On the contrary, division already exists. Unity of the white working class with the majority of women and people of color in this country can only be achieved on the basis of supporting and defending common social and economic rights.

Continuing to ignore harsh realities of racist discrimination will only continue our separation.

The picture is not totally bleak. There are some positive steps being taken.

Several major unions are making alliances with social justice organizations in the south, supporting millions of impoverished fast-food workers seeking a $15 minimum wage and increasing political support for exploited immigrant workers.

All these efforts place our unions on the side of sealing the social divide in our country.

But, as in the case of the AFL-CIO’s attitude toward the killing of Michael Brown, one wonders if lofty words will be translated into down to earth effective actions.

At a time when the overwhelming majority of working people have no contact with unions, it is imperative that we go to them – as partners in the combined struggle for economic and social rights.

Nowhere is this more true than in the besieged Black community where our natural and most loyal allies await our arrival.

Carl Finamore is former president (ret) and current Local Lodge 1781, IAMAW, delegate to the San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO. He can be reached at local1781@yahoo.com

Carl Finamore is Machinist Lodge 1781 delegate, San Francisco Labor Council, AFL-CIO. He can be reached at local1781@yahoo.com

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

August 31, 2016
NEVE GORDON - NICOLA PERUGINI
Human Shields as Preemptive Legal Defense for Killing Civilians
Jim Kavanagh
Turkey Invades Syria, America Spins The Bottle
Dave Lindorff
Ukraine and the Dumbed-Down New York Times Columnist
Pepe Escobar
Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, a Woman of Honor, Confronts Senate of Scoundrels
Jeff Mackler
Playing the Lesser Evil Game to the Hilt
Steve Horn
Dakota Access Pipeline Tribal Liaison Formerly Worked For Agency Issuing Permit
Patrick Cockburn
Has Turkey Overplayed Its Hand in Syria?
John Chuckman
Why Hillary is the Perfect Person to Secure Obama’s Legacy
Manuel E. Yepe
The New Cold War Between the US and China
Stephen Cooper
Ending California’s Machinery of Death
Stacy Keltner - Ashley McFarland
Women, Party Politics, and the Power of the Naked Body
Hiroyuki Hamada - Ikuko Isa
A Letter from Takae, Okinawa
Aidan O'Brien
How Did Syria and the Rest Do in the Olympics?
David Swanson
Arms Dealing Is Subject of Hollywood Comedy
Jesse Jackson
The Politics of Bigotry: Trump and the Black Voter
August 30, 2016
Russell Mokhiber
Matt Funiciello and the Giant Sucking Sound Coming Off Lake Champlain
Mike Whitney
Three Cheers for Kaepernick: Is Sitting During the National Anthem an Acceptable Form of Protest?
Alice Bach
Sorrow and Grace in Palestine
Sam Husseini
Why We Should All Remain Seated: the Anti-Muslim Origins of “The Star-Spangled Banner”
Richard Moser
Transformative Movement Culture and the Inside/Outside Strategy: Do We Want to Win the Argument or Build the Movement?
Nozomi Hayase
Pathology, Incorporated: the Facade of American Democracy
David Swanson
Fredric Jameson’s War Machine
Jan Oberg
How Did the West Survive a Much Stronger Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact?
Linda Gunter
The Racism of the Nagasaki and Hiroshima Bombings
Dmitry Kovalevich
In Ukraine: Independence From the People
Omar Kassem
Turkey Breaks Out in Jarablus as Fear and Loathing Grip Europe
George Wuerthner
A Birthday Gift to the National Parks: the Maine Woods National Monument
Logan Glitterbomb
Indigenous Property Rights and the Dakota Access Pipeline
National Lawyers Guild
Solidarity with Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against Dakota Access Pipeline
Paul Messersmith-Glavin
100 in Anarchist Years
August 29, 2016
Eric Draitser
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
Patrick Timmons
Dildos on Campus, Gun in the Library: the New York Times and the Texas Gun War
Jack Rasmus
Bernie Sanders ‘OR’ Revolution: a Statement or a Question?
Richard Moser
Strategic Choreography and Inside/Outside Organizers
Nigel Clarke
President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment
Robert Fisk
Iraq’s Willing Executioners
Wahid Azal
The Banality of Evil and the Ivory Tower Masterminds of the 1953 Coup d’Etat in Iran
Farzana Versey
Romancing the Activist
Frances Madeson
Meet the Geronimos: Apache Leader’s Descendants Talk About Living With the Legacy
Nauman Sadiq
The War on Terror and the Carter Doctrine
Lawrence Wittner
Does the Democratic Party Have a Progressive Platform–and Does It Matter?
Marjorie Cohn
Death to the Death Penalty in California
Winslow Myers
Asking the Right Questions
Rivera Sun
The Sane Candidate: Which Representatives Will End the Endless Wars?
Linn Washington Jr.
Philadelphia District Attorney Hammered for Hypocrisy
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail