But Officer, My Passenger is a Corporation


In the High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane, is the corporation a person?

Jonathan Frieman wants to know

That’s why for ten years he traveled in the HOV lanes in northern California alongside legal papers of one of his non profit corporations — the JoMiJo Foundation.

And for ten years, no police officer stopped him.

Then on October 2, 2012, Frieman was driving in Marin County’s carpool lane when he was pulled over by California Highway Patrol.

Officer Troy Dorn issued Frieman a citation for violating California’s HOV, aka carpool, regulations.

Jonathan was the only human passenger in the car.

California’s HOV regulations mandate “two or more persons per vehicle” for driving in the carpool lane during permitted hours.

Frieman had informed the state trooper that he was not in violation of California State Vehicle Code because the nonprofit corporation next to him – represented by its articles of incorporation – qualifies as a “person” under state law.

Nonetheless, Officer Dorn cited Frieman with a $478 ticket – and instructed him to take it up with the court.

And of course, that is what Frieman wanted from the get go.

Frieman got a lawyer – Ford Greene.

And on January 7, 2013, Frieman went to court.

Before Marin County traffic referee Frank Drago.

“The judge allowed the reporters and the television cameras into the courtroom,” Frieman told Corporate Crime Reporter in an interview last week. “His eyebrows were raised. He had a smile on his lips. He knew about this case.”

“The judge said it was a unique case. He said that he was going to rely on the common sense directive of the legislature – to get people out of their cars if they were driving alone and into cars with more than one person.”

“He said he could not allow corporation papers to stand as a person. He never addressed the issue of corporate personhood.”

The judge refused to dismiss the HOV ticket.

And Frieman is appealing to a three judge panel of the Marin County Superior Court.

That appeal should be filed soon, Frieman said.

Frieman calls himself a “social entrepreneur.”

He’s been active over the years in challenging corporate power.

He helped fund a group called the Center for Corporate Policy.

And he helped fund Corporations 2020.

He believes that stripping corporations of personhood won’t go very far in challenging corporate power.

To do that he suggests looking at questions of piercing the corporate veil, limited liability of shareholders, and addressing an obscure Supreme Court decision — Dartmouth College v. Woodward.

“But in this case, we are highlighting and challenging the absurdity of corporate personhood and inspiring others to take action,” Frieman said. (He’s put up a web site about the case — thecarpoolguy.com)

“There was a enormous debate on the net over this case. The comments were mostly in favor, but at least it got people laughing, it got people angry, it got people motivated. I spoke a week later at a protest against the Citizens United decision. And I was announced as the last speaker. And the cheering I got went on and on.”

(For the complete Interview with Jonathan Frieman, see 27 Corporate Crime Reporter 15(14), April 15, 2013, print edition only.)

Russell Mokhiber edits the Corporate Crime Reporter.

Russell Mokhiber edits the Corporate Crime Reporter.

November 25, 2015
Jeff Taylor
Bob Dylan and Christian Zionism
Dana E. Abizaid
Provoking Russia
Oliver Tickell
Syria’s Cauldron of Fire: a Downed Russian Jet and the Battle of Two Pipelines
Patrick Cockburn
Trigger Happy: Will Turkey’s Downing of Russian Jet Backfire on NATO?
Robert Fisk
The Soothsayers of Eternal War
Russell Mokhiber
The Coming Boycott of Nike
Ted Rall
Like Father Like Son: George W. Bush Was Bad, His Father May Have Been Worse
Matt Peppe
Bad Policy, Bad Ethics: U.S. Military Bases Abroad
Martha Rosenberg
Pfizer Too Big (and Slippery) to Fail
Yorgos Mitralias
Bernie Sanders, Mr. Voutsis and the Truth Commission on Greek Public Debt
Jorge Vilches
Too Big for Fed: Have Central Banks Lost Control?
Sam Husseini
Why Trump is Wrong About Waterboarding — It’s Probably Not What You Think
Binoy Kampmark
The Perils of Certainty: Obama and the Assad Regime
Roger Annis
State of Emergency in Crimea
Soud Sharabani
ISIS in Lebanon: An Interview with Andre Vltchek
Thomas Knapp
NATO: This Deal is a Turkey
November 24, 2015
Dave Lindorff
An Invisible US Hand Leading to War? Turkey’s Downing of a Russian Jet was an Act of Madness
Mike Whitney
Turkey Downs Russian Fighter to Draw NATO and US Deeper into Syrian Quagmire
Walter Clemens
Who Created This Monster?
Patrick Graham
Bombing ISIS Will Not Work
Lida Maxwell
Who Gets to Demand Safety?
Eric Draitser
Refugees as Weapons in a Propaganda War
David Rosen
Trump’s Enemies List: a Trial Balloon for More Repression?
Eric Mann
Playing Politics While the Planet Sizzles
Chris Gilbert
“Why Socialism?” Revisited: Reflections Inspired by Einstein’s Article
Charles Davis
NSA Spies on Venezuela’s Oil Company
Michael Barker
Democracy vs. Political Policing
Barry Lando
Shocked by Trump? Churchill Wanted to “Collar Them All”
Cal Winslow
When Workers Fight: the National Union of Healthcare Workers Wins Battle with Kaiser
Norman Pollack
Where Does It End?: Left Political Correctness
David Macaray
Companies Continue to Profit by Playing Dumb
Binoy Kampmark
Animals in Conflict: Diesel, Dobrynya and Sentimental Security
Dave Welsh
Defiant Haiti: “We Won’t Let You Steal These Elections!”
November 23, 2015
Vijay Prashad
The Doctrine of 9/11 Anti-Immigration
John Wight
After Paris: Hypocrisy and Mendacity Writ Large
Joseph G. Ramsey
No Excuses, No Exceptions: the Moral Imperative to Offer Refuge
Patrick Cockburn
ISIS Thrives on the Disunity of Its Enemies
Andrew Moss
The Message of Montgomery: 60 Years Later
Jim Green
James Hansen’s Nuclear Fantasies
Robert Koehler
The Absence of History in the Aftermath of Paris
Dave Lindorff
The US Media and Propaganda
Dave Randle
France and Martial Law
Gilbert Mercier
If We Are at War, Let’s Bring Back the Draft!
Alexey Malashenko
Putin’s Syrian Gambit
Binoy Kampmark
Closing the Door: US Politics and the Refugee Debate