Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! We only ask one time of year, but when we do, we mean it. Without your support we can’t continue to bring you the very best material, day-in and day-out. CounterPunch is one of the last common spaces on the Internet. Help make sure it stays that way.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

The Double Standard

by ROBERT FANTINA

The fact that there is a double-standard in effect for all aspects of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, favoring, of course, Israel, is no secret. The mainstream United States media, little more than a pawn for the government, ignores the countless, horrific abuses heaped upon the Palestinians on a daily basis by the U.S.’s sacred cow, Israel.

This double-standard has become so pervasive that the routine atrocities, such as the bulldozing of homes and olive groves, the shooting of unarmed farmers of all ages, etc., barely registers on the collective consciousness. ‘Ho-hum,’ we all seem to say; ‘business as usual in the Middle East.’

It is sometimes hard to judge which atrocity Israel commits against the defenseless Palestinians, all with the consent and financial backing of the United States and some of its more compliant puppets, is the most shocking.  We will leave that determination to the individual reader, as we look at one more.

This action strikes at the core of what many Palestinians hold sacred. Now it must be remembered that what is sacred to Israel is sacred to the world. Apparently, what is sacred to Muslims is worth no more than a place in a garbage dump.

A recent news article discusses an Israeli group in Jerusalem that is using state-of-the-art technology “to map every tombstone in the ancient cemetery on the Mount of Olives, a sprawling, necropolis of 150,000 graves stretching back three millennia.”

One can readily understand the value of this cemetery, not only from a religious, but also from an archeological standpoint. Its size and age alone give it value. Israel, theoretically, is understandably interested in its preservation.  That fact that is it on occupied territory will not be discussed here.

However, Israel isn’t so interested in religion or archeology when it comes to the Palestinians. In a double slap in the face, not only to Palestinians, but to the world community it so obviously disdains, Israel has erected a new ‘Museum of Tolerance and Human Dignity.’ Well, one wonders, what could possibly be objectionable about such a museum? This particular museum is constructed on the site of the Mamilla Cemetery, an historic Muslim cemetery. This cemetery was the final resting place of hundreds of prophets and leaders from the early Muslim period, along with thousands of Christians killed during the pre-Islamic era. It is, or was, sacred ground to Muslims and others.

In August of 2010, 300 Muslim gravestones were bulldozed, witnessed by a French reporter. A ‘stop work’ petition was issued to the courts, where it was rejected, allowing the destruction to continue the very same day.

Later, the Jerusalem city council claimed, incredibly, that fake gravestones had been erected in an attempt to prevent Israel from using the land.

What, one wonders, would have been the anguished outcry from the United States and its several puppet nations, if the Palestinians had desecrated a Jewish cemetery? What consequences would they have suffered? One can imagine U.S. Senators and members of the House of Representatives, many of whom rely on the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC) to funnel vast sums to their reelection campaigns, justifying the bombing of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, to prevent what they would, somehow, see as a threat to Israeli security. What kind of people, they would ask, hands wringing in despair, would desecrate a cemetery?

Please note that this question went unasked in the hallowed halls of Congress when Israel bulldozed the Mamilla cemetery.

Need anyone ask what makes the difference? If there were a Palestinian-American Political Action Committee, able to purchase members of the U.S. Congress the way the AIPAC does, perhaps the playing field would be different.  But no, the Palestinians need to rely on the good will and sense of fair play of the international community, and that, unfortunately, is no match for the almighty dollar.

This writer wonders how many people are even aware of the historic, sacred cemetery destroyed for Israel’s ‘Museum of Tolerance and Human Dignity.’ Closely as he follows the news, he somehow missed this particular news item.

Can one even begin to enumerate the injustices, indignities and horrific crimes that the Israelis commit against the Palestinians? Can one begin to put themselves in the place of these victims? Living in a so-called modern, so-called free society, can one imagine fleeing from one’s home as bulldozers begin to demolish it? Can one feel at all the horror of having seconds to gather one’s children and rush outside to avoid dying in the rubble? After the bulldozers leave, imagine poking around the wreckage, salvaging what can be salvaged, and sometimes continuing to live under parts of the house, since one has nowhere else to go. Lastly, imagine having no recourse to this crime.

President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and their cohorts continue to say that negotiations are the only avenue to peace in the Middle East. Are they not aware of the harsh, deadly oppression the Palestinians suffer at the hands of the Israelis? Or is it simply that, lacking the financial resources needed to purchase U.S. government officials, the plight of the Palestinians is simply not worth attending to?

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ bold move, requesting membership status at the United Nations Security Council, has ratcheted up the pressure on the international community considerably. The U.S. scrambles to strong-arm a sufficient number of Security Council members to vote down this request, promising an embarrassing, and foreign-policy-disastrous, veto, if it is unsuccessful. But that is not important; such a veto will ensure Israeli lobbying moneys continue to be directed to the coffers which Mr. Obama wants to see filled. Justice, human rights, equality and other such terms, often bandied about by the U.S.’s political players, are not to be considered. They are only to be paraded out during campaign speeches, when there is nothing behind them but the hot air of pompous politicians. And it has been generations since the concept of statesmanship was ever mentioned.

Yet there is a glimmer of hope on this dull and dusty horizon. With the Palestinians wisely choosing to bypass the hapless, insincere and ineffectual U.S. efforts for a settlement, the international community has been forced to take a bit more notice. That it favors an end to the occupation of Palestine is clear from the recent vote to admit Palestine to UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), and the fact that, once the U.S. defeats Palestine’s bid for U.N. membership at the Security Council, its acceptance by the General Assembly is assured. The U.S.’s international influence, especially in the Middle East, but throughout the rest of the world as well, will continue to dim, and Israel will become more and more isolated. Perhaps such consequences will force both nations to take a more realistic approach to their roles on the world stage, but one does not hold out much hope of that happening.

Robert Fantina is author of Desertion and the American Soldier: 1776–2006

 

Robert Fantina’s latest book is Empire, Racism and Genocide: a History of US Foreign Policy (Red Pill Press).

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
Matt Peppe
Taking a Knee: Resisting Enforced Patriotism
James McEnteer
Eugene, Oregon and the Rising Cost of Cool
Norman Pollack
The Great Debate: Proto-Fascism vs. the Real Thing
Michael Winship
The Tracks of John Boehner’s Tears
John Steppling
Fear Level Trump
Lawrence Wittner
Where Is That Wasteful Government Spending?
James Russell
Beyond Debate: Interview Styles of the Rich and Famous
September 26, 2016
Diana Johnstone
The Hillary Clinton Presidency has Already Begun as Lame Ducks Promote Her War
Gary Leupp
Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Against Russia
Dave Lindorff
Parking While Black: When Police Shoot as First Resort
Robert Crawford
The Political Rhetoric of Perpetual War
Howard Lisnoff
The Case of One Homeless Person
Michael Howard
The New York Times Endorses Hillary, Scorns the World
Russell Mokhiber
Wells Fargo and the Library of Congress’ National Book Festival
Chad Nelson
The Crime of Going Vegan: the Latest Attack on Angela Davis
Colin Todhunter
A System of Food Production for Human Need, Not Corporate Greed
Brian Cloughley
The United States Wants to Put Russia in a Corner
Guillermo R. Gil
The Clevenger Effect: Exposing Racism in Pro Sports
David Swanson
Turn the Pentagon into a Hospital
Ralph Nader
Are You Ready for Democracy?
Chris Martenson
Hell to Pay
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Debate Night: Undecided is Everything, Advantage Trump
Frank X Murphy
Power & Struggle: the Detroit Literacy Case
Chris Knight
The Tom and Noam Show: a Review of Tom Wolfe’s “The Kingdom of Speech”
Weekend Edition
September 23, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Meaning of the Trump Surge
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: More Pricks Than Kicks
Mike Whitney
Oh, Say Can You See the Carnage? Why Stand for a Country That Can Gun You Down in Cold Blood?
Chris Welzenbach
The Diminution of Chris Hayes
Vincent Emanuele
The Riots Will Continue
Rob Urie
A Scam Too Far
Pepe Escobar
Les Deplorables
Patrick Cockburn
Airstrikes, Obfuscation and Propaganda in Syria
Timothy Braatz
The Quarterback and the Propaganda
Sheldon Richman
Obama Rewards Israel’s Bad Behavior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail