FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Obama’s Narrowing Latino Options

by

Publicly, the Obama White House remains confident that key Democratic voter groups will show up at the polls this November, allowing the party to retain control of the US Senate and minimize its losses in the House.  But don’t believe a word of what you hear from top Democrats like Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).  The party’s desperation is palpable – and growing.  As I wrote last month, the erosion of support among Latinos has reached alarming levels not seen since the collapse of mid-2011.   And unlike in late 2012, when Obama could issue an executive order staying the deportation of undocumented immigrant students, electrifying his Latino base, the president has much less room to maneuver now.  A second executive order, which many Latino activists are urging upon the President, could feed the GOP’s narrative about “executive overreach,” further alienating independent voters in key competitive districts.

Moreover, the GOP is no longer as vulnerable on immigration as it once was.  In recent months, the party has largely closed ranks on the need for some version of “comprehensive immigration reform” – including a partial “amnesty” — and has even begun outlining elements of the legislation it plans to pass should it capture control of the Senate.  The GOP’s willingness to play ball – even if on its own terms — makes it difficult to justify an executive order, and indeed, severely raises the risk that such a move will be seen as a transparent partisan maneuver. However much it might galvanize Latinos, it could easily backfire with everyone else.

If immigration were Obama’s only problem, it might be easier for the president to assuage Latino concerns.  However, Latinos are beginning to peel away from the Democrats for other reasons.  A little-noticed Zogby poll released this week found that Latinos still tend to trust the Democrats more than the GOP to handle foreign policy, health care, and education, and still believe that Democrats are more in touch with Latino concerns on the whole.  However, Latinos have now joined the rest of the country in turning against the president on the economy, favoring the GOP 36%-25%.  In fact, a large percentage of Latino voters are still undecided on nearly all of these issues, and the Democrats barely earn 35% support even when they do edge out the GOP.  This means that much of the Latino vote, in a way not seen since the Bush years, is volatile, and might swing either way.

Part of the challenge for Obama is not just to win over Latino public opinion in the abstract but to rally Latino advocacy organizations – and the all-important Hispanic media — to exhort Latinos to vote.   But Obama hasn’t given these organizations much to cheer about.   In fact, they aren’t just disappointed that Obama is letting the GOP upstage him on immigration; they’re also disturbed that the president, despite his assurances, hasn’t appointed more Latinos to positions in his government – far fewer than his predecessor, in fact.  During his first term, no Latino occupied a top cabinet post but Obama did name Hilda Solis as Secretary of Labor and Ken Salazar as Secretary of Interior.  However, both have since left government.  A year ago, in response to criticism from the National Council for La Raza, the president agreed to work on a special initiative with the Office of Personnel Management to recruit and hire Latinos to more positions in the federal bureaucracy.  La Raza welcomed the move but it hasn’t mollified Latinos or soothed their anger at having played such an important role in winning Obama’s re-election without having received much in the way of political rewards – to say nothing of real economic advancement.

It’s that anger – and the real and growing threat of more massive Latino disaffection — which explains two recent developments.   One is Obama’s largely behind-the-scenes review of his deportation policy, focusing specifically on the controversial – and euphemistically named – “Secure Communities” program.   The program — begun in the waning days of the Bush administration, but fast-tracked under Obama — requires all of the nation’s prisons to identify and detain undocumented immigrants convicted of a major felony.  In fact, the program has exceeded its mandate by deporting thousands of immigrants guilty of minor misdemeanors—or worse, persons merely suspected of committing a crime.   Once a person is brought in for questioning – and booked – his or her fingerprints are sent to a federal database and matched against those with legal status.  Those that fail the check can be detained immediately, even if they turn out to be innocent of whatever charge they were first arrested on.  Adding insult to injury, Obama has even tried to make Secure Communities mandatory and to eliminate an “opt out” for local jurisdictions, including some “sanctuary” cities, that might object to the program.   Now even many police chiefs are quietly resisting compliance, and Obama, according to inside sources, is considering suspending or even eliminating the program, if only to assuage Latinos in the run up to the mid-terms.

A second, more visible part of Obama’s Latino damage-control strategy was his decision last week – largely unexpected – to appoint three-term San Antonio mayor Julian Castro to head up the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).   Castro, a rising young Latino star, made a big splash nationally when he delivered the keynote address for Obama at the Democratic Party convention in 2012.   Some of Castro’s boosters have promoted the idea that he might make an attractive running mate for Hillary Clinton in 2016 – a long-shot at best, given how “green” he still is.   Nevertheless, his appointment at HUD is likely to fuel such speculation further, which can only help Obama and the Democrats in the short-term.  Could the HUD posting give Castro the managerial experience he sorely lacks, while raising his visibility still further?  Not likely.   Historically, he position at HUD has proven to a graveyard for those with national electoral ambitions – just ask Rep. Jack Kemp or Henry Cisneros, another Democratic Latino – and coincidentally, another former San Antonio mayor — who was passed over for the vice presidency by Walter Mondale in 1984.   Cisneros met with Mondale thinking that the former vice president was seriously considering him for the post but Mondale quickly disabused him of that notion, saying a stint at HUD hardly gave Cisneros – Latino or not — the gravitas and heft he needed to contribute powerfully to the ticket.

In fact, when Castro himself was asked about a slot at HUD a year ago, he disavowed any interest in serving in Obama administration at any level.  He admitted, though, that he might consider Transportation.   The fact is, Castro can only run for one more two-year term as mayor of San Antonio and there are few other political avenues open in a state like Texas that still leans strongly GOP, despite the best efforts of Democrats to turn it Blue.   He needs a new political foothold somewhere while the Democrats, going into 2014, could use another highly visible Latino face.    As political appointments go, this one is about as token as it gets.

Sadly, this may be all the Obama administration has to offer Latinos at the moment – and it’s highly unlikely to make much difference in November.  Obama has already publicly invoked the iron law of American politics that parties in power generally suffer losses in the mid-terms, which suggests that the president and his party know full well they’re heading for defeat.  But there’s a big difference between mid-term loss that keeps the Senate in Democratic hands and a 2010-style “blow-out” that shifts the entire legislative momentum to the GOP.   Maybe Obama is content to try to exercise his veto power for the remaining two years of his presidency.  The problem?  That’s hardly enough to keep anxious Latinos – especially the group’s large bloc of swing voters — patiently waiting in the Democratic fold.

Stewart J. Lawrence can be reached at stewartlawrence81147@gmail.com

Stewart J. Lawrence can be reached at stewartlawrence81147@gmail.com

More articles by:
May 30, 2016
Ron Jacobs
The State of the Left: Many Movements, Too Many Goals?
James Abourezk
The Intricacies of Language
Porfirio Quintano
Hillary, Honduras, and My Late Friend Berta
Patrick Cockburn
Airstrikes on ISIS are Reducing Their Cities to Ruins
Uri Avnery
The Center Doesn’t Hold
Rodrigue Tremblay
Barack Obama’s Legacy: What happened?
Matt Peppe
Just the Facts: The Speech Obama Should Have Given at Hiroshima
Deborah James
Trade Pacts and Deregulation: Latest Leaks Reveal Core Problem with TISA
Michael Donnelly
Still Wavy after All These Years: Flower Geezer Turns 80
Ralph Nader
The Funny Business of Farm Credit
Paul Craig Roberts
Memorial Day and the Glorification of Past Wars
Colin Todhunter
From Albrecht to Monsanto: A System Not Run for the Public Good Can Never Serve the Public Good
Rivera Sun
White Rose Begins Leaflet Campaigns June 1942
Tom H. Hastings
Field Report from the Dick Cheney Hunting Instruction Manual
Weekend Edition
May 27, 2016
Friday - Sunday
John Pilger
Silencing America as It Prepares for War
Rob Urie
By the Numbers: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are Fringe Candidates
Paul Street
Feel the Hate
Daniel Raventós - Julie Wark
Basic Income Gathers Steam Across Europe
Andrew Levine
Hillary’s Gun Gambit
Jeffrey St. Clair
Hand Jobs: Heidegger, Hitler and Trump
S. Brian Willson
Remembering All the Deaths From All of Our Wars
Dave Lindorff
With Clinton’s Nixonian Email Scandal Deepening, Sanders Must Demand Answers
Pete Dolack
Millions for the Boss, Cuts for You!
Gunnar Westberg
Close Calls: We Were Much Closer to Nuclear Annihilation Than We Ever Knew
Peter Lee
To Hell and Back: Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Karl Grossman
Long Island as a Nuclear Park
Binoy Kampmark
Sweden’s Assange Problem: The District Court Ruling
Robert Fisk
Why the US Dropped Its Demand That Assad Must Go
Martha Rosenberg – Ronnie Cummins
Bayer and Monsanto: a Marriage Made in Hell
Brian Cloughley
Pivoting to War
Stavros Mavroudeas
Blatant Hypocrisy: the Latest Late-Night Bailout of Greece
Arun Gupta
A War of All Against All
Dan Kovalik
NPR, Yemen & the Downplaying of U.S. War Crimes
Randy Blazak
Thugs, Bullies, and Donald J. Trump: The Perils of Wounded Masculinity
Murray Dobbin
Are We Witnessing the Beginning of the End of Globalization?
Daniel Falcone
Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen, an Interview with David Hilfiker
Gloria Jimenez
In Honduras, USAID Was in Bed with Berta Cáceres’ Accused Killers
Kent Paterson
The Old Braceros Fight On
Lawrence Reichard
The Seemingly Endless Indignities of Air Travel: Report from the Losing Side of Class Warfare
Peter Berllios
Bernie and Utopia
Stan Cox – Paul Cox
Indonesia’s Unnatural Mud Disaster Turns Ten
Linda Pentz Gunter
Obama in Hiroshima: Time to Say “Sorry” and “Ban the Bomb”
George Souvlis
How the West Came to Rule: an Interview with Alexander Anievas
Julian Vigo
The Government and Your i-Phone: the Latest Threat to Privacy
Stratos Ramoglou
Why the Greek Economic Crisis Won’t be Ending Anytime Soon
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail