FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Reducing a Great Empire to a Small One

by HENRY PELIFIAN

This auspicious title is from Ben Franklin’s essay “Rules by which a Great Empire may be reduced to a Small One” penned in September 1773.

A great empire strode across the globe and it was said that the sun never set on its empire it was so vast.  It had a colony that it abused and taxed without representation, created more laws to subdue its colony that eventually the colony rebelled and fought for its independence.

Now that colony has emerged as even greater empire, not only the sun never sets on its empire it can reach out instantaneously today to strike across the globe.  Its people chose between two parties to create their modern empire.  Its empire is so vast, its agencies and departments so large and complex in their bureaucracies its citizens know almost nothing of them or their accomplishments, however small or large. The new empire runs on automatic pilot with democratic elections with convoluted ballots where many political parties may use the same candidates as the controlling two political parties on the ballot.  It’s not ballot stuffing, it’s multiple ballots for the same two groups of people, namely the controlling parties with few exceptions.

The new empire bullies smaller countries around the world.  Justice is for its own citizens is often delayed, for without money and influence success in the courts is always an expensive and tortured ordeal to be avoided for the majority seeking justice.  The new empire creates its own peace institutes, democracy institutes and whatever institute it needs to bolster its expensive agenda.

Ben Franklin was aiming at the British Empire which was abusing its American colony. Franklin stated that a great empire is like a great cake and its colonies were on its edges and those edges were more easily separated from the cake by being so remote.

Now, 239 years later, the country he fought so hard to release from the grasp of the British Empire has supplanted that old empire and created a far larger and more powerful one.  Instead of conquering countries the new empire uses its borrowed financial wealth for discretionary spending to persuade countries to comply with its economic and strategic goals and aims.  Sometimes it resorts to wars on flimsy rationales oblivious of the financial and human costs; albeit they are so enormous they are obscene.  But the new empire sees it all as necessary and proper.

Has this new American Empire become arrogant on the world stage and even cowing its own citizens like the old British Empire?   The tremendous expansion of the national security state ostensibly created to ensure safety to Americans has enlarged government with little regard to the rights of the citizens by always diminishing the citizen. Has enlarging the state for security become a financial parasite on the citizenry?

The criminal act of 9/11 is proof of the failure of the national security state with hundreds of billions of dollars expended annually on defense and national security.  Despite these enormous expenditures this massive security effort was easily foiled, which is ignored by the mainstream press which appear often to be cheerleaders of government by not reporting and identifying effectively its failures, mistakes and abuses.

Ben Franklin believed that the British Empire inflicted its power unfairly, flagrantly, unjustly and corruptly for profit and power.  The new empire spawned by Ben Franklin and the other Founding Fathers has descended 239 years later on its own citizens who scramble in its maze.

Ben Franklin musing for today’s rules of the new and greater empire might be,
Creating a large and enormously costly military with bases throughout the world to pay for friends while getting closer to those who abhor foreign military adventurism.

Creating a large and enormously costly military with bases throughout the world to pay for friends while getting closer to those who abhor foreign military adventurism.

Creating ever larger and enormously costly overlapping and non-overlapping “intelligence” agencies and departments draw citizens and non-citizens alike closer to empire hugging them as they squirm.
 
Creating an ever larger government without identifying and correlating tangible or intangible benefits for the citizenry as they make their way through the maze of laws of all kinds or hanging over them like a rope.
 
Creating an Empire on the backs of the people claiming it is for their security while their security declines in the process, including their economic security.

Creating a lone superpower on the backs of 75% of its citizens earning $50,000 annually or less cements the people into an indebted empire tending to drown its citizens every time they swim.
 
Creating the elite of government to protect the richest and most influential may inflame the people becoming remote from their government, like the edge of a great cake.
 
Today, Ben Franklin would assuredly be using his “Rules by which a Great Empire may be reduced to a small one” on his own country, applying it one rule at a time.

Oh, there are those who cry the new Empire is different, it is not like colonialism, it only exports democracy and freedom.  Ben Franklin might reply, “Have you done it without emptying the public purse to the disadvantage of your own citizenry?”

The grievances of Ben Franklin for that old empire have reverberated in the new empire as the people now vote for alternate jockeys from the two political parties to Ride the Horse of Empire into new lands.

