FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Banning the Koran

by Alexander Cockburn

Call it another skirmish in the war on terror, which is translating these days as more or less anything deemed unpalatable to social harmony. Los Angeles school officials are pulling an edition of the Koran from the district’s libraries because of complaints that the footnotes are anti-Semitic. This particular edition of Islam’s Good Book dates from 1934.

An example of one such offending footnote: “The Jews in their arrogance claimed that all wisdom and all knowledge of Allah was enclosed in their hearts. But there were more things in heaven and earth than were dreamt of in their philosophy. Their claim was not only arrogance but blasphemy.”

This doesn’t seem so bad, but I suppose you can never be too careful. A story in the Los Angeles Times reports that copies of “The Meaning of the Holy Quran” were donated in December to the Los Angeles Unified School District by a local Muslim foundation. A school district official told the Times that the books, a goodwill gesture in response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, were distributed to the schools last week “without the usual content review.”

It surely won’t be long before the Bible is pulled of school library shelves as well, since the Old Testament, is rough on the Palestinians and the New Testament rough on the Jews. Try the Book of Numbers, chapter 25, which has sentiments on racial harmony I assume to be different from those of the Los Angeles School District. God is furious about sexual intermingling between the children of Israel and the hosts of Midian. Phineas, son of Eleazar, having risen up with a javelin, “went after the man of Israel into the tent and thrust them both through, the man of Israel and the woman through her belly.” God is well pleased and signifies his approval by visiting a pestilence on the Midianites: “So the plague was stayed from the children of Israel. And those that died in the plague were twenty and four thousand.”

Also joining the anti-Bible coalition will presumably be the National Organization of Women, unless its officials are swayed by the fact, apparent in the passage just quoted, that Phineas was pro-choice, albeit in a somewhat drastic manner. Here’s St Paul on the status of women: “The head of every man is Christ and the head of the woman is man; and the head of Christ is God.”

Though my basic view is that any childish mind not innoculated by compulsory religion is open to any infection, by all means let us sweep the Jewish Bible, the Christian Bible and the Koran off every bookshelf whither might stray the hand of impressionable youth. Such a cleansing act would return us to the very roots of the European enlightenment.

An interesting review by Jonathan Ree appears in a recent edition of the London Review of Books, discussing the origins of the European enlightenment, specifically a pamphlet originating in the Netherlands and circulating in manuscript form around Europe in the 1680s. It was called the Traite des Trois Imposteurs (Treatise on Three Impostors), arguing that all the above mentioned Holy Scriptures were, as Ree puts it, “fabricated by conspiracies of priests who somehow managed to pass them off as the word of God.”

The first impostor was Moses, educated by Egyptians, who pulled the wool over the eyes of the credulous children of Israel; the second was Jesus who learned Moses’ political astuteness, picked up some mangled ideas from Plato and other Greek philosophers and in Ree’s words, “surrounded himself with a troupe of voluble imbeciles who were prepared to believe everything he said, even when he claimed his mother was a virgin and his father a holy ghost.” The third impostor was Mohammed who learned everything he needed to know from the other two charlatans.

The authors of the pamphlet have never been identified, but according to Margaret Jacob in her very influential 1981 study, The Radical Enlightenment, if they had a philosophical tutor it would have been Spinoza, a Dutch Jew. The way things are headed, even that identification will probably construed as being anti-Semitic, prompting worried school board officials in sensitive school districts to ban the London Review and Spinoza and the Enlightenment, along with the Talmud, the Holy Bible and the Koran. Hell, the kids can get probably get by without them. Let them read Martha Stewart and learn something useful about material things.

Alexander Cockburn’s Guillotined! and A Colossal Wreck are available from CounterPunch.

More articles by:
June 30, 2016
Richard Moser
Clinton and Trump, Fear and Fascism
Pepe Escobar
The Three Harpies are Back!
Ramzy Baroud
Searching for a ‘Responsible Adult’: ‘Is Brexit Good for Israel?’
Dave Lindorff
What is Bernie Up To?
Thomas Barker
Saving Labour From Blairism: the Dangers of Confining the Debate to Existing Members
Jan Oberg
Why is NATO So Irrational Today?
John Stauber
The Debate We Need: Gary Johnson vs Jill Stein
Steve Horn
Obama Administration Approved Over 1,500 Offshore Fracking Permits
Rob Hager
Supreme Court Legalizes Influence Peddling: McDonnell v. United States
Norman Pollack
Economic Nationalism vs. Globalization: Janus-Faced Monopoly Capital
Binoy Kampmark
Railroaded by the Supreme Court: the US Problem with Immigration
Howard Lisnoff
Of Kiddie Crusades and Disregarding the First Amendment in a Public Space
Vijay Prashad
Economic Liberalization Ignores India’s Rural Misery
Caroline Hurley
We Are All Syrians
June 29, 2016
Diana Johnstone
European Unification Divides Europeans: How Forcing People Together Tears Them Apart
Andrew Smolski
To My Less-Evilism Haters: A Rejoinder to Halle and Chomsky
Jeffrey St. Clair
Noam Chomsky, John Halle and a Confederacy of Lampreys: a Note on Lesser Evil Voting
David Rosen
Birth-Control Wars: Two Centuries of Struggle
Sheldon Richman
Brexit: What Kind of Dependence Now?
Yves Engler
“Canadian” Corporate Capitalism
Lawrence Davidson
Return to the Gilded Age: Paul Ryan’s Deregulated Dystopia
Priti Gulati Cox
All That Glitters is Feardom: Whatever Happens, Don’t Blame Jill Stein
Franklin Lamb
About the Accusation that Syrian and Russian Troops are Looting Palmyra
Binoy Kampmark
Texas, Abortion and the US Supreme Court
Anhvinh Doanvo
Justice Thomas’s Abortion Dissent Tolerates Discrimination
Victor Grossman
Brexit Pro and Con: the View From Germany
Manuel E. Yepe
Brazil: the Southern Giant Will Have to Fight
Rivera Sun
The Nonviolent History of American Independence
Adjoa Agyeiwaa
Is Western Aid Destroying Nigeria’s Future?
Jesse Jackson
What Clinton Should Learn From Brexit
Mel Gurtov
Is Brexit the End of the World?
June 28, 2016
Jonathan Cook
The Neoliberal Prison: Brexit Hysteria and the Liberal Mind
Paul Street
Bernie, Bakken, and Electoral Delusion: Letting Rich Guys Ruin Iowa and the World
Anthony DiMaggio
Fatally Flawed: the Bi-Partisan Travesty of American Health Care Reform
Mike King
The “Free State of Jones” in Trump’s America: Freedom Beyond White Imagination
Antonis Vradis
Stop Shedding Tears for the EU Monster: Brexit, the View From the Peloponnese
Omar Kassem
The End of the Atlantic Project: Slamming the Brakes on the Neoliberal Order
Binoy Kampmark
Brexit and the Neoliberal Revolt Against Jeremy Corbyn
Doug Johnson Hatlem
Alabama Democratic Primary Proves New York Times’ Nate Cohn Wrong about Exit Polling
Ruth Hopkins
Save Bear Butte: Mecca of the Lakota
Celestino Gusmao
Time to End Impunity for Suharto’’s Crimes in Indonesia and Timor-Leste
Thomas Knapp
SCOTUS: Amply Serving Law Enforcement’s Interests versus Society’s
Manuel E. Yepe
Capitalism is the Opposite of Democracy
Winslow Myers
Up Against the Wall
Chris Ernesto
Bernie’s “Political Revolution” = Vote for Clinton and the Neocons
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail