FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Nobody in the Obama Administration Gives a Damn

by

As the east Ukraine rebels announced their agreement to a ceasefire with the humanitarian crisis in Donetsk and Luhansk surpassing a deterioration of public utilities and the indiscriminate carnage of an unarmed civilian population, the ongoing attacks by the US-supported Ukrainian army continues.

And just as the Obama Administration displayed no, nada, zero, zilch compassion for the Palestinian people suffering  under a heavy artillery assault and massive invasion by the IDF, so too the Obama Administration which historically wraps itself in the self-delusion of being the good guys, have turned a cold shoulder  to the people of east Ukraine.

It may still strike some Americans as a surprising shock that a Democratic Presidential Administration would display such a cruel and grotesquely inhumane response to the obvious human devastation taking place in Ukraine.  The willingness of the Obama Administration to inflict extreme suffering on Ukraine citizens with no mercy, not a shred of charity, intent only on a big fat payback to Russian President Vladimir Putin at the expense of precious human life may be judged by a universal force greater than the American voter as an unforgiveable sin against humanity.

As the Donetsk rebel leaders who opposed the ouster of the democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych in February, are now surrounded and trapped, facing a looming catastrophe in a city of one million citizens, they have offered a truce,  Vice President Joe Biden relayed the message to Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko that “any Russian action in Ukraine even for  purported ‘humanitarian’  purposes, without the formal, express consent and authorization of the Ukraine government would be unacceptable and a violation of international law.” 

Sounding eerily reminiscent of the soulless Israel President Benyamin Netanyahu, Biden and Poroshenko agreed that “if Russia were serious about improving the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine, it had to immediately stop its shelling of Ukrainian troops and release Ukrainian hostages being held inside Russia, as well as cut its provision of weapons to Russian proxies operating in Ukraine.”

In addition to the blathering nonsense that either a ceasefire or humanitarian aid is a violation of international law, there are only speculative US satellite images that provide no credible evidence, not a scintilla of  factual proof that the Russians have been shelling Ukrainian troops.  The fact remains that if Russia had been providing weapons across the border, it would be reasonable to expect that the rebels in Donetsk and Luhansk would not now be surrounded and on the verge of surrender or suffering a human catastrophe.

What the recently US declassified satellite images do not prove is the source of Russian weapons – whether they came with disaffected Russian-speaking Ukrainian troops, earlier raids on Ukraine supply depots or a decades-old black marketeer.

And as the “Vice President and President Poroshenko reiterated that we continue to urge Russia to engage with the international community and the Ukrainian government to find a political solution to the crisis,” that is exactly what Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov have been attempting for several months – only to be spurned by the intransigence of the White House.

The same day as Biden’s call to Poroshenko, President Obama called German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister David Cameron to obtain their agreement to the same condition; namely that there will be no ceasefire or humanitarian assistance from Russia to the peoples of east Ukraine.  What remains in doubt is exactly who else might provide the necessary  level of adequate humanitarian assistance with the same dispatch since the suffering population are largely Russian speaking.

After his conversation with Obama, Cameron issued a statement reiterating that any humanitarian aid from Russia was “unjustified and illegal” as UK Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond agreed with ”I strongly urge Russia to avoid any provocative actions.”    Even as the UN estimated over 1,300 deaths since April, Hammond added that “The conditions for such an intervention in eastern Ukraine manifestly do not exist. In these circumstances, such an intervention would be unjustified and illegal.”

In response, the Russian Embassy to the UK replied that

“Russia did not supply and is not supplying weapons to Ukraine.  Despite previous international agreements, including provisions of the Geneva Statement of 17 April and the Berlin Declaration of 2 July, Kiev continues a large-scale military operation in this region using heavy artillery, armoured vehicles, Grad multi-launch missile systems, causing deaths of Ukrainian civilians and mass destruction of civilian infrastructure.”

On Tuesday, Lavrov suggested a proposal that the UN Security Council deploy an international humanitarian mission with Russian humanitarian aid under the auspices of the International Committee of the Red Cross in eastern Ukraine.   The ICRC in Geneva immediately announced its support for a humanitarian intervention citing that “In the current situation, any humanitarian initiative is welcome to alleviate the suffering of civilians” and that “The current situation calls for a bigger effort to help the civilian population, and we are deploying additional teams in Marioupol and Starobilsk.”

Meanwhile UN Ambassador Samantha Power who has frequently justified military action in Libya, Syria and elsewhere as ‘humanitarian’ intervention, responded that “Any further unilateral intervention by Russia in Ukrainian territory, including one under the guise of providing humanitarian aid, would be completely unacceptable and deeply alarming and would be viewed as an invasion of Ukraine.”

Whether it be Biden, Obama or Kerry or any member of Congress, what the US stark lack of political sophistication or statesman-like demeanor have consistently failed to recognize is that any escalation of violence on its border with Ukraine does not serve the economic or long term  interests of Russia.  Just as the annexation of Crimea was swift, without bloodshed and democratic, Putin appears to have missed the opportunity to allow the Donbass to annex itself to Russia with the west unable to respond as they were during the Crimean merger.

With the President’s performance on foreign policy at a 54% disapproval rating by Americans and a mere 37% approval, one might expect that any occupant of the Oval Office would respond with haste to do whatever it might take to improve those numbers –  a ceasefire, a formal negotiation, a withdrawal of military forces, an urgent supply of humanitarian assistance – but the reality is that no one in the Obama Administration gives a damn.

Renee Parsons was a staffer in the U.S. House of Representatives and a lobbyist on nuclear energy issues with Friends of the Earth.  in 2005, she was elected to the Durango City Council and served as Councilor and Mayor.  Currently, she is a member of the Treasure Coast ACLU Board.

Renee Parsons was a staffer in the U.S. House of Representatives and a lobbyist on nuclear energy issues with Friends of the Earth.  in 2005, she was elected to the Durango City Council and served as Councilor and Mayor.  Currently, she is a member of the Treasure Coast ACLU Board.

More articles by:
Weekend Edition
July 22, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Good as Goldman: Hillary and Wall Street
Joseph E. Lowndes
From Silent Majority to White-Hot Rage: Observations from Cleveland
Paul Street
Political Correctness: Handle with Care
Conn Hallinan
The Big Boom: Nukes And NATO
Ron Jacobs
Exacerbate the Split in the Ruling Class
Richard Moser
Actions Express Priorities: 40 Years of Failed Lesser Evil Voting
Eric Draitser
Hillary and Tim Kaine: a Match Made on Wall Street
Jill Stein
After US Airstrikes Kill 73 in Syria, It’s Time to End Military Assaults that Breed Terrorism
Jack Rasmus
Trump, Trade and Working Class Discontent
John Feffer
Could a Military Coup Happen Here?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Late Night, Wine-Soaked Thoughts on Trump’s Jeremiad
Andrew Levine
Vice Presidents: What Are They Good For?
Michael Lukas
Law, Order, and the Disciplining of Black Bodies at the Republican National Convention
Margaret Kimberley
Gavin Long’s Last Words
Mark Weisbrot
Confidence and the Degradation of Brazil
Brian Cloughley
Boris Johnson: Britain’s Lying Buffoon
Lawrence Reichard
A Global Crossroad
Kevin Schwartz
Beyond 28 Pages: Saudi Arabia and the West
Charles Pierson
The Courage of Kalyn Chapman James
Michael Brenner
Terrorism Redux
Bruce Lerro
Being Inconvenienced While Minding My Own Business: Liberals and the Social Contract Theory of Violence
Mark Dunbar
The Politics of Jeremy Corbyn
David Swanson
Top 10 Reasons Why It’s Just Fine for U.S. to Blow Up Children
Binoy Kampmark
Laura Ingraham and Trumpism
Uri Avnery
The Great Rift
Nicholas Buccola
What’s the Matter with What Ted Said?
Aidan O'Brien
Thank Allah for Western Democracy, Despondency and Defeat
Joseph Natoli
The Politics of Crazy and Stupid
Sher Ali Khan
Empirocracy
Nauman Sadiq
A House Divided: Turkey’s Failed Coup Plot
Franklin Lamb
A Roadmap for Lebanon to Grant Civil Rights for Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon
Colin Todhunter
Power and the Bomb: Conducting International Relations with the Threat of Mass Murder
Michael Barker
UK Labour’s Rightwing Select Corporate Lobbyist to Oppose Jeremy Corbyn
Graham Peebles
Brexit, Trump and Lots of Anger
Anhvinh Doanvo
Civilian Deaths, Iraq, Syria, ISIS and Drones
Christopher Brauchli
Kansas and the Phantom Voters
Peter Lee
Gavin Long’s Manifesto and the Politics of “Terrorism”
Missy Comley Beattie
An Alarmingly Ignorant Fuck
Robert Koehler
Volatile America
Adam Vogal
Why Black Lives Matter To Me
Raouf Halaby
It Is Not Plagiarism, Y’all
Rivera Sun
Nonviolent History: South Africa’s Port Elizabeth Boycott
Rev. Jeff Hood
Deliver Us From Babel
Frances Madeson
Juvenile Life Without Parole, Captured in ‘Natural Life’
Charles R. Larson
Review: Han Kang’s “The Vegetarian”
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail