Annual Fundraising Appeal
Over the course of 21 years, we’ve published many unflattering stories about Henry Kissinger. We’ve recounted his involvement in the Chilean coup and the illegal bombings of Cambodia and Laos; his hidden role in the Kent State massacre and the genocide in East Timor; his noxious influence peddling in DC and craven work for dictators and repressive regimes around the world. We’ve questioned his ethics, his morals and his intelligence. We’ve called for him to be arrested and tried for war crimes. But nothing we’ve ever published pissed off HK quite like this sequence of photos taken at a conference in Brazil, which appeared in one of the early print editions of CounterPunch.
The publication of those photos, and the story that went with them, 20 years ago earned CounterPunch a global audience in the pre-web days and helped make our reputation as a fearless journal willing to take the fight to the forces of darkness without flinching. Now our future is entirely in your hands. Please donate.


Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

or use

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

GOP Out of Ideas (But So are the Democrats) McCain's Economic Plan

McCain’s Economic Plan


John McCain has put forward an economic program that won’t rescue the economy from its mess but Senators Clinton and Obama offer little more.

McCain advocates tax cuts for parents and corporations and mortgage relief for distressed homeowners, paid for by pairing nondefense, discretionary government spending and higher Medicare premiums for the well off.

Cutting taxes and government outlays together won’t boost spending for U.S.-made goods, increase traffic at restaurants and dry cleaners, put unemployed back to work or resurrect growth.

Neither would a stronger stimulus package, because the economic quagmire is not a 1950s-style recession, caused by a temporary buildup of unsold goods precipitating shorter shifts and layoffs. Rather, it is caused by systemic malfunctions, created by wrong-headed energy, trade and banking policies, that won’t easily resolve themselves.

In 2008, net petroleum imports will likely cost $400 billion, up nearly ten fold since Bill Clinton took office. Many oil dollars sent to Arabia, Russia and other friendly places are not spent on American goods and do not create jobs here.

Coupled with booming prices for food prices, rising gasoline, electricity and heating bills give Americans less and less to spend on nonessentials. Retail sales sink, layoffs mount, and wages falter.

U.S. exports have not kept pace with the bills for oil and the other goods we buy abroad. Since Clinton took office exports have increased about $1.1 trillion, while imports have jumped $1.7 trillion.

The overall result is a $700 billion dollar trade gap that reduces GDP by $250 billion and longer-term economic growth by even more.

Americans use too much gasoline, and the ethanol program dents the problem much less than it pushes up prices for butter, baked goods and beef, and instigates food shortages in poor countries.

Ethanol is the sophistry begotten by pandering for farm votes. The real answer lies in more fuel efficient vehicles manufactured with readily available and reasonably obtainable technologies, within our reach. [Techno-break-throughs are not the only salve. Rational local and regional networks for distribution of food and other products cold easily halve transcontinental 18-wheeler traffic on the Interstates, with huge fuel savings. Editors.]

Our free trade policies would raise productivity and living standards if we paid for what we buy abroad with exports, because exporting industries use labor more productively and spend more R&D. However, governments in China, Japan, and much of Asia intervene in foreign exchange markets to keep their currencies artificially cheap and U.S. exports too expensive in rich markets with the greatest untapped opportunities.

McCain, Clinton and Obama all refuse to back bills pending in Congress that would get tough with Asian currency manipulation, and establish conditions for more balanced trade with those protectionist regimes.

Since the 1980s, banks have moved from making loans funded by deposits to jobbing out lending to mortgage brokers and private equity funds, and wrapping mortgage, credit card and business loan payments into complex bonds for sale to insurance companies, pension funds and other fixed income investors.

Mortgage brokers made liars’ loans, built on questionable assessments of home values and borrowers’ ability to pay. The banks understated default risks to fixed income investors, and skimmed off excessive profits and bonuses, and left too little to cover defaults.

The Bush Administration is seeking tougher standards for mortgage brokers and real estate appraisers but its reform proposals for financial regulation go light on the questionable business practices of the Wall Street banks.

Predictably, fixed-income investors will no longer buy bonds created by the banks, and the banks have much less money to lend homeowners, consumers and honest businesses.

The presidential contenders, all busy harvesting contributions in New York’s financial district, have not explained their plans to fix that mess.

On important energy, trade and banking issues, McCain offers Bush redux.

Clinton’s platform is a throwback to 1970s French statism. Obama is offering what he does best: an Elmer Gantry campaign, full of expressions of hope but thin on policy and anything truly new.

It seems elephants have long memories but few new ideas. Donkeys are endearing but even less adaptive.

PETER MORICI is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Business and former Chief Economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission.