Blair’s "Evil Ideology"


London is under attack once again. Though on the surface it doesn’t look like a catostrophic event the message is clear: we are very vulnerable. And yet, we seem to be very slow to learn our lesson. Although there are some indications that the majority of British public is seriously associating Blair’s policies with the deterioration of their day-to-day security situation, until now, no substantial political call to oust Blair has been made.

Blair is still running this country, and as it is apparent, we are aiming towards a colossal disaster. Some hours ago an Asian man was shot five times down in the Tube by "plainclothes police officers". We are moving rapidly towards a fragmented and segregated society in which Asian looking people seem to be under constant threat. In every speech Blair preaches at us to stop the evil ideology. Let me be clear about it, putting bombs in the tube is no doubt evil, but what is the ideology behind it? We are yet to learn who stands behind the different London bombings. Thus, we can’t associate the different events with any ideology. If to be honest, the only clear and unmistakeable evil ideology I can think of is the one practiced by Mr. Blair himself. Wasn’t it Blair who voluntarily joined forces with Mr. Bush, starting a war without UN approval? It is Blair and Bush the ones who turning our planet into a ticking bomb.

Things are getting complicated here in the UK. The British public is very confused. So far, the outcome of the investigation of the previous attack makes it undoubtedly clear that the four young Muslims suspected to be the perpetrators were anything but suicide bombers. According to the Sunday papers, on the day of the attack the suspected kamikazes put valid parking tickets on their car’s window screens. They then bought a return ticket form Luton to London. Down in the tube, they bought return tickets again. It doesn’t take a genius to realise that suicide bombers do not look to save money on their ‘way back’. The police argue that they carried their explosives in rucksacks. This is very unusual indeed. In Palestine and Iraq kamikazes strap their explosives to their bodies. Anyhow, the police are talking about the bombers carrying just five kilograms of explosives each. Again it doesn’t make much sense. People who want to kill do not save on explosives. They simply take as much as they can. The only explanation I can think of is that the young fellows more than likely didn’t have a clue. They didn’t know what they were carrying in their bags. They didn’t know what they were up to.

The four young fellows were not kamikazes. They were either decoys or more likely victims of a third murderous party with a clear vicious agenda. As it seems, they were blindly pooled into an act without really realising what they were involved in. Beyond doubt, none of them was the leader of the attack. A leader could carry far more explosives just to cause more carnage. Another fact to bear in mind is that the suspected terrorists didn’t leave any message behind. As we know, in Palestine kamikazes leave some sort of a farewell statement: a video, a letter, or even some lines of religious texts. Those using the tactic of the suicide bomb think of themselves in terms of martyrdom. So far, nothing as such has been found in the UK. The conclusion we can draw is clear. The real perpetrators of the underground bombing are still free, they are out there and they may attack again, but then who could they be?

It is very difficult to determine. Blair is trying to tell us that they must be Muslim fundamentalists, but in fact they can as well be just Arab nationalists. Thinking about it, isn’t it fathomable that they could just as easily be far right British nationalists? The BNP was the first to say "didn’t we warn you all about those Muslims?"

Seemingly, the list of potential perpetrators is open, clearly we know very little, but as a matter of fact we know nothing. We are just guessing here. Moreover, it is likely that we will never know the truth. However, one thing is clear. We all suspect the official government account. We do not trust our elected politicians. We know that Blair lied to us before and during the war, we know that all the official commissions of enquiries were nothing more than to provide a service of whitewashing. Clearly, we become more and more cynical about this concept of liberal democracy.

However, people here do understand that it is Blair’s policy that makes them so vulnerable. Blair is telling us that we have to fight the evil ideology. He pleads for us not to surrender to terror. He is right, we should never surrender to Anglo-American state terrorism. We must stop the current wave of Western colonialism. We must oust Blair and the sooner the better. Can we do it? Not really, it is down to the Labour Party to kick out their warmonger leader.

GILAD ATZMON was born in Israel and served in the Israeli military. He is the author of two novels: A Guide to the Perplexed and the recently released My One and Only Love. Atzmon is also one of the most accomplished jazz saxophonists in Europe. His recent CD, Exile, was named the year’s best jazz CD by the BBC. He now lives in London and can be reached at: atz@onetel.net.uk


Weekend Edition
October 9-11, 2015
David Price – Roberto J. González
The Use and Abuse of Culture (and Children): The Human Terrain System’s Rationalization of Pedophilia in Afghanistan
Mike Whitney
Putin’s “Endgame” in Syria
Jason Hribal
The Tilikum Effect and the Downfall of SeaWorld
Gary Leupp
The Six Most Disastrous Interventions of the 21st Century
Andrew Levine
In Syria, Obama is Playing a Losing Game
Louis Proyect
The End of Academic Freedom in America: the Case of Steven Salaita
Rob Urie
Democrats, Neoliberalism and the TPP
Ismael Hossein-Zadeh
The Bully Recalibrates: U.S. Signals Policy Shift in Syria
Brian Cloughley
Hospital Slaughter and the US/NATO Propaganda Machine
Paul Street
Hope in Abandonment: Cuba, Detroit, and Earth-Scientific Socialism
John Walsh
For Vietnam: Artemisinin From China, Agent Orange From America
John Wight
No Moral High Ground for the West on Syria
Robert Fantina
Canadian Universities vs. Israeli Apartheid
Conn Hallinan
Portugal: Europe’s Left Batting 1000
John Feffer
Mouths Wide Shut: Obama’s War on Whistleblowers
Paul Craig Roberts
The Impulsiveness of US Power
Ron Jacobs
The Murderer as American Hero
Alex Nunns
“A Movement Looking for a Home”: the Meaning of Jeremy Corbyn
Philippe Marlière
Class Struggle at Air France
Binoy Kampmark
Waiting in Vain for Moderation: Syria, Russia and Washington’s Problem
Paul Edwards
Empire of Disaster
Xanthe Hall
Nuclear Madness: NATO’s WMD ‘Sharing’ Must End
Margaret Knapke
These Salvadoran Women Went to Prison for Suffering Miscarriages
Uri Avnery
Abbas: the Leader Without Glory
Halima Hatimy
#BlackLivesMatter: Black Liberation or Black Liberal Distraction?
Michael Brenner
Kissinger Revisited
Cesar Chelala
The Perverse Rise of Killer Robots
Halyna Mokrushyna
On Ukraine’s ‘Incorrect’ Past
Jason Cone
Even Wars Have Rules: a Fact Sheet on the Bombing of Kunduz Hospital
Walter Brasch
Mass Murders are Good for Business
William Hadfield
Sophistry Rising: the Refugee Debate in Germany
Christopher Brauchli
Why the NRA Profits From Mass Shootings
Hadi Kobaysi
How The US Uses (Takfiri) Extremists
Pete Dolack
There is Still Time to Defeat the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Marc Norton
The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution
Andre Vltchek
Stop Millions of Western Immigrants!
David Rosen
If Donald Dump Was President
Dave Lindorff
America’s Latest War Crime
Ann Garrison
Sankarist Spirit Resurges in Burkina Faso
Franklin Lamb
Official Investigation Needed After Afghan Hospital Bombing
Linn Washington Jr.
Wrongs In Wine-Land
Ronald Bleier
Am I Drinking Enough Water? Sneezing’s A Clue
Charles R. Larson
Prelude to the Spanish Civil War: Eduard Mendoza’s “An Englishman in Madrid”
David Yearsley
Papal Pop and Circumstance
Christopher Washburn
Skeptik’s Lexicon