Henry Pelifian received a B.A. from the State University of New York at Geneseo, NY in English/Drama and Education, an MBA in International Managment from Thunderbird, Garvin School of International Management in Arizona. He served in the U.S. Army with one year in Qui Nhon, South Vietnam. A former Peace Corps Volunteer in Thailand, he worked for several more years overseas, primarily in Thailand in the U.S. Refugee Program. He is now writing novels, plays and short stories. You can visit his Amazon page here.

More articles by:
June 29, 2016
Diana Johnstone
European Unification Divides Europeans: How Forcing People Together Tears Them Apart
Andrew Smolski
To My Less-Evilism Haters: A Rejoinder to Halle and Chomsky
David Rosen
Birth-Control Wars: Two Centuries of Struggle
Sheldon Richman
Brexit: What Kind of Dependence Now?
Yves Engler
“Canadian” Corporate Capitalism
Lawrence Davidson
Return to the Gilded Age: Paul Ryan’s Deregulated Dystopia
Priti Gulati Cox
All That Glitters is Fearsome: Whatever Happens, Don’t Blame Jill Stein
Franklin Lamb
About the Accusation that Syrian and Russian Troops are Looting Palmyra
Binoy Kampmark
Texas, Abortion and the US Supreme Court
Anhvinh Doanvo
Justice Thomas’s Abortion Dissent Tolerates Discrimination
Victor Grossman
Brexit Pro and Con: the View From Germany
Manuel E. Yepe
Brazil: the Southern Giant Will Have to Fight
Rivera Sun
The Nonviolent History of American Independence
Adjoa Agyeiwaa
Is Western Aid Destroying Nigeria’s Future?
Jesse Jackson
What Clinton Should Learn From Brexit
Mel Gurtov
Is Brexit the End of the World?
June 28, 2016
Jonathan Cook
The Neoliberal Prison: Brexit Hysteria and the Liberal Mind
Paul Street
Bernie, Bakken, and Electoral Delusion: Letting Rich Guys Ruin Iowa and the World
Anthony DiMaggio
Fatally Flawed: the Bi-Partisan Travesty of American Health Care Reform
Mike King
The “Free State of Jones” in Trump’s America: Freedom Beyond White Imagination
Antonis Vradis
Stop Shedding Tears for the EU Monster: Brexit, the View From the Peloponnese
Omar Kassem
The End of the Atlantic Project: Slamming the Brakes on the Neoliberal Order
Binoy Kampmark
Brexit and the Neoliberal Revolt Against Jeremy Corbyn
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Alabama Democratic Primary Proves New York Times’ Nate Cohn Wrong about Exit Polling
Ruth Hopkins
Save Bear Butte: Mecca of the Lakota
Celestino Gusmao
Time to End Impunity for Suharto’’s Crimes in Indonesia and Timor-Leste
Thomas Knapp
SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement’s Interests versus Society’s
Manuel E. Yepe
Capitalism is the Opposite of Democracy
Winslow Myers
Up Against the Wall
Chris Ernesto
Bernie’s “Political Revolution” = Vote for Clinton and the Neocons
Stephanie Van Hook
The Time for Silence is Over
Ajamu Nangwaya
Toronto’s Bathhouse Raids: Racialized, Queer Solidarity and Police Violence
June 27, 2016
Robin Hahnel
Brexit: Establishment Freak Out
James Bradley
Omar’s Motive
Gregory Wilpert – Michael Hudson
How Western Military Interventions Shaped the Brexit Vote
Leonard Peltier
41 Years Since Jumping Bull (But 500 Years of Trauma)
Rev. William Alberts
Orlando: the Latest Victim of Radicalizing American Imperialism
Patrick Cockburn
Brexiteers Have Much in Common With Arab Spring Protesters
Franklin Lamb
How 100 Syrians, 200 Russians and 11 Dogs Out-Witted ISIS and Saved Palmyra
John Grant
Omar Mateen: The Answers are All Around Us
Dean Baker
In the Wake of Brexit Will the EU Finally Turn Away From Austerity?
Ralph Nader
The IRS and the Self-Minimization of Congressman Jason Chaffetz
Johan Galtung
Goodbye UK, Goodbye Great Britain: What Next?
Martha Pskowski
Detained in Dilley: Deportation and Asylum in Texas
Binoy Kampmark
Headaches of Empire: Brexit’s Effect on the United States
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail