Exclusively in the new print issue of CounterPunch
PARIS, THE NEW NORMAL? — Diana Johnstone files an in-depth report from Paris on the political reaction to the Charlie Hebdo shootings; The Treachery of the Black Political Class: Margaret Kimberley charts the rise and fall of the Congressional Black Caucus; The New Great Game: Pepe Escobar assays the game-changing new alliance between Russia and Turkey; Will the Frackers Go Bust? Joshua Frank reports on how the collapse of global oil prices might spell the end of the fracking frenzy in the Bakken Shale; The Future of the Giraffe: Ecologist Monica Bond reports from Tanzania on the frantic efforts to save one of the world’s most iconic species. Plus: Jeffrey St. Clair on Satire in the Service of Power; Chris Floyd on the Age of Terrorism and Absurdity; Mike Whitney on the Drop Dead Fed; John Wight on the rampant racism of Clint Eastwood’s “American Sniper;” John Walsh on Hillary Clinton and Lee Ballinger on the Gift of Anger.
Of Bailouts and Swaps

The Crafting of a Loophole

by ANDREW COCKBURN

Those who respect the law and love sausage should watch neither being made.

–Mark Twain.      

AMENDMENT TO THE PETERSON SUBSTITUTE FOR H.R. 3795 (a) OFFERED BY MR. PETERSON OF MINNESOTA (b) Page 21, after line 25, insert the following:

(19) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(50) ALTERNATIVESWAP EXECUTIONFACILITY. (c).—The term ‘alternative swap execution facility’ means a service that facilitates (d) the execution ortrading of swaps between two persons through any means of interstate commerce, but which is not a designated contract market (e), including any electronic trade execution or confirmation facility (f) or any voice brokerage facility (g).’’

Now let’s see what went into this legislative sausage.

(a) Everyone agrees that the unregulated “dark markets” of  Wall Street’s trading in over-the-counter derivatives such as credit default swaps moved the financial crisis from major problem to total disaster.  Currently, most trades in these “products” are privately negotiated on the phone, dealer to dealer.  It’s appallingly risky – that’s why we have a multi-trillion dollar  bailout.  But because the dealers at major banks can quote different prices to different customers, with huge spreads between buy and sell quotes, the banks are making huge profits and want to keep it that way.

So while congress is busy working on reform legislation, Wall Street’s  lawyer-lobbyists in Washington are working hard to neutralize such efforts.

Who’s winning?  Over lunch across town from Capitol Hill,  I recently asked that question of a very smart attorney endowed with deep experience in keeping Washington safe for Wall Street.  In answer, he pointed to this seven-line paragraph buried in a 26-page amendment to “HR 3795, Over-The-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of 2009,” passed in a voice vote by the House Agriculture Committee the night before. Following the vote, the committee had issued a press release hailing their vote for  “strengthening” regulation. 

On the contrary, said my friend, “I guarantee you that not a single member, and almost certainly no one else, apart from the traders on Wall Street and the lobbyist who inserted it on their behalf,  understood the significance of this paragraph.  It means that nothing will change.”

(b)   Colin Peterson (D-MN) is the Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture.  He is on record as asserting “The banks run this place…It’s huge the amount they put into politics.”

(c) An  “alternative swap execution facility” is intended by the original drafters of the bill to be a new, fully regulated market for trading over-the-counter derivatives – a technologically enhanced version of the various futures exchanges currently operating, such as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, where transactions and prices are open for all to see.

(d)    A beautiful word.  Now the “execution” facility doesn’t have to be an actual exchange. It has just been redefined as merely something that “facilitates” the execution of a swap trade. 

(e)   Reinforces the point that a “facility” does not have to be one of those transparent exchanges.  But wasn’t that what the bill is meant to make happen?

(f)    In 2005 the major swaps dealers, under pressure from the New York Fed, set up an electronic “confirmation facility”  to keep track of trades, which the dealers control.  Not much openness here.

(g)    “Voice brokerage.”  This means a telephone, as used by a dealer setting prices that are not publicly disclosed.  That’s what the dealers were doing the last time they led our financial system over a cliff, and that’s the system that is preserved by this one little paragraph.

ANDREW COCKBURN is the co-producer of the 2009 documentary American Casino. He can be reached at: amcockburn@gmail.com