Matching Grant Challenge
alexPureWhen I met Alexander Cockburn, one of his first questions to me was: “Is your hate pure?” It was the question he asked most of the young writers he mentored. These were Cockburn’s rules for how to write political polemics: write about what you care about, write with passion, go for the throat of your enemies and never back down. His admonitions remain the guiding stylesheet for our writers at CounterPunch. Please help keep the spirit of this kind of fierce journalism alive by taking advantage of  our matching grant challenge which will DOUBLE every donation of $100 or more. Any of you out there thinking of donating $50 should know that if you donate a further $50, CounterPunch will receive an additional $100. And if you plan to send us $200 or $500 or more, CounterPunch will get a matching $200 or $500 or more. Don’t miss the chance. Double your clout right now. Please donate. –JSC (This photo of Alexander Cockburn and Jasper, on the couch that launched 1000 columns, was taken in Petrolia by Tao Ruspoli)
 Day 19

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

pp1

or
cp-store

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

A Kill-Happy Government

Connecticut Chooses Death

by STANLEY HELLER

In a few days Connecticut prison officials will take a prisoner out of his cell and inject poison into his veins. He’s been held harmless for 20 years in prisons, but now he’s going to be killed. It will be the first execution in New England in 45 years. One New England state hasn’t had an execution since the 1800’s.

Another Connecticut official will soon be going to a prison, but for a different purpose. Governor John Rowland plea bargained to multiple corruption charges and he’s expected to get at least a year in prison.

The current governor, Jodi Rell, was Rowland’s lieutenant governor. As accusations piled up about Rowland’s cronies and the governor himself Rell said not a word. Once he resigned she said she was shocked, shocked, shocked at his conduct and was determined to bring ethical standards back to government.

Her first ethical choice was to decide to let Michael Ross die. Our constitution doesn’t allow her to turn his death sentence into a life term, but she could delay the execution. She won’t. Furthermore, she announced that if the legislature voted to abolish the death penalty she would veto the bill.

Now Michael Ross is not a guy to get a lot of sympathy. He killed eight women and girls, raping most of them. He’s not poor or a minority. He’s not a drooling idiot. You can read some of his letters on line. There’s zero doubt of his innocence. He confessed to the killings. He says that he suffered from a mental condition of "sexual sadism" and that in recent years medicines have cured him. Maybe so, but it has occurred to people that a serial murderer might also be a liar.

Still, it’s a disgrace to open the gates to executions in the "enlightened" Northeast when life without release is right on the books as an alternative. We’ll be ushering in all the abuses that are occurring in other states: executing killers too poor to get a decent lawyer, or those slated for death by racial profiling, wretches enslaved by mental compulsions or those convicted on the testimony of a convict or accomplice bargaining for a lower sentence. Of course, some who get the death sentence will be completely innocent. Read ex-prosecutor and famous novelist Scott Turow’s brilliant non-fiction book, "Ultimate Punishment: a Lawyer’s Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty" about his first hand experience with prosecutors run amok.

Even if the death sentence was given out without bias and without error how do you justify holding down a shackled human being and ripping the life out of him?

Sister Helen Prejean, who wrote "Dead Man Walking" spoke in New Haven some ten years ago and she impressed me tremendously. She ministers to murderers on death row and to the families of their victims. She has witnessed executions herself and she’s talked with family members who’ve gladly observed the death of killers. Prejean has been in the trenches and she’s 100% against the death penalty.

Governor Rell is laying down the gauntlet in typical George Bush fashion, "You’ve got a problem, kill it." So what are the state Democrats doing. Absolutely nothing. If there’s an anti-death penalty bill in the hopper no one is trying to do anything to bring it to a vote this week. The Dems didn’t even make an issue of the governor’s threatened veto.

The next gubernatorial election is next year and the candidates are off and running. The front runner, New Haven Mayor John DeStefano has a website that makes no mention at all of the death penalty. The site’s lead article is about all the money his campaign has collected. In 2005 the Republicans should be reeling, but it’s the Democrats who are laying low.

Aside from anti-death penalty activists the only group working to stop the execution is the Catholic Church. They actually brought it up all over the state at last Sunday’s mass. Bully for them.

The conventional wisdom is that Ross is so despicable that any death penalty fight now will backfire and make it harder to win in the future. Listen, the ones who get the death penalty have all been convicted of multiple or gruesome murders. If we have to wait to fight on behalf of a blind, retarded, black librarian convicted on the testimony of a jailhouse snitch, we,re going to have to wait till Hell has an ice storm. Hiding our heads in the sand now will only give the entire field to the Bush’s and Rell’s of this world.

Now the death penalty is not my big political issue. My main political work is on Palestine, Israel, and Iraq, but I do think there is a connection. Our government is kill happy. Our savage foreign policy kills hundreds of thousands of innocents for "FREEDOM", "DEMOCRACY", "SECURITY", whatever. Of all governments, the US government has to get out of the killing business at every level.

This week on my TV program I interviewed Antoinette Bosco. Ten years ago her son and daughter in law were blown away in Montana by a teenager for no apparent reason. She and her family decided that they would oppose the death penalty. She’s adamant that the death sentence for her son’s killer could not bring her "closure". Nothing would ever heal the wound.

Bosco thought three things would help her, first insuring that the killer could never kill again, second making it much harder for kids to get guns and third the granting of mercy. She quotes Shakespeare, "The quality of mercy is not strained. It drops as the gentle rain from heaven". She wrote a book called, "Choosing Mercy". Bosco insists that it blesses the one who gives it as well as the one who receives. Revenge may be a natural desire when one is injured, but it’s a quick fix. In the long run she says it’s the granting of mercy that best soothes the pain.

STANLEY HELLER writes on politics on his website StanOnPolitics.8k.com. He produces a TV show that can be seen at www.TheStruggle.org He can be reached at hastyent67@hotmail.com