FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

First a Hand on Your Crotch, Next a Boot in Your Face

by MICHAEL SCOTT

If the American public does not stand up and oppose the TSA enforced false choice between potentially dangerous irradiating body scanners or what amounts to federally mandated sexual harassment, then the Republic is almost certainly lost.(1) In the cause of fighting the ‘war on terror,’ the evisceration of the Bill of Rights will have finally been achieved. Americans must draw the proverbial line in the sand over this issue. The body scans and the invasive pat downs violate the fourth amendment. Despite the statements issued by the TSA, American citizens do not cede their constitutional rights when they buy a plane ticket or enter an airport.

John Pistole, director of the TSA, and Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, have been all over the media defending the new TSA patdowns and body scanners. Both have said that the new procedures are a must for airport security in the wake of the ‘underwear bomber’ and the recent attempted use of explosive laced ‘toner bombs.’ Both attacks were purportedly organized by the Yemeni based al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

After the underwear bomber’s attempt to blow himself up on a Northwest flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, the DHS rushed to deploy body scanners – some of which had already been purchased – at airports across the US. One of the primary advocates for the use of body scanners or the more politically correct ‘advanced imaging technology’ (AIT), is former DHS head Michael Chertoff. Secretary Chertoff’s advocacy of body scanners dates back to at least 2005. After leaving DHS, Chertoff founded the Chertoff Group, a consultancy firm whose corporate logo is an iron spiked closing portcullis.(2)

The Chertoff Group represents the primary manufacturer of body scanners, Rapiscan, which is set to make billions of dollars off the sale and maintenance of the body scanners. In the days after the attempted underwear bombing, Chertoff made the rounds on the cable news talk shows where he stressed the necessity of deploying body scanners. Of course Chertoff failed to disclose the fact that his company represented Rapiscan. Chertoff is not alone in having conflicting interests: a competing manufacturer of body scan systems, American Science and Technology, has retained the services of two former TSA administrators who are now acting as lobbyists.(3)

Thanks to the botched bombings and the efforts of Chertoff and lobbyists, the largely untested and potentially dangerous scanners are set to replace the traditional metal detectors at airports across the country. This despite the fact that a number of security experts have said that the scanners would not have stopped Umar Farouk, the underwear bomber.(4) The scanners are not able to detect substances or items hidden in human cavities: a tactic AQAP used in an attempt to assassinate Prince Nayef, the Saudi counter-terrorism head. Alternatives like the much less expensive and extensively tested use of bomb sniffing dogs were not considered despite the fact that well trained dogs are far more likely to detect a bomb hidden in a human cavity in addition to being able to detect traces of substances used in explosives on a person’s clothes or body.(5) No doubt it is much harder to make a profit off of training dogs, and the dogs would require skilled and well trained handlers.

Bomb sniffing dogs and electronic trace detection systems do not require what seems to be really desired by DHS and the TSA: submission and submissive behavior. It is not accidental that passengers are made to put their hands above their heads in what is the internationally recognized sign for ‘I surrender’ when they enter the body scanners. It is not accidental that men and women are forced to watch their partner’s, husbands, wives, and children’s bodies being forcibly prodded by employees of a government agency.

Since 9/11, we have given up many of our rights and our government has condoned practices like torture, legalized assassination, kidnapping, indefinite detention without access to council or trial – all in the name of keeping us ‘safe’ and ‘free’. We have adopted practices and behaviors that we used to abhor in other nations and regimes. These practices, as demonstrated by the TSA, have nothing to do with keeping us safe or free – quite the opposite.

If the American government were truly concerned about ‘safety’ and ‘freedom’, it would be reexamining its intelligence gathering and assessment capabilities as well as its foreign policy. The underwear bomber, Umar Farouk, should have never been allowed on the flight. His name was on the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) list.(6) His father, one of the wealthiest men in Nigeria, personally warned the US embassy in Lagos that his son was likely involved with terrorist groups.(7) Still Umar Farouk, who paid cash for a very expensive ticket, who flew a suspicious and circuitous route from Yemen, and who had no luggage, was allowed on the flight in Amsterdam. Our multi-billion dollar collection of intelligence services were supposedly unable or unwilling to stop Umar Farouk.

This failure is what should have been rigorously investigated. Instead, DHS and TSA used the ‘underwear bombing’ as an excuse to roll out new security procedures aimed at the American public while the CIA and the US military expanded its covert (though not so covert if you are Yemeni) war in Yemen. A strategy which is largely organized around the use of drones and cruise missiles to bomb suspected al-Qaeda targets.(8) So far more civilians, namely women and children, have been killed than al-Qaeda operatives. Every one of those women and children killed has a father, husband, or brother who will now be justifiably bent on revenge. Rather than focusing on aid, which Yemen desperately needs, we are going to give them more weapons – a 150 million dollars worth for 2010.(9) This strategy will no doubt be as much of a success as similar strategies have been in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The TSA and DHS may have done the country a favor by implementing such draconian and unconstitutional practices. They might just make us remember what the US once stood for and what a monumental accomplishment our Bill of Rights is for all of humanity. They might have reminded some of us what is worth fighting for and what it really means to be free. Freedom most certainly does not mean that when you enter an airport, that you are the prisoner of the TSA and subject to the whims of often poorly trained ‘agents’ on a power trip. Freedom does not mean being forced to stand by as your child has a stranger rub his or her hands all over him or her. Freedom does not mean that we must submit to dehumanizing searches in the name of safety. Our forefathers and all those men and women deployed around the world in the armed services did not and are not fighting for the right of a government agency to force Americans in to making a false choice between passing through a radiating naked body scan or being felt up.

MICHAEL SCOTT writes about the Middle East for a variety of publications.

Notes.

1. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35498347/UCSF-letter-to-Holdren-concerning-health-risks-of-full-body-scanner-TSA-screenings-4-6-2010

2. http://chertoffgroup.com/cgroup/

3. http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/airport-scanner-scam

4. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/are-planned-airport-scanners-just-a-scam-1856175.html

http://www.newstatesman.com/law-and-reform/2010/01/terrorism-security-scanners

5.http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-10/after-19-billion-spent-six-years-pentagon-realizes-best-bomb-detector-dog

6. http://homeland.house.gov/Hearings/index.asp?ID=234 (see Kennedy statment as well as video feed)

7. http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bombers-phone-call-father/story?id=9457361

8. http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/yemen-images-missile-and-cluster-munitions-point-us-role-fatal-attack-2010-

9. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61L4L120100222

 

More articles by:
June 27, 2016
Robin Hahnel
Brexit: Establishment Freak Out
James Bradley
Omar’s Motive
Gregory Wilpert – Michael Hudson
How Western Military Interventions Shaped the Brexit Vote
Leonard Peltier
41 Years Since Jumping Bull, 500 Years of Trauma
Rev. William Alberts
Orlando: the Latest Victim of Radicalizing American Imperialism
Patrick Cockburn
Brexiteers Have Much in Common With Arab Spring Protesters
Franklin Lamb
How 100 Syrians, 200 Russians and 11 Dogs Out-Witted ISIS and Saved Palmyra
John Grant
Omar Mateen: The Answers are All Around Us
Dean Baker
In the Wake of Brexit Will the EU Finally Turn Away From Austerity?
Ralph Nader
The IRS and the Self-Minimization of Congressman Jason Chaffetz
Gordon Smith
Goodbye UK, Goodbye Great Britain: What Next?
Martha Pskowski
Detained in Dilley: Deportation and Asylum in Texas
stclair
Headaches of Empire: Brexit’s Effect on the United States
Dave Lindorff
Honest Election System Needed to Defeat Ruling Elite
Louisa Willcox
Delisting Grizzly Bears to Save the Endangered Species Act?
Jason Holland
The Tragedy of Nothing
Jeffrey St. Clair
Revolution Reconsidered, Guest Starring Bernard Sanders in the Role of Robespierre
Weekend Edition
June 24, 2016
Friday - Sunday
John Pilger
A Blow for Peace and Democracy: Why the British Said No to Europe
Pepe Escobar
Goodbye to All That: Why the UK Left the EU
Michael Hudson
Revolts of the Debtors: From Socrates to Ibn Khaldun
Andrew Levine
Summer Spectaculars: Prelude to a Tea Party?
Kshama Sawant
Beyond Bernie: Still Not With Her
Mike Whitney
¡Basta Ya, Brussels! British Voters Reject EU Corporate Slavestate
Tariq Ali
Panic in the House: Brexit as Revolt Against the Political Establishment
Paul Street
Miranda, Obama, and Hamilton: an Orwellian Ménage à Trois for the Neoliberal Age
Ellen Brown
The War on Weed is Winding Down, But Will Monsanto Emerge the Winner?
Gary Leupp
Why God Created the Two-Party System
Conn Hallinan
Brexit Vote: a Very British Affair (But Spain May Rock the Continent)
Ruth Fowler
England, My England
Jeffrey St. Clair
Lines Written on the Occasion of Bernie Sanders’ Announcement of His Intention to Vote for Hillary Clinton
Norman Pollack
Fissures in World Capitalism: the British Vote
Paul Bentley
Mercenary Logic: 12 Dead in Kabul
Binoy Kampmark
Parting Is Such Sweet Joy: Brexit Prevails!
Elliot Sperber
Show Me Your Papers: Supreme Court Legalizes Arbitrary Searches
Jan Oberg
The Brexit Shock: Now It’s All Up in the Air
Nauman Sadiq
Brexit: a Victory for Britain’s Working Class
Brian Cloughley
Murder by Drone: Killing Taxi Drivers in the Name of Freedom
Ramzy Baroud
How Israel Uses Water as a Weapon of War
Brad Evans – Henry Giroux
The Violence of Forgetting
Ben Debney
Homophobia and the Conservative Victim Complex
Margaret Kimberley
The Orlando Massacre and US Foreign Policy
David Rosen
Americans Work Too Long for Too Little
Murray Dobbin
Do We Really Want a War With Russia?
Kathy Kelly
What’s at Stake
Louis Yako
I Have Nothing “Newsworthy” to Report this Week
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail