FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

International Criminal Court and Beyond

by NORMAN POLLACK

Pretend with me a scenario of manifest justice, though the furthest thing from reality, in light of world political-military foundations of power. The time, two weeks hence; the occasion, US missile attacks on Syria; the American reception, strident chest-pounding in Congress, mass cheering at all college and professional football games that weekend; the ambient political culture, cries of “traitor” directed to critics, moral assurances from all quarters of American humanitarianism and greatness; the ultimate result (here my fantasy kicks in), international condemnation, General Assembly votes of censure, the ICC-issued subpoena commanding Barack A.S. Obama to appear before the Court (A.S., not to confuse with others of the same name, designating two of his most obvious identifying marks, Assassination and Surveillance), and a verdict of guilty of murder, murder disguised as the pursuit of the American national interest. If the planets were aligned and Justice ruled the world, here fantasy would be converted into fact.

Obama stated at a news conference in Sweden (Sept. 4), ” I didn’t set a red line. The world set a red line.” No despot in recorded history could have said it better—not, I am the State; no, I am the world, miniaturized in my own person. I speak for humanitarian intervention, absent all the individuals vaporized through my authorized drone strikes (and even then, probably terrorists masking as women and children), absent too the ones killed for sport from helicopters, imprisoned via indefinite detention, disappeared via covert operations, tortured, its leading advocate now my CIA director, in sum, the form of humanitarianism–my present National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, will attest to this–best conducing to whatever is necessary for United States supremacy in international trade, politics, military affairs, and ideological values (i.e., capitalism as the sole determinant of Way of Life). And these, please note, do not question or qualify humanitarian intervention (as the term “absent” might suggest), for in every case America is self-evidently in the right—a proposition that holds true for whatever America does, killing for sport, e.g., warning others, by that example, that God has chosen the US for executing His/Her will, being the duty that flows from hegemony. Now, the world breathlessly awaits US action in Syria, by his reckoning, Good v. Evil, as the carrier Nimitz and its battle group sail into position, and a battleship lies in waiting in the Red Sea—all to prove Obama is a man of his word? Hardly, though his uncontrolled ego cannot be gainsaid.

For America, Syria is a pawn on the geostrategic chessboard, its concern over chemical weapons—still no convincing evidence pointing to the Assad regime—pathetically fraudulent for a nation that not so long ago used napalm (itself a chemical weapon) indiscriminately and promiscuously in Vietnam (the photograph of the young girl fleeing, her body in flames, should be etched into the conscience of the world—and should have prevented the high-octane patriotism of Kerry and Hagel, both Vietnam veterans, in their Foreign Relations Committee testimony supporting, Sept. 3, the new intervention) and now practices assassination, POTUS right in there with his hit lists, on a regular basis. The hearing, in which the chair, Sen. Menendez, a Democrat, in his introductory remarks had prejudged Obama’s call for the military attack vital to the national interest, and practically equated dissenters from that view with traitors, was sickening. Kerry’s testimony, however, was like Charlie McCarthy (to those old enough to remember Edgar Bergen and his puppet) scripted by Brennan-Rhodes-Donilon, ringing the charges of every Cold War platitude tied together by the Domino Theory—if we don’t stop Syria, watch out for Iran, North Korea, whomever is hiding under the rug.

Let’s drop the guise of fantasy—Obama will never be indicted for war crimes, America will not surrender its hegemonic claims and the means to their continued achievement, nuclear modernization increasing lethality will continue apace, China will remain Obama’s primary military-strategic focus, Russia will be reintroduced into the Cold War ideological framework as a supplementary consideration, surveillance will not abate, class-differentials of wealth and power will not lessen, and, if anything, grow, Snowden and Manning will still be thought unpatriotic (the communists of our time)—business as usual. If only the International Criminal Court had jurisdiction, or, as I think will happen, the attack on Syria will so enflame world opinion that, “friends and allies” dropping away, the US will become recognized as a pariah nation, having little to show for its Exceptionalism but interventions, surveillance, capitalism a runaway system of cyclic fluctuations and deepening hardship and suffering.
My New York Times Comment on its editorial rationalizing the use of military force in Syria (Sept. 4):

The international community’s attempt to deter further chemical weapons atrocities in Syria is far from over.” What if the international community should attempt to deter further drone warfare for targeted assassination ATROCITIES in Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and Afghanistan by the United States? How can NYT be so one-sided and myopic, neglecting decades of American intervention, and, in recent years, outright torture, rendition, covert campaigns of regime change…and blanket surveillance in an attempt to prevent the disclosure of these war crimes? Aren’t you suspicious of a POTUS who shows contempt for civil liberties, and who treats the Syrian intervention as though selling a used car–with all the public relations worthy of a huckster? The Foreign Relations Committee hearing revealed national leaders playing the patriotism tune ad nauseum, always overlooking the carnage left by American intervention. “Shock and awe” should have left the whole bunch under indictment for war crimes, and now, people, yes, civilians, scrambling around in Damascus, in fear for their lives, waiting for Obama to pronounce their death sentence. Has The Times lost its moral compass?

