FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Deny Santa If You Wish, But You Can’t Deny This

by MICHAEL DICKINSON

Earlier this week a junior school in England was forced to apologize after a teacher used a worksheet with a class of ten year olds revealing that Santa Claus was a myth. The students had to make up replies from mail staff to children’s letters to Santa asking for presents, explaining why they couldn’t have them.

One parent said: “My wife and I made a special effort to keep the belief in Santa in our daughter’s mind. What gives the school the right to decide when children should know the truth, when knowing the truth does take away that little bit of magic?”

The headmistress of the school said the choice of worksheet had been a sad mistake and it would never be used again. “As a school we delight in the magic of childhood and believe that Christmas is a special time.”

The Hamilton Trust, which produced the worksheet, didn’t think it would come as much of a shock to children of that age, claiming that by the age of 10 children tend to know that Santa does not exist.

And yet millions of parents in the West persist in feeding the lie of Father Christmas to their innocent trusting children for as long as possible, until they realize they’re being punked, and maybe I shouldn’t trust mommy and daddy so much any more? It’s an accepted acceptable untruth. Santa deniers are killjoys and spoilsports, not to be listened to. They have the right to deny, of course. One wouldn’t dream of jailing them for simply stating their opinion. After all, aren’t we in the West entitled to freedom of speech and belief? You may not agree with me, but I have the right to say what I think — don’t I?

Denial of something more serious than Santa has been making news of late. A Holocaust Denial conference held last week in Iran, which called into question the systematic murder of six million European Jews by Nazi Germany, suggesting that the history of the genocide has been falsified to justify the foundation of Israel, was described by British Prime Minister Tony Blair as “shocking beyond belief”, and by the White House as “an affront to the entire civilized world.”

So what is this Holocaust denial, and why is it so bad? Isn’t it just like a Conspiracy Theory? Like, you can believe that the American government masterminded the 9/11 attacks on the twin towers in order to spark Armaggedon, and tell other people what you think, without fear of being arrested in the United States, where freedom of speech is protected in the first amendment. A lot of people might call you a crank. We want proof. Give us the evidence.

But if you’re living in Europe, and you suggest that some facts and figures were rigged in the historic presentation of the Second World War in order gain guilty sympathy for, and facilitate the exodus of European Jews to the then newly born state of Israel — you are likely to find yourself in prison for your views, cranky or no. You are guilty of the crime of ‘Holocaust denial’.

Apart from being a crime in Israel itself, Holocaust denial is a penal offence in Germany, France, Belgium, Switzerland and several other European countries, one of them being Austria, from where British historian David Irving was released this week, after having served 13 months of a three-year sentence in an Austrian prison for denying the Holocaust. Lord Janner, president of the Holocaust Educational Trust, said Mr. Irving’s release was “unwarranted”, and Lord Foulkes of the Labour Friends of Israel, said he should be watched closely by the police since his return to England.

So what do Holocaust deniers (who actually prefer to be known as ‘Holocaust revisionists’) actually say, that causes such offence? They don’t, of course, deny the death of a huge number of Jews, but they dispute the number, claiming the figure of 5-6 million is exaggerated, saying that many emigrated or escaped. They claim that gas chambers were not used to mass murder Jews, nor were cremation ovens used to dispose of millions of extermination victims. They say that most of the photos and film shown after the war were manufactured propaganda by the Allies against the Nazis; that Jews as a group were not in particular singled out from other persecuted people such as Romanies, gays or Communists, and that the Holocaust in general is nothing more than an elaborate Zionist hoax.

I’m sure there are many who hold stranger and uglier views, (and those who stir up antagonism on the basis of either race or religion should be accountable to the law), but like the ‘Conspiracy Theory’ it resembles, Holocaust denial should not be an imprisonable offence. I don’t like David Irving. He supported apartheid in South Africa, describes himself as ‘a mild fascist,’ but he should not have been jailed for his views. As Voltaire put it: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

There are many other examples of genocidal denials around the world. In Turkey for instance, it’s a crime to refuse to deny the alleged Armenian atrocity, and we have yet to hear an American President stand up and apologize for his white countrymen’s ancestors for extinguishing numberless tribes of indigenous people in the land they came to conquer which they named America.

Whether the Holocaust happened or not, there is no denying that people can be very cruel to other people, especially when they are in the position of power, now and in the past. The world is full of examples, everywhere. The Jews certainly suffered terribly under the Nazi regime, and those Jews in power now years later in their own State of Israel certainly seem to have learned a few tricks from their former overlords. The harsh conditions to which they subject the Palestinian people resembles the way the Jews themselves were treated under Hitler, putting thems into prison camp getthoes, creating an apartheid system, stealing their land, destroying their homes and fields, imprisoning thousands, and causing the deaths of countless innocent people and children in bombings and shellings, all of this is really “shocking beyond belief”, and “an affront to the entire civilized world.”

Deny Santa if you wish. You may even deny the Holocaust. It’s your right. But you can’t deny this affront. It’s happening now.

MICHAEL DICKINSON is an English teacher who lives and works in Istanbul.

 

 

 

Michael Dickinson can be contacted at michaelyabanji@gmail.com.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

August 29, 2016
Eric Draitser
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
Patrick Timmons
Dildos on Campus, Gun in the Library: the New York Times and the Texas Gun War
Jack Rasmus
Bernie Sanders ‘OR’ Revolution: a Statement or a Question?
Richard Moser
Strategic Choreography and Inside/Outside Organizers
Nigel Clarke
President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment
Robert Fisk
Iraq’s Willing Executioners
Wahid Azal
The Banality of Evil and the Ivory Tower Masterminds of the 1953 Coup d’Etat in Iran
Farzana Versey
Romancing the Activist
Frances Madeson
Meet the Geronimos: Apache Leader’s Descendants Talk About Living With the Legacy
Nauman Sadiq
The War on Terror and the Carter Doctrine
Lawrence Wittner
Does the Democratic Party Have a Progressive Platform–and Does It Matter?
Marjorie Cohn
Death to the Death Penalty in California
Winslow Myers
Asking the Right Questions
Rivera Sun
The Sane Candidate: Which Representatives Will End the Endless Wars?
Linn Washington Jr.
Philadelphia District Attorney Hammered for Hypocrisy
Binoy Kampmark
Banning Burkinis: the Politics of Beachwear
Weekend Edition
August 26, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Louisa Willcox
The Unbearable Killing of Yellowstone’s Grizzlies: 2015 Shatters Records for Bear Deaths
Paul Buhle
In the Shadow of the CIA: Liberalism’s Big Embarrassing Moment
Rob Urie
Crisis and Opportunity
Charles Pierson
Wedding Crashers Who Kill
Richard Moser
What is the Inside/Outside Strategy?
Dirk Bezemer – Michael Hudson
Finance is Not the Economy
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Bernie’s Used Cars
Margaret Kimberley
Hillary and Colin: the War Criminal Charade
Patrick Cockburn
Turkey’s Foray into Syria: a Gamble in a Very Dangerous Game
Ishmael Reed
Birther Tries to Flim Flam Blacks  
Brian Terrell
What Makes a Hate Group?
Andrew Levine
How Donald Trump Can Still be a Hero: Force the Guardians of the Duopoly to Open Up the Debates
Howard Lisnoff
Trouble in Political Paradise
Terry Tempest Williams
Will Our National Parks Survive the Next 100 Years?
Ben Debney
The Swimsuit that Overthrew the State
Ashley Smith
Anti-imperialism and the Syrian Revolution
Andrew Stewart
Did Gore Throw the 2000 Election?
Vincent Navarro
Is the Nation State and Its Welfare State Dead? a Critique of Varoufakis
John Wight
Syria’s Kurds and the Wages of Treachery
Lawrence Davidson
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
Mateo Pimentel
The Affordable Care Act: A Litmus Test for American Capitalism?
Roger Annis
In Northern Syria, Turkey Opens New Front in its War Against the Kurds
David Swanson
ABC Shifts Blame from US Wars to Doctors Without Borders
Norman Pollack
American Exceptionalism: A Pernicious Doctrine
Ralph Nader
Readers Think, Thinkers Read
Julia Morris
The Mythologies of the Nauruan Refugee Nation
George Wuerthner
Caving to Ranchers: the Misguided Decision to Kill the Profanity Wolf Pack
Ann Garrison
Unworthy Victims: Houthis and Hutus
Julian Vigo
Britain’s Slavery Legacy
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail