Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! CounterPunch is entirely supported by our readers. Your donations pay for our small staff, tiny office, writers, designers, techies, bandwidth and servers. We don’t owe anything to advertisers, foundations, one-percenters or political parties. You are our only safety net. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Argentina’s Political Future

by LUCÍA ÁLVAREZ And DIEGO GONZÁLEZ

Without fanfare and with the apathy emblematic of the campaign, what everyone expected came to be. The first lady, senator, and presidential candidate for the currently ruling Front for Victory Party (FPV), Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, won a comfortable victory in the first round. Thus, with 44.92% of the vote, on Dec. 10 she becomes the first woman in Argentine history to accede to the presidency by popular vote.

Her first speech as president-elect was brief and revealed the shift toward a conciliatory tone and consensus building. “I want to bring all Argentines together, without rancor, without hatred; hatred is harmful, hatred only destroys.”

Beside her was her husband and current president Nestor Kirchner, whose future is the subject of much national intrigue. On the platform was also the next vice president, Julio Cobos, former governor of the Province of Mendoza. Cobos once belonged to the now fractured Radical Civic Union (UCR), and joined kirchnerismo (referred to with the letter “K” for short) through the new ruling coalition: Concertación Plural.

A large part of Fernández de Kirchner’s success was due to her ample victory in the crucial province of Buenos Aires. With more than 10 million voters, the province represents 37% of the country’s electorate. There, the current vice president, Daniel Scioli, was anointed governor with more than 48% of the vote, a higher margin than that obtained by the first lady not only at the national level but in the same province. This demonstrates the personal influence that the former powerboat racer wields in negotiations with the national executive and poses several questions regarding his political future. Scioli has emerged as a star of the Generation K of 20 to 40-year-olds, and there is speculation that he could become the leader of the most orthodox and traditional current of Peronism. Despite having political origins in the neoliberal decade of the 90s under then-President Carlos Menem (1989-1999), these days Scioli has managed to skillfully build an image of a down-to-earth and humble politician, which he ratified with his call to the opposition to “help him govern.”

The FPV won in every province except the City of Buenos Aires (better known as the Federal Capital), Córdoba, and San Luis. Fernández de Kirchner made a particularly good showing in the Buenos Aires suburbs, the northwest, the northeast, Mendoza, and Patagonia. But not only that, candidates running on various types of kirchnerist political platforms swept all eight of the provincial governorship races. This new hegemony is a mix of Generation K radicals, former followers of Menem, and pure Ks. Against all odds, it has spread to Gualeguaychú-the center of an ongoing conflict over the pulp mills in Uruguay-Colón, Concordia, and Santa Cruz, recently the site of strong demonstrations against the federal government mainly by teachers.

The executive will also have control of the Congress; 49 seats were up for elections and 75 new ones were added. Not only will the new administration have its own quorum in the Chamber of Deputies (129 are needed and the future government will have 137), but by joining with small allied blocks, it could make up to 60% of the body. In the Senate, the current government will account for almost two-thirds of the chamber. Thus, the FPV has left the opposition fragmented and without bargaining power.

Regardless, this overwhelming victory was accompanied by losses in large urban centers, which laid bare the enormous social-cultural divide in the Argentine vote. With the exception of San Miguel de Tucumán and Mendoza, Fernández de Kirchner lost the country’s major cities including Rosario, Córdoba, Mar del Plata, La Plata, Bahía Blanca, and the aforementioned Federal Capital. This phenomenon, labeled by some as political territoriality, is explained by the gap separating the middle class in large housing developments, whose demands focus on politics, especially greater transparency, security, and strong institutions; from the small population centers and poorer sectors, whose attention is on economic growth and job creation.

The Others

At the national level, Elisa Carrió of the newly formed Civic Coalition (CC) placed second-confirming the surge of women in politics. Accompanied by the Socialist (PS) Ruben Giustiniani, the “formula” coalition performed well in the large urban centers such as Rosario and the Federal Capital, where the ruling party was not able to gain a strong foothold. In the governor’s race for the Province of Buenos Aires, where it was expected that rightwing businessman Francisco de Narvaez would come in second-due to his investment of millions, his emphasis on insecurity, and support from the Buenos Aires mayor-elect Mauricio Macri-the CC also made a good showing. Margarita Stolbizer, a radical politician like Carrió, edged out the entrepreneur, garnering 16.58% of the votes to de Narvaez’s 14.9%.

From here on out, the goal of Carrió will be to translate the 25% of the votes she obtained into arguments for consolidating her leadership of the opposition. “We are already undisputedly the second largest political force,” she stated while acknowledging the triumph of the ruling coalition. The CC is the most powerful minority force in the new legislature since in alignment with the PS it forms a block of 35 seats. While this figure shows that it still lags well behind the FPV, it also points to the significant growth of this force.

Former economy minister Roberto Lavagna made a lackluster electoral debut, taking third place with 16.88% of the vote. Also a veteran of Peronist politics, Lavagna ran as candidate for the UCR. He acknowledged his defeat and accepted with resignation from his bunker that there is “no worse battle than that which is not fought.” After reviewing what had been his proposal for the government, he ended with a lament, “Argentines deserve more.” His consolation prize was an unexpected claiming of 35.22% of the votes in Córdoba, one of the country’s major provinces.

For his part, Alberto Rodriguez Saá, the governor of San Luis and candidate for old-style Peron politics, came in fourth with 7.7% of the national vote. In his orthodox speech, Rodríguez Saá sought to collect the scattered remnants of the Partido Justicialista, founded by General Juan Domingo Perón, that had been fractured with the arrival of the Kirchners and their pluralist coalition.

In fifth place, with 1.6%, came the leftwing filmmaker Fernando “Pino” Solanas, who was satisfied with “having rallied the troops” and looking toward 2009 and 2011, and for having beaten the rightwing governor of Neuquén, Jorge Sobisch, in the nationwide ranking.

Overall, elections day proceeded normally. However, the lack of ballots and the lack of poll officials (85.9% of people summoned as elections officials rejected notifications) generated annoyance, discussions, considerable delays, and a few unfounded allegations of fraud.

Outlook for the Future

The transition brings up a number of questions, both because it passes the baton from one spouse to the other and because it takes place in a general climate that ratifies continuity. Nonetheless, Fernández de Kirchner faces the challenge of responding to a demand for change that she made her campaign slogan. Now she must clarify what she means by change.

In the social sphere, the challenge consists of translating the 8% sustained growth in the economy into distributive policies. Even though the next president noted that the fight against poverty and unemployment would be her priority, it is unclear how much of the current economic model, ultimately the main pillar of the government in office, will be put in jeopardy to fulfill this goal.

The new president’s proposals for solving the need for more equitable distribution and controlling inflation (the central issue being discussed today in the country), focus on a wage pact between the state, employers, and trade unions that allows for a single raise in wages for the whole year and a gradual increase in prices, combined with the unorthodox recipe of not cooling demand but generating supply through investments.

This would be accompanied by a possible expansion of loans to the private sector, an increase in taxes on the agricultural sector-a measure that caused protests which are now diminishing as international soybean, corn, and wheat prices rise-and, it is rumored, an exchange rate ranging between 3.30-3.35 pesos to improve competitiveness and returns.

Otherwise, there are no signs of change in the government’s reluctance to recover businesses that were privatized during the 90s, or to curb the transnationalization of key sectors such as oil and gas, media, food, financial services, mining, and steel.

It also is not yet clear how the energy crisis will be solved, which according to the government was caused mainly by the cold winter, or how to address the problem of monocultures, and the tragic paradox that a country that produces food for 300 million people cannot meet the needs of its population of barely 40 million.

Building a Mystery Future

As for partisan politics, it’s anyone’s bet what the emerging political system will look like, having been shaken to its core by the “crisis of representation” of 2001. Also a mystery is the form of reorganization planned for the Front for Victory and Peronism in general, a task that seems to have been assigned to the current president.

Statements so far indicate the government’s desire to transform the classical Peronist/anti-Peronist divide into a party system with leanings from center-left to center- right, while retaining traces of the old partisan identities. For this election, however, the fact that Macri did not run allowed the votes to be characterized, beyond the fragmentation and dispersal of the traditional parties, by the first dichotomy. This factor benefited both Carrió and the Concertación, which by their own admission are not focused on right and left categories.

In the event that this reconfiguration takes shape, questions will hinge on the form and content of the regrouping proposed by the administration. So far, the only indication of what that will look like is the coalition formed for the elections. It also remains to be seen which of the two major opposition candidates, Macri or Carrió, gains the upper hand. Macri has been strengthened by the significant victory of winning the leadership of the capital city government. But the national elections revealed his political meanness and the costs of those methods, shown in the diminishing number of legislators loyal to him. Carrió is hoping that Macri will be contained in the Buenos Aires district, but her own leadership is limited to being a media figure within a political framework whose durability is a question mark.

Looking to the World

In international affairs, Fernández de Kirchner has shown more willingness to engage in pro-active foreign policy and expressed her dream that “Argentina make a mark in the world.” Apparently she has explicit intentions to seek outside investment, which could have as a first step rapprochement with the International Monetary Fund and the Paris Club. To that end and going beyond comparisons, the Argentine president may be counting on a change in the White House if Democrat Hillary Clinton takes office, and thus an end to the cold relations between Nestor Kirchner and George Bush.

Fernández de Kirchner further stated that she will maintain the policy of consolidating Argentina’s position in Latin America. It remains to be seen what the chances are for reconciling with neighboring Uruguay given the conflict over the Botnia pulp mill on the banks of the river that links the two countries. However, the new president has pointed to the need to expand Mercosur and build in greater complementary relations between its members.

Translated by Annette Ramos.

Diego González and Lucia Álvarez are independent journalists in Buenos Aires and analysts for the CIP Americas Policy Program www.americaspolicy.org.

 

 

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

Weekend Edition
September 30, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Charles R. Larson
Queen Lear? Deborah Levy’s “Hot Milk”
September 29, 2016
Robert Fisk
The Butcher of Qana: Shimon Peres Was No Peacemaker
James Rose
Politics in the Echo Chamber: How Trump Becomes President
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Vice Grip on the Presidential Debates
Daniel Kato
Rethinking the Race over Race: What Clinton Should do Now About ‘Super-Predators’
Peter Certo
Clinton’s Awkward Stumbles on Trade
Fran Shor
Demonizing the Green Party Vote
Rev. William Alberts
Trump’s Road Rage to the White House
Luke O'Brien
Because We Couldn’t Have Sanders, You’ll Get Trump
Michael J. Sainato
How the Payday Loan Industry is Obstructing Reform
Robert Fantina
You Can’t Have War Without Racism
Gregory Barrett
Bad Theater at the United Nations (Starring Kerry, Power, and Obama
James A Haught
The Long, Long Journey to Female Equality
Thomas Knapp
US Military Aid: Thai-ed to Torture
Jack Smith
Must They be Enemies? Russia, Putin and the US
Gilbert Mercier
Clinton vs Trump: Lesser of Two Evils or the Devil You Know
Tom H. Hastings
Manifesting the Worst Old Norms
George Ella Lyon
This Just in From Rancho Politico
September 28, 2016
Eric Draitser
Stop Trump! Stop Clinton!! Stop the Madness (and Let Me Get Off)!
Ted Rall
The Thrilla at Hofstra: How Trump Won the Debate
Robert Fisk
Cliché and Banality at the Debates: Trump and Clinton on the Middle East
Patrick Cockburn
Cracks in the Kingdom: Saudi Arabia Rocked by Financial Strains
Lowell Flanders
Donald Trump, Islamophobia and Immigrants
Shane Burley
Defining the Alt Right and the New American Fascism
Jan Oberg
Ukraine as the Border of NATO Expansion
Ramzy Baroud
Ban Ki-Moon’s Legacy in Palestine: Failure in Words and Deeds
Gareth Porter
How We Could End the Permanent War State
Sam Husseini
Debate Night’s Biggest Lie Was Told by Lester Holt
Laura Carlsen
Ayotzinapa’s Message to the World: Organize!
Binoy Kampmark
The Triumph of Momentum: Re-Electing Jeremy Corbyn
David Macaray
When the Saints Go Marching In
Seth Oelbaum
All Black Lives Will Never Matter for Clinton and Trump
Adam Parsons
Standing in Solidarity for a Humanity Without Borders
Cesar Chelala
The Trump Bubble
September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]