Norman Pollack is the author of “The Populist Response to Industrial America” (Harvard) and “The Just Polity” (Illinois), Guggenheim Fellow, and professor of history emeritus, Michigan State University. His new book, Eichmann on the Potomac, will be published by CounterPunch in the fall of 2013.

Norman Pollack Ph.D. Harvard, Guggenheim Fellow, early writings on American Populism as a radical movement, prof., activist.. His interests are social theory and the structural analysis of capitalism and fascism. He can be reached at pollackn@msu.edu.

Weekend Edition
February 12-14, 2016
Andrew Levine
What Next in the War on Clintonism?
Jeffrey St. Clair
A Comedy of Terrors
Ismael Hossein-Zadeh – Anthony A. Gabb
Financial Oligarchy vs. Feudal Aristocracy
Paul Street
When Plan A Meets Plan B: Talking Politics and Revolution with the Green Party’s Jill Stein
Rob Urie
The (Political) Season of Our Discontent
Pepe Escobar
It Takes a Greek to Save Europa
Gerald Sussman
Why Hillary Clinton Spells Democratic Party Defeat
Carol Norris
What Do Hillary’s Women Want? A Psychologist on the Clinton Campaign’s Women’s Club Strategy
Robert Fantina
The U.S. Election: Any Good News for Palestine?
Linda Pentz Gunter
Radioactive Handouts: the Nuclear Subsidies Buried Inside Obama’s “Clean” Energy Budget
Michael Welton
Lenin, Putin and Me
Manuel García, Jr.
Fire in the Hole: Bernie and the Cracks in the Neo-Liberal Lid
Thomas Stephens
The Flint River Lead Poisoning Catastrophe in Historical Perspective
David Rosen
When Trump Confronted a Transgender Beauty
Will Parrish
Cap and Clear-Cut
Victor Grossman
Coming Cutthroats and Parting Pirates
Ben Terrall
Raw Deals: Challenging the Sharing Economy
David Yearsley
Beyoncé’s Super Bowl Formation: Form-Fitting Uniforms of Revolution and Commerce
David Mattson
Divvying Up the Dead: Grizzly Bears in a Post-ESA World
Matthew Stevenson
Confessions of a Primary Insider
Jeff Mackler
Friedrichs v. U.S. Public Employee Unions
Franklin Lamb
Notes From Tehran: Trump, the Iranian Elections and the End of Sanctions
Pete Dolack
More Unemployment and Less Security
Christopher Brauchli
The Cruzifiction of Michael Wayne Haley
Bill Quigley
Law on the Margins: a Profile of Social Justice Lawyer Chaumtoli Huq
Uri Avnery
A Lady With a Smile
Katja Kipping
The Opposite of Transparency: What I Didn’t Read in the TIPP Reading Room
B. R. Gowani
Hellish Woman: ISIS’s Granny Endorses Hillary
Kent Paterson
The Futures of Whales and Humans in Mexico
James Heddle
Why the Current Nuclear Showdown in California Should Matter to You
Michael Howard
Hollywood’s Grotesque Animal Abuse
Steven Gorelick
Branding Tradition: a Bittersweet Tale of Capitalism at Work
Nozomi Hayase
Assange’s UN Victory and Redemption of the West
Patrick Bond
World Bank Punches South Africa’s Poor, by Ignoring the Rich
Mel Gurtov
Is US-Russia Engagement Still Possible?
Dan Bacher
Governor Jerry Brown Receives Cold, Dead Fish Award Four Years In A Row
Wolfgang Lieberknecht
Fighting and Protecting Refugees
Jennifer Matsui
Doglegs, An Unforgettable Film
Soud Sharabani
Israeli Myths: An Interview with Ramzy Baroud
Terry Simons
Bernie? Why Not?
Missy Comley Beattie
When Thoughtful People Think Illogically
Christy Rodgers
Everywhere is War: Luke Mogelson’s These Heroic, Happy Dead: Stories
Ron Jacobs
Springsteen: Rockin’ the House in Albany, NY
Barbara Nimri Aziz
“The Martian”: This Heroism is for Chinese Viewers Too
Charles R. Larson
No Brainers: When Hitler Took Cocaine and Lenin Lost His Brain
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail