Click amount to donate direct to CounterPunch
  • $25
  • $50
  • $100
  • $500
  • $other
  • use PayPal
Support Our Annual Fund Drive! CounterPunch is entirely supported by our readers. Your donations pay for our small staff, tiny office, writers, designers, techies, bandwidth and servers. We don’t owe anything to advertisers, foundations, one-percenters or political parties. You are our only safety net. Please make a tax-deductible donation today.
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Anti-Semitism or Ultra-Semitism?

by M. JUNAID ALAM

Boston, Mass.

“When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do.”

William Blake

For decades, Israel has tried to seal shut the coffin it long ago prepared for the Palestinians by hammering away at the nails of political, economic, and military violence. This method has never sufficed. Too crude, too callous, and too obvious, it fails utterly in snuffing out the flame of Palestinian defiance and succeeds only in setting off the spark of international indignation. Therefore, Israel’s apologists have seized upon a new asset of intellectual violence: the “new anti-Semitism” canard. This is the cheap and shoddy hearse the Palestinian native is to be tossed into and rushed to his grave while we Americans remain silent.

Who among us, after all, wishes to be branded with the dreaded label of “anti-Semite”? Even when equipped with the understanding that this accusation is simply an ugly smear, few activists and thinkers are prepared to counter it very effectively, often resorting to protestations that they are not, in fact, anti-Semites. It is possible, however, to address this accusation in a way that throws the spotlight on the racist mindset of Israel’s supporters and exposes them as hopelessly self-absorbed.

The first step in this task is to understand who is hurling the accusations of anti-Semitism at pro-Palestinian activists. We are already familiar with the general picture: the accusers are well-connected players invariably ensconced in powerful political cliques, elite think tanks, right-wing publications, and other multi-million dollar institutions – in a word, the usual “allies” of victims of racism everywhere. But beyond this it would do us well to understand that the accusers are, above all else, magicians.

Any magician worth his name can imbue the ordinary with magical powers. The champion of Israel waves his wand and performs this feat on the pro-Palestinian activist from the outset. For the activist – a young student, a college professor, or any other concerned citizen – loses his humble status as a more or less ordinary person as soon as he opens his mouth in defense of the uprooted and expropriated Palestinian. He is catapulted into some kind of world-historic force, conspiring, in the words of Israel’s sycophants, to “destroy Israel”, to “viciously attack and demonize” it, and perhaps even to “wipe out the Jews.” It is not clear just how the activist is rendered into a great power capable of confronting, never mind “destroying”, a state with the world’s 4th largest military and two hundred nuclear warheads ­ paid for by the activist’s tax dollars, no less. Such a truly awesome transformation can only be explained by magic.

This trick brings us to yet another attribute of the magician: the ability to make things vanish. For just as the activist is made into an all-powerful force, the Palestinian is made to disappear. Frightening rhetoric which posits the evil activist as “out to get” Israel completely tosses aside the actually-existing reality of Israel’s ongoing campaign to exterminate Palestinians as a national and political entity. This second magical feat fulfills on the ideological level what one-time Israeli PM Golda Meir declared on the political level: “The Palestinians do not exist.”

The dual process of deception ­ (1) elevating the activist to the level of omnipotence on the one hand, and (2) denigrating the Palestinian to the level of non-existence on the other – is neither arbitrary nor accidental. Rather, it is a revealing comment on the mindset of Zionists. If we look closely, we can see that it furnishes us ample proof of the very traits they desperately try to deny: self-absorption, stemming from (1), and racism, stemming from (2).

The self-absorption aspect of the Zionist mindset appears almost axiomatic. After all, how is it possible to twist and distort attempts to defend Palestinians suffering under a brutal colonial military occupation – one that includes murder, torture, abuse, bulldozing, checkpoints, and land theft – as an “attack on Israel” or as “anti-Semitic”? According to this specious logic, attempts to defend blacks from lynching by the Ku Klux Klan amounts to “attacking whites” and is “anti-white.” Is lynching blacks made acceptable by the “whiteness” of their attackers? Would it not be equally abhorrent whether 5% of whites supported it or 95% supported it? Only people who view themselves as part of a master race believe that the morality of an action is determined by the racial makeup of the group conducting it.

Furthermore, no pro-Palestinian activist cares about Israel one way or the other in the abstract. Zionists flatter themselves in thinking otherwise. Israel only figures into the situation to the precise extent that Palestinians are being gunned down, encircled, and impoverished by Israel. It takes a truly enormous amount of self-involvement on the part of Israel’s apologists not to notice this outstanding fact.

But it is necessary to probe deeper. What is really behind this enormous amount of self-involvement? How is it possible to gloss over the massively disproportionate suffering inflicted upon the Palestinians, as Zionists do when they leap into hysterics about “anti-Semitic” activists?

At the root of such self-absorption is the dismissal of Palestinians as non-entities, a dismissal epitomized by the Zionist “magic” in which Palestinians are, as I said earlier, “denigrated to the level of non-existence.” This dismissal is itself rooted in the psychology which always accompanies and props up colonialism ­ the very same colonialism the Zionists vociferously claim they are not guilty of. For in order to systematically brutalize a people, to uproot them, steal from them, torture them, and eliminate them, it is first necessary to dehumanize them ­ to render them as non-humans as much as possible, so that one can more easily rationalize murdering and destroying them. Positing human beings as hideous beasts eases a troubled conscience.

And this is precisely what the Israelis have done. One can quote former Israeli PM Menachim Begin, who in 1982 described Palestinians as “beasts walking on two legs.” Or one can quote Ehud Barak, another former Israeli PM who in 2000 said, “The Palestinians are like crocodiles.” There is also former Chief of Staff of the IDF Rafael Eitan, who said in 1983, “We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” Or to take a more recent IDF Chief of Staff, there is Moshe Ya’alon, who described Palestinians as a “cancer” requiring either “amputation” or “chemotherapy” in 2002. And then there is also Rabbi Yaacov Peerin, who, speaking at a ceremony held in the “honor” of Baruch Goldstein, considered a hero among Israeli settlers for mowing down Muslim civilians at a mosque, said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”

Now everything else falls into place. The Israelis and their allies could not possibly fathom why any person of conscience would care about Palestinians – since they have no conscience themselves. Having adopted a vitriolic and racist attitude toward the Palestinians as a direct result of their brutalization of them, they rob themselves of the ability to think clearly. According to their poisoned thought process, who could possibly care about “two-legged beasts” or “crocodiles”? No one, obviously. Therefore, the only “real” motive left for pro-Palestinian activists must be some kind of innate hatred for Israel.

In their hysterical attempts to brand pro-Palestinians as anti-Semites, then, Zionists reveal themselves as ultra-Semites: they view themselves as racially superior to their victims, and harbor deeply racist attitudes toward them. Moreover, they claim their victims aren’t really victims at all precisely because they consider them to be wild animals (or worse) compared to themselves. And because of this moral blindness, support for their victims is automatically and instantaneously construed as an attack on them, when it is in fact only an “attack” on their racism – also known among normal people as a defense of the oppressed. This utter inability to distinguish an “attack” on Zionist racism between an attack on the ethnic group and nation Zionism claims to represent indicates just how deeply Zionists are entwined with their racism.

When confronted with the accusation of anti-Semitism, we should no longer assume a weak defensive posture or accede to this canard . Rather, we should call a spade a spade and insist on our opposition to all forms of racial supremacy, including ultra-Semitism. An ideological weapon, it is arrayed alongside the Israeli tank and bulldozer and surpasses both in its destructiveness. Our task, then, is to seriously confront it and sharply expose it for what it is: merely one more example in an endless string of examples of Zionist racism.

M. JUNAID ALAM is co-editor of the leftist youth journal Left Hook (http://www.lefthook.org), and a student at Northeastern University. He can be reached at alam@lefthook.org.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M. JUNAID ALAM, 21, Boston, co-editor of radical youth journal Left Hook (http://www.lefthook.org), feedback: alam@lefthook.org , first published in Left Hook

More articles by:

2016 Fund Drive
Smart. Fierce. Uncompromised. Support CounterPunch Now!

  • cp-store
  • donate paypal

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

Weekend Edition
September 30, 2016
Friday - Sunday
Henry Giroux
Thinking Dangerously in the Age of Normalized Ignorance
Stanley L. Cohen
Israel and Academic Freedom: a Closed Book
Paul Craig Roberts – Michael Hudson
Can Russia Learn From Brazil’s Fate? 
Andrew Levine
A Putrid Election: the Horserace as Farce
Mike Whitney
The Biggest Heist in Human History
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: the Sick Blue Line
Rob Urie
The Twilight of the Leisure Class
Vijay Prashad
In a Hall of Mirrors: Fear and Dislike at the Polls
Alexander Cockburn
The Man Who Built Clinton World
John Wight
Who Will Save Us From America?
Pepe Escobar
Afghanistan; It’s the Heroin, Stupid
W. T. Whitney
When Women’s Lives Don’t Matter
Julian Vigo
“Ooops, I Did It Again”: How the BBC Funnels Stories for Financial Gain
Howard Lisnoff
What was Missing From The Nation’s Interview with Bernie Sanders
Jeremy Brecher
Dakota Access Pipeline and the Future of American Labor
Binoy Kampmark
Pictures Left Incomplete: MH17 and the Joint Investigation Team
Andrew Kahn
Nader Gave Us Bush? Hillary Could Give Us Trump
Steve Horn
Obama Weakens Endangered Species Act
Dave Lindorff
US Propaganda Campaign to Demonize Russia in Full Gear over One-Sided Dutch/Aussie Report on Flight 17 Downing
John W. Whitehead
Uncomfortable Truths You Won’t Hear From the Presidential Candidates
Ramzy Baroud
Shimon Peres: Israel’s Nuclear Man
Brandon Jordan
The Battle for Mercosur
Murray Dobbin
A Globalization Wake-Up Call
Jesse Ventura
Corrupted Science: the DEA and Marijuana
Richard W. Behan
Installing a President by Force: Hillary Clinton and Our Moribund Democracy
Andrew Stewart
The Democratic Plot to Privatize Social Security
Daniel Borgstrom
On the Streets of Oakland, Expressing Solidarity with Charlotte
Marjorie Cohn
President Obama: ‘Patron’ of the Israeli Occupation
Norman Pollack
The “Self-Hating” Jew: A Critique
David Rosen
The Living Body & the Ecological Crisis
Joseph Natoli
Thoughtcrimes and Stupidspeak: Our Assault Against Words
Ron Jacobs
A Cycle of Death Underscored by Greed and a Lust for Power
Uri Avnery
Abu Mazen’s Balance Sheet
Kim Nicolini
Long Drive Home
Louisa Willcox
Tribes Make History with Signing of Grizzly Bear Treaty
Art Martin
The Matrix Around the Next Bend: Facebook, Augmented Reality and the Podification of the Populace
Andre Vltchek
Failures of the Western Left
Ishmael Reed
Millennialism or Extinctionism?
Frances Madeson
Why It’s Time to Create a Cabinet-Level Dept. of Native Affairs
Laura Finley
Presidential Debate Recommendations
José Negroni
Mass Firings on Broadway Lead Singers to Push Back
Leticia Cortez
Entering the Historical Dissonance Surrounding Desafinados
Robert J. Burrowes
Gandhi: ‘My Life is My Message’
Charles R. Larson
Queen Lear? Deborah Levy’s “Hot Milk”
David Yearsley
Bring on the Nibelungen: If Wagner Scored the Debates
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]