FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Destroying Olive Branches in the Middle East

by

Many people like olives because they are delicious and produce wonderful oil.  They were originally cultivated in Syria, Palestine and Crete and there is evidence that some existing trees are 2,000 years old, which is amazing.

But there aren’t any 2,000 year-old olive trees in Palestine, nowadays. Indeed there are very few left in the Palestinian lands that have been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967.  Since then, the Israelis have destroyed 800,000 Palestinian olive trees and last week the Israeli army cut down another 52 in a village whose farmers are being driven into poverty by yet another vicious act of Israeli malice. The destruction was ignored by Western nations which claim they want a solution to what US Secretary of State Kerry calls a “puzzle where it is important to fit together all the pieces into a coherent whole.”

Yes, it’s a puzzle.  But even Kerry, in an off-guard truthful moment, ventured to say that if there is no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon, Israel risks becoming “an apartheid state with second-class citizens.”

That was welcome acknowledgement of Israel’s intentions and arrogance, but Kerry withdrew his words when there were yelps of disapproval. The usual people protested and received the customary encouraging publicity that is given to Israel by the US media.  Israel’s main representative in Congress, the House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, said it was “both offensive and inaccurate.”  And the censure caused Kerry to announce that he, like almost every US politician, “will not allow my commitment to Israel to be questioned by anyone, particularly for partisan, political purposes,”  which, alas, was a statement made for partisan political purposes.  He chose to ignore the fact that Israel is already an apartheid state where Palestinians are non-citizens.

There is nowhere else in the world, apart from Britain’s mediaeval Tribal Areas of Northern Ireland, where twenty-foot high concrete barriers separate peoples of different religions.  But the Israelis go further, because their barricades exemplify apartheid which is “a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race.”  Israel has 400 miles of walls separating Israel’s Jews from Palestine’s Arabs, and one of its latest extensions involves a village near Bethlehem which grows olives in “unique terraced hills built by hand over millennia.”  Its irrigation system was built by the Romans and has lasted 2,000 years, but it’s going to be destroyed by the Israelis. And nobody will do anything about it.

There will not be a squeak of protest from any western country, least of all the United States whose legislative system is controlled by the Israeli lobby. The wealthy propaganda and lobbying machine, AIPAC, the America Israel Public Affairs Committee, calls the shots in Washington and has given money to almost every Senator and Member of the House of Representatives.  And why would it do that?

All decent people are in favour of donating to charities. But legislators of the US Congress are not charities. When they are given money by an organisation of any sort they are expected to produce results that are favourable to the donor — and in the case of AIPAC they certainly do that.  President Obama isn’t a charity, either, and his speech to the 2011 AIPAC forum was grovelling and obsequious.

Obama declared that “I and my administration have made the security of Israel a priority.  It’s why we’ve increased cooperation between our militaries to unprecedented levels.  It’s why we’re making our most advanced technologies available to our Israeli allies.  (Applause.)  It’s why, despite tough fiscal times, we’ve increased foreign military financing to record levels.  (Applause) . . .  Today, Iran is virtually cut off from large parts of the international financial system, and we’re going to keep up the pressure . . .   the number of Palestinians living west of the Jordan River is growing rapidly and fundamentally reshaping the demographic realities of both Israel and the Palestinian Territories . . .”

He continued his pathetic discourse by declaring that “I thought of all the centuries that the children of Israel had longed to return to their ancient homeland . . .  [and]  when an effort was made to insert the United Nations into matters that should be resolved through direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, we vetoed it (applause).”

This was probably the most pitifully sycophantic speech ever made by a US president.  But he needed AIPAC support for his re-election campaign the following year. And of course he got it.

Two days after Obama’s rejection of the Palestinian people the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, addressed both houses of Congress in a triumphant diatribe denying the rights of Palestinians. And for this he received adulation on a scale hitherto reserved for international figures of illustrious achievement.

Since 1824, when the French hero of the Revolutionary War, the Marquis de Lafayette, was the first distinguished foreigner invited to deliver a speech to America’s legislators, dignitaries from each of France and Britain have spoken at eight joint meetings of Congress, the greatest number of addresses by representatives of any countries (and Churchill’s three orations were historic) ;   but there haven’t been any French or British luminaries welcomed in recent years.

So guess which country has been privileged to be awarded the next highest number of appearances in front of the legislators of the world’s greatest democracy.

Washington has laid out the Congressional carpet seven times for Israeli politicians, and Netanyahu leads with two imperial appearances.  And after his last triumphant performance it was reported that “President Obama got 25 standing ovations from Congress during his 2011 State of the Union address. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got 29 today.”

It is barely credible that this brutally racist prime minister could receive such adulation from the massed representatives of a nation having a Declaration of Independence declaring that “unalienable Rights” include “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Life?  —  A recent letter in Britain’s medical journal The Lancet notes that  “the life expectancy table [for 187 countries, in the Global Burden of Disease Study] ranks healthy life expectancy at birth for men in Israel at ninth worldwide, compared with 86th for men in the neighbouring Occupied Palestinian Territory. Corresponding ranks for women are 12th and 97th, respectively. This astonishing gap highlights yet again the apartheid-like regime that is in place in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. We must all remember that the artificial boundaries currently in place between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories were not in place 60 years ago, so the sizeable life expectancy gap is a recent phenomenon.”

