Matching Grant Challenge
BruceMatch
We’re slowly making headway in our annual fund drive, but not nearly fast enough to meet our make-or-break goal.  On the bright side, a generous CounterPuncher has stepped forward with a pledge to match every donation of $100 or more. Any of you out there thinking of donating $50 should know that if you donate a further $50, CounterPunch will receive an additional $100. And if you plan to send us $200 or $500 or more, he will give CounterPunch a matching $200 or $500 or more. Don’t miss the chance. Double your clout right now. Please donate.
 unnamed

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

pp1

or
cp-store

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

In a Word: Austerity

Jobs Report: an Ersatz Memo

by WILLIAM MANSON

“Lies, damned lies, and statistics.”—Mark Twain

Confidential Memorandum (Internal)

Problem: High-Surplus U.S. Labor Pool

Solution: Austerity=Phased-Out (Obsolescent) Workforce

A troubling problem that refuses to go away: what to do with our growing “surplus-population”?  That is to say: in our 21st century post-industrial economy, millions of U.S. citizens—i.e., human beings, right?—now have (virtually) no “market-value.”  Two factors are primarily responsible: hi-tech automation; and offshoring (primarily manufacturing).  Their job-skills—such as they were—are now overpriced, redundant, outmoded, superannuated.  They can neither be exploited as productive (and underpaid) workers nor as credit-happy consumers.  They are idle, discontented, restless—and liable to sudden spasms of angry social unrest.

What to do?  We’re talking about, say, at least 15% of the people living in the U.S. today. Within our capitalist ideology—in which individual “worth” is entirely reduced to “market-value”—they’re worthless.  (Remember: “there is no [civil] society”– Margaret Thatcher.)   So, I ask once again: what to do?  In the U.S. alone, the realistic figures for structural unemployment—subsuming also part-time “under-employed” and longterm “discouraged unemployed”–equal at least 20%.

You can’t just…kill them (although that would be the easiest, most cost-effective way of disposing of the problem).  Our elite 1% (or should we say, one-tenth of 1%) may still enjoy limited-liability through the legal protection of “corporations”—but that doesn’t include pre-meditated mass murder!  (Does it?)

An alternative approach often works: a variety of the so-called–Shock Doctrine.  To paraphrase our de facto policy: “In these times of financial uncertainty (and budget crises!), we simply can no longer afford to provide comprehensive governmental assistance.  After all, citizens—not to mention the undocumented!—are not automatically ‘entitled’ to a full menu of low-cost, government-subsidized services like basic medical care or (substandard) housing.”

In a word: Austerity.  When these people are down, a swift kick will make them “out.”  How so?  Out of desperation, they will steal a loaf of bread (figuratively speaking); and this army of Jean Valjeans can then at least fill some profit-making function—longterm “guests” (and forced-labor) in the expanding hostelries of PrisonsUSA (LLC)!    Or (more likely): despair and hopelessness can make a lot of these people simply “go away”—through self-destructive behavior, alcoholism, drug abuse, shootings, “accidents.”  You see, adopting a useful military analogy, you’ve attacked the poor and the useless; now, put them under a siege–called “austerity.”

This is simply necessary for improved business prospects and the longterm economic (if not moral?) health of the nation.  These people are “worthless,” right?  But–they’re an irritant, an annoyance, and they need to be phased-out of the picture.  So get to work on it.  There are many, many historical precedents to study for devising and implementing a more expedient policy.

William Manson, a psychoanalytic anthropologist,  formerly taught social science at Rutgers and Columbia universities. He is the author of The Psychodynamics of Culture (Greenwood Press).