Matching Grant Challenge
alexPureWhen I met Alexander Cockburn, one of his first questions to me was: “Is your hate pure?” It was the question he asked most of the young writers he mentored. These were Cockburn’s rules for how to write political polemics: write about what you care about, write with passion, go for the throat of your enemies and never back down. His admonitions remain the guiding stylesheet for our writers at CounterPunch. Please help keep the spirit of this kind of fierce journalism alive by taking advantage of  our matching grant challenge which will DOUBLE every donation of $100 or more. Any of you out there thinking of donating $50 should know that if you donate a further $50, CounterPunch will receive an additional $100. And if you plan to send us $200 or $500 or more, CounterPunch will get a matching $200 or $500 or more. Don’t miss the chance. Double your clout right now. Please donate. –JSC (This photo of Alexander Cockburn and Jasper, on the couch that launched 1000 columns, was taken in Petrolia by Tao Ruspoli)
 Day 19

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

pp1

or
cp-store

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Why the Right Wins and the Left Loses

Who Will Act to Free Bradley Manning?

by ERIC PATTON

The victorious army wins first, and then goes to war, while the defeated army goes to war first, and then seeks to win.

? Sun Tzu

Successful coaches tell their teams to worry about themselves and not their opponents.  Teams that win pay no attention to things they can’t control.  They have goals that they don’t waver from, and they formulate strategies to achieve those goals.  If strategy A fails, winning coaches and teams examine the strategy, modify it, and move on to strategy A-1.  Repeat as necessary.

This is how the right operates.  Consider Social Security.  The right has literally wanted to destroy SS since its inception.  That goal hasn’t changed.  But any substantive attack on it has remained largely beyond their reach ? until now.  “Temporarily” cutting the payroll tax is just the first salvo in a new offensive against the hated program ? as most people on the left correctly recognize.

Do you think that the right worried about how the left was going to react to this new attack?  Perhaps a little, but very little.  Why does Rahm call the left retards and recommend to his advisees that they ignore it?  Because winners largely ignore their opponents.

The left, on the other hand, obsesses about what the right does.  That’s all the left ever thinks about.  This is because, while the left does have goals, it doesn’t have the goals it thinks it does.

Consider Bradley Manning.  The left’s current strategy to free him will not be successful.  Oh, it will likely win Manning soft blankets and the right to do push-ups in his cell, and this is not completely insignificant (certainly not to Manning, anyway) ? but it is largely insignificant as part of the overall “good” war the left likes to imagine it’s fighting.

If the left hasn’t figured out how to free Mumia, Peltier, or Lynne Stewart, why should anyone believe it will free Manning?  The left will fail to free Manning, and then it will flit on to its next cause c?l?bre.

The right doesn’t operate this way.  And actually, neither does the left.  The right knows what it wants.  The left only thinks it knows what it wants.  What the left really wants is to be able to solicit donations, raise money, and get paid.

If you hook the left up to a polygraph, it really does believe it wants to free Manning.  But actually, its main priority is to raise money.  Partially, this makes sense.  If people have no money (even people on the left), they starve and go homeless.  And if organizations have no money, they go out of existence.  So yes, money is important.

But the left doesn’t see this, and that’s the problem.  The first step in battling addiction (or any problem) is seeing the problem.  The left, however, doesn’t see that’s its operating model isn’t about freeing Manning (or whatever), it’s about raising money.  Seeing the problem might lead to a solution.  Not seeing it will simply leave Manning ? as Mumia et. al. ? in jail.

ERIC PATTON lives in Cincinnati, Ohio, and can be reached at ebpatton@yahoo.com.