FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Dictator in His Labyrinth

by MARCO FONSECO

After all that was done and said, former General Ríos Montt took the witness chair before the First Court of High Risk on May 9, 2013 and mounted a defense based on genocidal military reason unprecedented in the history of Guatemala. “The plaintiffs have cornered me” he said, to start, thus indicating that his historical role was and should be unmistakable with the simple and common positions of lower ranking officers and bureaucrats of death. He was not, after all, a simple Álvarez Ruiz, one Chupina, a Víctores Mejia or a “Mayor Tito”: “I was not a company commander, I was not a battalion chief, I was not an area commander. I was a head of state”. As he went on to emphasize in his statement: “The state had a staff called the Ministers of State. And I was the chief of ministers of state.” He was Guatemala as a whole and not just one of its parts and, much less, one of the worst parts, the indigenous, the Ixil. Viewed from the Ixil perspective, of course, the optics of history and the meaning of this army general change, his historical perspective, and the social class he represents appear as the return of Cortes/Quetzalcoatl in its Maya version, as Kukulcan, as a snake draped in military fagigue, a snake of Creole heritage, Ladino, and conceitedly superior.

And, exactly as he used to do on the Sundays of his dictatorship and the festive days during his presidency of the Guatemalan Congress, once again he proclaimed a message focused on his role as redeemer of a State in financial and moral bankruptcy: “We could not respect the Constitution because all was a rot and falling by itself. So we had to issue the Fundamental Statue of Government.” And this Fundamental Law represented nothing less than the will of the general embodied in the particular will of the armed forces understood as the body of the Lord General who had been put in power by the will of history itself.

It is a discourse in which the being of the dictator and the very being of Guatemala are one and the same. In his presidential campaigns during the 1990s he used to say: “I am Guatemala.” And now in his closing speech in the trial against him for the genocide of the Ixil nation once again he reiterated the morality, the restorative and worthy mission that the position of head of state bestowed on him, a position that he and his lawyer insisted had also been offered to other officers but that only Ríos Montt had the “courage” to assume. And the essence of the defense case, the discourse of Rios Montt, is that at the high level of his position as Head of State the air is indeed rare, the dictator finds himself really alone, pondering the destiny of his nation, a place where there is only the dictator and his great mission of restoring and renewing the broken and threatened nation to an organic whole, and from there the high altitude of his nearly divinely-appointed power the dictator has absolutely nothing to do with what happens in the parrochial foothills of the state, on the bare plains of the multitudes and, much less, in the deep ravines and rocky chasms of the Wretched of the Earth where his orders are implemented by lower ranking appointees that come to their jobs with their own selfish agendas, divisions and inertia. But the dictator is above all of this, just like all dictoators in history that scan the horizon with an eagle’s eye and stand tall above the human comedy. The dictator’s essential self is thus not responsible for the everyday existential fate, the mundane implementation of his will. The decisions of this Supreme Leader have nothing to do with the practical consequences of state policy for that implementation and those consequences are left to others. The Maximum Leader is responsible only for the Idea of ​​a “nation of nations” that he wants to construct in a world that only others, social inertia and the “enemy” Communists disguised throughout indigenous lands as women, girls and grandmothers want to distort. In his own words: “The commanding general of the Army only does three important things: make the call to recruit people, give awards and grant pensions.” The judicial and extrajudicial execution of his order is, well, in the hands of others while the dictator stands alone in his labyrinth.

Genocide, from the perspective of power, is now a multicultural and multiethnic affair. In the words of Ríos Montt: “They call me a racist when I say that we are a country made up of many nations.” The level of ideological distortion by dictatorial reason reaches here, at this point in the speech of the dictator, unprecedented levels. In the name of multiculturalism there arises a need to remove precisely the multicultural threat. Once the orders have been given, once they have laid out the plans for “victory” and “strength” and once they invoked the old figure of wisdom (“Sofia”) as guide for what ought to be required no matter how painful, then it is possible to say “The chief of National Defence or the Minister of Defense did not give me reports of any kind.” Because once you have sketched out the course of destiny for the people below, for the “other”, what happens to the ancestral inhabitants of the mountains and valleys of the multicultural Mayan people becomes less than irrelevant. Their memory itself becomes a Communist plot to distort official history, the great benevolence and courage of the Leader, the “common” destiny of the nation. Even more so if in these places, as Ríos Montt argued in his speech, there is a  “Communist movement” that those ungrateful people, deeply indoctrinated, can not resist by themselves without the army’s salvific and cleansing assistance. So the moralizing campaign of his dictatorship consisted not only in making “public employees behave better so that they would not steal, would not lie and would not cheat”. It consisted, more fundamentally, in a policy of changing the very being of the multinational and ethnic diversity of the Creole fatherland: one nation for all nations; the Creole nation. It was about reminding the nation of its own history as Ríos Montt sees it: “From 1944 to 2013, all movements that in one way or another have made a contribution to progress in Guatemala have been led by the Army.” The Communist threat was thus not only a threat to real multiculturalism (the peaceful, obedient coexistence of colonially-constructed, delimited and controlled ethnic groups) but also to the fundamental sense of the modern history of Guatemala and the well being of the country’s ethnic diversity overseen by the State. There can be nothing more at stake than that.

Ríos Montt is not an ignorant man. If someone takes the dictator to be a fool they are committing a mistake. Ríos Montt’s lawyer Garcia Gudiel granted himself the right to disqualify expert testimony of people like García Granados on the grounds that it was the testimony of a “simple sociologist”. But he did not question or stop his own client when before, during and after his speech he declared, with a tint of sociological theory and even parrochial Marxism, the following: “Subversion is not a matter of gunshots, but a question of underdevelopment, disease, poverty and extreme poverty and hunger”. Although this logic of National Security Ideology was fully reflected in the National Security and Development Plan, it is also a developmentalist idea that in Guatemala, despite its constant repetition by small petty intellectuals and former officials of governments of the so-called “peace” time (after the Peace Accords) such as a Rosada Granados or Castejón Porras, this idea has never produced consistent and effective state policies to alleviate poverty. That is really not the goal of developmentalism. When the dictator offers this recognition of the political economy of underdevelopment and dependency – as it is still taught in that “Communist” and inveterate house of studies named University of San Carlos – he does not recognize the lineage of Creole racism and colonialism, the story of a failed independence and the uncompromising conservatism of a Carrera, the primitive capital accumulation promoted by another national military hero in the figure of Justo Rufino Barrios or the proto-fascism of Ubico that led directly to the Guatemalan Spring, which with the support of the CIA and his beloved army was eventually truncated only to leave precisely the structural conditions that would lead to the rebellion of the impoverished indigenous highland peoples and their genocide. By no means. For Rios Montt to goal of a plate of “beans and tortillas” is nothing more and nothing less than obedience and conformity. “Underdevelopment, disease, poverty and hunger” lead not only to “subversion” but also, even worse threatenly, to ethnic disobedience and insolence, lack of historical memory as Rios Montt articulates that historical memory: “From 1944 to 2013, all movements that in one way or another have made a contribution to progress in Guatemala have been led by the Army.”

This is the kind of national consciousness that a Head of State claims for himself. Trivializing the meaning and grotesque policies of genocide, Ríos Montt nonetheless expresses what it means, from the point of view of the Supreme Leader, to work for the rescue of the State: “When they capture rogue policemen illegally collecting taxes they are not going to put the Minister of the Interior on trial for that.” By extension, if officers and commanders with their own agenda kill a few “Indians” here or there, you can not lose sight of the grand national project embodied only by the Head of State, represented only by the military’s historical contribution to the country’s progress and that only a thorough moralizing campaign of the whole State can ensure. What may result from all this in the indigenous towns of Chajul, Nebaj and Cotzal may well be a misfortune, “a confrontation between brothers, between families”, but it is neither due to the history of racism, colonialism, underdevelopment and dependence or the orders of the Head of State, but rather it is due to the “Communism” of  the “honorable Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity” (URNG). It is precisely this anti-Communist logic of the dictator that helped germinate the seeds of genocide already planted during Spanish colonial times but whose bloom had been postponed until the coming to power of this serpent of war.

Now at the end of the trial, the dictator says that he was not involved in the daily execution of the genocide. He now says that it was “others” who executed his vision of a “nation of nations” and that these others may have committed “excesses” in their actions as indicated by the many reports of elimination of “chocolates” (army operational code for children during the scortched earth opeartions throughout indigenous towns) around here and there, but this is no reason to blame the dictator. From the totalizing perspective of the dictator: “I never had the intention nor the purpose of destroying any national ethnicity.” Actually, there is no need to have such an intention or purpose from the pinnacle of power when his whole body, the whole machinery of domination, all the bureaucracy of death is already executing the “wise” operation of destruction without having to bother the Dictator in His Labyrinth with the details.

Marco Fonseca was born and raised in Guatemala City. He received his Ph.D. in Social and Political Thought  specializing in political philosophy and Latin American Studies at York University.

 

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
February 24, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Exxon’s End Game Theory
Pierre M. Sprey - Franklin “Chuck” Spinney
Sleepwalking Into a Nuclear Arms Race with Russia
Paul Street
Liberal Hypocrisy, “Late-Shaming,” and Russia-Blaming in the Age of Trump
Ajamu Baraka
Malcolm X and Human Rights in the Time of Trumpism: Transcending the Master’s Tools
John Laforge
Did Obama Pave the Way for More Torture?
Mike Whitney
McMaster Takes Charge: Trump Relinquishes Control of Foreign Policy 
Patrick Cockburn
The Coming Decline of US and UK Power
Louisa Willcox
The Endangered Species Act: a Critical Safety Net Now Threatened by Congress and Trump
Vijay Prashad
A Foreign Policy of Cruel Populism
John Chuckman
Israel’s Terrible Problem: Two States or One?
Matthew Stevenson
The Parallax View of Donald Trump
Norman Pollack
Drumbeat of Fascism: Find, Arrest, Deport
Stan Cox
Can the Climate Survive Electoral Democracy? Maybe. Can It Survive Capitalism? No.
Ramzy Baroud
The Trump-Netanyahu Circus: Now, No One Can Save Israel from Itself
Edward Hunt
The United States of Permanent War
David Morgan
Trump and the Left: a Case of Mass Hysteria?
Pete Dolack
The Bait and Switch of Public-Private Partnerships
Mike Miller
What Kind of Movement Moment Are We In? 
Elliot Sperber
Why Resistance is Insufficient
Brian Cloughley
What are You Going to Do About Afghanistan, President Trump?
Binoy Kampmark
Warring in the Oncology Ward
Yves Engler
Remembering the Coup in Ghana
Jeremy Brecher
“Climate Kids” v. Trump: Trial of the Century Pits Trump Climate Denialism Against Right to a Climate System Capable of Sustaining Human Life”
Jonathan Taylor
Hate Trump? You Should Have Voted for Ron Paul
Franklin Lamb
Another Small Step for Syrian Refugee Children in Beirut’s “Aleppo Park”
Ron Jacobs
The Realist: Irreverence Was Their Only Sacred Cow
Andre Vltchek
Lock up England in Jail or an Insane Asylum!
Rev. William Alberts
Grandiose Marketing of Spirituality
Paul DeRienzo
Three Years Since the Kitty Litter Disaster at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Eric Sommer
Organize Workers Immigrant Defense Committees!
Steve Cooper
A Progressive Agenda
David Swanson
100 Years of Using War to Try to End All War
Andrew Stewart
The 4CHAN Presidency: A Media Critique of the Alt-Right
Edward Leer
Tripping USA: The Chair
Randy Shields
Tom Regan: The Life of the Animal Rights Party
Nyla Ali Khan
One Certain Effect of Instability in Kashmir is the Erosion of Freedom of Expression and Regional Integration
Rob Hager
The Only Fake News That Probably Threw the Election to Trump was not Russian 
Mike Garrity
Why Should We Pay Billionaires to Destroy Our Public Lands? 
Mark Dickman
The Prophet: Deutscher’s Trotsky
Christopher Brauchli
The Politics of the Toilet Police
Ezra Kronfeld
Joe Manchin: a Senate Republicrat to Dispute and Challenge
Clancy Sigal
The Nazis Called It a “Rafle”
Louis Proyect
Socialism Betrayed? Inside the Ukrainian Holodomor
Charles R. Larson
Review: Timothy B. Tyson’s “The Blood of Emmett Till”
David Yearsley
Founding Father of American Song
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail