Annual Fundraising Appeal
Over the course of 21 years, we’ve published many unflattering stories about Henry Kissinger. We’ve recounted his involvement in the Chilean coup and the illegal bombings of Cambodia and Laos; his hidden role in the Kent State massacre and the genocide in East Timor; his noxious influence peddling in DC and craven work for dictators and repressive regimes around the world. We’ve questioned his ethics, his morals and his intelligence. We’ve called for him to be arrested and tried for war crimes. But nothing we’ve ever published pissed off HK quite like this sequence of photos taken at a conference in Brazil, which appeared in one of the early print editions of CounterPunch.
100716HenryKissingerNosePicking
The publication of those photos, and the story that went with them, 20 years ago earned CounterPunch a global audience in the pre-web days and helped make our reputation as a fearless journal willing to take the fight to the forces of darkness without flinching. Now our future is entirely in your hands. Please donate.

Day12Fixed

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)
cp-store

or use
pp1

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Housing Up, Home Ownership Down

The Mysterious New Housing Bubble

by MIKE WHITNEY

The rebound in housing is now in full swing. Housing starts are up, existing home sales are gaining pace, inventory is down, and prices are on the rise. According to a recent report by Corelogic “House prices are up 6.3% year-over-year in October, the largest increase since 2006 and the eighth consecutive increase in home prices nationally on a year-over-year basis.” Many experts are now predicting that 2013 will be even better, in fact, J.P. Morgan thinks that prices could gain another 10 percent in the next 12 months. Here’s the story from the Wall Street Journal:

“J.P. Morgan Chase Co. expects U.S. home prices to rise 3.4% in its base-case estimate and up to 9.7% in its most bullish scenario of economic growth. Standard and Poor’s, which rates private-issue mortgage bonds, on Friday said it expects a 5% rise in 2013.” (“Home Prices Could Jump 9.7% in 2013, J.P. Morgan Says”, Wall Street Journal)

And the housing boom is having an impact on Wall Street, too, where prescient investors who loaded up on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are cashing in bigtime via the Fed’s new MBS-buying program dubbed QE3. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is paying top-dollar for financial derivatives that, in real terms, are probably worth just pennies on the dollar.

Despite the increasingly positive signs of market strength, there are reasons to be skeptical, after all, this is the second time that prices and sales rallied since the bottom fell out in 2006. The first rebound took place in 2009, when President Barack Obama initiated his Firsttime Homebuyer program which provided lavish incentives for potential buyers to sign on the bottom line. The program sparked a frenzy of activity that reversed the direction of the market, but quickly petered out in a matter of months. Could today’s sudden surge in prices be another “false start” or is it the real deal? Only time will tell. But it’s worth noting that the market has never really cleared and that normal supply-demand dynamics have never been allowed to work as one would expect in a free market. In fact, housing is arguably the most maligned and manipulated market of all time. Mortgage rates are artificially low due to Fed intervention (QE3). Inventory is artificially low due to the banks withholding of distressed backlog. Down payments are so minuscule (FHA=3.5%) that homebuyers end up leveraged at a 30 to 1 ratio, the same as the big Wall Street investment banks prior to the Crash of ’08. And, finally, government-backed mortgage modifications (HAMP) provide generous refinancing to high-risk “underwater” applicants with LTV at 125%, a process that makes subprime mortgages look like a model of prudent lending. So much is fake about today’s housing market, that it’s a stretch to call it a market at all.

Even so, there are anomalies in the data that don’t support the media’s storyline that “Housing Is Back”. For example, did you know that the homeownership rate is still falling?

But how can that be, you ask? After all, if housing is recovering, then more people must be moving into homes, right?

Wrong. Check out this illuminating post from Sober Look:

“Some readers have been asking how one can reconcile positive signs in the housing market with declining rates of homeownership. Indeed, homeownership is falling at an even faster pace than during the 08-10 period….The explanation is that so far a great deal of net demand growth in housing has been in rental units. …This demand for rentals is in fact one of the factors supporting the housing market – for every renter there is a landlord who buys a home.

JPMorgan: – There is no contradiction between increased demand for housing and reduced homeownership rates. Demand for housing is mainly dependent on the increase in the number of households, whether these households choose to own or to rent the housing units they live in. Growth of household formation had been stifled during the expansion to date by high unemployment and subdued job growth.

….

The decline in homeownership rates implies that virtually all the increase in demand for housing units associated with increased household formation consists of increased demand for rental units. Indeed current estimates indicate that over the past year the number of occupied rental units increased 1.32 million and the number of owneroccupied housing units actually declined 175,000.” (“Falling homeownership rate and the housing market”, Sober Look)

Well, that changes things a bit, doesn’t it? So if the number of people who actually bought a home and moved in dropped by 175,000, then what we’re seeing is industrial-scale investment by Wall Street speculators who are getting lavish financing perks from the banks to buy distressed properties that, if they had been sold on the MLS or via bank auctions, would have driven prices down even further pushing bank balance sheets deeper into the red. In other words, the Obama administration, the banks, the Fed and the behemoth private equity firms are all in bed together to prevent firsttime homebuyers from getting a good deal on a foreclosure and to reward the people who blew up the financial system with another backdoor bailout.

Does that change your attitude about the so called housing rebound at all?

But there is an upside to all this speculative investment, that is, at least the banks are whittling down their gigantic stockpile of backlogged homes. That’s got to be a good thing, right?

Wrong, again. Because the people who are getting pushed out of the market, are the very people the who historically provide continuity and stability, that is, firsttime homebuyers. Here’s the scoop from CNBC:

“Current homeowners are finally moving up, and distressed sales are making up less of the overall market—all signs of much-needed improvement in housing….Unfortunately, first-time home buyers are seeing just the opposite, largely left out of this surge in sales and prices. Their share of the market, usually up in the 40 percent range historically, fell to 34.7 percent in October, the lowest in the Campbell/IMF survey’s three-year history.” (“Housing Recovery Is Leaving Behind First-Time Buyers”, CNBC)

So, more of the low-end homes are being bought up by the big private equity firms, which means fewer crumbs for the little guy at the bottom. Is that really a positive development?

And, how about this: You probably read that existing home sales have been picking up, which is true. In October, sales on existing homes rose 2.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.79 million. But there’s more to this story than meets the eye. Check this out at CNBC:

“The October numbers were driven entirely by multifamily apartment starts, up 10 percent month-to-month and up 63 percent year over year…..Younger Americans are in fact moving out of their parents’ basements, but many are moving into rental units, and that is also a formed household.” (“Yes, Housing Starts Surge, but Rentals Are the Drivers”, CNBC)

So this is the great housing recovery that everyone’s been crowing about; little Johnny and Janie finally leave the nest to live in a rental unit owned by some fatcat PE pirate from Manhattan? That doesn’t exactly sound like the America Dream, now does it? And here’s something else to mull over (from the same article):

“Housing starts at 894,000 is near where they were at the depths of the 1981 and 1991 recessions and 60 percent below the peak in January 2006,” pointed out Peter Boockvar at Miller Tabak.”

So let’s keep things in perspective. Housing is still in the doldrums despite the hype, despite the low rates, despite the unprecedented meddling and intervention by the Fed, the banks and the USG. Just look at the data. Naturally, if the banks withhold distressed inventory, the government lends money to underwater homeowners, and the Fed slashes rates to record lows and buys whatever MBS the banks produce, then there’s going to be a surge in activity. But how long will it last?

No one knows. But one thing is certain, the Fed’s loosy goosy policies never seem to work as planned. Case in point: Bernanke’s zero rates and QE4 have not revived interest in housing as much as they have touched off a surge of speculation which could generate another destabilizing asset-price bubble. Get a load of this from the SF Gate:

“There is a tsunami of money coming into the market, billions of dollars to buy distressed single-family homes,” said Jeff Lerman, a San Rafael real estate lawyer, speaking about the national landscape. “The window of opportunity is rapidly closing (as prices rise). Over the next 18 months, profit margins in single-family opportunistic buying will be compressed quite a bit.”

A Chronicle analysis of sales data compiled by San Diego research firm DataQuick showed that absentee buyers, who once bought about 10 percent of homes sold in the nine Bay Area counties, account for about a quarter of all purchases this year, more than doubling their share…..

“Right now the dominating force driving the rental market in California is foreclosed-upon former homeowners transitioning to renters,” Burke said. “That demographic is an important market segment for us.” (“Investors rushing into real estate deals”, SF Gate)

Repeat: “A tsunami of money coming into the market” from deep-pocket speculators. That’s your “recovery” in a nutshell.

Of course the article focuses on the Bay Area, but the same thing is going on in the hotter markets across the country, particularly Los Vegas, Phoenix, Atlanta and Miami. Investors are buying up all the cheap homes they can get their hands on . The flurry of activity has pushed prices higher, but can it last? Housing expert Mark Hanson doesn’t think so. Here’s a clip from a recent post at The Big Picture:

“For years I have proclaimed that “no housing recovery will ever occur — or no dead-cat-bounce will reach “escape velocity” or become “durable” — unless the repeat buyer is leading the way. This is because investors and first-timers are thin, volatile cohorts who have been known over history to leave the market literally, overnight….

The problem is that the mortgaged homeowner has always been the primary demand cohort. It’s not investors, first-timers or those who own their homes free and clear. Rather, the mortgage-levered homeowner who tends to move every 6 to 8 years who provides most of the historic underlying support for macro housing.

This is a problem. Put simply, there are more houses today then there were five years ago but a full HALF of the primary demand cohort — repeat buyers — died due to negative equity….. and able buyers have been cut in half.

Bottom line, WHERE IS THE “DURABLE”, INCREMENTAL DEMAND GOING TO COME FROM(?) (“Shadow” & “Ghost” Inventory / Negative & “Effective” Negative Equity…The Real Challenges for US Housing”, Mark Hanson, The Big Picture)

Hanson makes a good point. Traditionally, repeat “move up” buyers have driven the market, but that’s not happening now because so many people are underwater and can’t afford to move. So, yes, housing prices can go higher for a while, but the higher they go, the less profit investors will make, which will lead to a drop-off in sales and greater price erosion. That will put us back at Square 1.

So, what’s going to happen next?

That’s easy. The banks are going to try to reduce their stockpile of unwanted homes by increasing the number of foreclosures. The supply of distressed homes actually increased while the banks fiddled inventory to effect the fake rebound. ( No, the banks are not running out of distressed inventory as the dissembling media would have you believe.) So now the banks have to dump more homes on the market which will put pressure on prices. The banks don’t want prices to jump 6.5% per year. They want just enough upward movement in prices to lure people back into the market. This process is already underway, as this CNBC article reveals:

“The good news is that overall foreclosure activity continues to fall and a decline in new foreclosures are leading the drop. The bad news is that the huge backlog of homes already in the foreclosures process, but long delayed, are finally going back to the banks in big numbers.

Bank repossessions jumped 11% in November month-to-month and rose 5% from November of 2011, according to RealtyTrac. That marks the first annual jump in just over two years.” (“Housing’s Repo Man Is Back”, CNBC)

So tell me this, dear reader: Why did “bank repossessions (suddenly) jump 11% in November”? And why has foreclosure activity picked up for the first time “in over two years”?

Is it because the banks didn’t know that they were sitting on millions of distressed properties that they’d eventually have to sell or is it because the banks colluded with the Fed and Obama to control the flow of foreclosures in order to prop up prices and seduce more suckers back into the market?

That’s a no-brainer, right? It’s all manipulation.

So, how is this all going to play-out?

Well, we know that the Fed is going to continue to purchase mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to the tune of $45 billion per month “indefinitely”. But housing sales could still weaken as profit margins on investment properties shrink and more of the big players look for other places to put their money. That gives Bernanke about a 6-month window to settle on a strategy for inflating another housing bubble. He knows he cannot count on organic demand or move up buyers because unemployment is still too high and wages are not showing any sign of growth. So, his only hope is to change regulations so the banks can resume lending to mortgage applicants who’ll never be able to repay the debt. And that is precisely what the Fed chair is doing. Take a look at this in Bloomberg:

“Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the Fed will take action to speed growth and a rebound in a housing market facing obstacles ranging from too-tight lending rules to racial discrimination….Bernanke said while tighter credit standards after a collapse in the subprime mortgage market were appropriate, “it seems likely at this point that the pendulum has swung too far the other way, and that overly tight lending standards may now be preventing creditworthy borrowers from buying homes, thereby slowing the revival in housing and impeding the economic recovery.”…

Bernanke said housing-finance authorities have taken steps to “remove barriers to the flow of mortgage credit” and referred to efforts by the Federal Housing Finance Agency and by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to clarify rules surrounding mortgages that go into default.

These steps, the 58-year-old Fed chief said, should “increase the willingness of lenders to make new loans.” (“Bernanke Says Fed Will Do What It Can to Support Housing”, Bloomberg)

Did you catch that part about how “the Fed will take action (on) racial discrimination”?

In other words, African Americans are going to be in the crosshairs again like they were during the subprime fiasco. Take a look at this in Bloomberg:

“Lenders were 3½ times more likely to steer blacks to high-interest mortgages than whites with comparable credit scores, according to a Center for Responsible Lending study of 27 million loans originated from 2004 to 2008. In Memphis, where 63 percent of the 652,000 residents are black, officials say their city was targeted for such predatory lending — a practice that Marano says his company didn’t engage in….”(“Wall Street Kept Winning on Mortgages Upending Homeowners”, Bloomberg)

Does Bernanke really care if minorities get fleeced for a second time in less than a decade?

Don’t make me laugh. The Fed doesn’t give a rat’s ass who gets taken to the cleaners as long as his crooked Wall Street buddies get their pound of flesh.

So, here’s how it’s going to go down: Bernanke’s going to twist arms at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to define a “qualified mortgage” in a way that allows the banks to dump their garbage loans on Uncle Sam without any risk to themselves. Once the new regulations are in place and the banks get the “safe harbor” provision they want; they’ll start issuing mortgages to anyone who’s strong enough to sit upright and put a “X” on the dotted line, which is how we got into this mess to begin with.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.