FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Secular Crusades

by ANTHONY GANCARSKI

“To tell people the truth is not hatred.” — Jimmy Swaggart, 11/15/2002

You won’t have Ronald Springel to kick around anymore, apparently. Spokane’s SPOKESMAN-REVIEW, in its 11/15 edition, followed up its marginally researched “Militia Pamphlets Spur Review” with a piece entitled “Militia Defends Leaflet Distribution.” This writer hopes that his “Defending MOM”, which appeared Wednesday on the Counterpunch website, wasn’t the sole catalyst for his local paper allowing Militia of Montana head John Trochmann the luxury of speaking on behalf of his beleaguered organization, via quotes from a letter Trochmann sent to Spokane County Commissioners in his defense.

SPOKESMAN-REVIEW readers who might have expected a screed that was “anti-everything”, to borrow a Springel-ism, were likely disappointed by the quotes on offer. Trochmann claimed in the missive that his Militia’s “Taking Aim” newsletter addresses “atrocities committed by Israel against the Palestinians”, “UN edicts and how far Israel is violating them and how Israel has bought off much of the US Congress”, and Israeli “genocide on a massive scale via the use of our military equipment and supplies.” The SPOKESMAN-REVIEW leaves it to the imagination exactly why Springel (or staff writer Bill Morlin) confused a rational argument against the US propping up Israel with anti-Semitism.

And you would expect the Spokane daily paper to leave that to the imagination. To analyze Springel’s knee-jerk reaction to being handed objectionable reading material would force that paper to analyze how mainstream US media forces the thinnest line of consent imaginable in a culture that produced Lenny Bruce, John Coltrane, and William Faulkner. The Springel line is the same old garbage given to us by soulless bastards who wrap themselves in banners of religion or government and advocate massacres on behalf of their sold-out creeds. It is impossible to reflect on the biographies of Arik and BiBi and think positive things about Judaism; at times it almost seems as if that image is projected intentionally. Billions around the world have their opinions of Jewish people daily shaped by horrific images; tanks spraying fire at children, or “settlers” gunning down Palestinians picking olives with the sanction of the Sharon government.

Of course, it’s not just the Israeli government that has a keen interest in having one part of society hold another at gunpoint. Consider the “Our Lady of Peace” Act [S. 2826], introduced in the US Senate on July 30th by a “bipartisan coalition. . . Including Senators Charles Schumer and Larry Craig”. Supported by the NRA, notably, this legislation provides three-quarters of a billion dollars over three years to states seeking to “improve database records of those not qualified to purchase guns,” to quote a letter from the office of Senator Maria Cantwell [D-WA].

Tyranny so often creeps in on cats’ paws, and this bill is a prime example thereof. Cantwell asserts that it is “appropriate to limit the ability of individuals who have been through a process that has judged them a potential danger to purchase guns.” Friendly fascism; 23 words, give or take, and not one truly active verb. Acceptable Democrats like Cantwell mask the true meaning of these initiatives with passive voice, as if intending to suggest that they believe people exist to serve the government and should actually be thankful for their impending opportunities to grovel at the boots of National Guard members rifling their cars at checkpoints throughout the nation.

But back to “Our Lady of Peace”. Our Lady of Peace affords states the opportunity to “compile lists of people judged to be ‘mentally defective’,” as Phil Jordan of the Washington Protection & Advocacy System put it in a recent email. As the recently murdered military wives in Fort Bragg might assert, there is a fine line between exhibiting mental defectiveness and bringing democracy to a failed state. However, Our Lady of Peace allows us to avoid such quandaries and simply establishes various categories of “mental defectives”. The cognitively disabled are “not qualified”. Neither are folks with mental illnesses who actually bought into the propaganda and “applied for services” because of their disabilities. Anyone who has even been “determined by any governmental agency to be a danger to themselves or others” would not be allowed to purchase guns. Likewise, those of “subnormal intelligence” are barred from purchasing them, though one supposes they’ll just get mall security gigs and hope for the best.

