FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

FBI Hunting Dead Panthers

by SOFFIYAH ELIJAH

John Bowman is a former Panther who was arrested in New Orleans in 1973 and was tortured by a task force of law enforcement officers from several jurisdictions. In 2003, some of those same agents came to his home in Oklahoma City and confronted him about an unsolved 1971 police murder in San Francisco. So began a several year journey of resisting interrogations and Grand Jury subpoenas. Shortly after getting out of San Francisco County Jail in October of 2005 for refusing to cooperate in a modern-day COINTELPRO investigation, John was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He persevered and continued to organize resistance along with four other former Black activists, formed the Committee to Defend Human Rights, and educated people about the responsibility to stay true to the precepts of the 10-Point Program of the Black Panther Party. Despite the pain of his illness and the ongoing suffering caused by his 33-year post-traumatic, post-torture pains, John Bowman educated and gave his soul to his people, community and the struggle.

Just weeks before his death, the same California Attorney General’s office that tried to force him to cooperate with his tormentors and jailed him for contempt of the Grand Jury, knew he was in terminal pain, and called his attorney, Douglas Parr, in Oklahoma City to ask if he might have a change of heart and now wanted to cooperate. Naturally John refused this inhumane request, said he was not interested and resisted until his transition on December 23, 2006.

But the torment doesn’t end at his passing. On Tuesday, February 13, 2007, two local FBI agents, one who identified himself as John Coyle, visited a funeral home in Oklahoma City and interrogated the owner and two staff people regarding the services it provided for John Bowman’s cremation and memorial. They displayed their badges and one left his card. It was clear from the tone and nature of their questions that they suspected that John had not actually died, and perhaps one or more people had participated in a scheme to feign his death. According to the agents, they were investigating John as a fugitive. They wanted to know about all the events leading up to his memorial service. The agents asked for the name of the crematorium, the doctor, the medical examiner, where John died, who picked up the body and who handled the service. They also questioned how the owner could be certain that it was indeed John’s body that had been cremated. The agents wanted to know if they had seen the body and if they could verify from a photo that it had been John who died. They were told that the body had not been viewed at that funeral home by anyone because it had already been cremated. Near the end of their visit the agents asked one of the funeral home administrators for their full name, date of birth, home address, home phone number, social security number and any other numbers where they could be reached. When asked why they needed all the personal information, the agents responded that it would be entered into the FBI data base. The funeral home owner said that in all the years they have been in business, this was the first time that anything like this had ever happened. They couldn’t believe that a question was being raised as to the identity of the deceased.

Today, Ann Moorman, John Bowman’s attorney, confirmed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been actively questioning whether her client is in fact dead.

“It was clear from the tone and nature of their questions that the agents suspected that John Bowman had in fact not died and that the Funeral Home had participated in a scheme to feign his death,” said Moorman.

She added, “Setting aside the insult to the Bowman family and John’s numerous friends by this inquiry, I am astonished law enforcement is questioning his death. John Bowman spent months in a local hospital suffering from cancer. Before his illness he demonstrated his willingness to face these baseless allegations by appearing numerous times during the course of various grand jury proceedings. The authorities know that if John Bowman were alive today he would stand up to these allegations and vigorously defend himself and the other men also facing the charges.”

After their interrogation at the funeral home, the agents went to the crematorium to interrogate the owner of that business. Again they asked if the owner had seen the body and if he could identify a photo. The owner explained that the body arrived wrapped in a sheet and that he hadn’t seen it. The agents had photos they wanted him to view but he insisted that he had not seen the body and therefore would be unable to identify any photos. They requested to see the log records for the body. They went on to ask the owner if he knew John personally, if he had heard of John, how it was that he was asked to do the cremation and what had been done with the ashes!! At the close of their interrogation they asked the owner for the same personal information they had asked for from the funeral home administrator. When he asked why they needed it, they responded that they needed it for their records. The crematorium owner said that in his 24 years of operation, this was the first time that anything like this had ever happened to him.

Moorman emphasized, “John Bowman was a proud man and would not hide from the FBI. Instead of questioning his death, they should instead be investigating why many court records favorable to the defense are missing. Or, why various items of physical evidence have also turned up missing. They overlook those obvious suspicious developments that bear directly on the credibility of this prosecution and instead go looking for a dead man. The whole case just does not pass the smell test and this just further confirms it.”

Can John Bowman ever rest in peace?

For more information contact:www.CDHRsupport.org

 

More articles by:
June 30, 2016
Richard Moser
Clinton and Trump, Fear and Fascism
Pepe Escobar
The Three Harpies are Back!
Ramzy Baroud
Searching for a ‘Responsible Adult’: ‘Is Brexit Good for Israel?’
Dave Lindorff
What is Bernie Up To?
Thomas Barker
Saving Labour From Blairism: the Dangers of Confining the Debate to Existing Members
Jan Oberg
Why is NATO So Irrational Today?
John Stauber
The Debate We Need: Gary Johnson vs Jill Stein
Steve Horn
Obama Administration Approved Over 1,500 Offshore Fracking Permits
Rob Hager
Supreme Court Legalizes Influence Peddling: McDonnell v. United States
Norman Pollack
Economic Nationalism vs. Globalization: Janus-Faced Monopoly Capital
Binoy Kampmark
Railroaded by the Supreme Court: the US Problem with Immigration
Howard Lisnoff
Of Kiddie Crusades and Disregarding the First Amendment in a Public Space
Vijay Prashad
Economic Liberalization Ignores India’s Rural Misery
Caroline Hurley
We Are All Syrians
June 29, 2016
Diana Johnstone
European Unification Divides Europeans: How Forcing People Together Tears Them Apart
Andrew Smolski
To My Less-Evilism Haters: A Rejoinder to Halle and Chomsky
Jeffrey St. Clair
Noam Chomsky, John Halle and a Confederacy of Lampreys: a Note on Lesser Evil Voting
David Rosen
Birth-Control Wars: Two Centuries of Struggle
Sheldon Richman
Brexit: What Kind of Dependence Now?
Yves Engler
“Canadian” Corporate Capitalism
Lawrence Davidson
Return to the Gilded Age: Paul Ryan’s Deregulated Dystopia
Priti Gulati Cox
All That Glitters is Feardom: Whatever Happens, Don’t Blame Jill Stein
Franklin Lamb
About the Accusation that Syrian and Russian Troops are Looting Palmyra
Binoy Kampmark
Texas, Abortion and the US Supreme Court
Anhvinh Doanvo
Justice Thomas’s Abortion Dissent Tolerates Discrimination
Victor Grossman
Brexit Pro and Con: the View From Germany
Manuel E. Yepe
Brazil: the Southern Giant Will Have to Fight
Rivera Sun
The Nonviolent History of American Independence
Adjoa Agyeiwaa
Is Western Aid Destroying Nigeria’s Future?
Jesse Jackson
What Clinton Should Learn From Brexit
Mel Gurtov
Is Brexit the End of the World?
June 28, 2016
Jonathan Cook
The Neoliberal Prison: Brexit Hysteria and the Liberal Mind
Paul Street
Bernie, Bakken, and Electoral Delusion: Letting Rich Guys Ruin Iowa and the World
Anthony DiMaggio
Fatally Flawed: the Bi-Partisan Travesty of American Health Care Reform
Mike King
The “Free State of Jones” in Trump’s America: Freedom Beyond White Imagination
Antonis Vradis
Stop Shedding Tears for the EU Monster: Brexit, the View From the Peloponnese
Omar Kassem
The End of the Atlantic Project: Slamming the Brakes on the Neoliberal Order
Binoy Kampmark
Brexit and the Neoliberal Revolt Against Jeremy Corbyn
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Alabama Democratic Primary Proves New York Times’ Nate Cohn Wrong about Exit Polling
Ruth Hopkins
Save Bear Butte: Mecca of the Lakota
Celestino Gusmao
Time to End Impunity for Suharto’’s Crimes in Indonesia and Timor-Leste
Thomas Knapp
SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement’s Interests versus Society’s
Manuel E. Yepe
Capitalism is the Opposite of Democracy
Winslow Myers
Up Against the Wall
Chris Ernesto
Bernie’s “Political Revolution” = Vote for Clinton and the Neocons
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail