FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The State of the Union, Obama-Style

by ROBERT FANTINA

There is no question that President Barrack Obama is a gifted orator. He rose to fame as the junior senator from Illinois, and was propelled to the White House, at least partly because of his skills as a speaker. In his five years as president, he has often used that skill when addressing the public.

Yet his pretty words delivered in a dramatic, riveting style, have often proven to be no more than empty sounds, reminiscent of the well-known Biblical verse: “Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal” (1Corinthians 13: 1).  During his recent State of the Union, Mr. Obama could easily be compared to a ‘sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal’. A look at a few excerpts from that speech is instructive.

“My fellow Americans, no other country in the world does what we do. On every issue, the world turns to us, not simply because of the size of our economy or our military might but because of the ideals we stand for and the burdens we bear to advance them.”

This quotation is almost more than this writer can bear.  Yes, no other country in the world sends pilotless planes to bomb innocent people.  No other country invades other nations for their natural resources, or overthrows sovereign, democratically-elected governments if they appear to be too ‘leftist’ for the U.S.’s taste.

And to think that the ‘world turns to’ the U.S. on every issue is actually comical. The U.S. manufactures problems in nations whose government it disapproves of, and then goes in to ‘resolve’ those problems, whether the legitimate governments of those nations want such ‘help’, or not.

One can only wonder what ‘ideals’ Mr. Obama was referring to. Perhaps it was the ideal of forcing countries into submission to the U.S. will. Perhaps it is runaway consumerism, requiring more and more of the earth’s natural resources, which must be taken, by force if necessary, from other nations that possess them. Perhaps it is the ideal of providing oppressive foreign governments with vast amounts of money, while at least 15% of U.S. citizens live in poverty, U.S. cities are crumbling, and U.S. education standards fall far below that of other industrial nations.

The ‘burdens we bear’ are not uniformly borne; the wealthy seldom fight the U.S.’s imperial wars, nor do they pay the financial burden through taxes.

“As we speak, American diplomacy is supporting Israelis and Palestinians as they engage in the difficult but necessary talks to end the conflict there; to achieve dignity and an independent state for Palestinians, and lasting peace and security for the state of Israel — a Jewish state that knows America will always be at their side.”

American ‘diplomacy’ has helped to keep the Palestinians oppressed for generations, and is doing nothing to assist them now. Negotiations can only take place between two parties when each has something the other wants, that can only be obtained by surrendering something it has. Israel, an apartheid regime if ever there was one, has been given free reign by the U.S. to take whatever it wants from Palestine. And as it is taking more and more land every day, and killing and oppressing the Palestinians, the U.S. rewards it with nearly $9,000,000.00 every single day.  So much for ‘American diplomacy’.

The president also, in this sentence, declared Israel to be a Jewish state. To what, one wonders, does this relegate all the non-Jews living in Israel?

And his talk about ‘security’ for the state of Israel is disingenuous at best. Israel is the only nuclear-armed nation in the Middle East, and has the military might of the U.S. behind it, mainly because of the Israel lobby group, the American Israel Political Affairs Committee. Diplomacy has no place in a government where political contributions rule the roost.

“And with our allies and partners, we’re engaged in negotiations to see if we can peacefully achieve a goal we all share: preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

Is this, indeed, a goal we all share? If Israel and the U.S., two nations that inflict unspeakable terrorism around the globe, are allowed to have nuclear weapons, why shouldn’t Iran have them? Shouldn’t the government of Iran have the right and capability to defend itself and its citizens from an Israeli attack?

“American diplomacy, backed by the threat of force, is why Syria’s chemical weapons are being eliminated.”

This statement might lead one to believe that the U.S. led the way in crafting a diplomatic solution to the issue of Syria’s chemical weapons.  One’s memory is short, indeed, if one has forgotten that it was, in fact, Russian President Vladimir Putin who spearheaded that effort, as the U.S. Congress was blathering away, trying to decide on a bill to authorize a U.S. invasion. Perhaps Mr. Obama had a brief memory lapse during his speech.

“And finally, let’s remember that our leadership is defined not just by our defense against threats but by the enormous opportunities to do good and promote understanding around the globe, to forge greater cooperation, to expand new markets, to free people from fear and want. And no one is better positioned to take advantage of those opportunities than America.”

The ‘threats’ the U.S. defends itself against are often mythical, dreamed up by government officials to start a war to gain natural resources, or destroy a democratically-elected leftist government. ‘Opportunities to do good’ are destroyed with each and every drone strike. The ‘understanding around the globe’ that the U.S. fosters is its well-deserved reputation as a terrorist nation.

Once again, a U.S. president has stood before the nation and the world, briefly mentioning some of the challenges facing the country, but mainly acting as a cheerleader for that most dangerous of lies, U.S. exceptionalism. Nothing will change; the partisan divide, fueled by an unrelenting conservatism favored by a small minority, but sufficient to terrify whatever may be left of mainstream Republicanism, will continue to stonewall any meaningful progress on any front. And next January, Mr. Obama will again stand before the world, praising all the common U.S. self-delusions, while throughout the world, people continue to suffer because of them. ‘Hope and change’ should not be anticipated by anyone.

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Dill Press).

 

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Pill Press).

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
March 24, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Michael Hudson
Trump is Obama’s Legacy: Will this Break up the Democratic Party?
Eric Draitser
Donald Trump and the Triumph of White Identity Politics
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Nothing Was Delivered
Andrew Levine
Ryan’s Choice
Joshua Frank
Global Coal in Freefall, Tar Sands Development Drying Up (Bad News for Keystone XL)
Anthony DiMaggio
Ditching the “Deep State”: The Rise of a New Conspiracy Theory in American Politics
Rob Urie
Boris and Natasha Visit Fantasy Island
John Wight
London and the Dreary Ritual of Terrorist Attacks
Paul Buhle
The CIA and the Intellectuals…Again
David Rosen
Why Did Trump Target Transgender Youth?
Vijay Prashad
Inventing Enemies
Ben Debney
Outrage From the Imperial Playbook
M. Shadee Malaklou
An Open Letter to Duke University’s Class of 2007, About Your Open Letter to Stephen Miller
Michael J. Sainato
Bernie Sanders’ Economic Advisor Shreds Trumponomics
Lawrence Davidson
Moral Failure at the UN
Pete Dolack
World Bank Declares Itself Above the Law
Nicola Perugini - Neve Gordon
Israel’s Human Rights Spies
Patrick Cockburn
From Paris to London: Another City, Another Attack
Ralph Nader
Reason and Justice Address Realities
Ramzy Baroud
‘Decolonizing the Mind’: Using Hollywood Celebrities to Validate Islam
Colin Todhunter
Monsanto in India: The Sacred and the Profane
Louisa Willcox
Grizzlies Under the Endangered Species Act: How Have They Fared?
Norman Pollack
Militarization of American Fascism: Trump the Usurper
Pepe Escobar
North Korea: The Real Serious Options on the Table
Brian Cloughley
“These Things Are Done”: Eavesdropping on Trump
Sheldon Richman
You Can’t Blame Trump’s Military Budget on NATO
Carol Wolman
Trump vs the People: a Psychiatrist’s Analysis
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
Marines to Kill Desert Tortoises
Stanley L. Cohen
The White House . . . Denial and Cover-ups
Farhang Jahanpour
America’s Woes, Europe’s Responsibilities
Joseph Natoli
March Madness Outside the Basketball Court
Bill Willers
Volunteerism; Charisma; the Ivy League Stranglehold: a Very Brief Trilogy
Bruce Mastron
Slaughtered Arabs Don’t Count
Ayesha Khan
The Headscarf is Not an Islamic Compulsion
Pauline Murphy
Unburied Truth: Exposing the Church’s Iron Chains on Ireland
Ron Jacobs
Music is Love, Music is Politics
Christopher Brauchli
Prisoners as Captive Customers
Robert Koehler
The Mosque That Disappeared
Franklin Lamb
Update from Madaya
Dan Bacher
Federal Scientists Find Delta Tunnels Plan Will Devastate Salmon
Barbara Nimri Aziz
The Gig Economy: Which Side Are You On?
Louis Proyect
What Caused the Holodomor?
Max Mastellone
Seeking Left Unity Through a Definition of Progressivism
Charles R. Larson
Review: David Bellos’s “Novel of the Century: the Extraordinary Adventure of Les Misérables”
David Yearsley
Ear of Darkness: the Soundtracks of Steve Bannon’s Films
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail