Annual Fundraising Appeal

The US Geological Survey recorded a minor earthquake this morning with its epicenter near Wasilla, Alaska, the probable result of Sarah Palin opening her mail box to find the latest issue of CounterPunch magazine we sent her. A few moments later she Instagrammed this startling comment…


The lunatic Right certainly has plenty of problems. We’ve made it our business to not only expose these absurdities, but to challenge them directly. With another election cycle gaining steam, more rhetoric and vitriol will be directed at progressive issues. More hatred will be spewed at minorities, women, gays and the poor. There will be calls for more fracking and war. We won’t back down like the Democrats. We’ll continue to publish fact-based critiques and investigative reports on the shenanigans and evil of the Radical Right. Our future is in your hands. Please donate.


Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

or use

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Civics 101

The USA v. Al Arian


If it’s Sunday night, it’s Civics 101 at the Mokhiber household.

Last night, the home schooling Civics topic:

U.S. Constitution.

First Amendment.

Congress shall pass no law abridging freedom of speech.

Let’s go to the DVD.

USA v. Al-Arian.

Let’s see if a documentary about the U.S. Constitution can hold the attention of a 13 year-old and a 10 year-old–for 90 minutes.

Sami Al-Arian is the University of South Florida Professor and Palestinian activist.

Al-Arian advocates for the overthrow of the Israeli occupation in the West Bank and Gaza.

As Nelson Mandela advocated for the overthrow of the apartheid regime in South Africa.

As any of us would fight against occupation–if we were occupied.

Al-Arian was engaging in free speech.

But, lo and behold, Al-Arian became a target of the U.S. Department of Justice.

They said he supported Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

They accused him of being a terrorist.

They indicted him and others in Florida and put him on trial.

They tapped thousands of his family’s phone conversations.

Including those of his wife ordering pizza.

They used 400 of those phone conversations at trial.

Picking and choosing.

Slicing and dicing.

They flew Israeli victims of bus bombings from Tel Aviv to St. Petersburg, Florida to testify against him.

They spent $50 million to prosecute Sami Al-Arian.

One problem–the government couldn’t establish a link between Al-Arian’s advocacy and these violent acts.

Two years ago this week, on December 6, 2005, Sami Al-Arian was found not guilty on eight counts.

The jury hung on the remaining nine counts.

The reporters wanted to know from the jurors–why didn’t you convict Sami Al-Arian of being a terrorist?

What was missing from the government’s case?

"Evidence," one juror responded wryly while leaving the courthouse.

"Guilty of what?" asked St. Petersburg Times reporter Meg Laughlin.

"Why is he still in jail?" asks my ten-year-old, Nicholas.

Good question.

Pause the DVD.

The jury acquitted Al-Arian of eight counts.

They were unanimous. 12 to 0.

But they deadlock in the remaining nine counts–10 to 2.

That’s called a hung jury.

And when the jury hangs, the prosecutor can come back and try Al-Arian again on those counts.

Which they threatened to do.

But they also held out the carrot.

Plead guilty to one count to non-violent support of Palestine Islamic Jihad.

And we’ll recommend time served.

And you’ll be deported.

One thing Al-Arian has to be proud of is–his family.

They are the stars of this movie.

His wife Nahla, and children Leila, Leena, Abdullah, Lama, and Ali–are strong, sane, composed, articulate.

Not that they don’t have their moments of frustration. They do. Nahla blows a gasket while cutting her son Ali’s hair. (Ali doesn’t help matters by resisting the hair cut.) Nahla blows again while speaking to Sami — he’s on the speaker phone from prison asking her to check some web site. She’s busy doing something else. He hangs up on her. She reaches for a couple of unidentified pills.

But never do the Al-Arians blow up at the Norwegian film crew–which is camped out at their home throughout the trial. If they did, the blow up didn’t make the final cut.

When federal prosecutors offered Al-Arian the plea deal, he questioned whether to take it.

He would have preferred to fight it.

He figured–hey, I beat the government once, I can beat them again.

But the family wanted none of it.

The family was fed up with our government’s harassment, trials, phone-tapping, and right wing attacks.

They wanted out.

Give us our father back and let’s move to Egypt.

As Georgetown University Law Professor David Cole puts it–Al-Arian could have fought through another six month trial, and even if he were found not guilty, he would still be facing deportation.

So, Al-Arian pleads guilty to one count.

And the family all drives down to the courthouse for what they thought was one last time to get their father.

But the Judge decides to reject the government’s proposed sentence–time served–and hits Al-Arian with the maximum sentence.

Al-Arian stays in jail.

He was due out earlier this year, but then came Gordon Kromberg.

Kromberg is an assistant U.S. Attorney in Virginia.

Kromberg wants to put Al-Arian through a perjury trap.

He wants him to testify before a federal grand jury in Virginia investigating Islamic charities.

This was in direct violation of the plea deal Al-Arian cut with the government.

So, Al-Arian refuses to testify.

Kromberg charges him with contempt and throws him in jail in Virginia.

When Al-Arian’s attorneys request a delay of the prison transfer during the holy month, Kromberg shows his stripes when he responds:

"If they can kill each other during Ramadan, they can appear before the grand jury. I am not going to put off Dr. Al- Arian’s grand jury appearance just to assist in what is becoming the Islamization of America."

The movie ends before Kromberg enters the picture.

Too bad.

He would have fit well into this little morality play.

Good v. Evil.

Civics 101.

Al-Arian remains in prison in Virginia on civil contempt charges.

As he appeals his case, the government is considering charging him again with criminal contempt.

Earlier this year, Nahla and her two youngest children–Ali and Lama — left the country for Egypt.

The movie–USA v. Al-Arian–will open in Washington, D.C. this Wednesday, December 5, 2007 at the Uptown Theater in Washington, D.C.

After the movie, Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman will moderate a roundtable discussion with Georgetown Law Professor David Cole, GWU Law Professor Jonathan Turley, one of Al-Arian’s trial attorneys–Linda Moreno–along with the Norwegian director of the movie Line Halvorsen, and Sami’s son Abdullah.

If you live in the Washington, D.C. area and you have young children — take them to see this movie.

If not, get a copy of the DVD and show it far and wide.

It’s a great crash course in Civics 101.

RUSSELL MOKHIBER is the editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter.