Here’s an important message to CounterPunch readers from
Here at CounterPunch we love Barbara Ehrenreich for many reasons: her courage, her intelligence and her untarnished optimism. Ehrenreich knows what’s important in life; she knows how hard most Americans have to work just to get by, and she knows what it’s going to take to forge radical change in this country. We’re proud to fight along side her in this long struggle. We hope you agree with Barbara that CounterPunch plays a unique role on the Left. Our future is in your hands. Please donate.
Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.
Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.
CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.
The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.
Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)
To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683
Thank you for your support,
Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel
CounterPunch PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558
A General as Knuckle-Dragging Buffoon
In using the description ‘knuckle-dragging buffoon’ I am of course referring directly (but far from exclusively) to the loutish Lieutenant General James Mattis, a US Marine officer who has been grossly over-promoted from latrine orderly. Recently he disgraced his country, his uniform and the Profession of Arms by boasting that he is a brutal thug. To remind you, what he said concerning his personal military ethos was : "Actually, it’s quite fun to fight them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot. It’s fun to shoot some people, I’ll be right up front with you. I like brawling . . . You go into Afghanistan, you’ve got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway, so it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them." These were his public words. They make me wonder what this man (I use the word loosely) might really think about in the depths of his diseased and malevolent mind.
Of course he has not suffered in the slightest for his glorification of killing. The official whitewash brush was wielded immediately after his announcement that he considers it a hell of a lot of fun to do the thing he thinks he is good at. Here is one example of how strongly the Bush administration feels about a general who is "right up front" about it being fun to kill people:
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, do you think the commandant of the US Marine Corps Development Command should be saying publicly that it’s fun to shoot people?
RUMSFELD: I have not read his words. I don’t know what he said precisely or the context. And I understand that General Pace has, and he’s responded.
When Rumsfeld is faced with a difficult question he either avoids it, tells a downright lie, or excuses himself from answering by claiming he has not read anything about it. In this instance he said he did not know what was said by a three star general who had just provoked derision and disgust throughout the world. Both should be sacked. But neither will go, because the Bush administration has lost touch with truth, decency and honor.
It was this same Mattis who dismissed photographic evidence of the slaughter of dozens of people by US forces at an Iraqi wedding party last year. (See Counterpunch, October 26, 2004.) The wedding took place in western Iraq, and Mattis denied there had been an atrocity. He said he could not understand how a wedding could take place in the desert, so he blitzed the gathering. He did not know that the desert is home to thousands of families, settled and nomadic, who have relatives and friends in villages, towns and cities, and that these people come to visit on occasions of celebration or grief. The man betrayed his appalling ignorance of the culture and customs of the country by exclaiming "Ten miles from the Syrian border and 80 miles from the nearest city and a wedding party? Don’t be naïve. Plus they had 30 males of military age with them. How many people go to the middle of the desert to have a wedding party?".
Thousands of them throughout the year, you poor dumb cluck.
And here, from a first-hand witness, recorded by reporter Rory McCarthy, is what Mattis achieved at that wedding party:
" ‘The bombing started at 3 a.m.,’ she said yesterday from her bed in the emergency ward at Ramadi general hospital, 60 miles west of Baghdad. ‘We went out of the house and the American soldiers started to shoot us. They were shooting low on the ground and targeting us one by one.’ She ran with her youngest child in her arms and her two young boys, Ali and Hamza, close behind. As she crossed the fields a shell exploded close to her, fracturing her legs and knocking her to the ground. She lay there and a second round hit her on the right arm. By then her two boys lay dead. ‘I left them because they were dead,’ she said. One, she saw, had been decapitated by a shell. ‘I fell into the mud and an American soldier came and kicked me. I pretended to be dead so he wouldn’t kill me. My youngest child was alive next to me’." (According to the US military, all this is Zarqawi propaganda.)
McCarthy continued : "Among the dead were 27 members of the extended Rakat family, their wedding guests and even the band of musicians hired to play at the ceremony, among them Hussein al-Ali from Ramadi, one of the most popular singers in western Iraq. Dr Alusi said 11 of the dead were women and 14 were children. ‘I want to know why the Americans targeted this small village,’ he said by telephone. ‘These people are my patients. I know each one of them. What has caused this disaster?’"
It was General Mattis who caused the disaster, the slaughter, which he considered to be of no importance. But then we have to remember that he thinks that "It’s a helluva lot of fun to shoot" people.
One survivor said ‘I saw something that nobody ever saw in this world . . . There were children’s bodies cut into pieces, women cut into pieces, men cut into pieces.’ His daughter, aged 25, was killed, along with her two boys, Raad, four, and Raed, six. ‘I found Raad dead in her arms. The other boy was lying beside her . . .’ His sister and her two daughters were also killed . ‘The Americans call these people foreign fighters. It is a lie. I just want one piece of evidence of what they are saying.’
The civilized world would like to have evidence about the atrocity , but not, of course, the barbaric weirdoes who agree with Mattis that "It’s fun to shoot some people". The sickening thing is that when he said this, during a presentation to the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association, he "evoked laughter and applause" in the audience, so obviously there are many more demented buffoons out there.
Can you imagine it? — "It’s fun to shoot some people" giggles an American general, and there is "laughter and applause" from his audience. Are these real people? It is difficult in this supposedly civilized era to believe that two hundred citizens of an advanced western country would laugh and clap their hands when a general declares he thinks it fun to shoot people. It happened in Nazi Germany when fascist functionaries described what they had done or would do to Jews. Now it happens in America when a government functionary describes what he has done to Afghans. None of the audience spoke out later, apart from retired Vice Admiral Edward H Martin who said "I don’t think any of us who have ever fought in wars liked to kill anybody". He appears to have been the only human being in the whole gathering. What on earth has America come to?
Mattis, unlike the honorable Admiral Martin, relishes killing people and is apparently well-known for his activities. No doubt this is why he has been promoted well beyond his ability. We had a saying in Vietnam – "Stuff up and Move up". (This is a family journal, so I use the word ‘stuff’.) What it meant was this : the war in Vietnam was a disaster, but McNamara, and all ‘The Best and the Brightest’ in Washington could not afford to reveal themselves as the incompetent boobies they were. They lost touch with reality and rewarded with promotion those who went along with their dismal self-deception that Vietnam was a winnable war.
Senior officers who were hopelessly incompetent in Vietnam were not sacked. The administration could not possibly do that, because it would be an admission of failure – not of the officer concerned (although that might be considered a fairly important factor), but of those involved in the system as a whole. The pattern is being repeated.
The Los Angeles Times recorded that "On April 4 , Maj. Gen. James N. Mattis, commander of the 1st Marine Division, whose units would carry the battle [in Falluja], summoned his commanders to a final briefing. The general, known as ‘Mad Dog Mattis’ to his men, made it clear that the Marines were now in warrior mode. ‘You know my rules for a gunfight?’ he asked a reporter outside the meeting. ‘Bring a gun, bring two guns, bring all your friends with guns’."
After a period of chaos, Mattis began to negotiate with some Iraqis in Falluja. According to the LA Times’ report (and other sources) "He struck a deal to allow them to raise a force of local men, the Falluja Brigade, to take control of the city."
Alissa Rubin and Doyle McManus, who produced this detailed and well-researched piece, recounted that "The deal [by Mattis] took other US officials by surprise – Bremer and Sanchez in Baghdad, and Rumsfeld and Bush in Washington. A US official in Baghdad said Abizaid telephoned Bremer and asked, ‘What’s going on down there?’ ‘I have no idea,’ Bremer replied. ‘It was a complete surprise to us,’ the official said. ‘Both Bremer and Abizaid were shocked. Bremer was furious . . . Bremer learned about it from the press. The Marines sort of said, ‘Presto, here it is’.’ In Washington, once it was clear that a deal had been struck, Rumsfeld announced a fait accompli. ‘The Marines on the ground are the ones that are making those judgments’."
But then on September 24, 2004 Rumsfeld told reporters "The Fallujah brigade didn’t work; and they tried, and they’re sorry. And they’re not going to let it sit there, they’re going to do something else about it. And life will go on." In other words, Major General Mattis stuffed up.
Then, naturally, he moved up. And he has stuffed up again.
But on February 7 Rumsfeld said that "the matter is closed" concerning his paranoic general. The Commandant of the Marine Corps, General Hagee, issued a statement saying "Lt. Gen. Mattis often speaks with a great deal of candor. I have counseled him concerning his remarks and he agrees he should have chosen his words more carefully." More carefully? How can you be ‘more careful’ about saying you get a kick out of killing people? Maybe : "I like shooting people, but only gently"? Or how about : "It’s fun to kill people, providing they enjoy it"?
It is the attitude of Mattis and his breed – and there are lots like him, think of the deranged General Boykin, for example – that has drawn US forces into the disaster that Iraq has become. Their swaggering, triumphal, smack-’em-in-the-mouth approach has caused millions of Iraqis to hate American troops because from day one the Mattis-type people acted as if every Iraqi was an enemy. They weren’t then, but most of them are, now, thanks to those in the military who followed the example of the all-American Marine who just loves killing people. He is a knuckle dragging buffoon, but the dangerous thing for the world is that he is a hero to millions.
Brian Cloughley writes on military and political affairs. He can be reached through his website www.briancloughley.com