ANTHONY GANCARSKI, a regular contributor to CounterPunch, recently had his work recognized in Utne Reader’s “Web Watch”. Email him at Anthony.Gancarski@attbi.com.

 

ANTHONY GANCARSKI is a regular CounterPunch columnist. He can be reached at Anthony.Gancarski@attbi.com

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

May 24, 2017
Paul Street
Beyond Neoliberal Identity Politics
Daniel Read
Powder Keg: Manchester Terror Attack Could Lead to Yet Another Resurgence in Nationalist Hate
Robert Fisk
When Peace is a Commodity: Trump in the Middle East
Kenneth Surin
The UK’s Epochal Election
Jeff Berg
Lessons From a Modern Greek Tragedy
Steve Cooper
A Concrete Agenda for Progressives
Michael McKinley
Australia-as-Concierge: the Need for a Change of Occupation
William Hawes
Where Are Your Minds? An Open Letter to Thomas de Maiziere and the CDU
Steve Early
“Corporate Free” Candidates Move Up
Fariborz Saremi
Presidential Elections in Iran and the Outcomes
Dan Bacher
The Dark Heart of California’s Water Politics
Alessandra Bajec
Never Ending Injustice for Pinar Selek
Rob Seimetz
Death By Demigod
Jesse Jackson
Venezuela Needs Helping Hand, Not a Hammer Blow 
Binoy Kampmark
Return to Realpolitik: Trump in Saudi Arabia
Vern Loomis
The NRA: the Dragon in Our Midst
May 23, 2017
John Wight
Manchester Attacks: What Price Hypocrisy?
Patrick Cockburn
A Gathering of Autocrats: Trump Puts US on Sunni Muslim Side of Bitter Sectarian War with Shias
Shamus Cooke
Can Trump Salvage His Presidency in Syria’s War?
Thomas S. Harrington
“Risk”: a Sad Comedown for Laura Poitras
Josh White
Towards the Corbyn Doctrine
Mike Whitney
Rosenstein and Mueller: the Regime Change Tag-Team
Jan Oberg
Trump in Riyadh: an Arab NATO Against Syria and Iran
Susan Babbitt
The Most Dangerous Spy You’ve Never Heard Of: Ana Belén Montes
Rannie Amiri
Al-Awamiya: City of Resistance
Dimitris Konstantakopoulos
The European Left and the Greek Tragedy
Laura Leigh
This Land is Your Land, Except If You’re a Wild Horse Advocate
Hervé Kempf
Macron, Old World President
Michael J. Sainato
Devos Takes Out Her Hatchet
L. Ali Khan
I’m a Human and I’m a Cartoon
May 22, 2017
Diana Johnstone
All Power to the Banks! The Winners-Take-All Regime of Emmanuel Macron
Robert Fisk
Hypocrisy and Condescension: Trump’s Speech to the Middle East
John Grant
Jeff Sessions, Jesus Christ and the Return of Reefer Madness
Nozomi Hayase
Trump and the Resurgence of Colonial Racism
Rev. William Alberts
The Normalizing of Authoritarianism in America
Frank Stricker
Getting Full Employment: the Fake Way and the Right Way 
Jamie Davidson
Red Terror: Anti-Corbynism and Double Standards
Binoy Kampmark
Julian Assange, Sweden, and Continuing Battles
Robert Jensen
Beyond Liberal Pieties: the Radical Challenge for Journalism
Patrick Cockburn
Trump’s Extravagant Saudi Trip Distracts from His Crisis at Home
Angie Beeman
Gig Economy or Odd Jobs: What May Seem Trendy to Privileged City Dwellers and Suburbanites is as Old as Poverty
Colin Todhunter
The Public Or The Agrochemical Industry: Who Does The European Chemicals Agency Serve?
Jerrod A. Laber
Somalia’s Worsening Drought: Blowback From US Policy
Michael J. Sainato
Police Claimed Black Man Who Died in Custody Was Faking It
Clancy Sigal
I’m a Trump Guy, So What?
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail