Here’s an important message to CounterPunch readers from
Here at CounterPunch we love Barbara Ehrenreich for many reasons: her courage, her intelligence and her untarnished optimism. Ehrenreich knows what’s important in life; she knows how hard most Americans have to work just to get by, and she knows what it’s going to take to forge radical change in this country. We’re proud to fight along side her in this long struggle. We hope you agree with Barbara that CounterPunch plays a unique role on the Left. Our future is in your hands. Please donate.
Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.
Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.
CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.
The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.
Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)
To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683
Thank you for your support,
Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel
CounterPunch PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558
Let’s take a quick look at where we are as a culture, and how far we’ve progressed. A century ago we were more or less stuck with how we looked and how we performed sexually. While we could use make-up, powders, hair dyes and wigs to enhance our appearance, we were pretty much destined to look the way Mother Nature intended us to look.
Accordingly, before the invention of Viagara, if men couldn’t get the job done sexually, they were SOL. Like it or not, Mother Nature didn’t intend for 80-year old men to walk around with erections. In truth, Mother Nature didn’t intend for 80-year old men to be walking around at all, but the advent of modern medicine and health education changed all that.
Take cosmetic surgery for example. That procedure has ushered in a whole array of choices. While the procedure used to be relatively rare, cosmetic surgery is now not only common, it’s ubiquitous, especially among celebrities. I read somewhere that in the last decade or so, rhinoplasty (nose job) had become the high school graduation gift of choice. It’s true. The most prized graduation gift used to be a new car. Today it’s a new face.
Even when the results of cosmetic surgery are disappointing or mildly disturbing (e.g., Steve Wynn, Kenny Rodgers, Bruce Jenner), celebs continue to seek surgical makeovers. After all, when you consider the big picture, it’s an eminently rational decision. If you’re unhappy with your body, why not overhaul it?
If I had the extra dough, I could see myself chopping my beak and pinning back my ears, and it wouldn’t be because I’m particularly unhappy with my appearance. Rather, it’s the enticement—the gnawing allure—of knowing that there’s an alternative, that you can actually reinvent yourself.
While on the subject of physical attributes, let us consider the general anatomical category of penises. Despite protestations to the contrary, it’s accurate to say that size does, in fact, matter. Larger is better. No, you don’t need a 9-inch member in order to please your partner, but you certainly need more than 3-inches to get the job done properly.
Which leads us to a technological prediction. In the future, lesser endowed men will pay for penis transplants. Forty-year old millionaires, whom Nature cruelly equipped with 3-inch rods, will pay large-framed, 80-year old Norwegian ex-lumberjacks $500,000 to swap penises with them. Obviously, the 80-year old Norwegian will jump at the offer because, at his age, he has no use for a large penis. What’s he going to do with it?
Moreover, as with violins, 80-year old penises work just as well as newer ones. The only problem with an 80-year old penis is that it’s attached to an 80-year old body no longer capable of using it. Let’s be realistic: Even with a pharmaceutical aid, who’s an 80-year ex-lumberjack going to have intercourse with?
So it’s an ideal trade. The wealthy Asian businessman gets to walk around knowing that he’s now packing some weight, and the formerly well-hung Norwegian gentleman not only comes away with a cool $500,000, but he gets a smaller, more manageable penis in return.
David Macaray, an LA playwright and author (“It’s Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor”), was a former labor union rep. He can be reached at email@example.com