Matching Grant Challenge
BruceMatch
We’re slowly making headway in our annual fund drive, but not nearly fast enough to meet our make-or-break goal.  On the bright side, a generous CounterPuncher has stepped forward with a pledge to match every donation of $100 or more. Any of you out there thinking of donating $50 should know that if you donate a further $50, CounterPunch will receive an additional $100. And if you plan to send us $200 or $500 or more, he will give CounterPunch a matching $200 or $500 or more. Don’t miss the chance. Double your clout right now. Please donate.

Day 17

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

pp1

or
cp-store

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Ending Racial Injustice in Drug Laws Last Shot for a Bush Legacy?

Last Shot for a Bush Legacy?

by BILL PIPER

In a recent interview Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice echoed Senator Obama’s call for a national dialogue on race, expressing her concern that the ugly bootprints of slavery still mark America’s cultural and political landscape. Her remarks came only a month after the United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination scolded U.S. officials for not doing enough to eliminate the vestiges of slavery, most notably America’s punitive drug war policies. President Bush spoke in favor of reforming some of these policies when he first took office but quickly had to turn his attention to responding to 9-11. With Secretary Rice stepping out on race, will Bush finally push for legislative reform? 

Secretary Rice certainly didn’t pull any punches.  "Africans and Europeans came here and founded this country together – Europeans by choice and Africans in chains," she said. "Descendants of slaves did not get much of a head start, and I think you continue to see some of the effects of that. That particular birth defect makes it hard for us to confront it, hard for us to talk about it, and hard for us to realize that it has continuing relevance for who we are today."

It’s especially hard for Americans to confront the issue when they’re supporting a new form of slavery. In a recent op-ed in The Times-Picayune of New Orleans, Ira Glasser, formerly ACLU’s executive director and current president of the Drug Policy Alliance, makes the case that the drug war is one of the major civil rights issues of our day. While the vast majority of drug law offenders are white, blacks represent 37 percent of those persons arrested for drugs, 53 percent of those convicted for drugs, and 67 percent of those persons imprisoned for drugs.

"[T]he racially discriminatory origin of most [drug] laws is reinforced by the disparate impact they have on racially targeted drug felons," Glasser writes. "In the states of the Deep South, 30 percent of black men are barred from voting because of felony convictions. But all of them are nonetheless counted as citizens for the purpose of determining congressional representation and Electoral College votes. The last time something like this happened was during slavery, when three-fifths of slaves were counted in determining congressional representation."

At the federal level no other policy is more responsible for racial disparities in the criminal justice system than the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity which punishes crack offenses 100 times more severely than powder cocaine offenses, even though they’re two forms of the same drug. President-elect Bush called for eliminating this disparity in 2001.

More recently President Bush commuted the sentences of two individuals serving outrageously long sentences for crack cocaine offenses. Asa Hutchinson, Bush’s first director of the Drug Enforcement Administration and a former Republican Congressman, made the conservative case for reform last month in an oped in The Washington Times co-authored with former Congressman and black conservative J.C. Watts.

Republican Senators Jeff Sessions (Alabama) and Orrin Hatch (Utah) want to pass crack/powder reform legislation this year. Their bills are far from perfect ­ they would reduce the disparity from 100-to-1 to 20-to-1, which is like desegregating 60 percent of public establishments instead of all of them ­ but at least they’re moving in the right direction. Additional support can be found among other Republican Senators, like Arlen Specter (Pennsylvania) and John Cornyn (Texas).

Democratic Senator Joseph Biden (Delaware) has introduced legislation to completely eliminate the disparity and this is the bill that most Democrats are rallying around, including Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Biden is working with Sessions and Hatch to develop a compromise bill, but those negotiations seem to have stalled. It may take leadership from the White House to rescue this reform from partisan gridlock.

Eliminating the crack/powder sentencing disparity won’t erase America’s "birth defect", but it will directly confront it. Because of draconian mandatory minimum sentencing and disparate drug law enforcement the U.S. now incarcerates more black men on a per capita basis than South Africa at the height of Apartheid. Bill Clinton ignored this racial injustice and has recently apologized for it. President Bush has less than a year to address it. 

BILL PIPER is director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance Network.