Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Keep CounterPunch ad free. Support our annual fund drive today!

Bush: the Year in Review


“I’m very proud of my gold pocket watch. My grandfather, on his deathbed, sold me this watch.”

–Woody Allen

“They have mouths, but they speak not; eyes have they, but they hear not; noses have they, but they smell not; they have hands, but they handle not; neither speak they through their throats.”

–Psalm 115 (written for Bush supporters?)

The Bushies will light the White House Christmas tree and buy family members expensive gifts they don’t need. No Monica lurks in the Oval Office waiting to offer him kinky pleasure. The adoring Harriet Miers gives virtual blow jobs — “you’re the very best, sir” ­ but no actual “playing around.”

The pious Bush, however, is deaf to thousands of daily demands that he be impeached and tried as a war criminal for waging an illegal and very bloody war against Iraq. Bush has fought back in speeches that repeat the same discredited fairy tales he used to get the country into war, vaguely linking the invasion and occupation of Iraq with the terrorist threat to the United States.

December polls show a tiny bump in his approval ratings as men, whites and Catholics bought some of his message. The majority, however, continue to give him failing grades for his performance at home and abroad. His close friends and family, not known for their heightened sensitivity, care little about approval indices. For them, W delivered more than they ever expected. From the disgustingly rich, the Elmer Gantry contingent, the neo con ideologues and followers of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon plus homophobes and anti-abortion fanatics, Bush got an A+.

They did not take points off Bush’s grade for prevaricating the nation into war, which has cost the lives of thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis. Nor did they take off points for W’s economic performance. In October, the US deficit grew to record levels as imports continued to exceed exports ­ W’s version of the benefits of free trade.

The Bushies don’t take seriously such banalities; nor do they worry about the fact that as a result of W’s ignorance and arrogance, the rest of the world sees the USA with hatred and contempt.

A December 3 Al Jazeera story reported that a University of Maryland-John Zogby poll in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco showed that 81% of the respondents believed that the Iraq war had brought “less peace” to the Middle East.

Do the nation’s elite to whom W gave major tax reductions fret over Bush’s bizarre military spending? Should we expect those on the very, very right to denounce W for erasing the centuries-old line that separates church and state? Actually, they would rather have church charity replace government as the place where the poor seek help.

Do Bushies find it morally reprehensible that W promised to leave no child behind and left many, to rebuild New Orleans and didn’t? In 2000, after all, he swore not to engage in nation building and did not rebuild Iraq after he broke it.

Even Daddy Bush (41) must chuckle when W periodically announces, “I’m the Commander in Chief.” In May 2003, el Comandante costumed himself in a jump suit, landed on an aircraft carrier and declared “Mission Accomplished.” As if!

In more sedate settings, W dons tailor-made gabardines, wrinkles his face and issues stern, snarling declarations: “As long as I’m commander in chief, we’re not going to cut and run in Iraq.” The Bush consiglieri (Brent Scowcroft and James Baker) must shake their heads over such imprudence, but W has fortified their immune systems against such intrusions by the money they made from his non-stop tax cuts.

Daddy Bush might have felt some shame after the 9/11 attackers struck and “the leader” read My Pet Goat to second graders for seven minutes. For hours afterwards, in a tizzy aboard Air Force One, W didn’t know what to do. His parents failed to teach him how to respond to other peoples’ crises.

In August 2005, when Katrina hit, the maximum jefe remained at his ranch for five days despite desperate pleas from hurricane victims; then he visited the stricken area from above, in an airplane.

“Above it all,” was also how the members of the Commission to investigate the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 judged the Administration. As Derrick Z. Jackson reported (Chicago Tribune December 12), the Commission in early December “gave the Bush administration an F for coalition detention standards. The U.S. has not engaged in a common coalition approach to developing standards for detention and prosecution of captured terrorists. Indeed, U.S. treatment of detainees has elicited broad criticism and makes it harder to build the necessary alliances to cooperate effectively with partners in a global war on terror.”

On the front of protecting citizens from disaster, Bush also received a universal F. Those with memories will recall how said: “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job,” during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath, when Michael Brown, the shlemiel he named to run FEMA, had totally botched the relief operation. He also named incompetents and ideologues to run the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the Food and Drug Administration. The pundits had a field day, but the loyal ­ and ever richer ­ Bushies remained uncritical.

Bush also gave corruption a bad name. He tolerated super profits ripoffs by companies supplying the military in Iraq and Afghanistan. The recent bribery case of former Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham exemplified the pattern of corruption. Cunningham, the Congressman, facilitated sleazy Pentagon contracts with the help of tainted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Bush’s erstwhile ENRON buddies provided a stunning example of how to rob billions. Most of the thieves have gotten away with their larceny. His congressional stewards, Tom Delay and Bill Frist in the House and Senate respectively, have exemplified the ethos of greed and ethical aphasia.

Under Bush’s reign, US employment has become precarious. He has allowed huge companies like United Airlines and General Motors to cheat employees out of their pensions and benefits and encouraged outsourcing of jobs ­ and money.

Bush’s ignorance extends to science as well, where he has cut deeply into funds available for research, not just on stem cells but throughout the natural sciences. The ultra right, however, couldn’t be happier. Each time the government fails, they giggle with delight. They want W to destroy government. Indeed, since Barry Goldwater won the Republican nomination in 1964 with the ambitious new ideologues from the Young Americans for Freedom and their Christian soldiers of God allies, the far right has set its sights on destroying government ­ meaning all legacies of the New Deal, all agencies that help poor people. They have also moved, successfully, to monopolize the courts and ensure their legislative power through dubious redistricting key states ­ especially Texas.

As liberals joked about his malapropisms, Bush successfully distracted them and reversed some victories won by gays and women, workers and immigrants. Indeed, in 2004, he beat the Democrats on abortion and gay marriage issues.

Finally, W has expanded presidential prerogatives beyond the liberals’ and real conservatives’ worst nightmares. The Patriot Act has devastated the Bill of Rights ­ and the Magna Carta. Bush’s cavalier attitude on torture and CIA kidnappings turn US rhetoric on human into a joke.

Bush kept these processes secret from Congress along with information on how the Pentagon spent tens of billions of dollars in the military budget. Bush has taken the Republic across the proverbial Rubicon and into blatant and dangerous imperial waters from which it will be difficult to return.

The Democrats — whatever and whoever they are — should be celebrating. At a time when people give gifts, Bush has handed them a priceless political present gift: his own failure; their opportunity. But Bush also knows that the nation will distract itself, take the stimulus offered thousands of times each day, and pay attention to shopping, not their own political lives and those of their children and grandchildren.

“Years ago,” a Mexican friend laughed, “I thought Christmas meant the time to devote yourself more (mas) to Christ (Cristo). Logical, no? Now I explain to my Mexican relatives that Shopmas is a more accurate description of US spiritual behavior.”

Thanks to commercial television’s conditioning, citizens rely on television whose message, Dave Barry explained “has always been that the need for truth, wisdom and world peace pales by comparison with the need for a toothpaste that offers whiter teeth and fresher breath.”

The holiday frenzy at malls and on line has become a motor of the economy. “Shopper confidence” determines whether tens of thousands of people will have jobs, not whether or how the United States rules its empire. But as the Bushies suspected, frightened Democrats refuse to rise to the challenge. Or is this judgment premature?

SAUL LANDAU is an Institute for Policy Studies fellow.




SAUL LANDAU’s A BUSH AND BOTOX WORLD was published by CounterPunch / AK Press.

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine


October 24, 2016
John Steppling
The Unwoke: Sleepwalking into the Nightmare
Oscar Ortega
Clinton’s Troubling Silence on the Dakota Access Pipeline
Patrick Cockburn
Aleppo vs. Mosul: Media Biases
John Grant
Humanizing Our Militarized Border
Franklin Lamb
US-led Sanctions Targeting Syria Risk Adjudication as War Crimes
Paul Bentley
There Must Be Some Way Out of Here: the Silence of Dylan
Norman Pollack
Militarism: The Elephant in the Room
Patrick Bosold
Dakota Access Oil Pipeline: Invite CEO to Lunch, Go to Jail
Paul Craig Roberts
Was Russia’s Hesitation in Syria a Strategic Mistake?
David Swanson
Of All the Opinions I’ve Heard on Syria
Weekend Edition
October 21, 2016
Friday - Sunday
John Wight
Hillary Clinton and the Brutal Murder of Gaddafi
Diana Johnstone
Hillary Clinton’s Strategic Ambition in a Nutshell
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Trump’s Naked and Hillary’s Dead
John W. Whitehead
American Psycho: Sex, Lies and Politics Add Up to a Terrifying Election Season
Stephen Cooper
Hell on Earth in Alabama: Inside Holman Prison
Patrick Cockburn
13 Years of War: Mosul’s Frightening and Uncertain Future
Rob Urie
Name the Dangerous Candidate
Pepe Escobar
The Aleppo / Mosul Riddle
David Rosen
The War on Drugs is a Racket
Sami Siegelbaum
Once More, the Value of the Humanities
Cathy Breen
“Today Is One of the Heaviest Days of My Life”
Neve Gordon
Israel’s Boycott Hypocrisy
Mark Hand
Of Pipelines and Protest Pens: When the Press Loses Its Shield
Victor Wallis
On the Stealing of U.S. Elections
Michael Hudson
The Return of the Repressed Critique of Rentiers: Veblen in the 21st century Rentier Capitalism
Brian Cloughley
Drumbeats of Anti-Russia Confrontation From Washington to London
Howard Lisnoff
Still Licking Our Wounds and Hoping for Change
Brian Gruber
Iraq: There Is No State
Peter Lee
Trump: We Wish the Problem Was Fascism
Stanley L. Cohen
Equality and Justice for All, It Seems, But Palestinians
Steve Early
In Bay Area Refinery Town: Berniecrats & Clintonites Clash Over Rent Control
Kristine Mattis
All Solutions are Inadequate: Why It Doesn’t Matter If Politicians Mention Climate Change
Peter Linebaugh
Ron Suny and the Marxist Commune: a Note
Andre Vltchek
Sudan, Africa and the Mosaic of Horrors
Keith Binkly
The Russians Have Been Hacking Us For Years, Why Is It a Crisis Now?
Jonathan Cook
Adam Curtis: Another Manager of Perceptions
Ted Dace
The Fall
Sheldon Richman
Come and See the Anarchy Inherent in the System
Susana Hurlich
Hurricane Matthew: an Overview of the Damages in Cuba
Dave Lindorff
Screwing With and Screwing the Elderly and Disabled
Chandra Muzaffar
Cuba: Rejecting Sanctions, Sending a Message
Dennis Kucinich
War or Peace?
Joseph Natoli
Seething Anger in the Post-2016 Election Season
Jack Rasmus
Behind The 3rd US Presidential Debate—What’s Coming in 2017
Ron Jacobs
A Theory of Despair?