Annual Fundraising Appeal
Over the course of 21 years, we’ve published many unflattering stories about Henry Kissinger. We’ve recounted his involvement in the Chilean coup and the illegal bombings of Cambodia and Laos; his hidden role in the Kent State massacre and the genocide in East Timor; his noxious influence peddling in DC and craven work for dictators and repressive regimes around the world. We’ve questioned his ethics, his morals and his intelligence. We’ve called for him to be arrested and tried for war crimes. But nothing we’ve ever published pissed off HK quite like this sequence of photos taken at a conference in Brazil, which appeared in one of the early print editions of CounterPunch.
The publication of those photos, and the story that went with them, 20 years ago earned CounterPunch a global audience in the pre-web days and helped make our reputation as a fearless journal willing to take the fight to the forces of darkness without flinching. Now our future is entirely in your hands. Please donate.


Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

or use

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

The Birth of a New "Islamo-fascist" Republic?

Shia Relish Chance to Rule Iraq


in Baghdad

"I’ll certainly vote for the Shia candidates," said Nabil Hassan Majid, a middle-aged Shia grocer in the Jadriyah district of Baghdad. "It is we who suffered and were oppressed under Saddam’s regime and now it is our chance to rule."

On the last day of campaigning before the Iraqi election, 1,000 Sunni clerics called on their community to vote. Their appeal was marred, however, by the murder of a Sunni candidate, Mizhar al-Dulaimi, who was shot dead as he campaigned in Ramadi, west of Baghdad.

The parliamentary election in Iraq tomorrow is expected to confirm that Shia Arabs are the dominant community after centuries of rule by the Sunni. They can win because at least 15 to 16 million of the 25 to 26 million Iraqis are Shia Muslims while there are only about five million Sunni Arabs and five million Kurds.

It is a historic change. Immediately after the American invasion in 2003, the Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the immensely influential Shia clerical leader, insisted that the occupiers hold an election, which they were initially reluctant to do. They knew that the Shia majority would be the inevitable victors.

The strongest party coalition in the election is the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA), the so-called clerics’ list, which had 140 seats in the 275-member National Assembly and won 48 per cent of the votes at the last election on January 30 compared to 25 per cent for the Kurds. The Shia and Kurdish strength was exaggerated by the Sunni Arab boycott, but it is still their candidates who are likely to carry the day.

The Shia clerical parties have a very strong hand. They already form the government, along with the Kurds. Ibrahim al-Jaafari, the head of the Dawa party, is the Prime Minister. While Ayatollah Sistani has not openly backed the UIA, his office has warned voters against secular parties and small parties. For the pious Shia voter, and most are religious, this does not leave much else to vote for aside from the UIA.

"I expect the Shia religious parties will get about 110 to 115 seats in the new parliament," said one political observer in Baghdad. "They will be in a commanding position." He ticked off their advantages. The largest party in the coalition is the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (Sciri) under Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, which already controls provincial councils in nine out of 18 Iraqi provinces. It has its powerful militia, the Badr Organisation, and is backed by Iran.

In this election the UIA is joined by the followers of Muqtada al-Sadr, the nationalist cleric, whose Medhi Army militia twice fought US forces in Najaf and across southern Iraq last year. He in effect controls Sadr City, the great Shia slum with a population of 2.5 million, in east Baghdad.

It is not that the Jaafari government has been particularly successful. Baghdad is as dangerous as it was a year ago. Kidnapping and crime are rife. There was a pre-election surge in electricity supply this week but there are continual shortages. Abed al-Ruda, a Shia engineer, admitted that Shia parties had "not managed to do anything for the people, but then they didn’t have much time". He was still going to vote for them because "I am hopeful for the future of Iraq and the Shia will be the people who will rule this country".

Not everybody is so forgiving. Some Shia see the triumph of "555" – as the United Iraqi Alliance list is universally known – as opening the door to a clerical state and civil war. Mohamed Haki Daoud, a student, said he was planning to vote for Iyad Allawi, the former prime minister, as a secular Shia who could hold Iraq together: "He stands against the break-up of Iraq." In Baghdad there is a secular nationalist vote but Allawi’s hopes may founder because it is not large and the provincial cities are largely under the control of his enemies. It is too dangerous for him to campaign in many areas. When he went to the shrine of Imam Ali in Najaf he was attacked by hostile worshippers whom he said had tried to kill him. Many Sunni Arabs sympathise with him but say they want to maximise Sunni influence by voting for Sunni parties.

Allawi’s opponents portray him as Saddam Hussein reborn. Posters show a figure with half his face and half Saddam’s face. Umm Hamid, an elderly woman, said she and her entire extended family would vote for the clerical coalition. Then she chanted: "No, No, for Allawi! No, No for the new Baath in Iraq again!"