Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! We only shake you down once a year, but when we do we really mean it. It costs a lot to keep the site afloat, and our growing audience, well over TWO million unique viewers a month, eats up a lot of bandwidth — and bandwidth isn’t free. We aren’t supported by corporate donors, advertisers or big foundations. We survive solely on your support.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

USA RIP?

by

American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer wants to become British, joining the ranks of other major corporations opening “headquarters” in low-tax-rate countries. At 21.0 percent in the U.K. versus 32.8 percent in the U.S., it’s a no-brainer. At the same time, roads, bridges, and airports – infrastructure that helped make the U.S. great more than a half century ago – is falling apart. Is there a connection?

Pfizer’s move is an old-fashioned takeover, hoping to acquire AstraZeneca for more than $100 billion, creating the world’s largest pharmaceutical group in the process. The modern part is the right to pay almost 40% less tax than legislated in the U.S. One calculation put the savings at $3.8 billion.

Another American pharmaceutical company investing in “inversion” or relocating their tax base away from the U.S. has set up in Ireland, where the corporate tax rate is a measly 12.5%. Endo has hoisted its shingle in a basement office in Dublin, where a skeleton staff is claiming “headquarters” status for its 4,100 Pennsylvania-based employees. The move is expected to save $75 million in taxes.

According to the Financial Times (April 30), Endo’s most recent major purchase was a Nespresso machine and the basement door of their new global “headquarters” doesn’t even have a brass name plate. As they would say in any of a hundred Dublin pubs located only blocks from Endo and the nearby Irish parliament, “Are you taking the piss?” Indeed, as the Financial Times further noted, the effective tax rate for U.S. pharmaceutical companies over the past decade is, in fact, “less than 6 per cent on over $100 billion of Irish profits,” less than half the official measly rate. No wonder corporations want to be tax resident in Ireland or Britain. No need to be Swiss or Cayman any more.

Inversion is all the rage for corporations looking to improve shareholder value. By listing profits in low-tax-rate jurisdictions overseas, American corporations save billions. Of course, some established companies don’t bother to move, using their own home-grown loopholes to escape the tax man. The largest corporation in the United States, General Electric, made U.S. profits of $5.1 billion in 2010, yet paid no taxes. In fact, they claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion. But to park almost $60 billion in “trapped” foreign profits, they want in on the international game too, hoping to acquire French power giant Alstom for tax purposes, a company Industry minister Arnaud Montebourg referred to as a “national jewel.”

Anything to keep their money from the American government. At the same time, American infrastructure is falling apart, with little will to maintain roads, bridges, or airports, not to mention a failing education system.

Government seems loath to get involved in public works, despite the past success of major nation-building projects. The FDR-inspired New Deal helped to build the Hoover Dam, a national interstate highway system, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), the nation’s largest public utility that provides almost 200 billion kWh and more than 40,000 jobs.

Depending on which side of the fence one stands, the TVA represents all that is wrong with government – top-down planning and restricted competition – or all that is right with government – organized effort and economic development. The New Deal heralded a proud new America still reeling after a decade of economic misery. In short, infrastructure helped rebuild America.

The top-down planning of NASA’s Apollo program and subsequent space missions helped bring about necessary component miniaturization needed in space, paving the way for the modern microchip revolution. Where would high-tech giants such as Intel, Microsoft, HP, or Apple be, never mind the recent Internet behemoths Google, Amazon, eBay, or Facebook, without government investment in the space program?

In a slimmed-down crisis-filled world, however, the U.S. space agency can’t even get to the International Space Station now without hitching a Russian ride (made all the more difficult with the current European border crises). In 2007, the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed over the Mississippi River, what Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty called “a catastrophe of historic proportions,” before acknowledging the lack of government funding in highway infrastructure. Joe Biden even recently likened passing through La Guardia airport to being in a third-world country. From New Orleans to Detroit, basic federal infrastructure is decaying piece by rotting piece.

Unfortunately, the U.S. is becoming a user-pay society, with different rules for the wealthy, elaborate gated communities, and multi-tiered levels of health care. If you can provide your own high-priced lawyers, security forces, and medical staffs, you don’t need government infrastructure. You don’t need government.

But infrastructure is a part of any national identity, as governments and people decide what’s important and strategic. In Germany, the state bars intercity bus travel to protect state-run train travel. In Canada, a multi-billion-dollar potash company takeover was deemed not to be of “net benefit” to Canada and blocked. In China, government subsidies spur on green technology to combat rising pollution. Integrated travel, mineral resources, and clean energy matter. In the United States, it seems keeping shareholders happy matters.

Pfizer has even cheekily threatened the U.K. government not to block their takeover of AstraZeneca, the 7,000-strong, London-based company they hope to outmuscle for preferred U.K. tax status, and a place to park their $85-billion overseas war chest. Known for popular performers such as Viagra, Pfizer’s own hard-on now is for reduced taxes. Forget outside innovation or the so-called R&D pipeline, the real jewel is increased share value via reduced taxes.

One wonders what Pfizer would do if the government sent them the bill for educating its workforce, providing on-demand electricity and water, or policing streets to protect their assets, important infrastructure and utilities falling short now because of vast reductions in the government tax take. By the way, AstraZeneca makes cancer-therapy drugs, not that that matters to the bottom line or shareholder profits.

When finance replaces industry as a national goal, decline follows. At the peak of the British Empire, business received preferential government treatment through an expanded circle of merchant bankers, who were no longer subject to any one government. Giovanni Arrighi noted in The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of our Times that “the massive relocation of surplus capital from industry to finance resulted in unprecedented prosperity for the bourgeoisie, partly at the expense of the working class.” In Empire, Niall Ferguson noted that of the more than threefold increase in per capita British GDP during almost 200 years of Indian rule, most of the profits “went to British managing agencies, banks or shareholders.” Over the same time, the Indian GDP per capita grew by only 14%. Basically, money any way you can get it.

To be sure, economic competition is a hazard when everyone wants the same limited resources or, in modern economic-speak, the same low tax rates. Regulation disappears, junk becomes gold, and the citizen consumer ends up with the bill. Barack Obama has gone on record saying he will tackle tax evasion, including a proposal in his most recent budget to outlaw inversion. But in fact, Obama and Co are really thinking about how to implement their own low corporate tax rate to keep pace with global competition.

The reality is that to fight low-rate tax regimes elsewhere countries are becoming low-rate tax regimes at home. It’s a fight that hurts everyone, and curbs much-needed infrastructure. Indeed, borderless corporations are defining the modern state. In the new user-pay USA, one can now expect either low corporate tax rates or a steady increase in corporate “inversions.”

Forget about new roads, modern electricity grids, and innovative changes to education. Forget about potholes on your street. Welcome to more pay for corporate shareholders. Welcome to third-world status. Sadly, the U.S. is being eclipsed by its own worst self. RIP USA (1776-2014?).

JOHN K. WHITE, an adjunct lecturer in the School of Physics, University College Dublin, and author of Do The Math!: On Growth, Greed, and Strategic Thinking (Sage, 2013). Do The Math! is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at: john.white@ucd.ie.

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

September 29, 2016
Robert Fisk
The Butcher of Qana: Shimon Peres Was No Peacemaker
James Rose
Politics in the Echo Chamber: How Trump Becomes President
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Vice Grip on the Presidential Debates
Daniel Kato
Rethinking the Race over Race: What Clinton Should do Now About ‘Super-Predators’
Peter Certo
Clinton’s Awkward Stumbles on Trade
Fran Shor
Demonizing the Green Party Vote
Rev. William Alberts
Trump’s Road Rage to the White House
Luke O'Brien
Because We Couldn’t Have Sanders, You’ll Get Trump
Michael J. Sainato
How the Payday Loan Industry is Obstructing Reform
Robert Fantina
You Can’t Have War Without Racism
Gregory Barrett
Bad Theater at the United Nations (Starring Kerry, Power, and Obama
James A Haught
The Long, Long Journey to Female Equality
Thomas Knapp
US Military Aid: Thai-ed to Torture
Jack Smith
Must They be Enemies? Russia, Putin and the US
Gilbert Mercier
Clinton vs Trump: Lesser of Two Evils or the Devil You Know
Tom H. Hastings
Manifesting the Worst Old Norms
George Ella Lyons
This Just in From Rancho Politico
September 28, 2016
Eric Draitser
Stop Trump! Stop Clinton!! Stop the Madness (and Let Me Get Off)!
Ted Rall
The Thrilla at Hofstra: How Trump Won the Debate
Robert Fisk
Cliché and Banality at the Debates: Trump and Clinton on the Middle East
Patrick Cockburn
Cracks in the Kingdom: Saudi Arabia Rocked by Financial Strains
Lowell Flanders
Donald Trump, Islamophobia and Immigrants
Shane Burley
Defining the Alt Right and the New American Fascism
Jan Oberg
Ukraine as the Border of NATO Expansion
Ramzy Baroud
Ban Ki-Moon’s Legacy in Palestine: Failure in Words and Deeds
David Swanson
How We Could End the Permanent War State
Sam Husseini
Debate Night’s Biggest Lie Was Told by Lester Holt
Laura Carlsen
Ayotzinapa’s Message to the World: Organize!
Binoy Kampmark
The Triumph of Momentum: Re-Electing Jeremy Corbyn
David Macaray
When the Saints Go Marching In
Seth Oelbaum
All Black Lives Will Never Matter for Clinton and Trump
Adam Parsons
Standing in Solidarity for a Humanity Without Borders
Cesar Chelala
The Trump Bubble
September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
Matt Peppe
Taking a Knee: Resisting Enforced Patriotism
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]