There is little liberty or happiness for Palestinians in their own country, because almost all Arab lands have been seized by the Jews. Yet Israel’s persecution of Palestinians meets with the wholehearted support of America’s government whose taxpayers give Israel over three billion dollars a year.

The bankrolled legislators of America’s Congress contemptuously ignore UN Security Council Resolutions about Palestinian rights. In 1979, with the US abstaining, the Council declared that “the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.”

But UN resolutions mean nothing to Congress or presidents if they are critical of Israel. Election money is much more important.  In total, Washington has vetoed 42 Council resolutions intended to curb or criticise Israeli excesses. And in his grovelling speech to AIPAC Barak Obama declared that “The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps — (applause).”

While the recent talks between Israel and Palestine were taking place the Israelis approved the illegal building of  another 13,851 new settlement houses on Palestinian land.  So the talks collapsed.  They were never meant to succeed by either Washington or Tel Aviv.

You would think that Israel might want to come to some sort of equitable arrangement with the Palestinians.  But Netanyahu will not consider any pact other than a one-sided declaration of total supremacy.  He wants eradication of the Palestinian people.  And Washington’s unconditional support for Netanyahu and his contemptible regime means that Israel will carry on its policy of apartheid, aided by hacking down the olive branches of peace.  The Israelis will continue building illegal settlements and destroying the olive groves of Palestine.

Brian Cloughley lives in France.

A version of this piece appeared in The News (Pakistan) on 12 May.

Brian Cloughley writes about foreign policy and military affairs. He lives in Voutenay sur Cure, France.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
February 24, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Exxon’s End Game Theory
Pierre M. Sprey - Franklin “Chuck” Spinney
Sleepwalking Into a Nuclear Arms Race with Russia
Paul Street
Liberal Hypocrisy, “Late-Shaming,” and Russia-Blaming in the Age of Trump
Ajamu Baraka
Malcolm X and Human Rights in the Time of Trumpism: Transcending the Master’s Tools
John Laforge
Did Obama Pave the Way for More Torture?
Mike Whitney
McMaster Takes Charge: Trump Relinquishes Control of Foreign Policy 
Patrick Cockburn
The Coming Decline of US and UK Power
Louisa Willcox
The Endangered Species Act: a Critical Safety Net Now Threatened by Congress and Trump
Vijay Prashad
A Foreign Policy of Cruel Populism
John Chuckman
Israel’s Terrible Problem: Two States or One?
Matthew Stevenson
The Parallax View of Donald Trump
Norman Pollack
Drumbeat of Fascism: Find, Arrest, Deport
Stan Cox
Can the Climate Survive Electoral Democracy? Maybe. Can It Survive Capitalism? No.
Ramzy Baroud
The Trump-Netanyahu Circus: Now, No One Can Save Israel from Itself
Edward Hunt
The United States of Permanent War
David Morgan
Trump and the Left: a Case of Mass Hysteria?
Pete Dolack
The Bait and Switch of Public-Private Partnerships
Mike Miller
What Kind of Movement Moment Are We In? 
Elliot Sperber
Why Resistance is Insufficient
Brian Cloughley
What are You Going to Do About Afghanistan, President Trump?
Binoy Kampmark
Warring in the Oncology Ward
Yves Engler
Remembering the Coup in Ghana
Jeremy Brecher
“Climate Kids” v. Trump: Trial of the Century Pits Trump Climate Denialism Against Right to a Climate System Capable of Sustaining Human Life”
Jonathan Taylor
Hate Trump? You Should Have Voted for Ron Paul
Franklin Lamb
Another Small Step for Syrian Refugee Children in Beirut’s “Aleppo Park”
Ron Jacobs
The Realist: Irreverence Was Their Only Sacred Cow
Andre Vltchek
Lock up England in Jail or an Insane Asylum!
Rev. William Alberts
Grandiose Marketing of Spirituality
Paul DeRienzo
Three Years Since the Kitty Litter Disaster at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Eric Sommer
Organize Workers Immigrant Defense Committees!
Steve Cooper
A Progressive Agenda
David Swanson
100 Years of Using War to Try to End All War
Andrew Stewart
The 4CHAN Presidency: A Media Critique of the Alt-Right
Edward Leer
Tripping USA: The Chair
Randy Shields
Tom Regan: The Life of the Animal Rights Party
Nyla Ali Khan
One Certain Effect of Instability in Kashmir is the Erosion of Freedom of Expression and Regional Integration
Rob Hager
The Only Fake News That Probably Threw the Election to Trump was not Russian 
Mike Garrity
Why Should We Pay Billionaires to Destroy Our Public Lands? 
Mark Dickman
The Prophet: Deutscher’s Trotsky
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of the Toilet Police
Ezra Kronfeld
Joe Manchin: a Senate Republicrat to Dispute and Challenge
Clancy Sigal
The Nazis Called It a “Rafle”
Louis Proyect
Socialism Betrayed? Inside the Ukrainian Holodomor
Charles R. Larson
Review: Timothy B. Tyson’s “The Blood of Emmett Till”
David Yearsley
Founding Father of American Song
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail