FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Does It Matter That the Bush Administration Lied?

by TOM STEPHENS

“I don’t believe anyone that I know in the administration ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons.”

– Donald Rumsfeld, May 14, 2003

“We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.”

– Dick Cheney, March 16, 2003

“Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.”

– Dick Cheney, August 26, 2002

“Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.”

— George W. Bush, September 12, 2002

“For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction [as the justification for invading Iraq] because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.”

– Paul Wolfowitz, May 28, 2003

 

It’s crystal clear now that the US government lied about its “intelligence” information regarding Saddam’s mythical, useless and totally unused WMD. Nothing. Nichts. Nada. How do you say “nothing” in French? From the above quotes, it appears that Rumsfeld is still lying. (What do you expect?) Wolfowitz of Arabia is a little more frank now that the damage is done. Bush is busy raising money and strutting his tax cut and military man stuff for now. He’ll start making big speeches about it again, come September 2004 and the election campaign. Does it really matter that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq?

On the one hand, you might think that a national issue as important as the reason for war would require official honesty, and that lying about it would be the kind of high crime identified as grounds for impeachment in the US Constitution. So based on those considerations you’d think it should matter that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

On the other hand, the ratings of the embedded and censored TV “coverage” of the war (“promotion” is more like it–the crucial means by which the lies were believed when it counted) were pretty good. The US casualties are still fairly low compared to past world & imperial wars. Bechtel and Halliburton, Raytheon and Lockheed are happy. Worldcom isn’t exactly happy with its $500 million fine for its $150 billion accounting fraud, but its new government contract to repair Iraq’s wireless network, and its $300 million tax rebate will all help it get thru. Reality TV helps the American People get thru America’s ugly economic reality–rapidly rising unemployment, institutionalized racism, stagnant wages, massive inequality, bloated corporate welfare disguised as “free trade,” bankrupt state and local governments, a monstrous health care crisis and a virtual civil war over public education and the separation of church and state. The American Empire reigns supreme for now thru unrivaled military power. And under Bush & Cheney might makes right. The Democratic Party is completely useless. The American People are primarily consumers, and ads lie to consumers all the time. The American People are only incidentally citizens, so based on the basic facts of daily reality and politics–“the art of the possible” – in the 21st century, maybe it doesn’t matter much that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

But the basic reality of the Big Lie here is the “twoness” of the war. It’s supposedly a war against terrorism. But that’s really secondary. It’s even incidental to the real war when push comes to shove (as it increasingly does in America’s ugly economic reality today). The real war is the one against workers. This real war is on the verge of utterly destroying or at least severely damaging all of the following things: American Democracy, the Rule of Law, as well as multinational global governance under evolving principles of customarily accepted international law; minimum socioeconomic welfare and wage structures; civilian control over the US military; many of the American People’s most fundamental constitutional liberties; the ability of the American People to participate fairly and meaningfully in corporate-dominated elections; the separation of powers–both government and corporate – upon which all legitimate US governing authority is theoretically based; the rights of workers to bargain collectively; the national treasury; the civil rights revolution of the 20th century; and the planet’s resources, climate and natural environment. All in significant part because the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

The suffering of the victims of US Empire is (or should be) the real issue. The collateral damage in Afghanistan and Iraq, the millions of prisoners of the vast American white supremacist prison-industrial gulag, the millions of children born into “a world that’s been raped and defiled,” where everybody knows that “Governments lie.” The working families cheated out of the American Dream by warmed-over Reaganomics and chickenhawk neoconservative fanatics. Given the enormous human and historical stakes, producing immense cynicism, perhaps People of conscience should be much more concerned with minimizing the widespread human suffering than about how the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

Leading Peace Movement spokespersons will point out that the massive suffering is caused in large part by the Big Lie. This is indisputably true. And it is also true–and great reason for hope–that in time the passive consent of many People may eventually be withheld if they come to understand how and why the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

But the potential to expose and use the Bush administration’s boldfaced lies to slow and eventually stop their deadly crimes is much more important than the fact of the lies themselves. What seems to be indisputably important in theory to history, morality, society and culture may matter much less in terms of practical reality. If the masses of People focus most of their energies for the vast majority of their time on private, family, and leisure time consumer activities; if politics is an alienating and sick joke; if the fundamental(ist) driving force of contemporary history is a spiritual crisis & crusade of Judeo-Christian Coalition “rapture,” in mutually reinforcing reaction to violent Islamic fundamentalism; if it’s totally obvious to those paying any reasonable amount of attention that the US government’s “war on terrorism” is really about economic, energy and environmental resources, US corporate/military power projection and control over those resources; if the Bush administration can get away with exploiting the pain and horror of the September 11 attacks this blatantly and shamefully, then maybe on any really existing levels of human and historical significance, it just doesn’t matter that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq.

As a consumer, an imperial subject, a worker governed by laws of the market, and a passive object of history, it doesn’t matter. Or it shouldn’t, by the disgustingly cramped criteria applicable to such degraded human states. As a citizen, a parent, a human being, and an active moral agent choosing my life’s essential meaning and content, it certainly does matter a whole lot. Whether or not it matters that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq depends on me. And us. We the People.

The current form of government – the Bush administration corporate fascist model–has become destructive of Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness, the ends for which Governments are instituted among Women and Men. Therefore it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it. The fact that the US Government lied about its reasons for going to war in Iraq may well provide a basis for indictments, impeachment, even political revolution. But that fact matters much less than the fact that the American People now face a choice. A choice about who we are, how we will get thru the consequences of this Big Lie, and why we do what we do to shape, define, create, and rationalize the world we will leave for our children. A choice between war and justice, shame and responsibility, freedom and the power of money. A choice between a culture of life and one of death. Their lies ultimately matter much less than our will and our ability to make the right choices.

Wolfowitz’s creepy phrase “bureaucratic reasons” evokes the infamous Wahnsee Conference, when top Nazi officials attended a high level meeting in a big old house in Berlin, facilitated by Himmler’s deputy SS man Reinhard Heydrich, to plan the administrative nuts and bolts of the “Final Solution.”

TOM STEPHENS is a lawyer in Detroit, Michigan. He can be reached at lebensbaum4@earthlink.

 

Tom Stephens is a coordinator of the communications working group of Detroiters Resisting Emergency Management (D-REM).  Their web site is at: http://d-rem.org

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
January 20, 2017
Friday - Sunday
Paul Street
Divide and Rule: Class, Hate, and the 2016 Election
Andrew Levine
When Was America Great?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: This Ain’t a Dream No More, It’s the Real Thing
Yoav Litvin
Making Israel Greater Again: Justice for Palestinians in the Age of Trump
Linda Pentz Gunter
Nuclear Fiddling While the Planet Burns
Ruth Fowler
Standing With Standing Rock: Of Pipelines and Protests
David Green
Why Trump Won: the 50 Percenters Have Spoken
Dave Lindorff
Imagining a Sanders Presidency Beginning on Jan. 20
Pete Dolack
Eight People Own as Much as Half the World
Roger Harris
Too Many People in the World: Names Named
Steve Horn
Under Tillerson, Exxon Maintained Ties with Saudi Arabia, Despite Dismal Human Rights Record
John Berger
The Nature of Mass Demonstrations
Stephen Zielinski
It’s the End of the World as We Know It
David Swanson
Six Things We Should Do Better As Everything Gets Worse
Alci Rengifo
Trump Rex: Ancient Rome’s Shadow Over the Oval Office
Brian Cloughley
What Money Can Buy: the Quiet British-Israeli Scandal
Mel Gurtov
Donald Trump’s Lies And Team Trump’s Headaches
Kent Paterson
Mexico’s Great Winter of Discontent
Norman Solomon
Trump, the Democrats and the Logan Act
David Macaray
Attention, Feminists
Yves Engler
Demanding More From Our Media
James A Haught
Religious Madness in Ulster
Dean Baker
The Economics of the Affordable Care Act
Patrick Bond
Tripping Up Trumpism Through Global Boycott Divestment Sanctions
Robert Fisk
How a Trump Presidency Could Have Been Avoided
Robert Fantina
Trump: What Changes and What Remains the Same
David Rosen
Globalization vs. Empire: Can Trump Contain the Growing Split?
Elliot Sperber
Dystopia
Dan Bacher
New CA Carbon Trading Legislation Answers Big Oil’s Call to Continue Business As Usual
Wayne Clark
A Reset Button for Political America
Chris Welzenbach
“The Death Ship:” An Allegory for Today’s World
Uri Avnery
Being There
Peter Lee
The Deep State and the Sex Tape: Martin Luther King, J. Edgar Hoover, and Thurgood Marshall
Patrick Hiller
Guns Against Grizzlies at Schools or Peace Education as Resistance?
Randy Shields
The Devil’s Real Estate Dictionary
Ron Jacobs
Singing the Body Electric Across Time
Ann Garrison
Fifty-five Years After Lumumba’s Assassination, Congolese See No Relief
Christopher Brauchli
Swing Low Alabama
Dr. Juan Gómez-Quiñones
La Realidad: the Realities of Anti-Mexicanism
Jon Hochschartner
The Five Least Animal-Friendly Senate Democrats
Pauline Murphy
Fighting Fascism: the Irish at the Battle of Cordoba
Susan Block
#GoBonobos in 2017: Happy Year of the Cock!
Louis Proyect
Is Our Future That of “Sense8” or “Mr. Robot”?
Charles R. Larson
Review: Robert Coover’s “Huck out West”
David Yearsley
Manchester-by-the-Sea and the Present Catastrophe
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail