FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

God and the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party

by LENNI BRENNER

All right, Godless CounterPunchers, we know that you are snickering about Alabama’s Chief Justice Roy Moore’s 10 Commandments rock. Now his eight associate judges have repudiated “Roy’s Rock,” and the state’s Attorney General removed it. So all is well. Or is it?

On July 22, the House voted 307 to 119 for an amendment to an appropriations bill. It prohibits the use of federal money to enforce the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals previous ruling that “under God” has no business in the Pledge of Allegiance. The next day it voted 260 to 161 to prohibit funding of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision demanding the removal of Moore’s monument.

Ninety-one of 199 Democrats voted to prohibit funding the “under God” decision, 50 out of 197 voted to ban US money for enforcement of the order against Moore. Cynics felt that this was just populist demagoguery, that they knew that the bill wouldn’t get past the Senate. Except that the Senate had previously voted, 99 to 0 and 94 to 0, to denounce the 9th’s ruling in nonbinding statements.

With Alabama’s court and AG promising to get rid of the 10 Commandments stone, the Senate won’t have to vote on that, but “under God” is still before the courts. As of now, no one has introduced the 11th Circuit Court amendment into the Senate, and it is possible that our Senators will cook up a parliamentary maneuver to evade binding a vote on the House’s handiwork. But if they do, that only postpones the political day of reckoning for our secular liberals until the 2004 elections.

Columnists in the New York Times, the Nation and other liberal journals now agonize over whether they are for Howard Dean or Dennis Kucinich. None of their ruminations mean a thing. Everyone familiar with those publications’ previous endorsements knows that they will tell us to vote for anyone the Democrats nominate, even if they dig up Attila and run him as a peace candidate. But for the Hun’s presidency to mean much, domestically, he’s got to have a Democratic Congress to back him up. Which means that our secular Democrats will be on their knees the night before the election, alongside Moore, praying that all the House Democrats who voted for him, and all the Senators who stood up for “God” against you heathens, get reelected.

Win or lose, liberalism faces its terminal crisis. Secularist organizations are deeply troubled. Secularism was invented by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Democratic Party’s founders. Library shelves sag under the weight of their warnings about mixing religion and politics. But every hypocritical Democrat’s vote on behalf of Moore or “under God” was a weapon of mass deception aimed at Jefferson’s great “wall of separation between Church and State.”

God and the 10 Commandments may be what Judaism is all about, but even the American Jewish Congress, which wants continued support of both parties for Israel, called the House votes “assaults on the rule of law.” Mock pious politicians may be ‘good for Israel,’ but their members live here and they fear that politically ‘shrewd’ pandering to the Christian right today can end us up with a Christian government on some tomorrow.

Secularist Democrats have fallen into a pit of their own digging. Ninety-eight, maybe 99 out of 100, share the cynicism of their party on other issues. For example, many secularists are privately for legalizing recreational pot. Yet they have no problem with Dean and Kucinich running like thieves from the issue, which isn’t central to the secular world view. But they know that any Presidential candidate of “the democratic wing of the Democratic Party,” will never denounce the congressional Democratic Jesus freaks and panderers to the freaks, and that the reason for their silence is exactly the same depraved vote counting reason they are quieter than Jerusalem Slim’s empty tomb re marijuana.

For all their populist rhetoric, ‘democratic wing’ politicians operate on the basis of a great unspoken truth: Poor people got poor ways. Foolish voters outnumber the wise, not just in Alabama, but in every state in the union. Their strategy is to pander to those fools, black, white and otherwise, by commission or omission, by lying to them, or keeping quite when their party colleagues do, all in the fools’ interests, you understand.

Wannabe leftist candidates also must face that sobering reality. Pander or educate. But if you pander, you never convert anyone into a thinking political being.

Democrats are “crackpot realists.” They know that 47% of Americans, 57% of Blacks, believe that God created the world about 10,000 years ago. They court that religious Black vote and desperately pander to white Protestant born-agains, pro-Zionist Orthodox Jewish believers in the Great Ham-hater in the sky, and similar powerful minds. They hem and they haw about gay marriage. But, in the ‘real world’ which they babble about without really examining, one in seven Americans now reject all religions, millions of sincere believers also believe in keeping religion out of politics, there are now over 19 million potheads, and tens of millions of straights accept gay marriage.

To be sure, as of now, no for-keeps revolutionary can get elected President. But a serious radical candidate in 2004 most assuredly can recruit a massive movement out of those already gigantic minorities. And always remember that the Democrats lost to Nixon in 1968 and 1972, yet Nixon lost the Vietnam war. That’s because it wasn’t Democrats Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern who organized hundreds of thousands into the antiwar movement. It was a few thousand Trotskyists and Stalinists who called the demonstrations.

And today no sane person expects Dean or Kucinich to call for an anti-war movement. Not here, and certainly not within the military in Afghanistan and Iraq and Saudi Arabia. That plain and simple truth automatically disqualifies them as genuine ‘peace candidates’.

James Madison to Edward Livingston

July 10, 1822

Notwithstanding the general progress made within the two last centuries in favour of this branch of liberty, & the full establishment of it, in some parts of our Country, there remains in others a strong bias towards the old error, that without some sort of alliance or coalition between Govt. & Religion neither can be duly supported. Such indeed is the tendency to such a coalition, and such its corrupting influence on both the parties, that the danger cannot be too carefully guarded agst. And in a Govt. of opinion, like ours, the only effectual guard must be found in the soundness and stability of the general opinion on the subject. Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance. And I have no doubt that every new example, will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt. will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together. It was the belief of all sects at one time that the establishment of Religion by law, was right & necessary; that the true religion ought to be established in exclusion of every other; And that the only question to be decided was which was the true religion. The example of Holland proved that a toleration of sects, dissenting from the established sect, was safe & even useful. The example of the Colonies, now States, which rejected religious establishments altogether, proved that all Sects might be safely & advantageously put on a footing of equal & entire freedom; and a continuance of their example since the declaration of Independence, has shewn that its success in Colonies was not to be ascribed to their connection with the parent Country. If a further confirmation of the truth could be wanted, it is to be found in the examples furnished by the States, which have abolished their religious establishments. I cannot speak particularly of any of the cases excepting that of Virga. where it is impossible to deny that Religion prevails with more zeal, and a more exemplary priesthood than it ever did when established and patronised by Public authority. We are teaching the world the great truth that Govts. do better without Kings & Nobles than with them. The merit will be doubled by the other lesson that Religion flourishes in greater purity, without than with the aid of Govt.

LENNI BRENNER is the editor of 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis and a contributor to The Politics of Anti-Semitism. He can be reached at BrennerL21@aol.com

 

Lenni Brenner is the author of Zionism In The Age Of The Dictators. He can be contacted at BrennerL21@aol.com.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

August 31, 2016
NEVE GORDON - NICOLA PERUGINI
Human Shields as Preemptive Legal Defense for Killing Civilians
Jim Kavanagh
Turkey Invades Syria, America Spins The Bottle
Dave Lindorff
Ukraine and the Dumbed-Down New York Times Columnist
Pepe Escobar
Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, a Woman of Honor, Confronts Senate of Scoundrels
Jeff Mackler
Playing the Lesser Evil Game to the Hilt
Steve Horn
Dakota Access Pipeline Tribal Liaison Formerly Worked For Agency Issuing Permit
Patrick Cockburn
Has Turkey Overplayed Its Hand in Syria?
John Chuckman
Why Hillary is the Perfect Person to Secure Obama’s Legacy
Manuel E. Yepe
The New Cold War Between the US and China
Stephen Cooper
Ending California’s Machinery of Death
Stacy Keltner - Ashley McFarland
Women, Party Politics, and the Power of the Naked Body
Hiroyuki Hamada - Ikuko Isa
A Letter from Takae, Okinawa
Aidan O'Brien
How Did Syria and the Rest Do in the Olympics?
David Swanson
Arms Dealing Is Subject of Hollywood Comedy
Jesse Jackson
The Politics of Bigotry: Trump and the Black Voter
August 30, 2016
Russell Mokhiber
Matt Funiciello and the Giant Sucking Sound Coming Off Lake Champlain
Mike Whitney
Three Cheers for Kaepernick: Is Sitting During the National Anthem an Acceptable Form of Protest?
Alice Bach
Sorrow and Grace in Palestine
Sam Husseini
Why We Should All Remain Seated: the Anti-Muslim Origins of “The Star-Spangled Banner”
Richard Moser
Transformative Movement Culture and the Inside/Outside Strategy: Do We Want to Win the Argument or Build the Movement?
Nozomi Hayase
Pathology, Incorporated: the Facade of American Democracy
David Swanson
Fredric Jameson’s War Machine
Jan Oberg
How Did the West Survive a Much Stronger Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact?
Linda Gunter
The Racism of the Nagasaki and Hiroshima Bombings
Dmitry Kovalevich
In Ukraine: Independence From the People
Omar Kassem
Turkey Breaks Out in Jarablus as Fear and Loathing Grip Europe
George Wuerthner
A Birthday Gift to the National Parks: the Maine Woods National Monument
Logan Glitterbomb
Indigenous Property Rights and the Dakota Access Pipeline
National Lawyers Guild
Solidarity with Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against Dakota Access Pipeline
Paul Messersmith-Glavin
100 in Anarchist Years
August 29, 2016
Eric Draitser
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation: Exemplars of America’s Political Rot
Patrick Timmons
Dildos on Campus, Gun in the Library: the New York Times and the Texas Gun War
Jack Rasmus
Bernie Sanders ‘OR’ Revolution: a Statement or a Question?
Richard Moser
Strategic Choreography and Inside/Outside Organizers
Nigel Clarke
President Obama’s “Now Watch This Drive” Moment
Robert Fisk
Iraq’s Willing Executioners
Wahid Azal
The Banality of Evil and the Ivory Tower Masterminds of the 1953 Coup d’Etat in Iran
Farzana Versey
Romancing the Activist
Frances Madeson
Meet the Geronimos: Apache Leader’s Descendants Talk About Living With the Legacy
Nauman Sadiq
The War on Terror and the Carter Doctrine
Lawrence Wittner
Does the Democratic Party Have a Progressive Platform–and Does It Matter?
Marjorie Cohn
Death to the Death Penalty in California
Winslow Myers
Asking the Right Questions
Rivera Sun
The Sane Candidate: Which Representatives Will End the Endless Wars?
Linn Washington Jr.
Philadelphia District Attorney Hammered for Hypocrisy
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail