FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Boy Scouts and Bigots

by CHRISTOPHER BRAUCHLI

Prejudice, n. a vagrant opinion without visible means of support.

Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary

It’s not 1991 in the Boy Scouts of America. That was the year that the Girl Scouts issued a Statement in which they said:  “As a private organization, Girl Scouts of the U.S.A. respects the values and beliefs of each of its members and does not intrude into personal matters.  Therefore, there are no membership policies on sexual preference.”

It’s not 1993 in the Boy Scouts of America.  That was the year that at the Girl Scouts’ national convention in Minneapolis it was decided by a vote of 1560 to 375, that a girl scout could pledge service to “God,” “Allah”, the Creator” or anyone else she wished.  B. LaRae Orullian, its national president said:  “The important thing is that the spiritual principles which continue to be the fundamentals of Girl Scouting recognize that there are some religious groups . . . that believe in a spiritual motivating force, but use words other than God.”

It’s not 2003 in the Boy Scouts of America. In a 2003 Girl Scout tract entitled “What We Stand For” the organization said:  “The Girl Scouts value diversity and inclusiveness and, therefore, do not discriminate on any basis. . . . We believe that sexual orientation is a private matter for girls and their families to address.”

It’s not 2011 in the Boy Scouts of America.   That was the year that the Girl Scouts of Colorado said:  If a child identifies as a girl and the child’s family presents her as a girl, Girl Scouts of Colorado welcomes her as a Girl Scout.”

It’s 2012 in the Boy Scouts of America.  It could be 1910, the year the organization was formed.  It could be 1993. That was the year that the Boy Scouts defended a suit brought by 10-year old Mark Welsh who lived in Chicago and wanted to become a Boy Scout.  Since he was a boy he was the right sex, and since he wasn’t gay, he had the right sexual orientation.  His only failing was he did not believe in the Boy Scout’s God. In fact, he said he didn’t believe in any god. He was an atheist.  That was too much for the Boy Scouts.  They denied him admission.  He sued demanding to be admitted to the scouts.  The Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,  two of whose members had been left stranded in the 19th Century upheld the Scouts.  They said letting young  Mark in would “run the risk of undermining one of the seedbeds of virtue that cultivate the sorts of citizens our nation so desperately needs. [Bigots].” So much for Mark.

While looking back fondly on that outcome, the Boy Scouts of America continue to march forward into the 19th Century.  In April 2012, Boy Scout den mother, Jennifer Tyrrell, of Bridgeport, Ohio, was told by the Boy Scouts that she could no longer serve as a den mother because she was a lesbian.  On July 1,  2012 she delivered a petition with 300,000 signatures on it to the Boy Scouts demanding that she be reinstated.  Shortly after she submitted her petition the Boy Scouts of America announced the conclusion of a 2-year study on the question of gays in the scouts and reaffirmed the policy of “not granting membership to open or avowed homosexuals.”  The organization reaffirmed its belief that admitting atheists, agnostics and gays would reflect badly on the organization.  Bob Mazzuca, Chief Scout Executive of the Boy Scouts explained the policy saying:  “The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family . . . . and at the appropriate time and in the right setting.”  This is a progressive attitude since it means a boy who engages in same-sex orientation discussions at home is not offensive to the organization. However, parents who learn of what the scouts would consider a son’s incorrect sexual orientation should keep that information within the family and not share it with a prospective scout troop.

According to documents released in a 1993 lawsuit against the Scouts, between 1971 and 1991, 1,800 Scout Masters were removed from their posts because they were suspected of molesting boys. In some cases the offending individuals were simply reassigned to other posts. In 2010 a jury awarded an Oregon man $18.5 million for abuse suffered by a man at the hands of his scout master during the 1980s. In 2009 a Burnsville, Minnesota scoutmaster was arrested and charged with six felony counts of sexually abusing scouts in his troop.  In 2011 he was found guilty of assaults on one boy and faced additional charges.  In March 2012 a boy scout volunteer was found guilty of first and second-degree sexual assault of one of the scouts who visited him in his home.

Heaven only knows what things would change if the Scouts were now to admit gays and atheists.  The answer might well be-nothing.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

Weekend Edition
August 26, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
How Donald Trump Can Still be a Hero: Force the Guardians of the Duopoly to Open Up the Debates
Rob Urie
Crisis and Opportunity
Louisa Willcox
The Unbearable Killing of Yellowstone’s Grizzlies: 2015 Shatters Records for Bear Deaths
Charles Pierson
Wedding Crashers Who Kill
Richard Moser
What is the Inside/Outside Strategy?
Dirk Bezemer – Michael Hudson
Finance is Not the Economy
Paul Buhle
In the Shadow of the CIA: Liberalism’s Big Embarrassing Moment
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Bernie’s Used Cars
Margaret Kimberley
Hillary and Colin: the War Criminal Charade
Patrick Cockburn
Turkey’s Foray into Syria: a Gamble in a Very Dangerous Game
Ishmael Reed
Birther Tries to Flim Flam Blacks  
Brian Terrell
What Makes a Hate Group?
Howard Lisnoff
Trouble in Political Paradise
Terry Tempest Williams
Will Our National Parks Survive the Next 100 Years?
Ben Debney
The Swimsuit that Overthrew the State
Ashley Smith
Anti-imperialism and the Syrian Revolution
Andrew Stewart
Did Gore Throw the 2000 Election?
Vincent Navarro
Is the Nation State and Its Welfare State Dead? a Critique of Varoufakis
John Wight
Syria’s Kurds and the Wages of Treachery
Lawrence Davidson
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
Mateo Pimentel
The Affordable Care Act: A Litmus Test for American Capitalism?
Roger Annis
In Northern Syria, Turkey Opens New Front in its War Against the Kurds
David Swanson
ABC Shifts Blame from US Wars to Doctors Without Borders
Norman Pollack
American Exceptionalism: A Pernicious Doctrine
Ralph Nader
Readers Think, Thinkers Read
Julia Morris
The Mythologies of the Nauruan Refugee Nation
George Wuerthner
Caving to Ranchers: the Misguided Decision to Kill the Profanity Wolf Pack
Ann Garrison
Unworthy Victims: Houthis and Hutus
Julian Vigo
Britain’s Slavery Legacy
John Stanton
Brzezinski Vision for a Power Sharing World Stymied by Ignorant Americans Leaders, Citizens
Philip Doe
Colorado: 300 Days of Sunshine Annually, Yet There’s No Sunny Side of the Street
Joseph White
Homage to EP Thompson
Dan Bacher
The Big Corporate Money Behind Jerry Brown
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume
DNC Playing Dirty Tricks on WikiLeaks
Ron Jacobs
Education for Liberation
Jim Smith
Socialism Revived: In Spite of Bernie, Donald and Hillary
David Macaray
Organized Labor’s Inferiority Complex
David Cortright
Alternatives to Military Intervention in Syria
Binoy Kampmark
The Terrors of Free Speech: Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act
Cesar Chelala
Guantánamo’s Quagmire
Nyla Ali Khan
Hoping Against Hope in Kashmir
William Hughes
From Sam Spade to the Red Scare: Dashiell Hammett’s War Against Rightwing Creeps
Raouf Halaby
Dear Barack Obama, Please Keep it at 3 for 3
Charles R. Larson
Review: Paulina Chiziane’s “The First Wife: a Tale of Polygamy”
David Yearsley
The Widow Bach: Anna Magdalena Rediscovered
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail