FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

C.V. Vigneswaran – The New Pop Star

by NILANTHA ILANGAMUWA

Let us remove the mask and without them let us look at the people who live on this rough soil. Where are we? What we are? Who has left us with nothing of value? Despair and hopelessness has been a part of our daily lives through the heritage of anger and stress due to rude, senseless, lawless, unjust power. One after another, time and time again the same thing in different modes is repeated over the years.

Our inability to learn from history, unwilling to accept wrongdoings, disobedience to the heart and minds of victims are the major strategies with which to find loopholes in order to run away from inescapable reality. We use the same mirror to look at the new pop star of politics in Sri Lanka, and on that basis we are refreshing our past agony to diagnose the present dispute. In our hands, crackers are exploding; fireworks are in the sky of the people who, with empty stomachs, yearn for change. On the other hand, wealth and power are centralized with those who abet tyranny. But unfortunately, we are yet to realize that the formal theory has no room to play when everything underneath is a manifestation of cynical power.

There is much ado on the selection of former justice C.V. Vigneswaran, as the chief ministerial candidate by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) for the Northern Province in the forthcoming provincial council election if, indeed, it is held as scheduled by President Mahinda Rajapaksa. The dream is ongoing and a fresh topic of debate has arrived.

Things are moving so fast in our imagination but in reality nothing is moving except the expansion of the power and wealth of the panoplied ruling family. But according to many so called critiques, the angel has arrived. He was discovered by the most senior cowardly leader in the history of the TNA which was formed as the Illankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi, a year after we claimed independence from the British, R. Sampanthan, who was one time a bird in the cage of the Tamil Tigers. It may be the wisest decision that the leader of the party ever took, but the general point of view is something very different and it is too early to predict the future of the party, or even the entire political multitude in the peninsula.

Recent discussions on Justice Vigneswaran, have restarted the debate on the Tamil Political struggle that lasted until the Tamil Tigers were killed, one time their advocate but later an opponent in one sense – Dr. Rajini Thiranagama. After that politics was nothing and was buried underneath the order of the militancy (the Tamil Tigers). There was of course, minor attempts by those moderate Tamils who tried to reveal nudity of the failure of their non-violent Tamil politics which became a puppet of militancy. Love letters continually written by Veerasingham Anandasangaree of the TULF to Velupillai Prabhakaran did not produce much effect but helped to burn the myth that many politicians were floating in. But no one dared to take his ideas up to the find a solution or have a serious dialogue on it; eventually President Rajapaksa sidelined him following the total elimination of the militancy power of the Tamil Tigers, to make them his own yes men out of the debate to manipulate the real soup that Tamil politics has become.

Rise up the new pop star, Justice Vignaswaran who has taken the whiteboard marker pen to describe the rights of Tamil based on history, culture, literature, and diplomacy obtained over the last thousands of years. But he has forgotten to take a white board with him, perhaps hanging in the air. Since he was nominated for the position of CM to the North, he has not, yes, unfortunately, described the gravity of the problem, instead engaging through very biased, popularized topics of the failed debate to grab votes from Tamils in the area. He has forgotten that the winning the election is just opening of a Pandora’s box, if the winner does not have real wisdom to address the problems at ground-reality. Alas, his simple theory has been exposed in his recent interview with a New Delhi based daily. When the husband is beating the wife, neighbours should intervene, and then you can’t say that is internal matter anymore, was his simple theory.

But in reality, the crisis in the area is beyond the militarization issue; it has grown beyond the boundaries of the cultural, linguistics and historical arguments that we have had in the past. Those boundaries were assassinated by the Tamil Tigers in their militant campaigns just after Thimbu peace talk in late 80s. If Justice Vignaswaran is going to reprint the alternatives to the Mahawansa, which seems to be his idea, to be the dominant source of the Sinhalaese developing an inability to accept the rights of Tamils, then there will be fewer differences between him and the demon that evaporated the last milestone of the personal liberty of Sri Lankans. It will give an enormous opportunity to the ruling party to crackdown the flowers that produce the seeds of freedom.

What do we need? We need not the worms that are clinging from the failed and poisoned arguments that the last generations suffered, but the man who can understand the difference between fanaticism and realism; the man who can cure the fanaticism. In other words, the man who can understand the problems that we suffered that led to the killing of thousands of innocents; a man who can accept the painful reality. Neither Sinhalese extremists nor Tamil extremists can contribute towards a real solution. They are more likely to burn the eyesight of peace. If Justice Vigneswaran’s argument had enough strength to change politics in Sri Lanka, then it would have happened much earlier when General Sarath Fonseka entered politics, or even later during Chief Justice Shrani Bandaranayake’s justice revolution due to the pinch by Rajapaksa. They also had similar arguments as individuals at their personal levels but unfortunately, like Justice Vigneshwaran, they also did not have a clear-cut picture of the reality of the tyrant whom they helped to gain strength and also the process of the general mindset of the public. There is no point in asking the help of neighbours when your house is burning if you yourself purchased the fuel with which to burn the house. Here is where we, of all communities, need to change the ideology of fanatic fatalism into accepting the real painful reality.

Nilantha Ilangamuwa is journalist and editor of the Sri Lanka Guardian, an online daily news paper based in Colombo Sri Lanka. He can be reached atilangamuwa@gmail.com or editor@srilankaguardian.org

Nilantha Ilangamuwa is Editor of Torture: Asian and Global Perspectives. He also edits the Sri Lanka Guardian, an online daily newspaper. He is the author of the recently released non-fiction books, “Nagna Balaya” (The Naked Power), published in Sinhalese, and “The Conflation”, published in English. 

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
January 20, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Divide and Rule: Class, Hate, and the 2016 Election
Andrew Levine
When Was America Great?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: This Ain’t a Dream No More, It’s the Real Thing
Yoav Litvin
Making Israel Greater Again: Justice for Palestinians in the Age of Trump
Linda Pentz Gunter
Nuclear Fiddling While the Planet Burns
Ruth Fowler
Standing With Standing Rock: Of Pipelines and Protests
David Green
Why Trump Won: the 50 Percenters Have Spoken
Dave Lindorff
Imagining a Sanders Presidency Beginning on Jan. 20
Peter Lee
The Deep State and the Sex Tape: Martin Luther King, J. Edgar Hoover, and Thurgood Marshall
Pete Dolack
Eight People Own as Much as Half the World
Roger Harris
Too Many People in the World: Names Named
Stephen Zielinski
It’s the End of the World as We Know It
David Swanson
Six Things We Should Do Better As Everything Gets Worse
Alci Rengifo
Trump Rex: Ancient Rome’s Shadow Over the Oval Office
Brian Cloughley
What Money Can Buy: the Quiet British-Israeli Scandal
Kent Paterson
Mexico’s Great Winter of Discontent
Norman Solomon
Trump, the Democrats and the Logan Act
David Macaray
Attention, Feminists
Yves Engler
Demanding More From Our Media
James A Haught
Religious madness in Ulster
Patrick Bond
Tripping Up Trumpism Through Global Boycott Divestment Sanctions
Robert Fantina
Trump: What Changes and What Remains the Same
David Rosen
Globalization vs. Empire: Can Trump Contain the Growing Split?
Elliot Sperber
Dystopia
Dan Bacher
New CA Carbon Trading Legislation Answers Big Oil’s Call to Continue Business As Usual
Wayne Clark
A Reset Button for Political America
Chris Welzenbach
“The Death Ship:” An Allegory for Today’s World
Patrick Hiller
Guns Against Grizzlies at Schools or Peace Education as Resistance?
Ron Jacobs
Singing the Body Electric Across Time
Ann Garrison
Fifty-five Years After Lumumba’s Assassination, Congolese See No Relief
Christopher Brauchli
Swing Low Alabama
Jon Hochschartner
The Five Least Animal-Friendly Senate Democrats
Pauline Murphy
Fighting Fascism: the Irish at the Battle of Cordoba
Louis Proyect
Is Our Future That of “Sense8” or “Mr. Robot”?
Charles R. Larson
Review: Robert Coover’s “Huck out West”
January 19, 2017
Melvin Goodman
America’s Russian Problem
Dave Lindorff
Right a Terrible Wrong: Why Obama Should Reverse Himself and Pardon Leonard Peltier
Laura Carlsen
Bringing Mexico to Its Knees Will Not “Make America Great Again”
John W. Whitehead
Nothing is Real: When Reality TV Programming Masquerades as Politics
Yoav Litvin
Time to Diss Obey: the Failure of Identity Politics and Protest
Mike Whitney
The Trump Speech That No One Heard 
Conn Hallinan
Is Europe Heading for a “Lexit”?
Stephen Cooper
Truth or Twitter? Why Donald Trump Is No John Steinbeck
Binoy Kampmark
Scoundrels of Patriotism: The Freeing of Chelsea Manning
Ramzy Baroud
The Balancing Act is Over: What Elor Azaria Taught Us about Israel
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail