Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! We only ask one time of year, but when we do, we mean it. Without your support we can’t continue to bring you the very best material, day-in and day-out. CounterPunch is one of the last common spaces on the Internet. Help make sure it stays that way.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

September, the Cruelest Month in Chile

by SAUL LANDAU

“Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.”

T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land

On September 10, 1810, Chile declared independence from Spain. On September 4 1970, Chile’s Popular Unity coalition of left parties under the leadership of Dr. Salvador Allende won the presidential elections with a plurality of 36.4 percent. On September 11, 1973, Army Chief General Augusto Pinochet led a US-backed military coup that killed Allende and Chilean democracy. The military dictatorship endured for 17 years.

US interference in Chile’s elections began in the 1950s and 1960s when the CIA poured money into the right wing opposition. Less than a week after Nixon received the disappointing news about the presidential vote, he decided to annul the Chilean vote. A quote widely attributed to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger explained Nixon’s morality: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.”

Nixon ordered CIA Director Richard Helms, according to Helms’ subsequently published notes, to use violence, economic warfare and whatever else it took to prevent Allende’s inauguration and, failing that, to unseat his government. Nixon and Kissinger’s sense of “responsibility” meant breaking the law — in the name of “national security.”

Following the bloody 9/11/73 coup in Chile, Kissinger eagerly recognized the Pinochet-led coup’s illegitimate “junta” and offered it economic aid as well. He also pressured international lending organizations to open their wallets to Pinochet.

The US government has yet to declassify documents related to the role in the coup of US Navy spy ships docked in the Valparaiso harbor ­ by coincidence? ­ on Septmber 11. The ships monitored Chilean military phone and radio traffic on the day of the golpe and provided coup organizers with information about units loyal to Allende that might resist; thus, the coup plotters could repress them and avoid civil war.

The coup script also called for Allende to surrender. Since he refused to play his assigned part, the generals ordered Chilean Air Force jets to fire rockets into the Moneda Palace. (Think of the Pentagon 28 years later ­ only the Chilean pilots did not sacrifice themselves, but flew their military jets to safety!)

The assault on the President’s office killed Chilean democracy ­ and President Allende. The high command of the Chilean armed forces ­ unlike the fiends who flew commercial aircraft into office buildings and the Pentagon ­ acted at the behest of “higher powers” in Washington, not in Heaven, although no one should doubt the intensity of US support for the coup.

General Carlos Prats, former Chilean Chief of Staff, identified Lt. Col. Patrick Ryan, a Naval Attache, as the key US military liason officer assigned to the coup plotters. (Prats was assassinated in 1974 in Buenos Aires by agents of Pinochet’s secret police.) Ryan called the day of the coup “our D-Day.” He described the military operation as “close to perfect.” (Department of Defense, U.S. Milgroup, Situation Report #2, October 1, 1973 )

Perfection for Ryan included the reestablishment of “liberty.” In the weeks following the coup, the military dictatorship showed its understanding of liberty: its troops murdered, kidnapped and tortured tens of thousands and forced hundreds of thousands to flee the country. Pinochet’s dictatorship endured for 17 years.

Thirty years later, Secretary of State Colin Powell offered sort of an apology: “what happened with Mr. Allendeis not a part of American history that we’re proud of.” (Interview on Black Entertainment Television’s Youth Town Hall, Feb. 20, 1973)

A typical congressional responses to imperial crimes came in 1975: post mortem hearings about the CIA’s role in Chile. In the testimony, the Solons “discovered” that Nixon and Kissinger had ordered the CIA to “destabilize” the Allende government. (United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D-ID).

Sanctimonious Senators and haughty House Members declared their outrage. Yes, once again, the President had broken US laws by conspiring to overthrow governments and kidnap and murder people. This “shocking” behavior occurred just as Congress voted no more funds to continue the Vietnam War where such behavior had become routine.

In one “responsible” gambit, the Agency paid $50 thousand to Patria y Libertad thugs. The extreme right wing “action” group tried to kidnap Army Chief General Rene Schneider, but the abductors shot and killed the General and his chauffer.

The CIA also organized strikes in strategic sectors of the economy, orchestrated Chilean media propaganda campaigns to smear Allende and paid saboteurs to attack power plants and other infrastructural assets.

The Treasury Department pressured international agencies and foreign “allies” to curtail Chile’s foreign credit. “Make the economy scream,” wrote CIA Chief Richard Helms in his notes taken from a meeting with Nixon and Kissinger about what the Agency should do to bring down the Alllende government.

Nixon had to resign in 1974, not because of his criminal acts against Chile, but rather for showing his contempt for US laws at home as well. Kissinger, however, continues to receive honorific deference and high consulting fees. In addition, he still gets his pompous commentaries published in leading newspapers. Like Nixon before he died, Kissinger deserves his proper place: in the dock facing charges of war crimes for conspiracy to commit mass murder and other crimes against the people of Chile. (Add to his crimes orders to bomb civilian targets in Vietnam and his support for massive killing in Indonesia. Kissinger represents the obvious dark side of empire ­ that Metternichian balance to “democracy spreaders” who paint noble intentions over US aggressions.)

Even after four and a half years of war in Iraq, “naïve Members still feign “shock” when confronted by daily illegal behavior. Imagine, the President dares violate the very laws and treaties that state Congress must declare war and outlaws interference in other nations’ destinies! Haven’t they learned the unwritten clause attached to US laws that says they apply to everyone else, not the empire’s rulers. Indeed, how would the empire “punish” naughty ­ disobedient — nations if it had to abide by such restrictions as non-intervention?

Others count much less. The US media paid little or no attention to the 34th anniversary of Allende’s election, or the military coup in Chile. When TV or print news cover that Andean nation ­ rarely ­ reporters often fail to mention the coup and the US role in it. Instead, Chile gets characterized as a “successful democracy,” an example of “free market” success, where neo liberal economics brought economic growth.

Amnesia exists in some Chilean minds as well; not just young people, but those who don’t want to recall the “unpleasantness” of that aberrant period. How long does it take to heal from the trauma of a coup and 17 years of military rule? I asked a Chilean friend.

“I’ll let you know,” he said.

September 18 is Chile’s national day, a week after September 11. Chileans count more dead from their 9/11 than the US does from its trauma ­ plus the loss of liberties, the constitution, university system and other institutions deemed dangerous by the military plotters. Chileans have recovered some freedom, some confidence in old institutions. Fools anywhere may continue to trust the military to accept its subordinate role, but only idiots will rely on Washington’s repeated assurances that it will obey international law.

The loss of innocence is painful and permanent. Salvador Allende, one of the last true democrats, perished with gun in hand, defending the Constitution, the people’s document.

In his last radio speech, tanks surrounding the Moneda Palace, Allende said:

“My words do not have bitterness but disappointment.” He refused to resign. “I will pay for loyalty to the people with my life. And I say to them that I am certain that the seeds which we have planted in the good conscience of thousands and thousands of Chileans will not be shriveled forever.”

Allende asked Chile’s workers to grasp the lesson: “foreign capital, imperialism, together with the reaction, created the climate in which the Armed Forces broke their traditionThe people must defend themselves, but they must not sacrifice themselves. The people must not let themselves be destroyed or riddled with bullets, but they cannot be humiliated eitherThese are my last words, and I am certain that my sacrifice will not be in vain, I am certain that, at the very least, it will be a moral lesson that will punish felony, cowardice, and treason.”

One day, the majority will absorb Allende’s warning.

SAUL LANDAU writes a regular column for CounterPunch and progresoweekly.com. His new Counterpunch Press book is A BUSH AND BOTOX WORLD. His new film, WE DON’T PLAY GOLF HERE (on globalization in Mexico) is available through roundworldproductions@gmail.com

His commentaries appear in CounterPunch and www.progresoweekly.com

 

 

SAUL LANDAU’s A BUSH AND BOTOX WORLD was published by CounterPunch / AK Press.

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
Matt Peppe
Taking a Knee: Resisting Enforced Patriotism
James McEnteer
Eugene, Oregon and the Rising Cost of Cool
Norman Pollack
The Great Debate: Proto-Fascism vs. the Real Thing
Michael Winship
The Tracks of John Boehner’s Tears
John Steppling
Fear Level Trump
Lawrence Wittner
Where Is That Wasteful Government Spending?
James Russell
Beyond Debate: Interview Styles of the Rich and Famous
September 26, 2016
Diana Johnstone
The Hillary Clinton Presidency has Already Begun as Lame Ducks Promote Her War
Gary Leupp
Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Against Russia
Dave Lindorff
Parking While Black: When Police Shoot as First Resort
Robert Crawford
The Political Rhetoric of Perpetual War
Howard Lisnoff
The Case of One Homeless Person
Michael Howard
The New York Times Endorses Hillary, Scorns the World
Russell Mokhiber
Wells Fargo and the Library of Congress’ National Book Festival
Chad Nelson
The Crime of Going Vegan: the Latest Attack on Angela Davis
Colin Todhunter
A System of Food Production for Human Need, Not Corporate Greed
Brian Cloughley
The United States Wants to Put Russia in a Corner
Guillermo R. Gil
The Clevenger Effect: Exposing Racism in Pro Sports
David Swanson
Turn the Pentagon into a Hospital
Ralph Nader
Are You Ready for Democracy?
Chris Martenson
Hell to Pay
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Debate Night: Undecided is Everything, Advantage Trump
Frank X Murphy
Power & Struggle: the Detroit Literacy Case
Chris Knight
The Tom and Noam Show: a Review of Tom Wolfe’s “The Kingdom of Speech”
Weekend Edition
September 23, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Andrew Levine
The Meaning of the Trump Surge
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: More Pricks Than Kicks
Mike Whitney
Oh, Say Can You See the Carnage? Why Stand for a Country That Can Gun You Down in Cold Blood?
Chris Welzenbach
The Diminution of Chris Hayes
Vincent Emanuele
The Riots Will Continue
Rob Urie
A Scam Too Far
Pepe Escobar
Les Deplorables
Patrick Cockburn
Airstrikes, Obfuscation and Propaganda in Syria
Timothy Braatz
The Quarterback and the Propaganda
Sheldon Richman
Obama Rewards Israel’s Bad Behavior
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail