FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Freedom Air

by MICHAEL DONNELLY

The unwarranted removal of passengers from a domestic air flight has triggered an investigation, a discrimination complaint and a national protest.

 

Flying While Muslim

On Tuesday November 21, six Muslim clerics were removed from a US Airways flight on their return from a Minneapolis meeting of 150 Imams held by the North American Imams Federation. The six–five from the Phoenix area and one from Bakersfield were taken from the plane by an airport police officer and a US Air Marshall after a pilot and passengers requested their ejection.

The grounds for the expulsion? Witnesses noted that three of the Imams had been seen doing their normal evening prayers in the terminal before boarding and they were supposedly heard making comments critical of the Iraq war. (With some 70% of Americans now critical of the war, the airlines would quickly bankrupt if that criterion was universally imposed.)

The other 135 passengers were also forced to de-plane and then re-screened for boarding – a process that delayed the flight for three hours.

This was not an isolated incident. Anti-Muslim prejudice is on the rise in all areas of American life. A recent report from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) details the sad rise in such bigotry.
A National Day of Protest

The day after the Imams were so rudely denied the right to freedom to practice their religion, airports around the country saw a concerted, indignant grass-roots protest. Hundreds of activists gathered at terminals around the country to protest the removal–of a woman who was nursing her 22- month-old toddler–from a Freedom Airlines flight on October 13th. The rest of the passengers endured the apparently standard three hour delay.

Clearly the removal of Emily Gillette, her husband Brad and the child from the flight in Burlington violated a Vermont law protecting breast-feeding “in any place of public accommodation.” Forty-three states have some sort of law protecting citizens’ right to breast-feed. Even Delta Air Lines, the parent of Freedom Airlines, according to spokesman Anthony Black, “supports a mother’s right to breast-feed-slash-bottle-feed her babies on our aircraft.” Freedom’s spokesman said that it was OK to breast-feed in a “discreet way”–whatever that means.

What it might mean is being sensitive to others’ sensibilities (you know, tolerance and diversity) and at least trying to shield one’s activity from public view, which is ultimately what Gillette objected to being asked to do; as “breast-feeding is natural.” So is using the toilet and most folks would not want to see others in that activity. Apparently, it’s easier and more satisfying to be indignant than to be sensitive.
Baby’s First Demo

While it is horrible for the airlines (and other public entities) to harass nursing mothers, what does it say about the Left’s response to discrimination when hundreds of white, middle class, well-educated, indignant moms (and dads) can be readily turned out–with a major assist from many of the usual foundation-sponsored “leaders” of various “progressive” non-profits–yet, odious and more widespread, well-documented racist/religious discrimination is on the rise and has gone virtually uncommented on by the Left?

When the airlines have hundreds of folks at their ticket counters protesting the type of treatment those religious leaders experienced; when progressive foundations pull out the checkbooks and support such actions; and non-profit leaders put their considerable organizing skills to such an end, then we can truly claim that individual rights are paramount in the eyes of the Left. Can we really accept a country where the right to breast-feed in public view is inalienable, but freedom of religion is surrendered as just another casualty in the War on Terror (aka the War Against the Global Resistance to US Domination)?

MICHAEL DONNELLY is a strong supporter of breast-feeding for a number of reasons–health, environment and opposition to the corporate baby formula empires. He also supports the right to believe or not believe in any religion one chooses. He can be reached at pahtoo@aol.com

 

 

MICHAEL DONNELLY has been an environmental activist since before that first Earth Day. He was in the thick of the Pacific Northwest Ancient Forest Campaign; garnering some collective victories and lamenting numerous defeats. He can be reached at pahtoo@aol.com

More articles by:
June 30, 2016
Richard Moser
Clinton and Trump, Fear and Fascism
Pepe Escobar
The Three Harpies are Back!
Ramzy Baroud
Searching for a ‘Responsible Adult’: ‘Is Brexit Good for Israel?’
Dave Lindorff
What is Bernie Up To?
Thomas Barker
Saving Labour From Blairism: the Dangers of Confining the Debate to Existing Members
Jan Oberg
Why is NATO So Irrational Today?
John Stauber
The Debate We Need: Gary Johnson vs Jill Stein
Steve Horn
Obama Administration Approved Over 1,500 Offshore Fracking Permits
Rob Hager
Supreme Court Legalizes Influence Peddling: McDonnell v. United States
Norman Pollack
Economic Nationalism vs. Globalization: Janus-Faced Monopoly Capital
Binoy Kampmark
Railroaded by the Supreme Court: the US Problem with Immigration
Howard Lisnoff
Of Kiddie Crusades and Disregarding the First Amendment in a Public Space
Vijay Prashad
Economic Liberalization Ignores India’s Rural Misery
Caroline Hurley
We Are All Syrians
June 29, 2016
Diana Johnstone
European Unification Divides Europeans: How Forcing People Together Tears Them Apart
Andrew Smolski
To My Less-Evilism Haters: A Rejoinder to Halle and Chomsky
Jeffrey St. Clair
Noam Chomsky, John Halle and a Confederacy of Lampreys: a Note on Lesser Evil Voting
David Rosen
Birth-Control Wars: Two Centuries of Struggle
Sheldon Richman
Brexit: What Kind of Dependence Now?
Yves Engler
“Canadian” Corporate Capitalism
Lawrence Davidson
Return to the Gilded Age: Paul Ryan’s Deregulated Dystopia
Priti Gulati Cox
All That Glitters is Feardom: Whatever Happens, Don’t Blame Jill Stein
Franklin Lamb
About the Accusation that Syrian and Russian Troops are Looting Palmyra
Binoy Kampmark
Texas, Abortion and the US Supreme Court
Anhvinh Doanvo
Justice Thomas’s Abortion Dissent Tolerates Discrimination
Victor Grossman
Brexit Pro and Con: the View From Germany
Manuel E. Yepe
Brazil: the Southern Giant Will Have to Fight
Rivera Sun
The Nonviolent History of American Independence
Adjoa Agyeiwaa
Is Western Aid Destroying Nigeria’s Future?
Jesse Jackson
What Clinton Should Learn From Brexit
Mel Gurtov
Is Brexit the End of the World?
June 28, 2016
Jonathan Cook
The Neoliberal Prison: Brexit Hysteria and the Liberal Mind
Paul Street
Bernie, Bakken, and Electoral Delusion: Letting Rich Guys Ruin Iowa and the World
Anthony DiMaggio
Fatally Flawed: the Bi-Partisan Travesty of American Health Care Reform
Mike King
The “Free State of Jones” in Trump’s America: Freedom Beyond White Imagination
Antonis Vradis
Stop Shedding Tears for the EU Monster: Brexit, the View From the Peloponnese
Omar Kassem
The End of the Atlantic Project: Slamming the Brakes on the Neoliberal Order
Binoy Kampmark
Brexit and the Neoliberal Revolt Against Jeremy Corbyn
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Alabama Democratic Primary Proves New York Times’ Nate Cohn Wrong about Exit Polling
Ruth Hopkins
Save Bear Butte: Mecca of the Lakota
Celestino Gusmao
Time to End Impunity for Suharto’’s Crimes in Indonesia and Timor-Leste
Thomas Knapp
SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement’s Interests versus Society’s
Manuel E. Yepe
Capitalism is the Opposite of Democracy
Winslow Myers
Up Against the Wall
Chris Ernesto
Bernie’s “Political Revolution” = Vote for Clinton and the Neocons
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail