Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! CounterPunch is entirely supported by our readers. Your donations pay for our small staff, tiny office, writers, designers, techies, bandwidth and servers. We don’t owe anything to advertisers, foundations, one-percenters or political parties. You are our only safety net. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.




Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez found a hero’s welcome when he visited Haiti on March 12. People from Port-au-Prince’s poor neighborhoods lined the streets of the capitol to cheer, to chant, to dance and sing, with the infectious enthusiasm of Haitian celebrations. President Chávez returned the affection. He jumped from his motorcade and joined the party, marching, even running with the crowd. At the National Palace, Mr. Chávez climbed up on the perimeter fence to shake and slap hands, like he had just scored a World Cup goal. He publicly thanked the Haitian people for their hospitality and enthusiasm, and for their historic support for liberty in the world.

President Chávez and the Haitian people hit it off so well for reasons of principle and of practice. Haitians consider Chávez a leader in the global fight against the global power inequalities that keep people in Haiti, Venezuela and the rest of Latin America poor, hungry and uneducated. They see him standing up to the most powerful leader in today’s world- President Bush (whose name was frequently invoked that day, not charitably) – and to the World Bank and other powerbrokers. Even better, unlike their President Aristide (whose name was frequently, and charitably, invoked), Chávez keeps getting away with standing up to the powerful.

President Chávez in turn knows that the Haitian people have been relentlessly standing up to inequality and other oppression for more than 200 years. He knows that Haitians won their own independence in 1804 by beating Napoleon- the most powerful leader of his day- and that Haiti became the first country to abolish slavery. Mr. Chávez knows- and acknowledged at the National Palace- that Haiti played a critical role in his own country’s independence. He also understands that the Haitian people are still fighting for their sovereignty, and will keep fighting as long as necessary.

President Chávez was also welcomed because he came bearing much-needed, tangible gifts. At the Palace, he signed a $100 million agreement with Haiti’s President Préval to provide Venezuelan oil, development assistance, and financial support for the Cuba/Haiti partnership that maintains over 800 Cuban medical professionals in Haiti’s poorest areas, and is training the same number of Haitians in Cuban medical schools (Fidel Castro joined the Chávez-Préval meeting by phone). These gifts are particularly welcome because unlike the North American and European donors, Venezuela and Cuba do not condition their largesse on Haiti decreasing social spending or restructuring its economy to benefit multi-national corporations.

This public display of mutual affection contrasted sharply with the Haitian poor’s relationship with other Latin Americans in Haiti, a relationship that is hostile for reasons of principle and practice. A few days before Chávez’ visit, Edmond Mulet of Guatemala, the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General, dwelled on the negative when he told Brazil’s Folha newspaper that “a photo of Haiti today would reveal a horrible situation: poverty, the absence of institutions, debility, and the absence of the State.” Brazil’s Ambassador to Haiti, Paulo Cordeiro Andrade Pinto, told the newspaper that President Préval was “passive” and “sluggish.”

Ambassadors Mulet and Andrade Pinto do not jump from motorcades to join the infectious enthusiasm of Port-au-Prince’s street celebrations. They travel quickly between homes in wealthy neighborhoods and offices in wealthy neighborhoods, with armed escorts in large cars, windows tinted and rolled up, air-conditioning on. Their employees, the soldiers of MINUSTAH, the United Nations (UN) “peacekeeping” mission that Mr. Mulet directs and Brazil leads, do go to poor neighborhoods, but they stay in armored personnel vehicles, their automatic weapons, rather than their hands, extended to the Haitian people.

Too often, MINUSTAH troops do more with their guns than just point. In December, January and February, they conducted repeated assaults on the crowded, poor neighborhood of Cité Soleil. MINUSTAH spokespeople claimed the troops were pursuing gang members, but their automatic rifles shot enough high-powered bullets into Cité Soleil’s thin-walled houses (MINUSTAH estimates it shot 22,000 bullets in one 2005 raid) to kill dozens of people- women, children, the elderly- with no possible connection to gang activity.

Mr. Mulet diplomatically refers to the civilians as “collateral damage.” They are collateral enough that MINUSTAH did not transport any of the civilians wounded in the December and January raids to hospitals. UN ambulances were on the scene, but for soldiers only.

The neighborhoods MINUSTAH hits hardest- Cité Soleil, Bel-Air and others- supplied the crowds that greeted President Chávez with such enthusiasm. They are also the urban base of Haiti’s Lavalas movement, which supplied the votes that brought landslide victories to Presidents Aristide and Préval in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2006. The neighborhoods never accepted the February 2004 overthrow of their constitutional government, sponsored by the United States, Canada and France, or the forced exile of President Aristide, banished to Africa on a U.S. Government plane. Nor have they accepted MINUSTAH, the only peacekeeping mission in UN history deployed without a peace agreement.

MINUSTAH’s mission was to consolidate George Bush’s coup d’etat. It originally supported the brutal and unconstitutional Interim Government of Haiti (IGH), led by Prime Minister Gérard Latortue, a Bush supporter and television host flown in from Boca Raton, Florida. The mission included backing up the IGH police force’s campaign of terror against Lavalas, but it also included MINUSTAH’s own attacks in the poor neighborhoods. After Haiti’s return to democracy in May 2006, the Haitian police stopped their murderous raids in places like Cité Soleil. But MINUSTAH, under frequent pressure from the Bush Administration and Haitian elites to take a “hard line” against the poor neighborhoods, keeps shooting.

People in Cité Soleil do not minimize gang violence- like the poor everywhere else, they bear the largest burden of street crime. But they understand that the violence will never be defeated by violence; that their violence can only be successfully attacked with healthcare, jobs, and dignified living conditions. Those are the weapons deployed by President Chávez, and by their own President Aristide, who was criticized for providing too many jobs to Cité Soleil’s youth. So week after week, Haitians take the streets, to call for MINUSTAH to leave and for President Aristide to come back. On March 12, along with “Viv Chávez, Viv Aristide”, they chanted “Aba Bush, Aba MINUSTAH.”

MINUSTAH at least understands the appeal of President Chávez’ generosity. After negative publicity following the December and January raids in Cité Soleil, the mission’s communications department started stressing its efforts to “win the hearts and minds” of Cité Soleil by providing healthcare, water and food in areas where they dislodged gang members. In March, Cité Soleil residents brought us to a basketball court, near a suspected gang headquarters. That same day, glowing press reports were posted on the internet, complete with photos of MINUSTAH’s humanitarian work. Brazilian Colonel Afonso Pedrosa bragged that MINUSTAH had provided 200 bottles of water and 1000 plates of food to the people, to show that things had really changed with the gangs’ departure.

The basketball court had been one of the heralded sites where MINUSTAH demonstrated how things had changed in Cité Soleil. The day the peacekeepers took over, the court was quickly transformed into a busy humanitarian center, with water distribution, food and a field hospital. But the Cité Soleil residents told me that the humanitarian center lasted only a day. After the photographers, reporters and PR specialists had documented MINUSTAH’s largesse, and returned to their hotel rooms, the whole operation was taken down. The humanitarian center quickly reverted to what we saw: a hot, dusty, basketball court. MINUSTAH soldiers reverted to patrolling Cité Soleil from armored personnel carriers, guns pointed out.

The Haitians we spoke with felt that MINUSTAH’s “hearts and minds” campaign targeted the hearts and minds that read newspapers and watched televisions in South America and the United States, while messages to Cité Soleil were delivered by automatic rifle. They reciprocate the antipathy and the cynicism of Ambassadors Mulet and Andrade Pinto, and MINUSTAH, calling the mission “TOURISTAH.”

President Chávez and MINUSTAH are taking two different paths of solidarity to Haiti, both pioneered by Simon Bolivar, South America’s Libertador. After Bolivar and his followers arrived in Haiti on Christmas Eve 1815, having been expelled from Venezuela then pushed out of Jamaica. Haiti’s President Pétion welcomed the freedom fighters, providing them shelter, guns, ammunition and a printing press. On his way out to start an uprising in Venezuela in April 1816, Bolivar asked how he could repay Haiti’s generosity. Pétion replied the best thanks Haiti could receive was the liberation of all the slaves in the Spanish colonies. Once in Venezuela, Bolivar the idealist freed the 1500 slaves his family owned, and on July 6 printed a proclamation, on Pétion’s printing press, abolishing slavery in Spanish America. Presidents Chávez and Préval commemorated this cooperation by placing flowers at Port-au-Prince’s monuments to Pétion and Bolivar.

But Bolivar had another setback, and by September he was back in Haiti. Pétion again provided shelter and supplies, and Bolivar launched another attack in December 1816. This time he was successful, liberating a wide swath of territory from Venezuela to Bolivia. But this time the freedom he sought was more limited. El Libertador had become a “realist,” willing to compromise his most fundamental ideals to satisfy his allies. This time he did not print out an emancipation proclamation, and Venezuela retained slavery and its horrors almost as long as the United States did, until 1854.

Bolivar also passed up other opportunities to thank Haiti for making his revolution possible. He declined to recognize Haiti (Venezuela did not send an Ambassador until 1874). When in 1826 the new Republic of Colombia organized the Congress of American States to bring together all the newly independent countries of the Americas, the “realists” acquiesced to the United States’ request that Haiti, the country that had sheltered their freedom fighters in their hour of need, be excluded.

Many of Haiti’s neighbors have taken the path of Bolivar the idealist. Cuba does not have Venezuela’s oil and money, but it does have doctors, so for the last decade it has supported a team of over 800 Cuban medical professionals, deployed to Haiti’s poorest and most remote areas. About the same number of Haitian students, many of them from poor families that could never afford medical school, are studying under scholarships in Cuba. The Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) stood up for Haiti’s democracy when it was under attack in 2004, calling for international support for the democracy and refusing to recognize the illegal replacement. CARICOM gave the rest of the world a civics lesson, by sticking to its democratic principles while the United States, Europe and most of Central and South America (but not Venezuela) embraced the dictatorship.

Many of Haiti’s other neighbors- generally the more powerful ones- have followed the path of Bolivar the “realist” and compromised their fundamental ideals to satisfy potential allies. The Organization of American States (OAS) is a successor to the Congress of American States in more ways than one. In principle the OAS has stronger democracy requirements than CARICOM, but in practice the organization accepted Haiti’s 2004 unconstitutional regime change without flinching. Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay have sent soldiers to join Brazil in MINUSTAH.

MINUSTAH’s participants do know what they are doing, and it does trouble them. Lieutenant General Urano Bacellar, the Brazilian Commander of MINUSTAH, committed suicide in January 2006, apparently because he was unable to reconcile his duty to fulfill his “mission” of taking a hard line in poor neighborhoods with his moral convictions. His predecessor, General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro, complained to a Brazilian congressional commission that “we are under extreme pressure from the international community to use violence” in Haiti’s poor neighborhoods. But General Heleno Ribeiro’s concern did not extend to poor Haitians who did not deserve to live, as determined from his Armored Personnel Carrier. He told Haiti’s Radio Metropole in October 2004 that “we must kill the bandits but it will have to be the bandits only, not everybody.”

A year ago, Brazil’s Folha interviewed returning Brazilian soldiers. One said “the name ‘Peace Mission’ is just to pacify the people. In reality no day goes by without the troops killing a Haitian in a shootout. I personally killed at least two.”

So far Latin America’s “realists” have been able to live with their consciences, confident that the advantages of participating in George Bush’s idea of a peacekeeping force will yield benefits to compensate for what they are doing to the Haitian people. For Brazil the benefits include an improved chance of a permanent seat on a potentially-expanded UN Security Council. For other countries, it is money for cash-strapped government budgets (the UN reimburses the countries several times a poor soldier’s salary), or a chance to appease the Bush Administration without compromising on trade issues or opposition to the Iraq War.

But the “realists” should see that the winds in Latin America are changing. The Bush Administration’s approach to the world, that MINUSTAH embodies, is losing credibility and failing, and not just in Iraq. While President Chávez was basking in the crowds’ energy in Port-au-Prince and other cities of Latin America, President Bush was traveling the region too. Mr. Bush was not caught up in the infectious enthusiasm of street celebrations. His itinerary was carefully orchestrated to avoid the large protests held in every single country he visited. In the last two months, citizens of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Peru have taken to the streets to protest their country’s complicity in MINUSTAH’s brutality. The MINUSTAH countries may soon find that in pursuing George Bush’s Haiti policy, they have tied their destiny to a sinking ship.

MARIO JOSEPH, a Human Rights Lawyer, manages the Bureau des Avocats Internationaux in Haiti,

Brian Concannon Jr. is the Director of the Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti,, and an analyst for the International Relations Center’s Americas Program. He was a Human Rights Observer for the United Nations in Haiti in 1995 and 1996.



2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine


September 29, 2016
Robert Fisk
The Butcher of Qana: Shimon Peres Was No Peacemaker
James Rose
Politics in the Echo Chamber: How Trump Becomes President
Russell Mokhiber
The Corporate Vice Grip on the Presidential Debates
Daniel Kato
Rethinking the Race over Race: What Clinton Should do Now About ‘Super-Predators’
Peter Certo
Clinton’s Awkward Stumbles on Trade
Fran Shor
Demonizing the Green Party Vote
Rev. William Alberts
Trump’s Road Rage to the White House
Luke O'Brien
Because We Couldn’t Have Sanders, You’ll Get Trump
Michael J. Sainato
How the Payday Loan Industry is Obstructing Reform
Robert Fantina
You Can’t Have War Without Racism
Gregory Barrett
Bad Theater at the United Nations (Starring Kerry, Power, and Obama
James A Haught
The Long, Long Journey to Female Equality
Thomas Knapp
US Military Aid: Thai-ed to Torture
Jack Smith
Must They be Enemies? Russia, Putin and the US
Gilbert Mercier
Clinton vs Trump: Lesser of Two Evils or the Devil You Know
Tom H. Hastings
Manifesting the Worst Old Norms
George Ella Lyon
This Just in From Rancho Politico
September 28, 2016
Eric Draitser
Stop Trump! Stop Clinton!! Stop the Madness (and Let Me Get Off)!
Ted Rall
The Thrilla at Hofstra: How Trump Won the Debate
Robert Fisk
Cliché and Banality at the Debates: Trump and Clinton on the Middle East
Patrick Cockburn
Cracks in the Kingdom: Saudi Arabia Rocked by Financial Strains
Lowell Flanders
Donald Trump, Islamophobia and Immigrants
Shane Burley
Defining the Alt Right and the New American Fascism
Jan Oberg
Ukraine as the Border of NATO Expansion
Ramzy Baroud
Ban Ki-Moon’s Legacy in Palestine: Failure in Words and Deeds
Gareth Porter
How We Could End the Permanent War State
Sam Husseini
Debate Night’s Biggest Lie Was Told by Lester Holt
Laura Carlsen
Ayotzinapa’s Message to the World: Organize!
Binoy Kampmark
The Triumph of Momentum: Re-Electing Jeremy Corbyn
David Macaray
When the Saints Go Marching In
Seth Oelbaum
All Black Lives Will Never Matter for Clinton and Trump
Adam Parsons
Standing in Solidarity for a Humanity Without Borders
Cesar Chelala
The Trump Bubble
September 27, 2016
Louisa Willcox
The Tribal Fight for Nature: From the Grizzly to the Black Snake of the Dakota Pipeline
Paul Street
The Roots are in the System: Charlotte and Beyond
Jeffrey St. Clair
Idiot Winds at Hofstra: Notes on the Not-So-Great Debate
Mark Harris
Clinton, Trump, and the Death of Idealism
Mike Whitney
Putin Ups the Ante: Ceasefire Sabotage Triggers Major Offensive in Aleppo
Anthony DiMaggio
The Debates as Democratic Façade: Voter “Rationality” in American Elections
Binoy Kampmark
Punishing the Punished: the Torments of Chelsea Manning
Paul Buhle
Why “Snowden” is Important (or How Kafka Foresaw the Juggernaut State)
Jack Rasmus
Hillary’s Ghosts
Brian Cloughley
Billions Down the Afghan Drain
Lawrence Davidson
True Believers and the U.S. Election
Matt Peppe
Taking a Knee: Resisting Enforced Patriotism