FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Cracks in the Occupation?

by Sam Bahour And Michael Dahan

To date, 272 officers and soldiers of the Israeli army have signed the initiative to refuse to serve the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinians, while thousands of other Israeli citizens have expressed their support. Those that have signed are not pacifists nor are they particularly radical. They are well- trained combat officers and soldiers who are no longer willing to take part in the crimes being committed against the Palestinians.

In their letter, which has raised a great deal of public debate within Israel and beyond, the soliders state that:

“We, combat officers and soldiers who have served the State of Israel for long weeks every year, in spite of the dear cost to our personal lives, have been on reserve duty all over the Occupied Territories, and were issued commands and directives that had nothing to do with the security of our country, and that had the sole purpose of perpetuating our control over the Palestinian people. We, whose eyes have seen the bloody toll this Occupation exacts from both sides… We, who sensed how the commands issued to us in the Territories, destroy all the values we had absorbed while growing up in this country… We, who understand now that the price of Occupation is the loss of IDF’s [Israeli Army] human character and the corruption of the entire Israeli society… We shall not continue to fight beyond the 1967 borders in order to dominate, expel, starve and humiliate an entire people.” [The full text of the letter is available at http://www.seruv.org.il].

While critics claim that these soldiers are only a small fraction of those serving in the army reserves, the initiative of these brave reservists has succeeded in bringing the horrors of the Occupation to the front pages of the newspapers, radio and TV talk shows, as well as in the street and in living rooms all over Israel. The chilling personal accounts of the reservists have served to shatter the silence and the ignorance of the Israeli public. This is even more crucial considering that Sharon has been quoted as saying that Israel is restricted in its response to Palestinian violence because “The world today is not the same as as it was 50 years ago. It is another world. The media is everywhere. Every event is seen around the globe within seconds.” Perhaps around the globe, but not necessarily within Israel, and in this lies the importance of those that have decided to refuse to serve in the territories.

No longer can people claim that they were not aware of what is happening: the daily humiliation of the Palestinian civilian population, the senseless deaths of infants, children and teenagers, the daily abuse of basic human rights, the indignities that Palestinian civilians face at the hands of Israeli soldiers at the various checkpoints and blockades throughout the Occupied Territories. No longer can the actions of the IDF be swept under the carpet or ignored as “isolated incidents”. For too long, the majority of the press in Israel has supported the official positions of the government and the army, thus maintaining the status quo, and neglecting their role as watchdogs of society. Indeed, these reservists have succeeded in providing a wake up call for the Israeli public in general, and the Israeli left in particular. Over the past few weeks, tens of thousands of Israelis have taken to the streets to protest against the Occupation, to speak out against the violence and to call for a return to the negotiating table with the purpose of ending the Israeli Occuption, once and for all.

As was clearly shown by his address to the nation last night, Sharon and his cabinet are incapable of drafting any kind of clear and positive political strategy, nor are they capable of seeing beyond the next few hours. With an unprecedented 10.2% unemployment within Israel, a 17% redcution of immigration to Israel and a drastic decrease in foreign direct investment in 2001, the government must realize that it has to choose between “Occupation and Prosperity” as noted in a recent editorial in Ha’aretz newspaper (http://www.haaretzdaily.com). The Occupation is not only corrupting Israeli society and values but it is also pushing Israel towards economic disaster.

The only way to move forward is for Israel to rid itself of the Occupation, to withdraw to 1967 borders, to dismantle the illegal settlements and to wholeheartedly support a free, sovereign and independent Palestinian state. This will guarantee the prosperity of both Israelis and Palestinians alike.

Sam Bahour is a Palestinian-American living in the besieged Palestinian City of Al-Bireh in the West Bank and can be reached at sbahour@palnet.com. Michael Dahan is an Israeli-American political scientist living in Jerusalem and can be reached at mdahan@attglobal.net.

Sam Bahour is a Palestinian-American business consultant in Ramallah and serves as a policy adviser to Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network. He was born and raised in Youngstown, Ohio and blogs at ePalestine.com.

More articles by:

CounterPunch Magazine

minimag-edit

bernie-the-sandernistas-cover-344x550

zen economics

Weekend Edition
February 17, 2017
Friday - Sunday
David Price
Rogue Elephant Rising: The CIA as Kingslayer
Matthew Stevenson
Is Trump the Worst President Ever?
Jeffrey St. Clair
Roaming Charges: Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Flynn?
John Wight
Brexit and Trump: Why Right is Not the New Left
Diana Johnstone
France: Another Ghastly Presidential Election Campaign; the Deep State Rises to the Surface
Neve Gordon
Trump’s One-State Option
Roger Harris
Emperor Trump Has No Clothes: Time to Organize!
Joan Roelofs
What Else is Wrong with Globalization
Andrew Levine
Why Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban?
Mike Whitney
Blood in the Water: the Trump Revolution Ends in a Whimper
Vijay Prashad
Trump, Turmoil and Resistance
Ron Jacobs
U.S. Imperial War Personified
David Swanson
Can the Climate Survive Adherence to War and Partisanship?
Andre Vltchek
Governor of Jakarta: Get Re-elected or Die!
Patrick Cockburn
The Coming Destruction of Mosul
Norman Pollack
Self-Devouring Reaction: Governmental Impasse
Steve Horn
What Do a Louisiana Pipeline Explosion and Dakota Access Pipeline Have in Common? Phillips 66
Brian Saady
Why Corporations are Too Big to Jail in the Drug War
Graham Peebles
Ethiopia: Peaceful Protest to Armed Uprising
Luke Meyer
The Case of Tony: Inside a Lifer Hearing
Binoy Kampmark
Adolf, The Donald and History
Robert Koehler
The Great American Awakening
Murray Dobbin
Canadians at Odds With Their Government on Israel
Fariborz Saremi
A Whole New World?
Joyce Nelson
Japan’s Abe, Trump & Illegal Leaks
Christopher Brauchli
Trump 1, Tillerson 0
Yves Engler
Is This Hate Speech?
Dan Bacher
Trump Administration Exempts Three CA Oil Fields From Water Protection Rule at Jerry Brown’s Request
Richard Klin
Solid Gold
Melissa Garriga
Anti-Abortion and Anti-Fascist Movements: More in Common Than Meets the Eye
Thomas Knapp
The Absurd Consequences of a “Right to Privacy”
W. T. Whitney
The Fate of Prisoner Simón Trinidad, as Seen by His U. S. Lawyer
Brian Platt
Don’t Just Oppose ICE Raids, Tear Down the Whole Racist Immigration Enforcement Regime
Paul Cantor
Refugee: the Compassionate Mind of Egon Schwartz
Norman Richmond
The Black Radical Tradition in Canada
Barton Kunstler
Rallying Against the Totalitarian Specter
Judith Deutsch
Militarism:  Revolutionary Mothering and Rosie the Riveter
Nyla Ali Khan
Kashmir Evoked a Lot More International Attention in the 1950s Than It Does Now
Adam Phillips
There Isn’t Any There There
Louis Proyect
Steinbeck’s Red Devils
Randy Shields
Left Coast Date: the Dating Site for the ORWACA Tribe
Charles R. Larson
Review: Bill Hayes’ “Insomniac City”
David Yearsley
White Supremacy and Music Theory
February 16, 2017
Peter Gaffney
The Rage of Caliban: Identity Politics, the Travel Ban, and the Shifting Ideological Framework of the Resistance
Ramzy Baroud
Farewell to Doublespeak: Israel’s Terrifying Vision for the Future
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail