Annual Fundraising Appeal

Here’s an important message to CounterPunch readers from Chris Hedges….

Hedges2

Chris Hedges calls CounterPunch “the most fearless, intellectually rigorous and important publication in the United States.” Who are we to argue? But the only way we can continue to “dissect the evils of empire” and the “psychosis of permanent war” is with your financial support. Please donate.

Day5

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

paypal-donate-21

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Why Are They Still Holding "Mrs. Anthrax?"

Iraqi Scientists Detained Despite Lack of WMDs

by PATRICK COCKBURN

Baghdad.

The US has detained for far too long Iraqi scientists arrested last year in the belief that they would provide information about Saddam Hussein’s WMD, according to an Iraqi government source.

Even when US investigators concluded that no such weapons existed the scientists were not freed because the Americans feared their release would be seen as a tacit admission that Iraq had no WMD. This may explain why the US embassy in Iraq is determined to detain Dr Rihab Taha, who once worked on biological weapons, while the Iraqi justice ministry says it sees no good reason for her continued detention.

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whose Tawhid and Jihad group is threatening to behead the British contractor Kenneth Bigley, probably had no idea that his demand would focus attention on the detention of two female Iraqi scientists. It is more likely that Zarqawi was trying to make propaganda points since it is widely rumoured among Iraqis that the US and Britain hold many female Iraqi prisoners.

When Dr Taha, a microbiologist with a doctorate from the University of East Anglia, surrendered to US forces in Baghdad on 12 May last year, US officials hoped she would lead them to biological weapons.

In the approach to the war, one of the key demands of the US and Britain was that Saddam Hussein allowed free access to scientists whom the UN inspectors wanted to interview about WMD. After the war, American inspectors, first under David Kay and from January under Charles Duelfer, were able to order the detention of these scientists.

But the 1,500-page study by the US government’s Iraq Survey Group now concludes that Iraq had no large-scale programmes to build such weapons.

The Iraqi Ministry of Science and Technology has unsuccessfully sought the freedom of some detained scientists on the grounds that their expertise is needed to rebuild Iraq’s scientific potential. Dr Taha headed a research team to develop biological weapons from 1985 to 1995 and it is possible that she and Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash, the biotech researcher nicknamed "Mrs Anthrax", were able to provide information about WMD developed during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, but much of this would already have been known in the US and UK.